The purpose of this study is to identify the flow resistance of the bottom trawl net. The bottom trawl net being used in the training ship of Chonnam National University was selected as a full-scale net, and model nets such as 1/10, 1/25 and 1/50 of the actual net were made. Total resistance of the net part, the height of the net mouth and the flow resistance of components of the net such as wing, bag and cod-end part was measured, converted into full-scale and compared. Additionally, the model rule of Tauti (1934), which has been most frequently used in fishing net modeling experiments, was applied to interpret flow resistance and scale effect of model experiment was investigated. Presumed that the flow resistance R is R=kSr2 against the flow velocity of each net r, resistance coefficient k was calculated by substituting R, r and S of the net. From the result, it was found that k decreases exponentially when u increases which makes k=cr-m. Whereas m of each net is ranged between 0.13-0.16 and there was not significant difference between nets. c does not show big difference in 1/10 and 1/25 model and the value itself was relatively bigger than in 1/50 model. The height of the net mouth of 1/25 and 1/50 model net h decreases exponentially according as r increases to make h=dr-n. Whereas d and n values were almost same in two nets. Additionally, when resistance of cod-end, wing and bag part in 1/25 and 1/50 model nets, both nets showed big resistance in bag part when flow is 1m/s as more than 60%. Wing and cod-end part showed almost same value or wing part had little bit larger value. On the other hand, when reviewing the reasons why both models showed difference in 1/50 model while c value against the resistance coefficient k did not show big difference in 1/10 and 1/25 model, it is inferred that the difference occurred not from material difference but from the difference in net size according to scale. It was judged that they are the scale effects concomitant to the model experiments.

유속의 변화에 따른 오일펜스 만곡부 후면의 속도장과 압력장, 와도 및 난류 강도를 계측한 PIV 실험의 결과 유속이 증가함에 따라 유동 경계역의 후면부에서의 흐름 방향이 전면부의 흐름 방향에 가까워지는 현상이 나타났고, 압력 분포의 양상이 달라졌으며 난류도 더욱 불규칙적인 형태로 나타났다. PIV 실험과 동일 조건으로 수행한 CFD 해석 결과, 후류의 유동 패턴이 0.3m/s이하의 저속인 경우는 PIV 실험 결과와 유사하게 나타났으나, 유속이 0.4m/s일 때는 오일펜스 자체의 유연성으로 인해 다소 차이가 나타났고, 오일펜스 하단의 압력차로 인한 불규칙한 난류가 수면까지 영향을 주었다.

In order to investigate the cause and magnitude of scale effect occurring in the model experiments of fishing nets, five pairs of Nylon pyramid nets and one pair of PE ones in which all the two nets paired were equal each other in the factors determining their flow resistance, i. e., the ratio d/l of diameter d to length l of bars, the angle f between two adjacent bars, the attack angle q of nettings to the water flow, and the wall area S of nets, and different in the values of d and l were prepared. Then, the nets were attached to the circular steel frame alternately and their flow resistances with shapes in water were measured on the sea ascribing no turbulent flows by using the tension meter made of a block bearing for the experiment. All the Nylon nets were spreads out easily in water to form a circular cone at relatively low velocity of water and showed the resistance smaller a little in the nets with larger d and l than them with smaller d and l, because the filtration of water through meshes become easier in nets especially with larger l. But PE nettings were not spread out sufficiently on account of their small flexibility and showed higher resistance especially in them with thicker twines. Therefore, the difference in bar length or mesh size and flexibility of nettings between prototype and model nets are regarded to become factors ascribing scale effect. Especially the influence of the difference in mesh size may become large significantly in actual model experiments because the mesh size of model nets is decided at much larger value than that given by scale ratio and so the difference of mesh size between the two nets become much larger than that between nets used in this experiment.

유속의 변화에 따른 오일펜스 만곡부 후면의 속도장과 압력장, 와도 및 난류 강도를 계측한 PIV 실험의 결과 유속이 증가함에 따라 유동 경계역의 후면부에서의 흐름 방향이 전면부의 흐름방향에 가까워지는 현상이 나타났고, 압력 분포의 양상이 달라졌으며 난류도 더욱 불규 칙적인 형태로 나타났다. PIV 실험과 동일 조건으로 수행한 CFD 해석 결과, 후류의 유동 패턴이 0.3m/s이하의 저속인 경우는 PIV 실험 결과 와 유사하게 나타났으나, 유속이 0.4m/s일 때는 오일펜스 자체의 유연성으로 인해 다소 차이가 나타났고, 오일펜스 하단의 압력차로 인한 불규 칙한 난류가 수면까지 영향을 주는 것 같았다.

