인삼 뿌리썩음병균(Cylindrocarpon destructans)과 뿌리혹선충(Meloidogyne spp.)은 국내 인삼(panax ginseng C. A. Meyer) 연작장해의 주요인으로, 인삼 생산성 향상을 위해 방제가 필요하다. 본 연구는 새로 개발한 액제 훈증성 토양 소독제를 살포하며 동시에 비닐피복이 가능한 트랙터부착형 토양 소독기를 이용하여 dimethyl disulfide (DMDS)를 처리하였을 때, C. destructans와 뿌리혹선충의 방제효과를 분석하고, 시작기의 성능을 확인하기 위해 수행하였다. 토양 소독기를 이용하여 인삼 재배 포장에 DMDS를 처리한 후 비닐이 피복된 상태에서 5주간 훈증하였다. 토양 소독기의 성능은 약제 살포량 오차 2.5%, 작업능률 0.9h/10a로 40%의 노력절감 효과가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 또한, 처리 전후 C. destructans 의 밀도를 분석한결과 82.5%의 밀도 억제 효과가 있는 것으로 나타났으며, 뿌리혹선충 방제효과는 100%로 나타났다. 따라서, 본 토양 소독기 시작기를 이용하여 능률적으로 DMDS를 처리할 수 있으며, C. destructans와 뿌리혹선충의 방제효과를 볼 수 있는 것으로 판단된다.

It is important for radish to have late flowering characteristics especially in the case of spring and winter cultivars. To understand late flowering characteristics of radish at the molecular level the flowering time genes of two radish lines (NH-JS1 and NH-JS2) with different flowering time were compared by re-sequencing their genomes. There were a total of 872,587 SNPs and 194,637 INDELs between the two lines. The SNP density of each chromosome was relatively uniform throughout, but the region with low SNP density was found at the end of R3 and the middle of R9. To compare the flowering time genes of the two lines, we first looked for the flowering time genes in radish using Arabidopsis thaliana flowering time genes. As a result, homologs of radish were found for most flowering time genes, but FRIGIDA was not found. Among 224 radish flowering time gene-homologs found, 97 genes showed more than one sequence difference (SNP or INDEL) between the two lines, and 127 genes had no difference. In particular, no sequence differences were found in FT, CO, and FLC, core flowering time control genes. Rs350520 (FVE), Rs193800 (CURLY LEAF) and Rs255320 (ATX1) with more than 100 sequence variations were expected to have a significant effect on flowering time difference between the two lines. These results will be of great help in understanding the flowering timing difference between the two lines at the molecular level.

Cho, Hye-Sun. 1998. The Meaning of English Demonstratives: The Extension of the Semantic Feature. Studies in Modern Grammar 14, 285-300. This paper shows that all the functions of English demonstratives that previous linguists have noted, such as denoting the spatial and temporal relationship to the speaker, referring anaphorically and cataphorically in discourse, expressing the speaker`s emotion, and indicating focus or the degree of attention on the referent, can be accounted for as extension of their basic semantic features, `proximal/distal`. The reason why the linguists assign so many different uses to demonstratives is that they take the whole linguistic environment where the demonstratives are used as the meaning of demonstratives. However, this paper suggests that demonstratives do not have separate meanings such as expressing sympathy, solidarity, empathy, sharedness, closeness, etc. This seeming versatility of demonstratives is a result of the extension of the basic spatial meanings of the demonstra the discourse contexts where they are used. That is, the proper demonstrative choice can be established by the result of the interaction of the semantics of these demonstratives and pragmatics.