본 연구는 SNS 계정으로 화장품 브랜드를 구독하고 있는 10대에서 50대 남녀의 지각된 연령을 기준으로 소비자-브랜드 상호작용과 관계가 구매동기와 만족도에 미치는 영향력을 분석하기 위해 설문 조 사를 하였다. 수집된 자료의 통계처리는 SPSS 21.0로 빈도분석, 요인분석, 신뢰도분석, 회귀분석, 다중회귀 분석을 하였다. 조사대상자들의 지각된 연령을 타인이 지각한 연령과 스스로 지각한 연령의 차이에 따라 ‘지각된 저집단’, ‘지각된 중집단’, ‘지각된 고집단’으로 분류하였다. 세 집단은 소비자-브랜드 상호작용과 소비자-브랜드 관계는 구매동기와 유의미한 정의 관계가 나타났고, 소비자-브랜드 관계는 구매동기 중에 서도 ‘매력적’을 설명하는 주요 변수로 나타났다. 세 집단은 소비자-브랜드 상호작용과 소비자-브랜드 관 계는 만족도와 유의미한 정의 관계가 나타났고, 소비자-브랜드 관계는 만족도를 설명하는 주요 변수로 나 타났다. 그러므로, 본 연구의 결론은 지각된 연령집단별, 소비자-브랜드 상호작용과 소비자-브랜드 관계가 구매동기와 만족도에 정적 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 특히, 소비자-브랜드 관계는 화장품 구매동기 와 만족도에 주요한 변수가 된다는 것을 알 수 있었다. 본 연구는 SNS에서 지각된 연령이 화장품 브랜드 마케팅에 미치는 영향력을 실증적으로 분석함에 따라, 화장품 판매전략을 수립할 수 있는 실무적 시사점 및 마케팅에 활용될 수 있는 기초자료가 될 것으로 사료된다.

This study understood what effect was produced on the purchasing decision making of outdoor wear by a shopping orientation, fashion involvement and demographic characteristics offered practical suggestions as to what effect was produced on the store selection criteria, product selection criteria for purchasing decision making in purchasing outdoor wear. This research was conducted through a questionnaire survey, and 397 males in were collected for analysis. The results were as follows. First, shopping orientation group was classified into hedonic shopping orientation group and utilitarian shopping orientation group. And it was classified into high fashion involvement group and low fashion involvement group according to fashion involvement. Product selection criteria were classified into 2 factors such as intrinsic attributes and extrinsic attributes. And store selection criteria were classified into 4 factors such as store atmosphere, store environment, promotion and salesmen. Second, there was partly significant difference in product selection criteria, and store selection criteria between utilitarian shopping group and hedonic shopping group. Third, there was significant difference in product selection criteria and store selection criteria between high fashion involvement group and low fashion involvement group. Finally, there was significant difference in the and according to age, job, and income among demographic characteristics.

The purpose of this study was to investigate empirically the consumer behavior regarding the purchase of millinery items in relation to their evaluation criterion and demographic characteristics. The survey was carried out to 395 individuals in their 20s and over who were quota sampled according to age and gender. The collected data were statistically treated with the SPSS 12.0 program in terms of descriptive statistics, cross tabulation, t-test, one-way ANOVA, factor analysis, Cronbach’s α coefficient and Duncan-test. The 20s and 50s over were more interested in hat products than other ages. Female consumers obtained the most information about hat products from store visits, TV and magazines. On the other hand, male consumers had it from the acquaintances and internet. Younger consumers more often utilized internet to have it. Their main purchase location was department stores. The younger purchased it more in traditional market, the older purchased it more in mega wholesale market or discount store. The consumers of hat products considered the intrinsic classification most when buying hats. The evaluation criteria employed by them were aesthetics, quality, and external attributes. Hat consumers were more concerned about aesthetics attributes than the other two criteria. Female consumers and consumers who are more interested in the hat and have a higher level of education and income considered aesthetics attributes most important.

This study was conducted to investigate purchasing behavior of jeans consumers and to find differences in jeans evaluative criteria according to consumers' characteristics. Male and female university students participated in the study. Quota sampling method was used to collect the data. Data from 492 questionnaires were used for the statistical analysis. Descriptive analysis, factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha coefficient, ANOVA, Duncan test, and t-test were conducted. Three factors of jeans evaluative criteria classified (i.e., external criteria, internal/aesthetic criteria, internal/quality criteria). Results indicated that most of respondents put on jeans wear more than three times per a week and 38.1% of respondents reported that they owned three to four jeans products on average. Department store was the most used place to buy jeans product with 44.2%. 27.5% of respondents spent from 50,000 won to 100,000 won on purchasing jeans. Style was the highest important jeans evaluative criterion with 36.2%, followed by fitness, price, color, condition of washing treatment. Women respondents considered aesthetic criteria and quality criteria more importantly than men did. Respondents who were on a high income and spent more than 200,000 won per a month on apparel more concerned aesthetic criteria and external criteria than the other respondents did. Results of this study provide a basis for understanding jeans consumers' purchase behavior and evaluative criteria.

Recently, Avatar business has in favor on the internet and lots of profit has been increasing. In this study, we apply evaluation criteria for clothing purchase to Avatar, and try to find out the differences of the evaluation criteria by the age and sex.

Recently, Avatar business has in favor on the internet and lots of profit has been increasing. In this study, we apply evaluation criteria for clothing purchase to Avatar, and try to find out the differences of the evaluation criteria by the age and sex. There are many forms in the evaluation factors for purchasing clothes of Avatar by categorizing into five primary factors with statistical tool among them. At this point, future research should use these results for the area of the customer management and marketing in Avatar business on the internet.

본 연구는 구매결정요인으로서의 제품평가기준에 대한 소비자인식이 국가간에 차이가 있는지 그리고 구매사황과 평가기준의 중요도 인식과의 관계가 어떠한지를 스포츠화를 대상으로 하여 실증적으로 분석하였다. 한·미양국 소비자의 스포츠화 구매동기면에서 제품속성을 구분한 결과, 양국 모두 실용적 요인과 감성적요인의 차원으로 구성되는 제품평가기준의 구조가 동일하게 나타난다. 한편 중간 수준의 관여도를 나타낸 스포츠화는 미국이 실용적 요인을 보다 중요하게 평가하고 있으며, 개별속성에 대한 중요도 인식에 있어서도 부분적인 차이를 보이고 있다. 또한 제품 평가기준에 영향을 미치는 소비자의 구매상황-구매관여도, 제품친숙도, 구매목적-에 따라 이들 기준의 중요성 평가에 차이를 보이고 있는데. 특히 구매관여도가 가장 유용한 구매상황적 변수로 나타났다. 그리고 실용적 요인 구매상황에 따른 집단간 차이의 구분에 있어 강한 판별력을 가지고 있는 것으로 나타나 소비자의 집단별 특성에 대한 예측력이 강함을 알 수 있다. 이상과 같이 제품속성의 중요도를 파악하기 위한 국가 및 구매상황변수의 고려를 통해 국제시장에서의 목표시장 선정과 이에 적합한 효과적인 포지셔닝전략이 구체화될 수 있다. 연구결과를 종합해 볼 때 감성적 요인에 치중한 자체브랜드 개발전략보다 스포츠화의 기능성 즉 실용적 요인의 속성에 마치는 목표고객집단의 선정, 제품전략 및 구체적인 실행프로그램의 개발이 필요하다.