This study has been developed to find policy implications and to suggest suitable correctional programs for adult inmates and their families based upon the importance of family ties between those two parties. Keeping good family ties can be a valuable resource for inmates, families and the government. The study has reviewed existing researches on the effects of family factors on prison lives and recidivism rate. It has been suggested that families play an important role in rehabilitating prisoners and re-entry into the community after their release. The empirical studies showed consistently that good family ties during incarceration can contribute inmates' positive prison lives and reduce new offence after prison. After looking at the empirical studies and Korean correctional policy situations, this study recommended the correctional policies and the programs that could maintain stability and improve relations between inmates and their families. The policy directions with two objectives were suggested by this study. The first thing was to establish and activate the tying programs between the inmates and their families. That included increasing contact programs between the two parties, and enhancing familyhood through education. The second thing was the improvement of the economic conditions of the inmates' families and personal supports for the children with imprisoned parents. It concluded that more assistance programs and activities should be provided for inmates and their families to enhance family ties.

리스크 관리 실패는 기업 및 국가 경쟁력 약화 요인으로 작용하고 있으며 현재 선진 각 국에서는 리스크 경영시스템을 구축하고 도입함으로써 시각과 발상의 전환, 그리고 국면타개를 도모하고 있습니다. 이에 본 논문은 선진국에서 현재까지 진행되어 온 리스크 정책 개발 동향을 조사 연구하고, 선진국의 경우 정부적인 차원에서 어떠한 내용의 프로젝트를 수행하고 있는지 조사 연구하여 국내 기업 여건에 맞는 리스크 경영시스템 구축에 중요한 정보를 제공하고, 시스템 구축에 대한 방향을 제시하고자 합니다.

최근 우리 나라에서는 국립공원의 지정 목적을 효과적으로 달성하기 위한 정책들이 등장하고 있다. 가슴반달곰 보호를 위한 등산로 폐쇄, 병원균 확산을 막기 위한 애완동물 출입금지, 화재를 예방하기 위한 화기 반입 금지 등이 그 예이다. 이러한 정책들은 다소간 국립공원 방문객과 지역주민들에게 불편을 야기할 수 있으므로 그로 인한 저항과 반발을 줄이고 정책의 원활한 추진을 위해 대중 참여를 통한 의사결정의 중요성이 커지고 있다. 본 연구에서는 생태계 관리 정책을 수립하는 과정에서 흔히 발생하는 선호와 가치 사이의 갈등 문제를 국립공원을 사례로 설문 조사를 통해 분석하였다. 242명의 대학생이 참여한 본 연구의 결과, 응답자들의 절대다수(93.%)가 생태계 관리 정책을 수립하는 과정에 대중이 참여하는 것이 필요하다고 응답하였으며, 그 이유로는 대중이나 지역주민이 원하는 바를 정책에 적절히 반영할 수 있다는 점을 꼽았다(51 7%). 또한 생물종보존을 위해 개인의 재산권이 제한될 수 있지만. 그에 대한 보상이 이루어져야 한다고 응답하였다. 가슴반달곰에 대한 개인적 선호를 넘어서 절대 다수의 응답자(97.1%)가 반달곰 보호를 위한 등산로 폐쇄 정책을 지지하는 것으로 나타났다. 국립공원 내 식물 채취에 대해서는 과거부터 해 오던 일이라면 주민들의 식물 채취는 허가해야 한다는 의견이 많았다(53.3%). 본 연구의 결과는 국립공원 생태계 관리 정책 수립 과정에서 대중의 참여를 포함시킬 때 개인적 선호를 넘어 집단적 가치의 측면에서 판단하도록 유도하고. 대중에게 충분한 정보와 토론할 기회를 제공하는 것이 중요하다는 선행 연구의 결론을 지지하는 것으로 생각된다.

The Public preservation measure is a Kind of legal sanctions other than criminal punishments, which is to be imposed on a person who should be protected, because of his (her) future risk on the ground of his(her) behaviors open to the public, for the main purpose of giving medical treatment or educating or reinstating. Therefore in the view of a possibility of risk according to the responsibility, generally a criminal punishment has been understood as a treasure of peace preservation. That is to say that a criminal punishment is a retributive justice to a crime based on the responsibility, on the other hand the public preservation measure is a legal sanction for the social protection as well as his(her) correction and education related with social danger. A sharp line between the two legal viewpoints mentioned has been drawn. Accordingly as mentioned above judging from this point of view of distinction between a criminal punishment and the public preservation measure, the responsibility system is to be linked with a criminal punishment, but is not to be linked with the public preservation measure. For all that recently a view that the public preservation measure is able to be imposed even to the matter of responsibility has been on the rise. So the purpose of this study consists in the matter of the theory that the enforcement of preservation measure even to the responsibility is possible or not. In other words, it's a question that whether the responsibility system and the public preservation measure can be linked, if possible, how is it coming along with each other and if not possible, for what reason is it? On such problems a study has been pursued from the point of view of the criminal policy.

This Research suggests improvement of current correctional policy on juvenile delinquents. It argues that recent augmentation of crimes committed by younger juveniles and its aggravation is caused by correctional policy based on punitive execution. For the research, 552 correctional officers from youth detention centers and prison for youth in Kyoung-ggi, Dae-jeon, Cheon-an, and Kim-cheon of 1,550 correctional officers from all the correctional facilities for the youth draw up the self-reports. This illustrates us satisfactions on the facilities and its educational or vocational programs offered. It also shows us how correctional community protects released youth from possible repeated offenses. According to the result of self-reports, more than half of participants were satisfied with current correctional facilities, however many participants point out that correctional facilities must be improved to be more mitigate. Even though there are positive views on the intellectual education, academic education and vocational training offered in the current correctional system, lots of them believe it needs to offer more practical education that youth can fit into the community more successfully after release. In addition, many people take interests in new treatment system such as group home, foster homes, day treatment and alternative school program which are community treatments performed in America and Australia. However, it needs to examine carefully though. For the future, when these variety system operates successfully, we can forecast that they will reduce crimes of juvenile delinquents and contribute to prevention of possible repeated offenses.

We have endured a lot of social and economic loss due to the industrial calamities. A study for the government policies to reduce the loss in the field of industrial safety and health leaves much to be desired. The practical one on the government policies industrial safety and health policies, however, hasn't been accomplished as much expected. The purpose of this study is to suggest a research framework fir the execution process analysis, which is needed to find out the desirable or undesirable elements of industrial safety and health policies. The focus of the analysis lays on a policy problem of the industrial safety and health criteria. And based on this paper, it will proceed to the practical research for the industrial safety and health policies.

산업재해로 인한 개인·사회·국가적 손실이 막대함에도 불구하고, 이러한 산업재해손실을 최소화하기 위한 산업안전보건정책의 결정과 집행과정에 대한 분석·연구는 매우 미흡한 실정이며, 유사한 성격의 사회정책으로서 공정거래제도나 환경분야보다도 훨씬 뒤떨어 져 있다 본 논문은 산업안전보건기준이라는 정책과제를 중심으로 산업안전보건정책의 집행 과정의 성공과 실패요인의 분석에 필요한 연구분석들을 제시하고자 하며, 향후에 이를 바탕으로 실증적인 적용실태연구를 통해 산업안전보건정책방향의 일단을 제시하고자 한다.