본 연구는 20세기초 훼철된 강진객사에 대한 복원적 고찰이다. 강진현의 관아건물이 있었던 치소는 1417년 강진현이 도강군과 탐진현이 합하여 강진현이 되었을 당시에는 탐진현의 옛 치소, 현재의 강진군청 자리였던 것으로 보이며, 1429년 도강군 송계리(현, 성전면 수양리 수암마을)로 치소를 잠시 옮겼다 가 1475년 또다시 현재의 군청 자리로 치소를 옮겼다. 1910년 강진현 객사가 일본헌병대 둔소가 되었다는 기록과, 1914년 1월 강진공립보통학교가 객사로 이전되어 수업했다는 기록이 있고, ‘조선사진엽서’에서 강진우편소(1910년 12월 개설)와 강진경찰서(1919년 3월 신설)가 있는 사진으로 보아 1919 년까지도 강진객사가 존재했다는 것을 알 수 있다. 한편 일본육군참모본부에서 제작한 조선지지략(朝鮮地誌略)』전남도지부 강진현 편에 ‘관아의 문은 ‘금릉아문(金陵衙門)’ 이고 객사는 동북 방향에 ‘금릉관(金陵館)’이 있으며 남면한다는 내용으로 강진객사의 명칭을 확인할 수 있다. 강진객사 금릉관의 규모는 ’조선사진엽서‘를 통해 정청 3칸, 동익헉 7칸, 서익헌 5칸 등 총 15칸으로 추정할 수 있다.

본 연구는 전라남도청의 설치와 관련하여 1911년 전라남도가 조선총독부 정무총감에게 보낸 공문서 중 ‘나주안’에 수록된 원 나주재무서 청사에 대한 사용계획을 분석한 것이다. 연구의 성과는 다음과 같다. 실측도가 수록된 원 나주재무서 청사는 ‘목포안’에 수록된 목포부청 실측도, ‘나주안’에 수록된 금성관 객사 실측도, 조선 총독부 자료 ‘나주군청 정문 양여건’ 등의 치수 분석자료와 발굴조사 자료 분석을 통해 조선후기까지 나주 향청으로 쓰인 건축물이었다는 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 나주 향청이 과거에 나주(금남)금융조합, 농지개량조합으로 사용된 사실은 ‘나주목향청복원기본계획(2019)’에서 밝힌 바 있으나 ‘원 나주 재무서 청사’와 ‘향청’의 관계에 대해 규명하면 1911년 문건을 통해 향청복원의 근거가 명확하게 마련될 것 으로 기대된다.

본 연구는 고흥 구 녹동우편소의 복원을 위해 원형을 고찰한 것으로 성과는 다음과 같다. 1. ‘체신성 우무국 우편선로도’에 의하면 1927년 개소한 녹동우편소는 원래 3등 우편국이었으나 전신, 전화 설비가 추가되 면서 전신 및 전화취급 특정 우편국으로 등급이 상승한 것을 알 수 있었다. 2. 1927년 우편소 개소 당시에는 우편업무만 취급했던 관계로 내부는 사무실과 객장으로 구분되었으나 1930년 이후에는 전신사무 및 전화통화사무를 취급하였으므로 내부의 평면 변화가 있었을 것으로 추정할 수 있었다. 3. 녹동우편소의 초대 소장은 야와타요시이치라는 인물로 원래 고흥경찰서 순사부장이었던 것이 파악되었고, 우편소의 관 사에서 거주하였던 것을 알수 있었다. 4. 2007년 수리공사자료 분석, 현장조사, 일본국회도서관 소장 건축자료공동형록 등을 통해 재료의 원형을 파악할 수 있 었다.

The purpose of this study is to classify three-Kan hipped and gable-roofed Buddhist temples with the construction of their eave curve of part chunyeo and examine the characteristics and causes. The conclusions have been drawn as follows: First, there are largely three ways to secure symmetry in eave curve of part chunyeo. One is to obtain symmetry in eave curve of part chunyeo by making the size of eaves curves on well sides the same and forming symmetric curves in the front section along with the side roof and then forming the straight line in the central part (hereinafter referred to as the long straight line section method). The second is a method to enlarge eaves curves in the front and form eaves curves on the roof section to be symmetric (hereinafter referred to as the front is larger than side eaves curves method). The third is the method to make eaves curves in the roof section to be symmetric by adjusting the roof length and making difference between the front and side roof’s length minimum(hereinafter referred to as the roof length-controlling method). Second, there are 16 cases applying two or more methods, and they are the mainstream. Third, there are 12 cases applying the front is larger than side eaves curve method and roof length-controlling method both, which seems to be the most universal. To sum up, they secured symmetry in roof edges considering the construction of seonjayeon and pyeongyeon according to the size of the structure, recognition on the directions of entrance into the area of the building, forms of planes, harmony with structures around, recognition on roof curves in accordance with the size, and also structural faults in the chunyeo part.

