본 논문은 중국 사찰 채화의 시대별 전개 양상, 독자성과 보편성 등을 파악 하며 한국과 중국의 단청과 채화를 비교・분석한 것이다. 중국 채화는 송대에 편찬된 『영조법식(營造法式)』에 의해 정형화되었고, 명・청대는 채화의 전성기 를 이루었다. 고려시대 단청은 중국과 차별화된 이른바 한국적인 특색을 나타 내었고, 조선시대에는 명・청과 정치, 경제, 문화 등 여러 방면으로 교류하면서 사찰 단청의 형식과 문양 등에서 보편성과 특수성을 띠게 되었다. 명・청 사찰 채화와 조선시대 사찰 단청의 머리초[조두], 금문(錦紋), 별지화[잡화], 단독문 등을 통해 공통점과 독자적인 특징을 살펴보았다. 머리초・금문・단독문은 한 부재에 반복적으로 사용되는 도안화된 장식문이고, 별지화는 부재별로 다양한 도상이 사용된 회화적 장식화이다. 한국 단청과 중국 채화의 유사한 문양 가운 데 네 종류를 선별해 조선시대 단청과 명・청대 채화를 비교하였다. 이를 통해 양국 단청[채화]의 차이점과 공통점 그리고 국가별 독자성을 파악할 수 있었다.

Pavilions, follies, and installations provide a place with a new experience beyond that of simple garden architecture. From this point of view, this study tried to analyze the constructs in the Glass House site, which Philip Johnson has built for 50 years. After Chapter 1 Introduction, which summarized the background of the study, Chapter 2 investigated the design background of the landscape and the types of the constructs there. It also, studying literature on pavilions, follies, and installations, defined the basic meanings of them. Chapter 3 identified the features of each construct through the case studies of it, analyzing Johnson’s intentions on it. These features are such as the applications of classical follies, the quotations of architectural history, fusion with art, architectural experiments, and the monuments of personal history. In conclusion, this study, finding the site specificity as a common feature of pavilions, follies, and installations, referred to two aspects of this, which are not only physical placeness but also cultural media.

This paper attempts to interpret the meaning of Mies van der Rohe's famous aphorism that “less is more” in terms of space. From his assertion that the art of building is the spatial execution of spiritual decisions, one can presume that his art of building was revealed through his spatial execution consciously guided by creative principles. One of his spatial principles was less is more a representative motto for the creation of sparsely furnished space with few objects and little perceptible architecture. After his awareness of an open plan, Mies intended to create less architecture by designing a minimal form of structural frames and maximum openness of open plans and glazed walls. This study posits that Mies created more potential space, for which he intended his open plans and neutral frames to be viewed as less. His building was designed to serve as the background of works of art and the changing nature outside so restrained its own existential voice in favor of the achievement of total harmony.