This action research explores an effective teaching method for EFL teacher’s questioning types in a Korean online university context. By reviewing the previous studies on teachers’ questioning types which have been categorized mostly by cognitive linguistic tradition, this study sorts out the different questioning types from socio-linguistic perspective using the Systemic Functional Grammar (SFG) framework. These new categorized questioning types are applied to instruct the participant students (57) who were majoring in English and were mostly interested in TESOL (Teaching English to the Speakers of Other Languages) certificate program provided by the online university in Korea. Using a series of lecture content, two assignments, and an online discussion board, these newly added questioning types (offer and request types replacing command) were successfully taught in an online lecture entitled ‘Classroom English and Communication’ in the first semester of 2021. With a mixed analysis method, this study explains the procedures of various classroom tasks and analyzes the assignment data and online discussion board texts. This teacher classroom communication consisting of instruction and questioning needs to be reconsidered due to this study’s findings and its pedagogic implications that are clearly based on socio-linguistic perspectives.

과학영재교육 관점에서 성공지능 이론은 영재교육과정이 과학영재의 특성에 맞게 제시되고 있는지를 파악할 수 있는 수단이 된다. 이 연구의 목적은 초등 과학영재교육 교재에 제시된 발문 특성을 Sternberg의 성공지능 관점을 적용 하여 분석하기 위한 것이다. 이를 위하여 교육청 영재교육원 2곳과 대학부설 영재교육원 1곳의 초등 과학영재교육 교재에 제시된 발문 각각 143개와 134개를 추출한 후, 이렇게 추출된 발문들의 구조적 특성에 차이가 있는지를 비교하기 위해 언어네트워크분석 방법을 활용하여 분석하였다. 그 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 교육청 및 대학부설 영재교육원의 교재는 분석적 능력, 창의적 능력, 실행적 능력 등과 같은 성공지능을 균형 있게 반영하지 못하고 있었다. 둘째, 교육청 및 대학부설 영재교육원의 교재는 학생들에게 ‘문제 확인하기’, ‘정보 표상하고 조직하기’, ‘분석적 사고 촉진하기’ 등 분석적 능력 영역을 집중적으로 요구하고 있었다. 셋째, 교육청 및 대학부설 영재교육원의 교재는 성공지능의 각 프레임 요소를 서로 유기적으로 연결되지 못한 채 제시되고 있다는 한계를 보였다. 과학영재들은 일반학생과 달리 학습속도 가 빠르고 보다 복합적인 사고를 선호하는 특성을 보이기 때문에, 앞으로 과학영재교육 교재를 개발할 때에는 과학영재의 수준에 맞게 다양한 영역의 능력을 경험하고 통합적 사고를 촉진할 수 있도록 개발할 필요가 있을 것이다. 이런 측면에서 이 연구는 과학영재들의 맞춤형 교육지원을 위한 교재 개발을 위해 유용한 정보로 활용될 수 있을 것으로 기대 된다.

Studies of the Chinese neologisms zōngjiào 宗教 and zhéxué 哲學 have been pursued along etymological and historical lines, focusing on works of particular intellectuals that employed these terms. I argue that these methods are limited in their explanatory power to indicate how these words become dominant terms representing new academic disciplines in 20th century China. There is a need to demonstrate how the these terms invoked new interests shaping East Asian intellectuals’ identities in differing 19th and 20th century cultural contexts. A dialectical cultural transformation is involved, as well as institutionalization processes reflecting the values associated with these neologisms. These Chinese words become dominant terms precisely because there was a new set of experiences which older terms could not articulate. Zōngjiào and zhéxué, therefore, not only emerged from external cultural sources, but also represented a new mentality among Chinese intellectuals involved in modern transformations of post-traditional Chinese cultures.

해상에서의 선박 임장임검과 불심검문의 법적성격과 강제력을 수반한 영장 없는 선박 임장임검과 불심검문의 가능성 및 그 허용범위의 문제를 특히 미국 및 일본의 경우와 비교하여 고찰하였다. 선박의 임장임겁이나 해상에서의 선박에 대한 불심검문이 원칙적으로 육상의 불심검문과 같은 성격을 갖지만, 선박의 특수성과 육상과는 다른 해상에서의 상황의 특수성을 고려 한다면, 선박의 임장임검이나 해상에서의 불심검문이 육상의 불심검문과 같이 항상 임의적으로 이루어져야 한다고 보기는 어려운 측면이 있는 것으로 판단된다.

The purpose of this study is to analyze teachers' questioning patterns in EFL classes, and propose a new set of classification based on the interaction flow that a question initiates and the teachers' intention of questions in language classroom. Data were collected from five advanced EFL classes. Six categories of teacher questions were observed and two types of interactions following the initial questions were found. The interactions were usually opened by the teacher, which confirmed the general conception, and the types of interactions were mostly chosen by the teacher's preference and the activity the class was doing.

This is a descriptive study to identify patterns of teacher questioning discourse. Transcripts from Korean secondary science classrooms were examined while extensive review of literature on classroom discourse was carried out. When it is assumed that teacher questioning discourse can be categorized into different patterns by considering together the apparent exchange structures and pedagogical functions, various patterns of teacher questioning discourse were revealed. Although most patterns found illustrate the centrality of the teacher, a few of them are considered alternatives to the typical IRE discourse. A framework for classifying teacher questioning discourse is suggested and its implications for science teacher education and future research discussed.