It is difficult to build a hipped and gable roof in slender rectangular type due to restraint in variation of lateral length caused by gongpo arranged on the side, purlin space and the form of gable part and aesthetical effect of chunyeo maru. Against this backdrop and with the assumption that this phenomenon is more apparent in roofs of three-bay-kan Buddhist temples with the hipped and gable roof among national treasure Buddhist temples, this study has aimed to prove that a roof can be built in a less slender rectangular type than that of flat form and to present the building methodology and found the following findings. First, The ratio of lateral to longitudinal length of the roof has been adjusted by protruding the chunyeo and the method of adjusting the ratio of lateral to longitudinal length of the roof is considered to be determined depending on the availability of woods to be used in chunyeo. Second, in order to symmetrically arrange the edge of the roof, which is critical from the perspective of construction morphology, the chunyeo angle has been intentionally adjusted to reduce the gap of length between the front roof and the lateral roof. To sum up, the characteristic of the hipped and gable roof, which is difficult to be built in slender rectangular type, is more clearly shown in the roof and it is identified that the length of the front roof and the lateral roof has been intentionally adjusted to achieve the symmetrical arrangement of roofline of the roof edge.

This study explored the Jeollajwasuyeong Dongheon in the Late Joseon dynasty and its findings are as follows. Buildings in Jeollajwasuyeong were completed since the mid-18th century. They formed areas based on functions and were largely classified into two areas. The buildings within Yeongseong included Gaeksa (guesthouse), Dongheon(government office), Hyangcheong(advisory organ), Jungyeong(military camp), Guncheong (county office), Gongbang(workroom), and Changgo(warehouse). There were also buildings for low-ranking government officials. The central part of Jeollajwasuyeong was the areas of Gaeksa and Dongheon. Gaeksa was iconic area where local governors served King and had 75 Jinnamgwan Guesthouses and 3 inner gates. Those were measured off by separate walls. The Dongheon area was located in the northeast of Gaeksa. There were three gates such as Wanyeongru, Gongsamun, and Jeongbyeonmun at the entry area, which were also divided by walls like Gaeksa. Unjuheon (Dongheon) was at the center of the area where Gyeolseungdang, Mugwonjae, Naea, Chaekbang, and Gongsu were built. Outside the area, Baekwadang(used as Bijangcheong), Jinhyulgo, and Byeonggo were composed of part of the Dongheon area. Most of the buildings in Dongheon seemed to be repaired since 1664. It was difficult to locate the area of previous Dongheon. In particular, Jinnamgwan was first built in 1599 and destroyed by fire in 1716. In 1718, the building was reconstructed and shared historic denominator with Unjuheon before 1858 and reconstructed Unjuheon in 1869. It was found that Unjuheon was reconstructed more than at least three times, which was the central building in Dongheon. The buildings including Gyeolseungdang, Mugwonjae, and Baekwadang in the area were not existed within Jeollajwasuyeong and were reconstructed more than once and maintained until the early 1900s.

Many researches on the typology of 'Maru'(Wooden deck) in Korean traditional houses have mainly focused on the high-class houses in the central region of Korea. They were mainly concerned on defining Maru's typology by social status of the owner, based on the researches regarding its physical and spatial properties. Maru in the high-class traditional houses has been served as an essential architectural feature showing the social status of owners as well as adapting in the region of humid and hot summer. This research investigated the typology of Maru's placement in traditional single houses of four Kan in Chonnam province, which shows many differences in its placement according to the regions. Research results show that the typology of Maru's placement and openness is different with the location of houses within the region. This difference affects on the circulation of movement, which eventually affects on the pattern of space use. The difference is also very likely to be affected by the natural environment of geography and climate of the region.