주왕산 국립공원의 자연보존지구를 중심으로 분포하고 있는 천연림의 생육현황과 구조를 정확히 파악하고자, 이 지역에 21개의 방형구(20×20m)를 설치하여 식생을 조사하였다. Cluster 분석한 결과 두 개의 집단으로 분류되었다. 수종간의 상관관계는 서어나무와 물푸레나무, 졸참나무와 굴참나무, 생강나무와 국수나무 등의 수종들 간에는 비교적 높은 정의 상관관계를, 고로쇠나무와 쇠물푸레, 당단풍과 굴참나무 둥의 수종들 간에는 높은 부의 상관관계를 보였다. 본 조사지의 종다양도는 1.1306~l.2688로 비교적 높게 나타났다.

덕유산 국립공원의 고산지대 (해발 1,350m이상)를 대상으로 삼림식생의 실태와 삼림군집 구조를 정확히 파악하고자, 자연보존지구에 29개의 방형구(20×20m)를 설치하여 식생을 조사하였다. Cluster 분석한 결과 네 개의 집단으로 분류되었다. 수종간의 상관관계는 신갈나무와 들메나무, 들메나무와 노린재나무 및 싸리, 시닥나무와 주목, 함박꽃나무와 작살나무, 주목과 구상나무 등의 수종들 간에는 비교적 높은 정의 상관관계를, 신갈나무와 시닥나무, 주목 및 괴불나무 등의 수종들 간에는 높은 부의 상관관계를 보였다. 본 조사지의 종다양도는 0.9969~l.2217로 비교적 높게 나타났다.

This study aimed to develop strategies to re-establish the Park Nature Conservation Area in Bukhansan National Park, reflecting landscape ecological value by using the zonation program Marxan with Zones. Planning unit was set by watershed, and the basic data were mapped, considering topographical and ecological values. Mapped indicators were analyzed with the application framework of Marxan with Zones by indexing some indicators. The zones divided into Park Nature Conservation Area (Zone A), Park Nature Environment AreaⅠ(Zone B) which is reflected on the concept of Potential Park Nature Conservation Area and Park Nature Environment AreaⅡ(Zone C). The best solution for each of the scenarios was fixed through the sensitiveness analysis. From these, the final solution was selected considering five criteria including area ratio of conservation area and grouping. Lastly, the final solution was verified in the overlapped analysis with recent zonation. According to the results, the number of watersheds was 77, with an average area of 1,007,481 m2. In terms of basic mapping and indexation, the slope index and number of landscape resources for topographical property were average 0.22 and 38 places, respectively. Biotope index was average 0.69 and legally protected species was 14 species, reflecting ecological values. As the social and economic indicators, trail index was average 0.04, and the number of tour and management facilities was 43 places. Through the framework of Marxan with Zones, the best solution for scenario 1 which was set by the highest conservation criteria was selected as the final solution, and the area ratio of Park Nature Conservation Area and grouping was excellent. As the result of overlapped analysis, suggested zonation of the Park Nature Conservation was better than the recent zonation in the area raito (28.3%), biotope gradeⅠ(15.4%) and the distribution points (10 places) of legally protected species with verification of proper distribution of conservation features according to the zone.