The objective of this study was to investigate the optimal shapes and arrangements of sinkers attached to net cages to prevent their deformation in a current. A series of model experiments were conducted in a circulating water channel, using 5 different types of sinker(high-weighted ball, low-weighted ball, columntype, egg-shaped and iron bar-framed) and 2 types of square net cage constructed from both Nylon Raschel netting and Nylon knotted netting, on a 1/20th scale. The deflection of the model nets against the flow was smallest with the iron bar-framed weight compared to the other four types of sinker. It was expected that the optimal shapes of sinkers would be either the ball or egg-shape; however, iron bar-framed weight actually had larger drag forces. The dispersed deployment of sinkers on the bottom frames of model net cages performed better with relatively slow flows, while the concentrated deployment at 4 corners functioned better with relatively fast flows, in preventing the nets from becoming severely deformed. The deformation of the net cages was larger for the Nylon knotted netting than the Nylon Raschel netting. With respect to flow resistance, the Nylon Raschel netting, rather than the Nylon knotted netting, was more suitable for construction of net cages.

The purpose of this study was to identify the state of demersal fish resource catch by small trawlers, which live in the southern waters off Goheung. We investigated the results of catch of sample fishing vessels, and performed fishing experiments using the actual fishing operation vessels from early November in 2002 till end of October in 2003. The daily amount of catch per vessel of the 35 small trawlers selected as sample vessels was the highest in summer seasons(June and July) as 70kg and the lowest in winter seasons(January and February) as 45kg and Octopus minor occupied as 17 to 30kg nearly 30% of the total catch. Additionally the catch of Octopus minor per vessel, per dragging hour ranges 3 to 6kg, which is the highest in March and June and the low in January to February, April to May and September. In the fishing experiments using small trawler, during the study period, a total of 75 fish species were collected. The number of individuals by species consisted 58.2% in Shrimps, 17.8% in Fish, 2.3% in Cephalopod. Of these, Parapenaeopsis tenella was the highest in 29.2%, Squilla oratoria and Crangon hakodatel was 14.6% respectively and Octopus minor was 0.2% of the total number of individuals. As far as the appearance number of individuals by month was concerned, February was the highest and then May, April and June followed in order, and October showed the lowest. Additionally the monthly catch per dragging was the lowest in December to January as 20kg and the highest in July as 160kg. Specially, Octopus minor was caught throughout the year regardless of season and the catch was the highest at the period from March to June. When looking into the body mean length of dominant fishes caught, we could observe the followings; Trachurus japonicus 8.9cm, Cynoglossus robustus 10.8cm, Muraenesox cinereus 15.3cm, Setipinna taty 10.3cm, Amblchaeturichfhys hexanema 9.3 cm and Collichthys niveatus 8.9cm, most of which were in their immaturity when they were caught.

2개의 PE 부이가 클램프 및 벨트로 고정되고 그 위에 발판을 지지하기 위한 프레임 등으로 구성된 단위 틀이 외부 재질이 고무 성분인 힌지로연결된 어업용 프레임 구조물의 강도 및 변형을 해석하여 구조적 안정성을 평가하고자 유한 요소법을 이용하여 그것의 구조 해석을 수행하였으며, 해석에서 얻어진 결과는 다음과 같이 요약할 수있다. 1) 고무 힌지로 구성된 어업용 프레임 구조물의 구조적인 안정성을 해석하기 위해서는 힌지 부분을 정확하게 모델링하는 것이 중요하며, 특히 해석 결과는 모델링의 기법에 따라 다르게 나타났다. 2) 고무 힌지의 경우 먼저 재료 시험을 통해 그것의 정확한 불성치를 확보한 후 구조 해석을 수행해야 하며, 단순히 영 계수 E만을 인자로서 해석하는 경우 신뢰성이 있는 결과를 얻을 수 없다는 것을 확인하였다. 3) 초탄성 거동을 하는 고무는 대변형을 하지만 하중과 변형이 선형 관계를 유지하고 있으므로 영 계수 E 등의 물성치를 적절히 사용하면, 힌지를 단순하게 선형 문제로 이상화하여 구조해석을 수행할 수 있을 것으로 사료된다. 4) 동일한 조건에서 파랑 하중에 대한 어업용 프레임 구조물의 구조 응답은 Hogging 상태 즉, 파정이 그것의 중앙부에 오는 것이 정수 중이나 Sagging 상태인 경우보다 크게 나타났다.

