이 글에서는 신안해저문화재 가운데 자기 고족배(高足杯)에 주목하여 출수 현황과 조형 특징을 정리하고, 중국 내 생산 및 소비 유적 출토품과 비교를 통해 그 성격과 특징을 살펴 보았다. 필자가 지금까지 파악한 바로는 신안선에서 고족배가 60 여점 발견되었는데 이는 전체 도자기 수량의 0.3% 미만을 차지하는 매우 적은 수량이다. 그러나 청자와 백자가 모두 확인되며 특히 일부 백자 고족배의 경우 부량자국이 관할한 우수한 민간 요장에서 생산된 고 급 생산품이기에 일부는 특별한 목적성을 갖고 교역된 기종으로 여겨진다. 즉 일부 고족배는 높은 위상을 가진 고급 무역품으로 당시 중국 민간 요장에서 중앙으로 공납했던 양식과 유사하다는 점에 주목할 필요가 있다. 즉 원나라 관에 공납․유통되었던 것 과 유사한 양식을 갖춘 것이 무역에서 통제 대상이 아니라 오히려 고급 상품성을 가지고 지 역적․계층적으로 폭넓게 유통되었음을 확인한 셈이다. 따라서 신안선에서 발견된 고족배 분석으로 원대 도자무역의 개방된 성격을 확인할 수 있다. 한편 각종 회화와 문헌 자료를 통해 고족배의 용례에 대해 살펴본 결과 중국에서 술잔 혹 은 찻잔, 공양구로로 사용되었음을 확인하였다. 일본에서는 신안선에서 발견된 고족배의 비율을 반영하듯 소비지역에서 출토사례가 많지는 않았다. 그러나 그러한 가운데에도 일부 선 종 사찰에서 고족배가 출토되었다는 점은 소비지 성격을 이해하는데 참고자료로 도움이 된 다. 일본의 용례를 살펴본 결과 술잔, 과일이나 음식 등을 바치는 공양기로 사용되었을 가능 성이 가장 높았으며, 오랫동안 전세되어 내려오면서 그 용도가 바뀌어 다실에서 향로로 사용 되기도 하였다. 또 에도시대 중국 청자 고족배가 재현 대상이 되었던 사례를 확인하여, 일본 일부에서는 중국 고족배를 분명하게 인식하고 있었고 또 소장 대상으로서 애호했음을 알 수 있었다.
In the era of mass leisure, tourism has become an important way for people to relax and pursue pleasure. But at the same time, tourists who leave their habitual residence and than unknown to the tourist destination,will generally have a sense of strangeness, insecurity. With fun and travel, tourism safety also exists in the journey. "Security" is the basic psychology of tourists traveling. Attach importance to the safety of tourism, especially the importance of the outbound tourism safety which is more strange, complex environment and culture,is increasingly important. Outbound tourism safety has many categories, the causes are different. But to strengthen the safety consciousness, forming national tourism safety climate initiative, strengthen prevention and supervision, both parties act calmly, and nip in the bud, these should be the lessons we learn from the disastrous events such as "Oriental Star" shipwreck event of the special major tourism safety. And we also summed up the pros and cons after advice, as a warning for the future.
Tean Mado Shipwreck No. 3 is presumed to have been shipwrecked between 1260 and 1268. It departed from a Southern costal area of Yeosu in Jeonnam Province to Ganghwa Island, its final destination at which the temporal regime of Koryo Dynasty was located. In the shipwreck, a total of 35 wooden tablets were found, and forwarding places, senders, receivers, descriptions, and quantities of freight were written on the wooden tablets. The names of receivers included Kim Jun, who was influential in the late Musin Era of the Koryo Dynasty, and key institutions such as Junmin and Sambyulcho of the Musin force. Twenty wooden tables had lists of food items such as barley, abalone, salted-fermented abalone, mussel, dried mussel, salted fermented mussel, dried shark meat, fish oil, pheasant, and dried dog meat. The food items in the late 13th century were systematically examined using scientifically determined food organic remains and records of wooden tablets among the marine relics of Mado Shipwreck No. 3.
Joseph Mallord William Turner (1775-1851) has been widely regarded as the most original and brilliant English landscape painter in the 19th century. Admitted to the Royal Academy Schools in 1789, Turner was a precocious artist and gained the full membership of the prestigious Royal Academy in 1802 at the age of 27. Already in the 1800s he was recognised as a pioneer in taking a new and revolutionary approach to the art of landscape painting. Among his early works made in this period, The Shipwreck, painted in 1805, epitomizes the sense of sublime Romanticism in terms of its dramatic subject-matter and the masterly display of technical innovations. Of course, the subject of shipwreck has a long standing history. Ever since human beings first began seafaring, they have been fascinated as much as haunted by shipwrecks. For maritime societies, such as England, shipwreck has been the source of endless nightmares, representing a constant threat not only to individual sailors but also to the nation as a whole. Unsurprisingly, therefore, shipwreck is one of the most popular motifs in art and literature, particularly during the 18th and 19th centuries. Yet accounts, images and metaphors of shipwreck have taken diverse forms and served different purposes, varying significantly across time and between authors. As such, Turner’s painting registers a panoply of diverse but interconnected contemporary discourses. First of all, since shipwreck was an everyday occurrence in this period, it is more than likely that Turner’s painting depicted the actual sinking in 1805 of the East India Company’s ship ‘The Earl of Abergavenny’ off the coast of Weymouth. 263 souls were lost and the news of the wreck made headlines in major English newspapers at the time. Turner’s painting may well have been his visual response to this tragedy, eyewitness accounts of which were given in great quantity in every contemporary newspaper. But the painting is not a documentary visual record of the incident as Turner was not present at the site and newspaper reports were not detailed enough for him to pictorially reconstruct the entire scene. Rather, Turner’s painting is indebted to the iconographical tradition of depicting tempest and shipwreck, bearing a strong visual resemblance to some 17th-century Dutch marine paintings with which he was familiar through gallery visits and engravings. Lastly, Turner’s Shipwreck is to be located in the contexts of burgeoning contemporary travel literature, especially shipwreck narratives. The late 18th and early 19th century saw a drastic increase in the publication of shipwreck narratives and Turner’s painting was inspired by the re-publication in 1804 of William Falconer’s enormously successful epic poem of the same title. Thus, in the final analysis, Turner’s painting is a splendid signifier leading the beholder to the heart of Romantic abyss conjoing nightmarish everyday experience, high art, and popular literature.