This paper aims to explore the processes of poetic transformation of Ireland matter in W. B. Yeats and Seamus Heaney and compare the two poets’ characteristics of attitudes to Irish politics. Even though one does not have any idea of their poetic prepositions in their poetry, there can be some understanding of the relationship between each poet’s poetic material and his works of poem. Yeats and Heaney keep distances themselves from Ireland in their poetry as a man does to woman. Some critics’ attacks that the contamination of literary discourse by political statements points to the poetics of Yeats and Heaney, and those attacks are resulted from the notion of the identification of woman with the land, which are the characteristics of these two poets. To the tradition of romantic love poems Yeats admires the Ireland and its people and transforms them into a sort of mythology. That is to speak that love poems and patriotic poems are blended in Yeats. With this point of view one feels in reading Yeats’s poems the period after the Easter Uprising of 1916, like “Nineteen Hundred and Nineteen” or “Easter 1916” and “September 1913,” a terrible new beauty that changes the old political and moral landscape. He struggles to question the situations caused the bloody violences and sacrifices. With this questioning he mystifies the imagined or ideal community. The essential Yeatsian themes and attitudes sound through the earlier works of Heaney. He draws an analogy between the preserved bodies of human sacrifices in the peatbogs of Denmark and corpses on the streets of contemporary Northern Ireland. And He employs gender stereotypes and myths to describe the violent and depressive situations in Ireland in his poems. Sometimes he uses myths, whether of apocalypse or sacrifice. But he always takes a questioning stance toward the power of mythic signification. In “The Tollund Man” the speaker comprehends the transforming and eternalizing power of myth and he also recognizes that power as a ‘blasphemy’ because it averts his, and the reader’s, eyes away from the specific victims and from the horror of the individual violent act.With this focusing on the individual victims, Heaney gives voice to those victims who can no longer speak, not silencing their individual voices on favour of a single voice and eternalizing their mythic power.

한국어 교육은 교사의 발화에서부터 시작한다고 할 수 있을 만큼 교사 발화는 중요하다. 교사의 발화는 학습자에게 학습 내용을 입력시키고 표현을 이끌어 내는 역할을 한다. 이를 통해 수업의 상호작용이 이루어지는데 교사의 ‘질문하기’가 출발점이라고 할 수 있다. 본 연구는 교사의 ‘질문하기’에 따른 학습자의 ‘응답 하기’의 양상을 분석하여 상호작용 관계를 알아보고자 한다. 이를 위해 한국어 수업 대화를 전사한 자료를 분석하였다. 교사의 질문 유형을 형태, 목적에 따라 분류하고, 학습자의 대답을 형태, 적절성에 따라 사용 양상을 살펴보았다. 그 결과 질문하기 형태는 ‘네/아니오 의문문’, ‘무엇 의문문’ 등 순서였다. 목적은 열린 질문인 ‘참조형 질문’, ‘확인 점검 질문’, 교사가 대답을 알거나 추측 가능한 ‘나열형 질문’ 순서였다. 학습자의 응답 형태는 ‘개인 응답’이 가장 많았으나, 교사의 질문에 침묵하는 경우가 29%로 높았다. 그러나 응답 적절성은 ‘올바른 대답’이 81%로 학습자들이 학습 내용을 이해하고 있었다. 이렇게 한국어 교실에서 이루어지는 교사와 학습자간 대화 분석을 통해 상호작용의 양상을 확인할 수 있었다. 그러나 전사 자료의 한계점과 교사와 학 습자의 상호작용 관련성에 대한 연구는 부족하였다. 앞으로 교사 발화의 유형과 목적에 따른 학습자의 발화 유형, 효과 등에 대한 연구와 분석이 필요할 것으로 보인다.

The study is conducted to analyze the questioning styles in three middle school environmental textbooks in terms of frequency, type, and placement of questions. It is also to analyse and compare the kinds of scientific processes elicited by the questions in the topics of textbook. The instrument was the Textbook Questioning Strategies Assesment Instrument (TQSAI) which was developed the Cooperative Teacher Preparation Program, University of California. The mean number of questions per topic was 4.0 and the ratio of questions to sentences was 3.8%. The numbers of empirical and non-empirical questions were 52.5% and 47.5% for textbook D, 56.6% and 43.4% for textbook J, and 92.7% and 7.3% for textbook K, respectively. The open-hearted question was the highest in all types of questions for three middle school environmental textbooks. The explanatory question was the highest in all characteristics of questions. The types of various questions were distributed throughout textbooks including the green field, debate-discussion, examination, and so on.

The purpose of this study was to examine the questioning styles in middle school environmentology textbook in terms of frequency, type, and placement of questions. It was also to analyse and to compare the kinds of scientific inquiry processes elicited by the questions in the topics of textbooks. The instrument was the Textbook Questing Strategies Assessment Instrument (TQSAI) developed the Cooperative Teacher Preparation Project, University of California. The average number of questions per topic was only 1.09 and the ratio of questions to sentences was 2.5%. Most of questions were in explanatory place(75%). Nearly 90% of experienced questions types were reasoning or application. The frequencies of non-experiential question were higher than those of experiential question. In action, there were much kinds of question-styles.