그물의 SN2S값이 서로 다른 2가지의 상자 구조의 우리형 그물을 1/10로 축소한 모형에 대해 실물 그물의 면적 1m2당 각각 0.1, 0.3, 0.5 및 0.7kg에 상당하는 침자를 그물의 각 모서리에 1개씩 총 4개를 부착하여 회류 수조에서 유속의 변화에 대한 그물의 변형을 측정하고, 이를 통해 조류에 의한 우리형 그물의 형상 유지에 효과적인 침자의 적정량에 대하여 검토하였다. 실험에서 얻어진 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 1. 유속이 증가함에 따라 그물이 날림으로써 그것의 용적은 급격히 감소하였으나, 변형 각도 의 변화량은 증가하였다. 2. 그물의 SN2S값은 유속이 0.4m/s이하일 때는 그물의 변형에 약간의 영향을 끼쳤지만 유속이 0.5m/s 이상일 때는 별다른 영향을 끼치지 않았다. 3. 그물의 변형은 유속, 침자의 무게 및 SN2S값에 의해 결정되었다. 4. 그물의 용적을 50% 이상으로 유지하기 위한 침자의 총무게는 유속이 0.3~0.6 m/s일 때 31~245kg이고, 침자의 적정량은 그물의 면적 1m2당 0.5kg 정도로 나타났다.

민꽃게를 대상으로 하는 통발 어구에 관한 지금까지의 연구가 통발의 형상, 입구의 수 등 주로 강조적인 측면을 개선하는데 주력하였을 뿐 민꽃게의 은신행동 등 민꽃게 자체의 기본적 습성을 충분히 이용하였다고는 볼 수 없고, 그물 통발이 가지는 민꽃게 수입 성능상의 한계점을 근본적으로 개선하지는 못하였다고 생각되었기에 본 연구에서는 민꽃게의 수입 성능적 그물 통발은 한계가 있다고 보고, 민꽃게의 습성을 고도로 이용함으로써 수입성능을 높일 수 있는 2종류의 어구를 고「 하여 수조실험과 해상실험을 통해 금.고(1987, 1990)가 개발한 통발과 비교 실험을 행하였다. 실험에서 얻어진 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 1) 그물 통발과 파이프형 통발에서 시간의 경과에 따른 민꽃게의 접촉율과 반응율은 금.고(1987.1990)가 행한 사구식 각주형 그물 통발의 실험 결과와 대체로 일치하였지만, 평판형 얽애그물에서는 접촉율이 잠깐 증가하였다가 바로 감소하였고, 반응율은 급히 증가하기 시작하여 최대치를 보인 후 일정해지는 경향을 나타내 차이가 있었다. 2) 민꽃게의 입농시작 시간은 평판형 얽애그물에서 민꽃게가 그물에 접촉하기만 하면 신체의 일부분이 곧바로 그물에 얽혀버렸기 때문에 포획에 걸리는 시간이 다른 통발 어구에 비해 가장 짧게 나타났고, 다음이 파이프형 통발이며 그물 통발에서 가장 늦게 나타났다. 3) 민꽃게의 통발내 분포율을 나타내는 접촉율 곡선과 반응율곡선과의 시폭은 평판형 얽애그물에서 가장 빨리 그리고 많이 벌어져 민꽃게의 체포자체에 있어서는 그 성능이 가장 우수하게 나타났으며, 파이프형 통발의 경우 직경의 차이(Φ 150, 250mm)에 따라서는 큰 차이를 보이지 않았지만, 그물 통발에 비해 성능이 높게 나타났다. 4) 파이프형 통발은 입농한 민꽃게에 대해 통발내에서 정제하는 은신행동을 수발하게 하여 민꽃게의 은신처로 작용한다는 것을 알 수 있었다. 5)그물 통발과 파이프형 통발 및 평판형 얽애그물에 대한 어획 실험에서 어구 하나당 평균 어획량은 파이프형 통발에서 가장 많았고, 다음이 그물통발이였으며, 평판형 얽애 그물에서 가장 적어 수조실험과는 차이를 보였다.

