This study aimed to verify the validity of the evaluation items and weight determination of the indoor environmental safety area, which has the most frequent accidents, among the safety certification evaluations of educational facilities by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea, which has been conducted since May 2021. As a preceding study, the evaluation items of the school safety evaluation checklist being implemented in the US state of Vermont were compared, and the causes of accidents judged by teachers in the accident experiences written by 200 Korean teachers were compared with the safety certification evaluation items belonged to the Ministry of Education. In addition, research literature using the AHP analysis technique on safety risks of elementary and secondary schools in China and safety evaluation index study cases of 539 elementary school children in Indonesia were analyzed. Through these preceding studies, measures to add and adjust evaluation items were derived and the validity and importance rankings of evaluation items were calculated through AHP questionnaires to teachers and safety experts. In addition, a survey was conducted on 104 ordinary people to verify the results of expert analysis. As a result of expert AHP analysis, 'safety education and disaster response training (.396)' was the highest priority for the relative importance of the first layer, followed by 'safety measures (.387)' and 'building materials'. Safety (.216)' was found to be the highest priority. In the overall importance ranking of the 13 second-tier screening items, safety accident prevention education had the highest priority and disaster preparedness training ranked second, proving that the Ministry of Education's review weight was underestimated. In addition, slip and collision accident countermeasures, which were not in the existing Ministry of Education review items, ranked 4th, laboratory practice room safety measures ranked 6th, and sanitation, cleanliness, hazardous substance management, and cafeteria/cooking room safety measures ranked 9th, indicating a significant level of importance. Referring to the importance ranking, which is the result of this study, it is suggested that it is necessary to review the weight of each review item again.

The present management of the domestic and international advanced enterprises is transferring the systems and the regulations to the prevention system management. Expecially, KOSHA (Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency) in Korea has supported to set up the OSHMS (Occupational Safety & Health Management System) by KOSHA 18001 since 1997. But small & medium enterprises (SMS) has many difficulties to set up the OSHMS system because of limited natural and human resources. In this study, the rating system as a judgment method of an OSHMS based on the certification standard of the OSHMS, which was suggested in previous study, was developed for SMS to adopt voluntarily the OSHMS, certify KOSHA 18001, and improve the safety and health level.

The present management of the domestic and international advanced enterprises is transferring the systems and the regulations to the prevention system management. Expecially, KOSHA (Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency) in Korea has supported to set up the OSHMS (Occupational Safety & Health Management System) by KOSHA 18001 since 1997. But small & medium enterprises (SMS) has many difficulties to set up the OSHMS system because of limited natural and human resources. In this study, the rating system as a judgment method of an OSHMS based on the certification standard of the OSHMS was suggested for SMS to adopt voluntarily the OSHMS, certify KOSHA 18001, and improve the safety and health level.

국내 최초의 중·저준위 방사성폐기물 처분시설에 대한 건설·운영허가가 지난 2008년 7월31일 발급되었다. 이 논문에서는 중·저준위 방사성폐기물 처분시설에 대한 국내 기본 규제체계, 규제요건 및 기술기준을 제시하고, 동 시설의 안전성 확인을 위해 실제 적용된 안전심사 수행절차를 주요 단계별로 요약·기술하였다. 원자력법은 부지선정, 설계, 건설, 운영, 폐쇄 및 제도적관리 등 중·저준위 방사성폐기물 처분시설의 전과정에 대한 단계별 안전규제체계를 규정하고 있으며, 하위 법령과 교육과학기술부고시 등은 관련 세부 규제요건 및 기술기준을 규정하고 있다. 한국원자력안전기술원은 원자력관계법령에 근거한 교육과학기술부의 위탁에 따라 처분시설에 대한 안전심사를 수행하였으며, 부지 및 구조안전성, 방사선환경영향, 운영 안전성, 계통 및 설비의 안전성, 품질보증, 종합안전성평가 등 세부 기술 분야별 적합성을 종합적으로 검토하였다. 전체 안전심사 과정은 사전준비단계, 초기심사단계, 본심사단계, 완료단계 등으로 구분할 수 있으며, 한국원자력안전기술원의 심사결과는 원자력안전전문위원회 5개 전문분과의 심의를 거쳐 교육과학기술부에 보고되었고, 교육과학기술부는 원자력안전위원회의 최종 심의를 통해 처분시설에 대한 건설·운영허가를 발급하였다. 이후 처분시설의 안전성은 원자력관계법령에 규정된 일련의 규제검사 및 심사를 통해 확인될 것이며, 건설·운영자의 지속적인 안전성증진계획 이행을 통해 장기적인 안전성 증진과 안전사례에 대한 신뢰구축이 가능할 것이다.