This study aimed to verify the validity of the evaluation items and weight determination of the indoor environmental safety area, which has the most frequent accidents, among the safety certification evaluations of educational facilities by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea, which has been conducted since May 2021. As a preceding study, the evaluation items of the school safety evaluation checklist being implemented in the US state of Vermont were compared, and the causes of accidents judged by teachers in the accident experiences written by 200 Korean teachers were compared with the safety certification evaluation items belonged to the Ministry of Education. In addition, research literature using the AHP analysis technique on safety risks of elementary and secondary schools in China and safety evaluation index study cases of 539 elementary school children in Indonesia were analyzed. Through these preceding studies, measures to add and adjust evaluation items were derived and the validity and importance rankings of evaluation items were calculated through AHP questionnaires to teachers and safety experts. In addition, a survey was conducted on 104 ordinary people to verify the results of expert analysis. As a result of expert AHP analysis, 'safety education and disaster response training (.396)' was the highest priority for the relative importance of the first layer, followed by 'safety measures (.387)' and 'building materials'. Safety (.216)' was found to be the highest priority. In the overall importance ranking of the 13 second-tier screening items, safety accident prevention education had the highest priority and disaster preparedness training ranked second, proving that the Ministry of Education's review weight was underestimated. In addition, slip and collision accident countermeasures, which were not in the existing Ministry of Education review items, ranked 4th, laboratory practice room safety measures ranked 6th, and sanitation, cleanliness, hazardous substance management, and cafeteria/cooking room safety measures ranked 9th, indicating a significant level of importance. Referring to the importance ranking, which is the result of this study, it is suggested that it is necessary to review the weight of each review item again.

본 연구는 중국의 대학평가제도인 “五位一体”를 관료적·법적·정치적 책무성 확보기제, 시장적 책무성 확보기제, 전문적 책무성 확보기제로 분류하고 각각의 특징, 문제점, 개선방안을 제시한 것이다. 중국 고등교육기관, 학술정보서비스, 국가데이터플랫폼 등에서 법규, 지시, 공고문서와 주요보고서, 논문을 수집하여 내용을 분석하였고, 분석을 위해 사용한 이론적 틀은 Burke(2005)의 책무성 트라이앵글이다. 분석 결과, 첫째, 관료적·법적·정치적 책무성 확보기제의 문제점은 상급기관의 행정명령으로 인식된다는 점, 평가지표와 평가방법의 지나친 통일성으로 인해 대학 자율화와 특성화에 부정적 영향을 준다는 것이다. 둘째, 시장적 책무성 확보기제로 분류되는 독자적 평가제도는 없으며, 국가와 전문가 관점의 책무성 확보기제의 평가 항목을 통해 간접적으로 확보된다는 점이 특징이다. 문제점은 정부와 대학의 편견에 의해 시장적 책무성 결과가 왜곡될 수 있다는 점과 학생, 학부모, 기업 등 시장의 관점에서 유의미한 제도가 아니라는 것이다. 셋째, 전문적 책무성 확보기제의 특징은 개인(교원)에게 요구되는 책무의 내용, 수단이 없다는 것이며 문제점은 폐쇄적 전문성을 바탕으로 한 자율규제 방식이라 대학과 개인(교원)의 실질적 문제점이 외부로 공개되지 않는다는 점이다. 각 책무성 확보기제의 문제점을 개선하기 위한 주요 방안으로 1) 개방적 평가기구를 설립, 2) 대학 내 사회 적합의 기구 설치, 3) 평가절차 및 평가결과 공개 강화, 4) 내적 동기부여 시스템 구축을 제시하였다. 본 연구는 기관평가와 상호 연계된 대학 자체평가, 학문계열평가, 국제평가, 교학상시현황모니터링시스템을 책무성 이론 관점에서 종합적으로 분석해 봄으로써 향후 중국 대학 평가제도의 발전 방향 등에 대한 시사점을 제공한다는 점에서 의의가 있다.

The mobile device users have been increasing significantly because of the development of social network system. Mobile educational serious games are occupying a large portion of the serious game market but there is a lack of the quality evaluation elements for providing useful quality evaluation information about educational serious game to user or developer. This study conducted prioritizing the quality elements of mobile educational serious game contents. Then, these elements are decomposed into sub-elements and resulted into a hierarchical model with three levels. To evaluate the priorities among elements, AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) is adopted. Additionally, if the evaluation element of this study would be applied into other game contents, it can provide the fundamental information for quality improvement of total mobile educational serious game contents.

