Notwithstanding the existence of The Act on the Establishment of Safe Laboratory Environment to prevent accidents in laboratory, it has not been secured substantive level of safety. Moreover, it is hard to apply to the scope of responsibility when the accident occurs in laboratory with The Occupational Safety and Health(OSH) Act. Thus, it is necessary to review and compare the OSH Act and The Act on the Establishment of Safe Laboratory Environment to reinforce the safety in laboratory.

This study was evaluated the indicators of GRI guideline LA6-LA9 for industrial safety sanitation field on 22 domestic sustainable management reports and 46 overseas reports published by companies in 2007 and 2008, was developed new indicators with emphasis on industrial safety sanitation act, and was assessed whether they are released. As a result, LA6(Percent of total workforce represented in formal joint management-work health and safety committees that help monitor and advise on occupational health and safety programs) was evaluated highest in release ratio on whether to release the reports by each indicator of industrial safety sanitation field using domestic sustainable management report GRI guideline, and in the case of overseas companies, it was evaluated that there is no companies that release all from LA6 through LA9 among GRI guideline, but it was grasped that the ratio of partial release is high. As for the release of indicators was developed with the use of industrial safety sanitation act of 22 domestic companies, the release of indicator No. 1(report and industrial disaster record) and 10(health diagnosis) of industrial safety sanitation act was high. This study is meaningful in that it analyzed the industrial safety sanitation field of sustainable management report(CSR) that has not been attempted so far with the use of new indicators developed with emphasis on GRI guideline and industrial safety sanitation act.

The government separated and established the industrial safety and health law from the Labor Standard law since 1981 to promote the labor's working environment and to improve the conditions of laborers. The government made a lot of effort to discharge the industrial safety and health law by continuous revision of the law thereafter. it is, however, difficult to establish clear-cut lines of authority and responsibility due to the fact that the substantial application of the industrial safety and health law is adapted by enterprise's autonomous management. There are frequent industrial disasters on the small and medium enterprises which have financial difficulty and it means this causes much more social cost. Finally, for the improvement of laborer's safety, health and working environment in the small and medium enterprises we need to raise the effectiveness of the industrial safety and health law through enhancing a government-office's administration and surveillance with the changing mind of a business proprietor. On this paper, we research on the actual condition of the administration, inspection and regulation of safety and health by means of the industrial safety and health law. Thereafter we analyze how much the Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency and vicarious businesses of safety & health management help. we used the survey method to gather data from 380 laborers directly and analysed the data by SPSS v17.0.

This article is based on the recent Supreme Court decision on Article 66–2 of the Industrial Safety and Health Act, which calls for the criminal responsibility of the employer in the event of a worker being killed or injured because of violation of the safety measure, I want to critically analyze some of the problems that appear. There was some comment on the judgment of the labor law in academia, and it was positively evaluated that the significance of the case was further on the position of the Supreme Court. And it is pointing out the problem of the law of the industrial safety health law itself. However, my judgment is that there is not a change in the judiciary that recognizes the nature of the employer as an employer in the case of the rise of the contractor’s worker, but because the employee of the laborer accidentally performed work supervision duties at the accident site, But only as an employer in the punishment rule, and as a result, the original company was punished, but it does not appear to be a judicial judgment with great significance. If the employees of the original company are not sent to the work site where there is a possibility of accidents in the future, the possibility of punishment by the original employer is still insufficient if they are supervised more poorly. However, in my judgment, the object of judgment is the inherent problem of the Industrial Safety and Health Act, namely, the listed list of the constitutional elements of the crime, which is appended to the end of the individual statute, a special penalty constitutional requirement called “administrative criminal law” The Court has not specifically pointed this point, but instead acknowledged the corporation’s liability on the basis of exceptional facts. Although the Court recognizes the inherent limitations of the judiciary which must be bound by the given laws and the scope of the indicted cases, the Court is also concerned with the legality of the law, It should be pointed out.