In this study, a comparative test operation was conducted through the alternate haul method to examine the selectivity of the four mesh sizes (60 mm, 90 mm, 110 mm, and 130 mm) of the trawl codend. The selectivity was analyzed using the SELECT model considering the fishing efficiency (split parameter) of each fishing gear in the comparative test fishing operation in the trawl and the maximum likelihood method for parameter estimation. A selectivity master curve was estimated for several mesh sizes using the extended-SELECT model. As a result of analyzing the selectivity for silver croaker based on the results of three times hauls for each experimental gear, it was found that the size of the fish caught increased as the size of the mesh size increased. When the selectivity for each mesh size analyzed by the SELECT model considering the split ratio was evaluated based on the size of the AIC value, the estimated split model was superior to the equal split model. Based on the master curve, the 50% selection length value was 2.893, which was estimated to be 136 mm based on the mesh size of 60 mm. In some selectivity models, there was a large deviance between observed and theoretical values due to the non-uniformity of the distribution of fished length classes. As a result, it is considered that appropriate sea trials and selectivity evaluation methods with high reliability should be applied to present trawl fishery resource management methods.

The concept of sustainability was first introduced a few decades ago, and it has gradually become the primary concern of many nations and firms around the world. Sustainability is a broad concept that encompasses three pillars, namely, economic, social, and environmental, represented as profit, people, and nature. It implies that firms can only sustainably develop if they grow without compromising the benefits of their stakeholders. Thus, this study aims to identify, through the participatory approach and the Delphi method, an appropriate set of sustainability indicators to strategically evaluate Hai Phong port's sustainable development achievements. The paper will critically review past studies on port sustainable development to find the most frequently used indicators for assessing port sustainability. These indicators vary because of the availability of data and the researcher's perceived level of importance given to each indicator. Finally, we employ the Delphi method to narrow down the initial set of sustainability indicators based on consensus on the importance of indicators and availability of data among experts. Some indicators that are not important and statistical data unavailable are eliminated. Therefore, the final set includes all crucial indicators for evaluating the sustainability of Hai Phong seaports with collected data.

교량은 도로나 철도 네트워크를 구성하는 중요한 사회기반시설로 부재의 파손으로 인한 보수, 보강, 교체에 따른 교통통제나 갑작스런 붕괴 등이 발생할 경우 사회경제적으로 커다란 손실과 인명사상을 유발하기 때문에 일정한 안전수준 이상으로 관리되어야 한다. 사용연수의 증가에 따라 열화 손상되거나, 사고, 천재지변 등으로 인해 문제가 발생한 교량의 성능을 회복시키기 위하여 다양한 보강 공법들이 연구되고 있다. 그러나 어떤 공법을 사용하는 것이 합리적인가에 대한 판단기준 없이 의사결정을 수행하고 있는 실정이다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 개략 설계된 여러 보강대안 중 최적 보강공법을 선정하는 문제를 해결하기 위해, 의사결정인자를 도출하고 불확실성을 고려한 정량적 평가 및 의사결정방법을 제안하였으며, 이를 간략한 예제에 적용하여 개발된 모델의 합리성 및 적용성을 검토하였다. 본 연구에서 제안된 방법론은 불확실성이 존재하는 대안들 가운데 최적의 대안을 선택하는 분야에 응용하여 적용할 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.