The train-centric control systems development has some distinct points in that a big size of government budget is in general expended in there and the development duration seems to be long. In addition, the changes are ever made continuously in the capability and operational requirements for Trains. Thus, the impact of the potential changes in the required operational capability on the development activities can induce some type of project risks [7]. As such, proper management of project risk has been one of crucial subjects in the train systems development. All these notes combined together make it the significance of the safety management process be raised further up in the train-centric control systems development. As such, the underlying safety management process should be capable of appropriately handling the potential risks that can be created due to the unexpected changes and the long-term development period. The process should also be complemented for the safety consideration of train-centric control systems, for instance, stop. To study these aspect is the objective of the paper. To do so, a step-by-step approach to analyzing the safety management process is first presented. Then, to enhance the process some necessary and useful activities are added in terms of risk and safety management. Then, to pursue some enhancement on the process, a set of necessary and useful activities are added in terms of risk and safety management. The resultant process is further analyzed and tailored using a design structure matrix method. The resultant process is applied in a train-centric control development as a case study.

The main point of this study is to find out duplicates and differences among various regulations from different organizations. Also, it focuses on creating a reasonably unified regulation system to standardize safety & environment management. In this study, I analyzed the commonalities and the differences of two systems which are typical korean Process Safety Management System and off-site Consequence Analysis. It is confirmed that there are 25 species of overlapped material of those two systems and assessment like handling material information, facilities lists, hazardous substances and list of machine power. Process safety report focuses on onsite workers and facility protect. On the other hand, off-site Consequence Analysis focuses on design, arrangement and management of handling facility from off-site influence. I found difference two system of Enforcement purposes and way. Contradiction of Harmful information of Chemicals Control Act and occupation safety and health acts from same material. To be specific, There are no unit rule of occupation safety and health acts. so it permit inch, psi etc. But Chemicals Control Act provides that m, Mpa units. Therefore, Each regulatory duplication of items for chemicals management, standardization is writing so that you can coordinate overlapping items in the measures the need to be presented.

Plant safety management that is enforcing introducing more than 95% in domestic manufacturing industry is using total plant efficiency by the evaluation index, and as a result, can see a lot of examples that plant productivity, economy and safety is increased. The efficient safety estimation for a business should analyze an accident data by considering every possible and potential factor. This study's purpose centers plant safety management activities that is management system for plant production and safety efficiency's maximization, plant evaluation system that plant safety management activities factor(reliability, maitainability, safety, service quality) that is enforcing in manufacturing industry can develop evaluation model that can evaluate qualitative activities by quantitative activities in process that maximize plant safety management wishes to do design.

Process control and autonomous safety control by applying PSM(Process Safety Management) method using AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) and to development of PSIM(Process Safety Information Management) evaluation method in the construction. The reason why PSIM method should be quantitative and substantial progress is because it contributes Korean constructing companies to enhancing their safety control ability and to taking an equal stance just like developed countries, thereby strengthening their competitive edges.

It is difficult to put it into practice in that it requires bearing too much burden to draw out the planning itself in a case of large construction work. Consequently in this paper we select evaluation criteria by construction progress, classify into several categories, and regard potential danger which often occurs, as a evaluation criterion. Further step is to allow workers or collaborated companies to express their expert opinions or experiences and to encourage quality and process control and autonomous safety control by applying PSM(Process Safety Management) method using AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) and to development of PSIM(Process Safety Information Management) evaluation method in the construction. The reason why PSIM method should be quantitative and substantial progress is because it contributes Korean constructing companies to enhancing their safety control ability and to taking an equal stance just like developed countries, thereby strengthening their competitive edges.

CT 조영검사 예약환자의 원활한 검사 진행과 조영검사로 인한 부작용을 줄일 수 있는 전처치 프로세스 시스템을 개발 및 적용하여 CT 조영검사 예약환자의 검사 만족도를 높이고자 하였다. 2014년 1월부터 201 4년 2월까지 CT 조영검사를 예약하여 추적검사를 시행했던 2,846명의 환자들 중 예약시간에 검사를 시행 하지 못하고 지연된 214명의 환자들을 대상으로 지연사유를 분석한 후 전처치 프로세스 시스템을 구상 및 개발하여 2015년 1월부터 2015년 2월까지 전처치 프로세스 시스템을 이용하여 전처치가 필요한 644명을 대상으로 SMS 전송 시행율, SMS 전송내역, 예약시간 준수율, 예약시간 지연 사유, 예약 시간보다 지연된 시간 등을 분석하였다. 2014년 1~2월 외래 CT 조영검사 예약환자는 2,846명이었고, 그 중 예약시간에 검사 를 시행하지 못한 환자는 214건으로, 약 7.52%의 비중을 차지하고 있었다. 예약시간보다 지연된 세부적인 사례는 creatinine 미확인이 98건(46%), creatinine 1.3 이상이 40건(19%), 과거조영제부작용이 34건(16%), 금 식 등 전처치 미흡이 25건(11%), 메트포민제제 당뇨약 복용이 4건(2%), 기타 이유가 13건(6%)으로 나타났 으며, 평균 지연시간은 creatinine 미확인이 120분, creatinine 1.3이상이 30분, 과거조영제부작용이 40분, 금식 등 전처치 미흡이 120분, 메트포민제제 당뇨약 복용이 30분, 기타 사유가 60분으로 나타났다. 2015년 1월~2 월 전처치 프로세스 시스템을 적용하여 전처치가 필요한 대상자 644명중 SMS 전송시행율은 515건(80%)으 로 나타났으며, SMS 전송내역을 분석한 결과 당일 검사가 283건(44%), 진료과 방문이 185건(29%), 전처치 불필요가 47건(7%), 외래과에서 전처치 프로세스 시스템 미확인으로 SMS 전송이 안 된 건수가 129(20%)건 으로 나타났다. CT 조영검사 예약시간 준수율은 전체 644건 중 560건(87%)이 예약시간 안에 검사를 시행 하였으며, 예약시간보다 지연된 세부적인 사례는 creatinine 미확인이 23건(28%), creatinine 1.3이상이 11건(1 3%), 과거조영제부작용이 7건(8%), 금식 등 전처치 미흡이 30건(36%), 메트포민제제 당뇨약 복용이 6건( 7%), 기타 이유가 7건(8%) 이었다. 예약시간보다 평균 지연된 시간은 creatinine 미확인이 90분, creatinine 1. 3이상이 20분, 과거조영제부작용이 30분, 금식 등 전처치 미흡이 120분, 메트포민제제 당뇨약 복용이 30분, 기타 사유가 60분으로 나타났다. 조영제 부작용의 효율적인 관리적 측면과 CT 조영검사 예약시간에 검사가 원활하게 진행될 수 있도록 전처치 프로세스 시스템을 적용해본 결과 적용 전에 비해 전처치 준비 시간이 줄어들고 CT실, 진료실, 채 혈실, 주사처치실 등의 방문횟수 및 동선이 줄어들어 CT실을 찾는 고객들의 검사만족도와 의료서비스 향 상에 기여가 될 것으로 사료된다.