2009년 개정 교육과정은 내용 체계에서 전면적 개정을 가져왔다. 내용 체계는 그 이전의 것과는 다른 체계이다. 개정 교육과정에서는 ‘한자’ ‘한자어’ ‘한문’의 영 역이 사라지고, ‘한문’ ‘한문지식’ 이라는 새로운 내용체계를 선보였다. ‘한자어’ 개 념이 사라지고 ‘어휘’가 등장하였고, ‘한자’와 함께 한문 지식 영역의 하위 영역으 로 포함되었다. 한자영역의 변화는 그에 따른 내용 요소의 변화를 이끈다. 교육과정의 내용 체계 에 변화가 있는 이상, 이에 대한 성취 기준과 평가 기준을 새롭게 마련해야 한다. 본 연구는 개정 교육과정의 한자의 내용 요소를 평가하는 문항개발에 목적이 있다. 한문지식의 하위 영역인 한자의 ‘한자의 특징’, ‘한자의 짜임’, ‘한자의 역사’ 등의 내용 요소를 평가하는 문항을 개발하고자 하는데 목적을 두었다. 본 연구가 수행되는 과정에서 첫째, 한자의 내용 요소 중 요소 간, 학년 간의 학습량과 내용 수준에 있어 명확한 진술이 필요하다는 점. 그리고 중학교용 기초 한자 900자의 산술적인 구분으로 학년 간 학습량과 내용 수준의 구분은 성취 기 준과 평가 기준에 대한 설정과 진술을 반복적으로 제시하는 것에 한계가 있다는 것과 둘째, 내용 요소 중 ‘한자의 형성과정을 이해한다.’와 ‘한자 자체의 변천과정 을 이해한다.’는 내용 요소의 성취 기준은 ‘한자의 역사를 개략적으로 이해한다.’라 는 한 가지에 귀결되는 점을 발견할 수 있었다. 추후 이 두 가지 내용 요소와 성취 기준에 대한 구체적인 논의와 연구가 진행되어야 할 것이며, 한자의 단순한 음과 뜻을 아는가 모르는가에 대한 단편적 지식과 이해의 평가보다는 고등 정신 능력 과 복합적 사고를 평가하는 문항으로 개발되어야 할 것이다.

This study was carried out to evaluate the consumer recognition with regard to the safety management for imported foods. In order to evaluate the effect of the prgram on consumer education, the program was practiced for 89 female college students in Seoul, Korea. The participants were given an instruction with materials on imported food safety, including the safety management of imported foods and their distribution. The results showed that the participants achieved a greater understanding of imported foods. In particular, they had firmly grasped the importance of expiration date in selecting imported foods. Before the instruction, 50.6% of total participants blamed the Korean government for the problems arising from imported foods; only 18.0% placed the blame on individuals or businesses importing from foreign countries. After the instruction, 39.3% had blamed the individuals or businesses importing from foreign countries. Furthermore, 36.0% had disapproved of the foods that are imported from China before the instruction, while 32.6% found objectionable the views on the illegally distributed foods; 29.2% criticized the junk foods that target children (after the instruction). In addition, the level of participant satisfaction via-a-vis imported foods safety supervision had improved from 2.76 ± 1.59(before the instruction) to 3.37 ± 1.58(after the instruction). The results indicate that consumers are concerned with the imported foods that contain adulterated or forbidden substances and the illegally distributed foods from foreign countries. Thus, consistent and informative educational programs on imported food safety could help consumers in choosing safer products, resulting in an improvement in the consumer confidence with respect to imported foods.

Although the educational facility are an important considerations on a social equity standpoint, educational environment in rural areas has been continuously deteriorated by numerous social problems such as decreasing birth rate and increasing of local school closing. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accessibility of educational environment in rural areas on village level. First, we evaluate physical accessibility based on legally defined commuting distance. Second, the implication of village population of potential accessibility is analyzed. Lastly, the facility centrality index of each village is estimated for assessing the relations of educational accessibility. The main results of this study are as follows; (1) The accessibility of most villages in Pyeongchang-gun is vulnerable that 81.10% for elementary school, 73.17% for middle school, and 82.32% for high school, respectively; (2) The average commuting distance per student considering estimated number of students for each educational facilities indicated 2.75km for elementary school, 4.37km for middle school, and 5.79km for high school; (3) the facility centrality index is highly correlated to educational facilities but not to village population.