검색결과

검색조건
좁혀보기
검색필터
결과 내 재검색

간행물

    분야

      발행연도

      -

        검색결과 3

        1.
        2008.06 KCI 등재 서비스 종료(열람 제한)
        The defendant in this case withdrew 50,000 Won from a cash dispenser by using a cash card given by the card owner, who asked the defendant to withdraw 20,000 Won. The defendant gave 20,000 Won to the card owner, but took 30,000 Won for himself. The prosecutor accused the defendant of committing "fraud by using a computer" in Article 347-1 of the Penal Code, but the trial court held him not guilty in that the object of "fraud by using a computer" was limited to "property interest" different from "property." Appealing to the higher court, the prosecutor accused the defendant of committing "theft" in Article 329 of the Penal Code. However, the appeal court held him not guilty in that a cash dispenser was supposed to give cash to a cash card user if provided with a correct password; the bank, the occupier of the cash dispenser, could not be considered to have an intention of giving cash to a card user after reviewing the scope of the entrust between the card owner and the card user; therefore, the defendant did not withdraw cash against the intention of the bank. After reviewing the case, the Supreme Court held the defendant committed "fraud by using a computer" in Article 347-1 of the Penal Code, providing when the defendant withdrew 50,000 Won, he did not commit "theft" while he acquired "property interest," which is 20,000 Won. This article reviews legal dogmatic issues of this case. First, it compares this new decision by the Supreme Court with its previous decisions where it held the defendant committed "theft" in that he withdrew cash from a cash dispenser by using a cash card without any entrust from the card owner. Second, it analyzes two important aspects of the case: whether the defendant in this case withdrew cash against the intention of the bank or not; why 20,000 Won in this case should be interpreted as "property interest," not "property."
        3.
        1977.12 KCI 등재 서비스 종료(열람 제한)
        재배 환경 조건이 주요 밀 품종의 품질에 미치는 영향을 보기 위하여 조광을 포함한 9개 품종을 8개 지역에 재배하여 지역별 기상인자와 소맥분 단백질함량 및 침전가와의 관계를 검토한 결과는 다음과 같다. 1. 소맥 재배기간중의 기온이 낮은 북부 일수록 단백질 함량과 침전가는 품종에 관계없이 높은 경향을 보였다. 2. 소맥분의 단백질 함량 및 침전가에 미치는 가장 큰 기상요소는 등숙기간중의 평균 기온이었다. 3. 기온이 낮은 북부지역일수록 출수일이 늦어져서 등숙기간의 기온이 높아진다. 등숙기간의 평균기온이 높은 지방일수록 소맥분의 단백질 함량 및 침전가는 높아졌다. 4. 소맥의 단백질 함량에 미치는 온도반응은 품종에 따라 차이가 있었으며 온도반응이 예민한 품종은 Altas 66, Kitakamikomugi 및 영광이었고 둔감한 품종은 원광, Centurk 및 Bezostaya 이었다. 5. 소맥분의 침전가에 미치는 온도반응은 침전가가 높은 Atlas 66, Centurk, NE 701132, 품종들에서 높았고 침전가가 낮은 Roussalka 및 국내 품종들에서는 둔감하였다.