본 연구에서는 존 어리의 새로운 모빌리티 패러다임의 시선으로 박태 원의 소설가 구보씨의 일일(小說家 仇甫氏의 一日)을 연구하였다. 1930년대 경성이라는 도시 내에서 구보씨(仇甫氏)의 산책로를 따라 한 장소에서 또 다른 장소로 이동하면서 각각의 파편적인 장소에 녹아있는 소설가 구보씨의 개인적 기억과 감정뿐만 아니라 한 시대의 애환과 정서 를 다양한 방향으로의 서술을 가지고 살펴보았다. 특히 이러한 새로운 모빌리티 패러다임 중에서 ‘장소’, ‘이동’, ‘만남’을 중심으로 한 장소 안 에서 그리고 장소 간의 이동 중에서 생긴 만남과 감정을 분석하였다. 대 상과 주체가 이동을 통해 끊임없는 순환과 사회적 위치(계급)의 존재, 다 양한 장소에서 다양한 사물, 정치와 경제, 문화와 교통이 서로 복합적인 관계를 형성하고 있다는 것을 문학작품 분석을 통해 알 수 있었다. 지금 까지 사회학의 관점의 하나인 존 어리의 모빌리티의 패러다임으로 문학 작품을 분석•연구하려는 시도는 거의 없었다. 사회학에서 주로 논의되어 온 모빌리티 개념과 특징을 하나의 문학작품과 연계하여 분석한 결과를 바탕으로 향후 더 많은 문학작품을 살펴보기 위해 인문학과 사회학의 융 합적인 새로운 시도는 필요하다.

This study aims to examine how the Gyeongseong Hokuk Shrine established the natural environment in Yongsan during the Japanese colonial period, focusing on the relationship between Japan and Chosen Hokuk Shrines. In the colonies, the establishment of shrines strongly tended to symbolize Imperial Japan and visually represent its ruling logic. The Gyeongseong Hokuk Shrine holds historical significance as a place to commemorate soldiers who died for the Emperor and as a tool of colonial rule, but further discussion is needed on how it was organized within the Yongsan. This study focuses on Hokuk Shrine planning under which the Shrine Bureau of Home Ministry constructed similar shrines across Japan by the Ministry of Home Affairs Ordinance No. 12 of 1939. As a result, this study examines the environment and architectural styles of Hokuk Shrines through examples from Japan and uses this analysis to explore the characteristics of Gyeongseong Hokuk Shrine and its relationship with the Yongsan. The significance of this research lies in highlighting the historical urban significance of Yongsan during the modern period.

This research aims to investigate Park Kilyong’s architectural theory and critique of Gyeongseong (Seoul) buildings, expressed in his ‘Overview of Modern Buildings in Gyeongseong’ and ‘Critique of Gyeongseong Buildings’ (Samcheolli, Sept. and Oct. 1935); and ‘Architectural Form of the 100% Function’ and ‘The Modern and Architecture (1)-(4)’ (Dong-A Daily, 28 Jul. to 1 Aug. 1936). As a result, it is confirmed that Park had the functionalist theory of modern architecture, which suggests that Korean architects of the Japanese colonial period were accommodating the contemporary trend of world architecture. However, Park shows his fundamental limitations in the fact that the main content of his articles was a verbatim translation of two Japanese references (Kurata, 1927; Ishihara, 1929) without proper indications. Despite the limitations, his texts are still meaningful since he formed his own architectural theory on the basis of what he translated; and indeed his critique of Gyeongseong buildings, however simple, was based on the theory. This research makes a critical analysis of Park’s functionalist theory from both the 1930s’ and present points of view and compares his commentaries on Gyeongseong architecture with those by Ko Yu-seop (1932) and Hong Yunsick (1937), illustrating how Korea perceived architecture and modernism in 1930s.