본 연구는 이용자참여를 통한 도시농업공원의 운영관리방향에 관한 연구이다. 공공성과 텃밭, 정원에 대한 개념정리를 통해 도시농업공원의 주제정원으로서 ‘텃밭정원’의 도입을 가정하였다. 이에 대하여 도시공원 이용자와 전문가를 대상으로 설문조사를 하여 각 집단의 선호 인식을 분석한 결과를 바탕으로 도시농업공원의 텃밭정원의 운영관리방향을 제안하는 데 목적이 있다. 텃밭정원을 위한 도시농업공원의 입지조건은 도심 내 평지 공원으로 집으로부터 걸어서 10분 이내, 500m~1km이내 이다. 텃밭정원의 취미활동은 텃밭농사, 꽃가꾸기, 휴식이며, 설치물은 식물재료와 이동식 시설이다. 조성비용은 참여자 개인부담과 지자체의 지원비로 확보한다. 임대면적은 16~33㎡이고, 임대기간은 2년이며 1회 연장할 수 있으며, 연간 임대료는 5만원이다. 임대구획은 일괄적으로 부여된 번호순으로 배정하며, 다수임대는 연속된 구획으로 최대 2구획이다. 텃밭정원은 이벤트 시 공공에게 개방하며, 텃밭정원 참여자는 텃밭정원 교육을 통해 텃밭정원의 조성 및 운영관리에 필요한 역량을 확보하고, 도시농업공원의 관리활동에 참여할 수 있다. 주민참여 텃밭정원은 공원시설부지면적에 산입하지 않는다.

본 연구는 옥상텃밭 적용을 위한 원예용상토와 펄라이트 배합비율에 따른 잎들깨의 생장반응을 조사하였다. 실험구는 직경 18cm, 높이 18cm의 플라스틱 용기에 원예용상토:펄라이트를 9:1, 7:3, 5:5, 3:7, 1:9(v/v)로 혼합한 다음 본엽이 3-4엽인 잎들깨 식재하였다. 측정항목 으로는 초장, 엽장, 엽폭, 엽수, 엽면적, 엽록소함량, 엽록소형광, 엽색, 생체중, 건물중 등의 생육 및 형태적 특성을 식재 후 4주와 8주 2회에 걸쳐 조사하였다. 초장, 엽장, 엽폭, 엽수, 엽면적은 식재 후 4주차에는 9:1 배합비에서 가장 높았으며, 그 다음으로 7:3, 5:5의 순이었다. 8주 차에는 9:1과 7:3에서 생육이 가장 양호하였으며, 전체적으로 원예용상토의 비율이 높아질수록 생육도 양호한 것으로 나타났다. 생체중과 건물중도 마찬가지로 4주, 8주차 모두 9:1에서 가장 높았으며, 그 다음으로 7:3, 5:5 순이었으며 1:9에서 가장 낮은 것으로 나타났다. 엽록소 함량은 4주차에는 9:1에서 가장 높았으며, 1:9에서 가장 낮았으나 8주차에는 1:9에서 가장 높았고 5:5에서 가장 낮은 것으로 나타났다. 엽 록소형광은 4주차에는 모든 배합비에서 차이가 나타나지 않았으나 8주차 때에는 1:9에서 0.565로 나타나 양분결핍에 의한 스트레스를 받 는 것으로 나타났다. 이상의 결과를 종합하면 옥상텃밭을 위한 잎들깨 재배시 원예용상토와 펄라이트 배합비율은 5:5 이상이 적절한 것으 로 판단된다.

This study was in line with consecutive growth of urban agriculture implemented to provide a functional vegetable garden model for urban vegetable gardeners. It targeted the users who actually raise functional vegetable gardens, analyzed the flaws for correction in many ways including a type of products, quantity, ratio, and the like and existing problems. It is found out from Utilization that first is the highest ranking with no experience of growing vegetable garden education while growth education helping vegetable garden activity takes the half. Saying yes to the participation in the growth education following the process ranked the highest. In addition when planting, in regards to earning information about plantation timing and measure, they responded that they directly determine those by themselves. Second, the type of plant that they are mainly supposed to produce in family gardening was vegetables. Many say that it is easy to produce, easy to get information. In the fall, Kimchi and vegetables ranked the highest, the reason for functional vegetable gardeners to participate in planting family garden is an interest in a variety of producing crops. Third, the current amount included is proper for flower･herb plants in functional vegetable garden model while the ratio of crops vegetables60.5 : medical21.2 : flower･herbs18.3 in vegetable garden model is responded moderate.

This study intended for Cheongryongsan Community Garden in Gwanak-gu, one of the demonstration places for 'Community Garden' Project recently implemented by the Seoul Government. This study had two major purposes: investigating the current status of the management and usage and identifying its characteristics; investigating users' awareness to consider the construction and operation directions of sustainable community gardens. This study was conducted based on several surveys such as an investigation into the spatial configuration and the management system of parks through a field study, a use survey through a questionnaire survey for vegetable garden users and an awareness survey about the construction direction of gardens direction preferred by users through the analytical hierarchy process (AHP). As a result of a questionnaire survey for vegetable garden users, the usage status was summarized as follows: Considering the common trends in the 2012 and the 2013 user survey, women used Cheongryongsan Vegetable Garden more than men. Over fifties used it most of all users. Users were mostly neighborhood residents. They used to visit there three to five times a week and stayed for about 30 minutes to one hour. Users differently responded to the question related to the order of priority for the use of the garden in the 2012 and the 2013 survey. They had increasingly used it for individuals' production activities more than social exchanges. As a result of making an AHP analysis for general park users, vegetable garden users there were clear differences in the targets which each subject put emphasis on in relation to the construction and operation of vegetable gardens. General park users recognized a vegetable garden as a park where park functions and the functions of the vegetable garden coexisted. On the other hand, vegetable garden users viewed it as a space where they attached importance to the functions of the vegetable garden like an allotment. Last, this study contemplated subjects related to the construction and operation of vegetable gardens which had to be considered in the future. Vegetable gardens tended to be biased as personal hobby places. It was viewed that the main reason was insufficient support activities for vegetable garden education and exchange programs originally planned when vegetable gardens had been constructed. Vegetable garden users recognized vegetable gardens as places for individuals' farming activities like allotments. For the desirable operation of vegetable gardens, it would be necessary to give priority to the park management before the production activities in individuals' vegetable gardens. The important role of the government would be to build the base through the provision of education and opportunities so that a local resident organization could actively participate in the management of a vegetable garden after a vegetable garden was constructed. It would be necessary to make a use survey and an awareness survey for users conducted in this study on a regular basis because the surveys could be important basic data in the decision-making process for the sustainable operations of the vegetable garden.