본 연구는 닭가슴살(5, 15, 25%)과 기계발골 계육(5, 15, 25, 35%)의 첨가 수준을 달리하여 제조한 소 시지의 품질특성을 조사하여 육가공제품의 원료로 적정 첨가 수준을 구명하고자 실시하였다. 닭가슴살을 첨가한 소시지는 수분과 단백질 함량이 증가하였으나, 지방함량이 감소하였다. 기계발골 계육 첨가는 소 시지의 수분과 단백질 함량을 감소시키고, 지방함량을 증가시켰다. 무기물의 경우 닭가슴살 첨가가 소시 지의 인, 나트륨, 구리 함량을 증가시켰으며, 기계발골 계육 첨가는 칼슘, 철 함량을 증가시켰다. 닭가슴 살 또는 기계발골 계육을 첨가한 소시지는 pH를 감소시켰다. 닭가슴살 첨가는 소시지의 명도를 증가시키 고, 적색도와 황색도를 감소시켰으며, 기계발골 계육을 첨가한 소시지는 명도가 감소하고, 적색도와 황색 도가 증가하였다. 조직감에서 닭가슴살 첨가는 경도, 탄력성, 검성, 씹힘성이 증가하였으나, 기계발골 계 육 첨가는 경도, 탄력성, 검성, 씹힘성을 감소시켰다. 관능적 특성에서 기계발골 계육 첨가는 저작감을 감소시켰다. 기계발골 계육 첨가는 육색에는 긍정적인 영향을 미치나, 조직감을 저해시키고 단백질 함량 을 낮추어, 기계발골 계육을 첨가할 경우 5% 이하로 첨가해야 할 것으로 사료된다.

We developed a type of sausage made of chicken breast and liquid egg whites for consumers interested in weight management. To determine the quality of the product, its chemical characteristics, fatty acid composition, free amino acid contents, and nucleotides contents were evaluated during 4 weeks of storage. Sensory evaluation was conducted by both general consumers and body-builders. The sausage was proposed as a fat-free product as fat content was 0.12% based on the Korean Indication Standard of Animal Origin Food. Protein content was 13.42% and calorie value was 61.50 kcal/100 g of the sausage. In sensory evaluation, the mixture of chicken breast and egg whites stuffed into the same casing had an adverse effect on taste, color, texture and overall acceptance while the product that contained egg white stuffed separately into the outer casing enclosing the chicken breast (double layer) improved these attributes. The developed double-layer sausage can last for at least 4 weeks of storage without quality deterioration of flavor-related compounds, such as fatty acids and nucleotides.

The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal mixing conditions for two different amounts of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) powder and olive oil for the processing of chicken sausage. The experiment was designed according to the central composite design of response surface methodology, with ten experimental points, including two replicates for turmeric powder and olive oil. The physicochemical and mechanical analysis of each sample, including water holding capacity, moisture content, lightness, redness, yellowness, hardness, chewiness, gumminess, and cohesiveness, showed significant differences. The results from sensory evaluations also showed very significant differences in color, flavor, tenderness, chewiness, and overall quality. The optimal formulation, calculated by numerical and graphical methods, was 1.89 g of turmeric powder and 9.77 g of olive oil. Under these conditions, the model predicted pH-6.01, salinity-0.20, WHC-94.88, L* value-61.13, b* value-37.45, hardness-36.66×102 (N), springiness-8.70 (mm), chewiness-26.88×103 (N×mm).