In the trend of globalization, global citizenship, social responsibility,and sustainability are seen as the benchmark for assessing the sociology of schools. However, there are few formal definitions or concepts of global citizenship and convincing evidence of how global citizens engage in cultural activities at universities. Therefore, it is essential to research extensively and accurately to create concepts about global citizens in higher education. International higher education, social sciences,and business materials are considered to have integrated a deep understanding of global citizenship in the context of universities in general and business schools in particular. The recognition of the concept of global citizens through the moral and transformative lens is considered a practical solution when approaching this new and full of problems. This paper describes the learning of global citizens through social imagination, relationships,and reflexes. These qualities will help students develop complex and ambiguous global business thinking. The materials and knowledge considered in this paper are the basis for establishing ethical reasoning, sensitivity and value-based teaching in universities. These aspects will create new ways to integrate the concept of global citizens into training programs at business schools. Global citizen learning will create the necessary links of social responsibility with sustainable development and ethical principles when implementing the curriculum at business schools. Besides, the paper also outlines how to learn from global citizens and apply that learning method to teaching practice.

The purpose of this study is to investigate which of the main social and personality factors affect the attitudes of consumers towards counterfeit products and their purchase intentions in one of largest counterfeit product market as much as the attractive one for the Global Luxury goods ,namely Turkey.

국제 전략적 제휴의 파트너간 유사성/다양성에 관한 기존 문헌은 `유사한 파트너끼리의 결합이 좋은 성과를 가져온다`거나 `보완적 차이점이 성공에 필수적`이라는 등의 일반 통념 수준에서 크게 벗어나지 못하고 있다. 과연 어떤 유사성이 전략적 제휴의 결과를 좋게 하는가? 혹은 어떤 다양성이 좋은 결과를 가져오는가? 파트너의 특성과 능력이 파트너 선정 과정에서는 물론 제휴의 결과에 지대한 영향을 미치고 있음에도 불구하고 이러한 유사성/다양성이 제휴의 결과에 미치는 영향에 대해서 체계적이고 종합적으로 검토한 연구는 찾아보기 어렵다. 본 연구에서는 경쟁적 유사성과 협력적 유사성이라는 새로운 개념을 파트너간 유사성/다양성의 차원으로 파악하고, 이들이 제휴의 결과에 미치는 영향을 종합적으로 분석하였다. 90개의 국제 전략적 제휴에서 우편설문조사를 통해 수집한 자료는 경쟁적 유사성이 제휴의 결과에 부정적인 영향을 미치고 협력적 유사성이 제휴의 결과에 긍정적인 영향을 미친다는 본 연구의 가설을 대체로 지지하였다.

Global strategic marketing planning has become increasingly important with the advent of worldwide competition and the growing rapidity of change in the international marketplace. In this article, research and commentaries from the strategic management and international marketing planning literatures are synthesized into a model examining what factors influence global strategic marketing planning formality, and what direct and indirect benfits accrue from the process. Responses from 90 multinational corporations were subjected to a LISREL analysis and correlation analyses. Organizational climate, supply chain element, foreign regulations and competition were identified as key determinants of global strategic marketing planning formality. Considerable direct: and indirect benefits also accrue as planning formality increases.

This paper aims to empirically examine how shipping companies can effectively acquire knowledge from their strategic alliance partners. This paper adopts cooperative network embeddedness mechanism, such as network density and tie closeness, as a channel through which to acquire more knowledge for shipping participants within a strategic alliance network. This study also examines the moderating role of competition between alliance partners in reinforcing the effectiveness of the cooperative relationships on the knowledge acquisition. Based on the literature, hypotheses to predict the aforementioned associations between cooperative network embeddedness and knowledge acquisition and the moderating role of competition in facilitating that association are established. A quantitative research method using survey data conducted in the Korean shipping industry was employed in order to empirically test the presented hypotheses. The results show that if players in a shipping alliance network are embedded in a dense network and have close relationships with their alliance partners, this helps to facilitate a greater degree of knowledge acquisition from the partners; and the impact of network density on the knowledge acquisition would be intensified with the higher level of competition between shipping companies.