Wolsong Unit 1, a domestic heavy water reactor nuclear power plant, was permanently shut down in December 2019. Accordingly, Wolsong Unit 1 plans to prepare a Final Decommissioning Plan (FDP), submit it to the government by 2024, receive approval for decommissioning, and begin full-scale decommissioning. One of the important tasks in the decommissioning of Wolsong Unit 1 is to determine the decommissioning strategy. It is necessary to decide on a decommissioning strategy considering various factors and variables, secure the technical background, and justify it. The selection of a decommissioning strategy is best achieved through the use of formal decisionmaking assistance techniques, such as considerations related to influencing factors. It is very important to understand the basic decommissioning strategy alternatives and whether sufficient consideration has been given to situations where only a single unit is permanently shut down in a multi-unit site like Wolsong Unit 1, while the remaining units are in normal operation. As a process for selecting a decommissioning strategy, first, all considerations that could potentially affect decommissioning presented in the KINS Decommissioning Safety Review Guidelines were synthesized, influencing factors to be used in the decision-making process were determined, and the concept was defined. In order to select the most appropriate decommissioning strategy by considering various evaluation attributes of possible decommissioning alternatives (immediate dismantling and delayed dismantling), the Wolsong Unit 1 decommissioning strategy was evaluated by reflecting the AHP decision-making technique.

In this study, the case of brand IMC communication of LG Hausys’ total interior solution brand Z:IN was dealt with. The target consumer of the Z:IN brand is a general end consumer and also shows the character of industrial goods. Accordingly, there should be a unique aspect that brand management and communication methods must be made from more angles. For many companies which are active in the industry, this case study should be significant. This case study was researched in terms of consumer’s purchase decision-making process and consumer participation and experience. Brand Zi:in developed a brand communication strategy following the flow of the consumer purchasing decision process. And the brand actively induces consumer experience and participation so that consumers can communicate more closely with the brand. Brand communication from the perspective of consumer purchasing decision-making and consumer experience and participation is a crystal that fully considers LG Hausys’ products, markets, and competitors, and will be an effective strategy to continue to preoccupy the market not only in the present but in the future.

This study presents the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) as a potential decision-making method for obtaining the relative weights of alternatives through pairwise comparison in the context of hierarchical structure. The aim of this study was to elicit prior strategies for brand communication for Korean restaurants overseas. We created a questionnaire and surveyed experts at government agencies, restaurant companies, and universities from October to November 2011. By applying the pairwise comparison matrix, relevance was perceived as a more important strategy evaluation criteria than effectiveness or urgency. The highest-ranked strategy was the 'Identification of the BI and positioning of Korean restaurants' followed by 'Development of Korean food content for overseas promotion', 'Development of locally customized Korean food recipes and new Korean menus', 'Development of marketing communication strategies for Korean restaurants by countries', and 'Development of Korean restaurant differentiation strategies'. The results of this study can be used for effective Korean food globalization by enhancing the competitiveness in the world market.

Under limited resources such as budgets and experts, it is necessary to make decisions for promotion strategy of standardization work items in Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs). This paper focuses on a method of setting standardization pro

산업혁명 이후 제조업 중심의 산업구조는 인터넷과 정보통신기술(ICT)의 발달과 함께 서비스업 중심의 구조로 급격하게 진화되었다. 이성적, 합리적, 물리적 제품이나 서비스의 창출을 넘어서 감성적, 창조적, 경험적 가치 창출의 시대로 접어든 것이다. 이에 기업의 디자인 영역에 있어서도 제품이나 서비스의 기능적 혁신을 넘어서 수요자들의 감성을 충족시켜 줄 수 있는 경험디자인에 관한 관심이 증가하고 있다. 하지만 디자인경영전략에 관한 연구에서 경험디자인 분야 또한 디자인경영의 확장의 측면에서 논의되어야 함에도 불구하고 경험디자인이라는 영역은 디자인경영을 벗어난 개별적 영역으로 인식되어지는 경향이 있다. 이에 본 연구는 의사결정이론을 기반으로 제조업 중심의 디자인경영 전략과 서비스업 중심의 디자인경영 전략을 비교, 분석해 봄으로써 현 시대에 맞는 융합적 디자인경영 전략 과 의사결정 프로세스를 고찰해 보는데 그 목적이 있다. 제조업 중심의 디자인경영 전략은 기업 전략을 통한 ‘전략형성’, 사업 전략을 통한 ‘전략선택’, 기능전략을 통한 ‘전략실행’의 3단계의 ‘분석적 사고’를 중심으로 한 정형적 의사결정 단계를 통하여 디자인을 창출함으로써 기업 전략이 소비자들에게 제품이나 서비스를 통하여 전달되는 수직적, 계층적 경향을 보인다. 반면에 서비스업 중심의 디자인경영 전략은 사용자 경험에 대한 관찰을 통하여 새로운 요구를 발견하는 ‘창조적 사고’를 중심으로 한 ‘전략탐색’의 과정이 중요하며 모든 이해관계자들이 참여하는 비정형적, 수평적, 정성적 의사결정 형태를 가지고 있다. 이러한 ‘분석적 사고’와 ‘창조적 사고’, 정형적, 비정형적 의사결정 단계가 융합되어질 때 ‘디자인사고(Design Thinking)’를 통한 융합적 디자인경영 전략과 의사결정 프로세스가 구축될 수 있다. 디자인의 중요성이 점점 더 강조되고 새로운 비즈니스의 창출이 중요해진 현 시점에서 제조업과 서비스업의 융합적 디자인경영 전략 프로세스에 관한 연구는 매우 중요하며 학계나 산업에 있어서 지속적으로 관심을 가지고 연구해 나아가야할 주제임이 틀림없다. 본 연구는 융합적 디자인경영 전략 프로세스에 관한 초기 연구로써 이론적인 고찰로써의 한계를 가지며 이를 기반으로 향후 실제 기업 조사를 통한 더욱더 세밀하고 실제 적용 가능한 융합적 디자인경영 전략 프로세스에 관한 연구가 지속되어져야 할 것이다.