본 연구는 구스타프 클림트의 <스토클레 프리즈>의 디자인 전개과정을 살펴본다. 먼저 스토클레 저택과 스토클레 가문에 대해서 고찰하고, 이어서 클림트의 <스토클레 프리즈>를 위한 디자인 스케치부터 완성된 모자이크까지의 형식과 구성을 검토할 것 이다. <스토클레 프리즈>는 스토클레 저택의 다이닝룸 벽을 장식했던 모자이크 작업이다. 벨기에 브뤼셀에 위치한 스토클레 저택은 비엔나 공방이 추구했던 “총체예술 (Gesamtkunstwerk)”의 실현물로서 2009년에는 유네스코 세계문화유산으로 지정되었다. <스토클레 프리즈>를 주문했던 아돌프 스토클레는 은행업과 철도사업을 운영했으며 20세기 전반기 중요한 예술후원가였다. 1905년, 아돌프 스토클레와 수잔 스토클레 부부는 요셉 호프만에게 스토클레 저택의 건축을 의뢰했다. 이후 스토클레 저택은 호프만의 지휘 아래 건물과 실내장식부터 식기까지 20세기초 새로운 모더니즘 경향의 예술품과 물건들로 장식되었다. 1905년, 클림트는 호프만을 통해 스토클레 저택의 다이닝룸 벽화장식 주문을 받았다. 이어서 클림트의 디자인 작업은 다음과 같이 세 단계에 걸쳐 진행되었다. 먼저 여러 점의 구상 스케치들이 1908년도에 제작되었다. 이후 완성 모자이크 벽화에 등장하게 되는 형식적 특징들이 초기 스케치들에서 이미 나타난다. <스토클레 프리즈> 디자인이 결정된 후, 클림트는 이 디자인 구상을 총 9장의 실물크기의 작업드로잉으로 확대, 제작했다. 클림트는 모자이크 재질과 색상의 농도 등 실물 벽화제작을 위한 상세한 지시사항 들을 1910/11년 제작된 작업드로잉 위에 직접 적어 놓았다. 작업드로잉들은 곧 모자이크 제작을 위해 모자이크 공방과 비엔나 공방으로 전달되었고, 그 결과물이 바로 비엔나 공방의 “총체예술”의 이상의 실현이자 구스타프 클림트의 황금시기를 대표하는 <스토클레 프리즈>(1910-1912)이다.

The purpose of this study is to explore the applicability of QFD to product development of clothes by empirically applying it to development of a specific clothes, middle and elderly women’s formal knitwear. The voices of customers(VOCs) for formal knitwear was collected through in-depth interviews with 25 customers, shop masters, and designers. Also, questionnaires of which respondents were 230 customers were used to rank the importance of the items of VOC. A QFD team of 10 knitwear experts implemented the task of translating VOCs into design attributes and measuring the values of the relationships between VOCs and design attributes. Importance ranking of the items of design attributes was obtained based on Lyman’s method. The results of this study were as follows. First, the customer requirements for formal knitwear were classified into five dimensions, that is, symbolism, aesthetic, fitness, usefulness, and maintenance. Second, the descending order of the necessity of improving the quality was maintenance, aesthetic, fitness, usefulness, and symbolism. Third, three-staged design attributes were obtained as a result of translating of VOCs into design attributes. Lastly, the descending order of the importance of design attributes was “sorts of yarn”, “sorts of color jacquard”, “color”, “tone”, “ease”, etc.

This study aims to identify and analyze the factors that influenced the construction of London Eye which was led by private groups, including characteristics in progress, differentiated value in design, the combination of technology and design, and construction costs. The results of this study were the followings. 1) London Eye provides a new construction method for a landmark in the downtown in that the architects became the clients of the project which might have been hoarded, procuring the construction costs and completing it by themselves. 2) London Eye presents a space utilization method where undeveloped spaces in the downtown are used in three-dimensions by erecting a structure on the river with a minimum land. 3) The process of design, production and erection is propelled the realization of technical intention design with one system and from at the initial stage, the participation of the engineer where the designer is equal with you must accompany. 4) London Eye is endowed with strong shape by a circle in design concept, which is the simplest geometrical figure, and it provides organic relationship between the past and the present by utilizing historical elements in various ways. 5) The construction was completed through four phases including idea phase, promotion phase, turn-key contract phase, and design-build phase. The most critical factor to the success is derived from the direct contact with Involved companies from the production phase. 6) In a project facing many challenges in terms of technology, the design-build method proves to be a more effective method than turn-key contract in that it may more allocate risks and enable coherent implementation of the core concept in design. The organization for the design-build method was composed of three phases including general affairs, responsible contracting by sector, and cooperative system by sector. Since that was a new concept structure, high-level contractors who hadn't had existing cooperative relationships with one another formed new cooperative relationship, while collaborating companies who had long cooperated led the responsible contracting and sub-cooperative system, which resulted in reduction of risks and time. 7) The major factors to change design were the design characteristics, derived from a technically great combination, and the opening time. 8) A new erection method was applied to London Eye, a structure that overcame the limitation in land and period, and the process of installation demonstrated that it is an important value for the construction of a landmark in the city. 9) In spite of many visitors and tremendous operational income, the factors that London Eye fails to free itself from debts include the construction costs expended double than expected, and interest burden to the investments, which occurred in the course of procuring the costs. Absolute limit in time increased the construction costs, resulting in being a great obstacle in the course of operation.