This study amid to examine how the translative mode of native language make an effect on Chinese Learners when studying Korean language, expecially on the second person. Due to the culture's difference, it is one of the most difficult part to use the second person expression exactly. so two forms of mistakes were pointed out, which is addition, substitution and form error. Also, based on this, some suggestions were given to improve the ability of Chinese learners on using the second person expression.

Lee Jee-won. 2015. “The interactional function of the first-person plural pronouns women and zanmen in naturally occurring conversation”. The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea 23(3). 239~266. This study examines the use of first-person plural pronouns in spoken Chinese from a conversational-analytic perspective. Focusing on the pronouns, women and zanmen, this study shows that the use of first person plural pronouns systematically functions to create a membership category between participants. In particular, we investigate the exact categories that are enacted and how the participants in a conversation recognize and use them in the course of an interaction. We argue that participants produce and recognize categories in their talk and that these categories index aspects of a speaker's relationship with the other participants, such as social difference or intimacy. This study offers a new understanding of what motivates speakers' choice of discourse forms and patterns in the evolving sequence of talk.(123 words)

潘悟云(2002)는 중국어 오방언의 인칭 대명사 복수 부가성분인 t/d、l와 n은 方位名词 “耷”에서 유래했다고 주장한다. 본문은 이 주장이 적절하지 못하다고 여긴다. 본문은 충분한 자료를 바탕으로 이러한 접미사가 중국어와 티베트버마어, 알타이어계에 속하는 각 언어들에서 광범위하게 분포하고 있음을 증명한다. 이것에 근거하여 중국어-티베트버마어와 알타이어의 인칭대명사 복수 접미사는 동일성을 가지고 있으며, 그 출현 시기도 매우 빨라 동북아시아 지역의 원시 언어의 공통적인 부분이라는 가설을 제시한다. 이런 종류의 동일성이 과연 발생학적인 측면의 성질인지 아니면 교류로 인한 조성 인지는 지금 성급히 결론을 내릴 필요는 없다. 본문은 유전학적 연구 성과를 인용하여 이러한 가설을 지지하고자 한다.

Kim, Ye-Sug. 2004. A Study of the Social, Cultural Connotations of French Personal Pronouns. The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea, 12(2). This study explores the social, cultural connotations of French personal pronouns. The second person pronoun divides into TU and VOUS. In the past, TU was used when the speaker of high standing calls a person of low birth. VOUS was used by the latter calling the former. Between persons of high rank, VOUS was used reciprocally and between persons of lower classes TU was in the reciprocal usage. At the time of the French Revolution, TU was considered as the real pronoun for the citizens whereas VOUS was rejected as flattering, causing inequality. But a few years later, VOUS began to be used again. The change was made by the way that the use of TU presents familiarity between speaker and hearer, and no more equality. So nowadays, the choice of TU/VOUS depends principally on the horizontal relationship, not on the vertical relationship. Other terms of address like 'Monsieur', 'Madame', 'Mademoiselle', the first name and the last name come join TU/VOUS and make the most appropriate mode to call or indicate persons.

본 논문의 목적은 제1차 세계대전 이후 비슷한 시기에 쓰여진 T. S. 엘리엇의 『황무지와 스티븐 스펜더의 『비엔나가 각각 어떻게 1인칭 대명사를 사용했는지를 탐구함으로써, 유럽의 분열과 정치사회적 탄압 이라는 주제가 각 시에서 어떻게 표현되었는지를 조명하는 것이다. 1인 칭 대명사 사용에 대한 연구는 시인이 “얼마나”, 또 “어떻게” 자신의 시 에 직접 개입하여 (정치적) 메시지를 전달하려 했는지를 알기 위한 중 요한 작업이다. 이 논문에서는 먼저 『황무지속의 1인칭 대명사 “I”의 정체를 찾기 위한 과정이 유럽의 분열이라는 시적 주제를 어떤 방식으 로 표현하고 있는지를 탐구할 것이다. 그 다음, 『비엔나에서의 “we”와 “they”의 병치가 어떻게 사회주의자들을 향한 정치적 탄압 뿐 아니라 동성애자들을 향한 사회적 탄압을 반영하고 있는지에 대하여 논할 것이 다.

Chegyung Im. 2017. Word Formation and Merge of Korean Personal Pronouns Based on Feature Agreement Theory and Distributed Morphology. Studies in Modern Grammar 96, 23-50. Most of the previous studies on the personal pronouns in Korean have depended on the typological studies of English pronouns. I argue, in this study, that the recent theories of the Distributed Morphology and the Strongest Uniformity Hypothesis show the process of morphological formation of Korean pronouns and featural agreement in the process of their Merge. I also argue that the hyper structure of Speech Act Phrase is needed to license the computational process among the speaker, the hearer, and the arguments in the sentence.

절대를 향한 엘리엇의 희구는 1927년 그가 영국국교회교도로 개종하 기 훨씬 전부터 존재해 왔다. 엘리엇이 철학자에서 시인-비평가로 ‘돌아 선 것,’ 시의 몰개성 이론을 주창한 것, 그리고 의식 대(對) 무의식을 뛰어넘는 ‘비(非)의식’ 논쟁을 펼친 것 등은 모두 이처럼 절대에 대한 갈망의 결과이다. 그리고 이 갈망은 본질적으로 낭만적이며, 이상주의적이 고, 궁극적으로는 시인 단테가 의미한 바와 같이 종교적이다. 재의 수요일 은 종교적 구원에 대해 긍정적인 암시로 인해 이전의 시와는 구분 된다. 그러나, 평자들이 주장한 바처럼 절대를 노래한 시가 아니라, 이 시의 1인칭대명사 ‘I’와 접속사가 충실하게 기록하듯이 회의주의와 종교 사이에서 여전히 고민하는 정신에 관한 시이다.

This study aims to show that 2nd person pronouns in English and Korean do not cover the grammatical category only. They show spatio-temporal indications of discourse covering extralinguistic categories such as politeness, respect, intimacy, solidarity, all of them social, pragmatic components. Our study also reveals the fact that both languages have employed honorific/common nominal expressions as a last resort to fill the blank caused by the inappropriateness of the pronoun. Another fact we discovered is that Korean has a more complicated hierarchy for 2nd person pronouns than English does, which is a reflect of strong/weak social hierarchy in both cultures.

Chung Moo-Joo. 1998. Personal Pronouns and Their Speech Roles. Studies in Modern Grammatical Theories 12, 169-186. The referents of the 1st and 2nd person pronouns are not fixed, but shift according to the situation, as participants take turns to speak. This paper was written to describe a wide variety of social and political roles and stances of these inter-personal pronouns. The actual discourse referents for use are seemingly limitless its precise interpretation is dependent on the particular context of use. `Inclusive we` ostensibly implies joint activity; but in different contexts there is actually a greater pull either towards egocentricity [+ego] or a vocative function [+voc]. The most striking example of egocentric reference is the so-called `royal We` and `editorial use`, both representing the authority of the speaker. The `inclusive we` with its addressee role is used when the speakers feel solidarity with the subordinate addressees. Impersonal pronoun one, recently, is used as a socio- linguisticaly marked form of I among the upper class and royalty and their hangers-on. To refer to the addressee, the third person forms can be used, implying deference, distance, or intimacy. On the evidence of medieval and Early Modern English texts the polite form you was used to address a singular social superior and also a social equal among the upper class, leaving thou for address to a social inferior and for reciprocal address among the lower classes. There was, however, considerable fluctuation between you and thou in address to the same individual, even within the same utterance. This code-switching of you and thou frequently signals expressive shifts of feeling that are not easily explained by a power semantic.