목적: 본 연구의 목적은 주의초점 간 맥락간섭이 초보자의 배드민턴 하이클리어 학습에 미치는 영향을 규명하는 것이다. 방법: 배드민턴 초보자 대학생 30명을 내적주의지침만 제시된 불변연습집단, 외적주의지침만 제시된 불변 연습집단, 내/외적주의지침이 무선적으로 제시된 무선연습집단에 무작위로 각각 10명씩 배정하였다. 사전검사, 습득단계, 지연 파지 및 전이검사에서 배드민턴 하이클리어 수행의 절대오차, 가변오차, 전체오차를 계산하였다. 결과: 지연 파지검사결과, 내적주의지침이 제시된 불변연습집단과 무선연습집단은 외적주의지침이 제시된 불변연습 집단보다 정확성이 높은 것으로 나타났다. 성취도에서는 무선연습집단에서 통계적으로 유의한 지연 파지효과가 나타났다. 결론: 초보자의 배드민턴 하이클리어 학습에서 내/외적주의지침을 무선적으로 제시하는 방법이 단일한 주의지침을 반복적으로 제시하는 방법보다 효과적일 수 있으며 맥락간섭을 적용한 주의초점지침이 운동기능학습을 촉진시키는 새로운 주의초점형태로 제시될 수 있다.

Purpose: The contextual interference effect is a theory crucial for explaining the importance of efficient practice and its application in the field, and representative hypotheses on the theory are elaboration hypothesis and reconstruction hypothesis. as the recent studies on contextual interference by Lin et al. (2008, 2009, 2010) and Cross et al. (2007) support different hypotheses, this study purposed to examine the time point and tasks of interest in order to compare the result of the two hypotheses Methods: The subjects were 36 right‐handed male and female adults aged between 19 and 32, and they were divided into two groups (n=18 each) at random according to practice condition (blocked practice/random practice). In each group, 9 subjects were given transcranial magnetic stimulation(TMS) before task performance and the other 9 were given TMS after task performance. In the test, key pressing response time was used, and each group had the acquisition phase (1st day), and retention test and transfer test (2nd day), and then response time measurements were analyzed statistically Results: When TMS was given after task performance in the acquisition phase, the performance level was lower in the blocked practice group, but in the retention test when TMS was given before task performance the stimulation hindered the random practice group’s learning and lowered its performance level and consequently the contextual interference effect did not occur. Conclusion: After task performance in the acquisition phase, the information process occurs between tasks in the resting phase, and at the same time, the information process occurs in the preparation phase before task performance and affects learning. Accordingly, both the retention phase before task performance suggested by the reconstructive hypothesis and the resting phase after task performance suggested by the elaboration hypothesis can be the time points when contextual interference occurs between tasks, and therefore it is concluded that the reconstructive hypothesis and elaboration hypothesis may coexist with each other.