This study was conducted to establish scores according to the importance levels of each HACCP evaluation item in cattle farm. The importance levels and score of each HACCP evaluation item was derived through the non-compliance rate and severity levels of hazard. In order to change the score criteria according to the importance of each HACCP evaluation item, we analyzed the importance of each HACCP evaluation item by using the portfolio mapping method according to the occurrence frequency and severity levels of hazard. The scores were classified into 3 point, 2 point, and 1 point, respectively, by classifying the importance of each category as ‘high’, ‘middle’ and ‘lower’. Accordingly, we have established a now scoring system of each HACCP evaluation item through this study. Through the result of this study, the objectivity of the comparative evaluation was verified by implementing the currently used HACCP evaluation item to the cattle farm. In conclusion, Implementation of the result of this study to cattle farm may help to increase the objectivity and also improve more safety and hygienic cattle management and raw milk production.

본 연구는 안전한 육계 및 계란 생산에 기반이 되는 닭 농장의 HACCP 심사의 객관성을 높이기 위하여 현행 심사항목 점수부여 체계의 문제점에 대한 개선방안을 도출하기 위한 목적으로 실시하였다. 기존 닭 농장 HACCP심사항목은 중요도 수준의 구분 없이 동일한 점수(5점)를 부여하고 있으나 본 연구에서는 최근 3년간 지적비율, 위해의 심각도 수준 등 을 고려하여 심사항목별로 중요도 수준을 도출하였고 그 결과에 따라 심사항목의 점수를 차등 부여하도록 하였다. 닭 농장의 선행요건 분야 심사항목(60개)은 중요도에 따라 최대 5 점에서 최소 2점의 점수체계를 구축하여 총 점수가 200점이 되도록 하였으며, HACCP 관 리 분야 심사항목(15개)은 최대 10점에서 최소 5점 체계를 구축하여 총 점수가 100점이 되 도록 개발하였다. 본 연구결과를 현장에 적용할 경우 심사의 객관성을 높여 더욱 안전하고 위생적인 육계 및 계란 생산이 가능할 것으로 예상된다. 이는 나아가 닭 농장 HACCP 제도 의 활성화와 소비자에게 보다 안전한 축산물을 공급할 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

본 연구는 친환경안전축산물 생산에 기반이 되는 돼지농장의 HACCP 평가항목별 점수부 여 체계의 문제점에 대한 개선방안 도출하여 보다 안전하고 위생적인 돼지 생산에 기초자 료로 활용을 제안하기 위한 목적으로 실시하였다. 현행 돼지농장 HACCP 평가항목은 중요 도의 구분 없이 동일한 점수(5점)를 부여하고 있으나 본 연구에서는 최근 3년간 지적비율, 위해의 심각도 등을 고려하여 평가항목별로 중요도를 도출하였고 그 결과에 따라 평가항 목의 점수를 차등 부여하도록 하였다. 돼지농장의 선행요건 평가항목(70개)은 중요도에 따 라 최대 4점에서 최소 2점의 점수체계를 구축하여 총 점수가 200점이 되도록 하였으며, HACCP 관리 분야 평가항목(15개)은 최대 10점에서 최소 5점 체계를 구축하여 총 점수가 100점이 되도록 개발하였다. 본 연구결과를 현장에 적용할 경우 보다 안전하고 위생적인 돼지의 생산이 가능하여 돼지농장 HACCP 도입의 목적을 보다 효과적으로 달성할 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

Currently internal harbor and fishing port facilities are being maintained with the "Safety inspection and in-depth safety inspection detailed guideline" This is provided with the evaluation focusing on the safety and durability of the structure, based on the usability are not presented. In this study, we derive the evaluation items of the harbor and fishing port facilities for the transition from the maintenance of the existing system to the performance-based safety and maintenance system.

Since the 1970s, construction projects of SOC infrastructure have began rapidly. therefore, it is expected that the proportion of infrastructure using for more than 30 years will be increased in an instant. Because an aging infrastructure can greatly damage the national economy and people, maintenance of the infrastructure is essential. In this paper, performance-based evaluation items for maintenance of SOC(Social Overhead Capital) infrastructure and the process of calculating the weights of each items by using the AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) method are introduced.

This study was performed to select the performance-based evaluation items of concrete retaining wall. This study used Delphi Technique. As a result of survey, this study gained 17 condition assessment items and 7 safety evaluation items at final round. The results will be utilized as the basis for the performance-based evaluation.

This study aims to develop a rational evaluation system which consists of the selection of evaluation items and the estimation of its weight for the Enhancement Program of the Quality of Life for Farmers and Fishermen and Rural Development. This system has two hierarchical steps. The first step shows the evaluation goals which are relevance, efficiency and effectiveness of the program. The second step stands for the evaluation items which have 11 sub-items such as necessity and externalization for the program, rationality of procedures, feedback and monitoring system, budgetary allocations, information activities, impacts on the program, achievements of the goals and so on. A tentative evaluation system was proposed by brainstorming and Delphi method of expert-group. Weighting values of evaluation items were calculated through pair-comparison works of expert group using stepwise matrix sheets by AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process).

This study, a sub-one of comprehensive research works titled under "Rural Resources Evaluation System", tried to propose a rational methodology for development of rating tabulation on evaluation items. Firstly, the database system for handling of original/processed data of each evaluation items was constructed, being mainly focussed on the possibilities of data acquisition and statistical treatment. The rating tabulation system developed in the study has the formalized evaluation classes as 2 or 5 for convenience/simplification of analysis works. For each evaluation item in lower step of the goal system, 5 types of rating technique were arranged, which were based on statistical analysis using mean and standard deviation values(Type I), its existence or not(Type II), relative significance of its holding volume(Type III), synthesized weighting scale of its quality and quantity(Type IV), and the others(Type V). And, standardized 4-steps procedure for rating tabulation was proposed. Finally, the rating tabulation system developed in the study was applied to each evaluation item of goal system, from which the numerically-valued ranking criteria was obtained.

As one of methodological approaches for objective and systematic evaluation for rural resources, a sequential system for significance determination of resources items was formulated using AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) as the base technique. By the system constructed in this study, the significance values were calculated for all items of standard goal system which had been presented in the first phase- paper of research works for rural resources evaluation. The results analysed and obtained in the study are summarized as follows; 1. In case that the number of resources items for evaluation are relatively large, stepwise matrix method is considered as the better one for pair-comparison works in view of evaluator's convenience and consistency. 2. The significance valuing results for most resources items showed a considerable difference between characteristic areas, especially in aspects of land and human resources, so being considered as wet reflecting the specific areal varieties, 3. On land resources, the items for industrial development and land use showed higher significance value, while natural environment resources the items for ecological varieties and on human resources the items for artificial facilities. However, lower-valued ones were the items for mineral stocks in land resources, for control and protection in natural environment resources and for lower-level culture heritage respectively.