지금까지(1988∼2000년) 국내 해양안전심판원에서 재결한 선박충돌사고의 원인분류 통계데이터를 살펴보면 전체 2,290건의 인적과실(Human Error) 중에서 상대선박에 대한 경계의무소홀이 929건으로 약 40.6％나 되는 가장 많은 비중을 차지하고 있는 것으로 파악되고 있다. 선박충돌사고는 좌초사고와 더불어 인적과실로 기인한 수많은 인명피해와 재산피해 및 해양환경오염을 유발하는 심각한 해양사고로서 이에 대한 사고원인을 철저히 분석하고 그 예방대책 마련이 무엇보다 중요한 과제가 되고 있다. 따라서, 본 연구에서는 선박충돌사고의 인적과실을 분석하기 위한 목적으로 목포해양안전심판원에서 재결한 선박충돌사고(1990∼2002, 65건)에 대하여 상대선 경계의무소홀이나 동정감시 불충분으로 기인하여 발생한 충돌사고를 조사항목별로 분석하고, GEMS 동적모델을 이용하여 선박충돌사고의 인적과실 유형을 체계적으로 분류하였다.

선박충돌사고는 많은 원인이 서로 복잡하게 상호작용을 하여 발생하고 있으며, 특히 인적요인에 의한 충돌사고가 가장 큰 비중을 차지하고 있다. 이러한 선박충돌사고 원인분석은 선박의 안전 운항상의 측면에서 매우 중요하다고 할 수 있다. 따라서 본 연구의 목적은 시스템 다이내믹스법을 이용하여 선박충돌사고 인적요인 모델을 구축하고, 선박충돌사고를 감소시키기 위한 가장 효과적인 대책을 수립하기 위한 정책요소를 제시하고자 한다. 본 연구의 수행을 위해 FSM법에 의한 충돌사고원인의 구조분석을 인과지도상의 정량적, 정성적, 피드백 루프로 변환하였다. 그리고 시뮬레이션 기간을 20년간(1993-2012)으로 설정하여 표준시뮬레이션모델과 8가지 정책시뮬레이션모델에 대해 시뮬레이션을 수행하였다.

지금까지 IMO를 비롯한 해운산업분야에서는 해상의 인명 재산, 해양환경보호에 항상 큰 관심을 가지고 해양사고예방을 위한 많은 노력들이 견주되어 왔다. 하지만 이러한 노력에도 불구하고 크고 작은 해양사고가 지속적으로 발생하고 있는 것이 오늘날의 현실이다. 한편, 선박충돌사고는 수많은 원인이 서로 복잡하게 상호작용을 하고 있어서 사고예방대책마련에 어려움이 많다 따라서, 선박충돌사고의 정량적인 분석을 위해서는 이들 상호작용요소간의 관계를 시스템적으로 파악하고 분석하는 것이 선행되어야 한다. 본 연구에서는 먼저, 지난 10년(1991-2000)간 국내에서 발생한 선박충돌사고에 대한 위험성을 분석하였고, 또한 사고발생에 가장 큰 영향을 미치는 위해요소(Hazard)인 인적요소(Human Factor)에 대해서 전문가집단의 의견을 수렴하여 FSM기법을 이용하여 인적 위해요소를 계층화한 후 각 요소 상호간의 관련성을 분석하였다. 그 결과로써 인적요소에 의한 선박충돌사고의 발생과정과 각 계층에 속한 요소가 사고에 미치는 영향력을 규명하고, 각 요소간 상호관계를 파악하여 사고예방대책마련을 위한 우선순위를 결정할 수 있는 선박충돌사고의 인적요소 구조그래프를 제시하였다.

해상에서 발생한 선박충돌사고 재결과정에서 당사자들의 진술을 통하여 해도나 플로팅용지에 충돌선박의 항적을 플로팅하는 과정을 삼각자 및 디바이더를 이용한 수작업에 의존함으로써 많은 시간이 소모되고 오류가 발생하는 문제점이 대두된다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 다양한 충돌상황에서도 충돌선박 당사자들의 진술내용을 컴퓨터에 입력하여 초인시부터 충돌에 이르기까지 양선박의 시간대별 거동을 그래픽과 수치 및 텍스트로 제시함으로써 충돌당사자 진술의 진위여부를 판단할 수 있고 해양안전심판의 정확도도 높일 수 있는 충돌사고 분석시뮬레이터를 제안하였으며, 해상선박충돌사고 실례들을 시뮬레이터에 적용하여 그 유효성을 확인하였다.

