This study attempted to examine how the airline safety reporting system affects the go-around that may occur when flight crew members operate an aircraft. In addition, we sought to determine how the captain's awareness of command responsibility intervenes and influences the relationship between safety reporting and go-around. The results of the study showed that among the official safety reporting subfactors, Response & Feedback had a statistically significant effect on go-around(ΔR2 = .009, p < .05). In the relationship between formal safety reporting and go-around, the moderating effect of command responsibility(β = .595, p < .05) showed statistically significant results. In addition, the interaction effect between Response & Feedback and Command & Responsibility was confirmed through a simple slope test, and as a result, it had a statistically significant effect when Command & Responsibility was low.

오늘날 여행객들의 증가와 함께 이동수단인 운송수단 또한 대형화 추세로 변화하고 있으나, 필요악인 사고 역시 이에 비례해 끊임없이 발생하고 있다. 그런데 주목할 점은 사고 발생 시 희생자의 규모 등 사고피해의 정도가 천차만별이라는 것이다. 전문가들에 따르면, 이는 사고 당시 승무원들이 보여주었던 상황대처 능력이나 리더십에 기인한 바 크다고 한다. 즉 비상상황에서 승객의 안전을 도모하고자 하는 승무원의 리더십이 어떻게 발현되느냐에 따라 승객의 안전이나 희생정도가 크게 달라졌다는 것이다. 본 논문은 이 같은 사실에 착안해 여객선·항공기 승무원의 리더십과 승객안전 간의 상관관계를 논의하고자 한다. 특히 유사시 여객선·항공기 승무원의 리더십 형성에 결정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 알려진 안전교육을 중심으로 이를 논의하고자 한다. 구체적으로, 본 논문은 여객선과 항공기의 사고사례를 비교분석함으로써 승무원의 안전교육과 그로 인한 리더십의 형성이 유사시 승객안전의 확보에 얼마나 중요한지 실증하고자 한다.

The aim of this study was to develop a pattern of flight attendant uniform shirts to provide better comfort for their work postures. Flight attendants’ work postures were evaluated to determine the problems of clothing and mobility during their work. The pattern of the flight attendants’ uniform shirt was altered by applying dynamic wearing ease(DWE). DWE was calculated from four standardized dynamic postures and a static posture. An experimental garment was made with the altered postures. The researcher redesigned the pattern of the uniform shirts, which minimizes physical limitations in movements. The fit and mobility of the shirts were evaluated. Results of this study are as follows. First, the five representative work postures were selected by “clothing stress” and “repetitiveness.” These postures included raised arms, twisting midriff and shoulder postures. Five representative postures were selected by using the ergonomic posture assessment device index(OWAS). Second, the experimental garment was developed by applying DWE across the back and at armhole depth, back length, and side length. Third, the fit and mobility of the experimental garments and the original uniform shirts were compared at the flight working environment set and 5 dynamic body postures of raising arms. The experimental garments made with an altered pattern provided better fit and mobility than the original sample shirts.

The purpose of this study is to investigate systematic and comprehensive explanation about safety behavior by applying integrated model of Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and Social Cognitive Theory (SCT). By showing the interrelationship of effects of factors affecting safety behavior in a single model, comprehensive understanding regarding safety behavior will be possible. Research design, data, and methodology: This study try to integrate the two theory, TPB and SCT, to introduce background factors, such as safety culture, affecting cognitive factors of subjective norm, safety attitude, perceived behavioral control, safety consciousness, which are again affecting behavior intention of the TPB. We composed 73 questionnaire to analyse the relationship among factors affecting safety behavior. The questionnaire were distributed to stewards and stewardesses of KAL, ASIANA, and LCCs. 422 were collected and used for analysis. Factor analysis, regression analysis, and control effect analysis were conducted using SPSS windows version 2.0. Results: The safety culture, safety atmosphere, and safety education/training were turned out to affect subjective norm, safety attitude, perceived behavioral control, safety consciousness. And the cognitive factors also showed to affect safety intention significantly. The results that safety intention affects safety behavior was found. Also there are control effect of cost consciousness and punishment while safety intention affects safety behavior. Conclusions: Safety is the virtue that should be given first priority to in our daily life. To secure safety, everyone in an organization should have high level of safety intention and conduct safety behavior. The study results provide systematic and comprehensive understandings on the relationship among factors affecting cabin crews’ safety behavior. The results will help design safety related regulations, education/training, and support employees to engage in safety behavior related activities.