In order to obtain the most favourable classification system for fishing gears, the problems in the existing systems were investigated and a new system in which the fishing method was adopted as the criterion of classification and the kinds of fishing gears were obtained by exchanging the word method into gear in the fishing methods classified newly for eliminating the problems was established. The new system to which the actual gears are arranged is as follows ; (1)Harvesting gear \circled1Plucking gears : Clamp, Tong, Wrench, etc. \circled2Sweeping gears : Push net, Coral sweep net, etc. \circled3Dredging gears : Hand dredge net, Boat dredge net, etc. (2)Sticking gears \circled1Shot sticking gears : Spear, Sharp plummet, Harpoon, etc. \circled2Pulled sticking gears : Gaff, Comb, Rake, Hook harrow, Jerking hook, etc. \circled3Left sticking gears : Rip - hook set line. (3)Angling gears \circled1Jerky angling gears (a)Single - jerky angling gears : Hand line, Pole line, etc. (b)Multiple - jerky angling gears : squid hook. \circled2Idly angling gears (a)Set angling gears : Set long line. (b)Drifted angling gears : Drift long line, Drift vertical line, etc. \circled3Dragged angling gears : Troll line. (4)Shelter gears : Eel tube, Webfoot - octopus pot, Octopus pot, etc. (5)Attracting gears : Fishing basket. (6)Cutoff gears : Wall, Screen net, Window net, etc. (7)Guiding gears \circled1Horizontally guiding gears : Triangular set net, Elliptic set net, Rectangular set net, Fish weir, etc. \circled2Vertically guiding gears : Pound net. \circled3Deeply guiding gears : Funnel net. (8)Receiving gears \circled1Jumping - fish receiving gears : Fish - receiving scoop net, Fish - receiving raft, etc. \circled2Drifting - fish receiving gears (a)Set drifting - fish receiving gears : Bamboo screen, Pillar stow net, Long stow net, etc. (b)Movable drifting - fish receiving gears : Stow net. (9)Bagging gears \circled1Drag - bagging gears (a)Bottom - drag bagging gears : Bottom otter trawl, Bottom beam trawl, Bottom pair trawl, etc. (b)Midwater - drag gagging gears : Midwater otter trawl, Midwater pair trawl, etc. (c)Surface - drag gagging gears : Anchovy drag net. \circled2Seine - bagging gears (a)Beach - seine bagging gears : Skimming scoop net, Beach seine, etc. (b)Boat - seine bagging gears : Boat seine, Danish seine, etc. \circled3Drive - bagging gears : Drive - in dustpan net, Inner drive - in net, etc. (10)Surrounding gears \circled1Incomplete surrounding gears : Lampara net, Ring net, etc. \circled2Complete surrounding gears : Purse seine, Round haul net, etc. (11)Covering gears \circled1Drop - type covering gears : Wooden cover, Lantern net, etc. \circled2Spread - type covering gears : Cast net. (12)Lifting gears \circled1Wait - lifting gears : Scoop net, Scrape net, etc. \circled2Gatherable lifting gears : Saury lift net, Anchovy lift net, etc. (13)Adherent gears \circled1Gilling gears (a)Set gilling gears : Bottom gill net, Floating gill net. (b)Drifted gilling gears : Drift gill net. (c)Encircled gilling gears : Encircled gill net. (d)Seine - gilling gears : Seining gill net. (e)Dragged gilling gears : Dragged gill net. \circled2Tangling gears (a)Set tangling gears : Double trammel net, Triple trammel net, etc. (b)Encircled tangling gears : Encircled tangle net. (c)Dragged tangling gears : Dragged tangle net. \circled3Restrainting gears (a)Drifted restrainting gears : Pocket net(Gen - type net). (b)Dragged restrainting gears : Dragged pocket net. (14)Sucking gears : Fish pumps.