Generally hull insurance is undertaken by mean of a contract of hull insurance. A contract of hul1 insurance here is a contract whereby the insurer undertakes to indemnify the assured against the loss and damage to the vessel mused by maritime perils. A contract of hull insurance is consists of printed main insurance clauses and a clause includes many sub-clauses. Now the Institute Time Clauses-Hulls (hereunder refer to as "English hull insurance clauses"made by the Institute of London Underwriters is much used as the standard from or basic from by many countries ail over the world Now Korean insurance companies hue not made our their own hull insurance clauses, they have just adopted the made-out English hull insurance clauses and the english law and practice to solve the problem related to marine insurance. On the other hand, the United States of America and Japan have made out their own hull insurance clauses based on English hull insurance clauses and used the clauses for many years. Now American is using American Institute Hull Clauses(hereunder refer to as "American hul1 insurance clauses"as its own clauses which was made out by American Institute of Marine Underwriters in 1977 and Japan is also wing its own clauses named Japanese Hull Standard Clauses(hereunder refer to as "Japanese hull clauses") which was made out by japanese Hull Insurance Association in 1990. Therefore the purpose of this study is not only to make a comparative study on English hull insurance clauses 1995, American hull insurance clauses 1977 and Japanese hull clauses l990, but also to supply on some legal materials necessary for Korea to establish and perform our own hull insurance clauses.

이 연구는 항만교통정보센터의 시스템 확충 및 연안 선박교통관리제도의 도입에는 많은 비용이 소요되기 때문에 비용과 편익을 비교하여 타당성을 조사하고자 한다. 따라서 비용과 편익을 분석하는데 중요한 기초자료가 되는 사고예방효과를 추정하고자 한다. 추정의 방법은 거제해역에서 발생한 해양사고를 분석하여 원인요소를 도출한 후 이를 설문문항으로 구성하여 항만교통정보센터의 운영요원을 대상으로 설문을 실시한다. 연안 선박교통관리제도의 도입에 의한 사고예방효과는 충돌사고에서 55.572%, 좌초사고에서 51.667%로 추정되었다. 또한 인적요소와 환경요소에 의한 효과는 높지만 기술적 요소에 의한 효과는 미미한 것으로 분석되었다.

The collisions at sea among marine casualties are not reduced as the tonnage and speed of ship's increase as well as the traffic quantity increase at sea, in spite of the improvement of nautical equipment, enforcement of crew's education and training as well as improvement of quality standard according to the implementation of ISM code. The measures to prevent the collisions at sea are simple, and are composed of six stage.: The first stage is that the officer on duty detect the target from his eye or radar information. The second stage is determining the type and kind of target-ship. The third stage is target tracking; calculation of target speed, course, CPA and TCPA from radar information or visual check. The fourth stage is determination of vessel in danger after calculation of third stage. The fifth stage is the judgement of situation if own ship is stand-on or give way vessel according to the 1972 COLREG. The last stage is to carry out proper action according to 1972 COLREG, under the circumstances. But by the case, the situations are so different under the different external conditions; for example, natural/navigational conditions, crew's human factors, ship's particular, rule or regulation, management system on board, the condition of watch keeping. Therefore the reasons and casualties are so complicated. This study aims to investigate the collision casualty at sea which needs to clarity all these causal factors of afore-mentioned, and to analyze the causes of problems so as to utilize them to establish the measures of preventing marine accidents. This study, described the concepts of causal factors into three groups; environmental factor, and company/on board management system and navigator's act. Also described how to investigate and analyzes the casual factors. Even though it was described in this paper how to detect the causal factors and reasons of collisions, and how to analyze the inter-relation of each causal factors, it is necessary to do further study how to analyze between the liability of concerned parties and the casual factors involved.

In general, marine casualities take palace by the composite action of three elements such as waterway condition, vessel condition and man condition. One of the important characteristics of most marie casualties for small cargo vessels in maritime transportation of near-coastal and greater-coasting seas in that the same kind of casualities take place repeatedly in spite of the apprent causes, Because, it takes much time and effort for seamen to master waterway, vessel or operatin technique only to the practical and sensible level. In these days, with the development of our economy, our shiypping industry has grown and therefore the demand of marine officers has increased. This economic growth brought about undesirable situation like the evasion of seamen and frequent casualities of Korea vessels. These marine casualities are being caused mainly by the unskilfulness of operating technique as well as the bad waterway condition and ship's installation condition. Therefore, I conclude, in this paper, that the most efficient and economic preventing measures of marine casualities are seeking causes and removing them in advance under the close coperation system among all concerned parties.

For traffic proceeding in random directions on a plane surface the frequency of collision, if no avoiding action in taken ,is approximately proportional to the square of the traffic density and directly proportional to the size and speed of the ship, Avoiding is normally taken and the rte of collisions is therefore also governed by additional factors such as the visibility, the effectiveness of the collisionavoidance rules, the competence of personnel or watchkeeping attitude, the maneuverability of the ship and the efficiency of radar and other equipments. From the viewpoint of watchkeeper who is responsible for maneuvering, watchkeeping attitude such as lookout and action to avoid collision is the most controllable factor among those mentioned above. In practice, according to the investigation of the institution of marine courts, about 50% co collisions occurred is caused by disorbedience to steering and sailing rules of international regulations for preventing collision at sea including lookout. So we classify the process of collisions with first sight of another ship , assessment of risk of collisions and action to avoid collisions and make a factural survey about lookout and action to avoid collisions from the point on "time" and " distance", namely relationship among ship's size, speed, first sight time of another ship, action to avoid collisions ,and distance from sight of another ship to collision occurred. According to the results of the actual survey , we come to conclude that most of collisions occurred are due to improper lookout and ineffective action to avoid collision which means time lag from first sight of another ship to time of action taken to avoid collision is relatively long. is relatively long.