본 연구의 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 1. 무공해식품의 구매동기로는 건강상의 이유(4.43/5점)가 가장 높았으며, 그 다음으로 영양가의 이유(4.01), 맛의 이유(3.39)의 순으로 나타나 무공해식품이 지닌 장점이 곧 소비자의 구매동기로 작용하고 있었다. 2. 첫번째의 무공해식품의 주정보원은 TV 라디오(65.1%)이었으며, 2위는 신문과 잡지(35.4%), 3위는 가족 친구 친지의 조언 상담(26.1%)으로 나타나 매스컴은 주요한 무공해식품의 정보원으로 활용되고 있었다. 3. 무공해식품의 구매시 전반적 고려정도(3.97/5점)가 상당히 높았고, 7가지 고려사항이 모두 높게 나타나 이 7가지 사항이 평가기준으로 활용되고 있었으며, 특히 위생상태와 신선도(4.37/5점), 영양가(4.13), 안전성(3.99)을 상당히 고려하는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 무공해식품의 의견선도자는 매스컴(53.5%)이었으며, 구매시 자녀(50.6%)와 남편(34.3%)을 고려하여 구매하는 경향이었다. 4. 첫번째로 이용하는 구매장소는 슈퍼마켓(67.9%)이었으며 두번째의 장소로는 백화점(42.1%), 세번째로는 시장(35.5%) 및 인근가게(27.0%)로 나타났다. 또한 구매시 전반적 확인정도는 높았으며, 확인사항으로는 유통 보존기한(4.63)과 제조일자(4.59), 포장의 손상여부(4.47)는 반드시 확인하고 구입하는 경향이었으나, 제조회사명(3.83)을 확인하는 경우가 다소 낮았으며, 환경마크 및 품질보증표(3.91)와 식품첨가물(3.96)도 확인하는 경향이 높았다. 5. 구매 후 전반적 불만족도는 그다지 높지는 않았으나, 가격(4.03), 제품함량 부족(3.61), 성분과 제조날짜의 표시 미기재 및 불명확(3.45, 3.23)에 대해서 다소불만족한 것으로 나타났다. 6. 무공해식품의 전반적 고려정도와 확인정도에 영향력을 미치는 가장 큰 변수는 무공해식품에 대한 관심도이었으며 그 다음으로는 주택유형이었다. 또한 전반적 불만족도에 가장 큰 영향 변수로는 소득으로 나타났으며, 그 다음으로도 주택유형으로 나타났다. 즉 무공해식품의 관심도가 많고 아파트에 거주하는 집단에서 무공해식품의 구매시 고려정도와 확인정도가 높으며, 소득이 많고 아파트에 거주하는 집단에서 무공해식품에 대한 전반적 불만족도가 높았다.

The organic foods is the terminology calling the organic products, the organic livestock and the organic processing food. The value of organic food may be evaluated as the index of the nutrient content, the safety and the health promotion. The reason why consumers prefer the organic food in the market is because the value of health promotion to be obtained through its consumption is expected to be bigger than the expense according to the purchase of organic food. This study has the significance in developing the direct evaluation model like the human biomonitoring method. The hypothesis for this study is summarized, “If the metabolome of metabolic syndrome of decreases, the exposure of substance of health harm decreases, the number of hospital care decreases and the quality of life shall be improved if the organic food is incepted in the long term and the health care is managed well”. The consumer’s cooperative and the health consumer's cooperative select the experimental group of 100 persons and the comparative group of 100 persons in 5 areas in the whole country at the same time to verify this hypothesis. Its rate of change is compared and analyzed by measuring the blood and urine of each biomarkers such as the exposed agriculture pesticides, the nitrate in the body at intervals of 2 months for 1 year. Also, by letting participants in the experiment record the major activity such as the dietary intake and the exercise, etc., in the questionnaire and the performance evaluation form, the statistical analysis for the correlation of this with the metabolome, etc., is conducted. The time that is called minimum 1 year and a lot of expense are required to implement this model. Accordingly, the cooperative study by composing the consortium of the interdisciplinary and the interagency is desirable.

Japan launched its regulatory certification system for organic foods based on the amended JAS laws in June 2000, followed by the implementation of regulations on organic agricultural products and organic processed foods in January 2001 and with the implementation of the standards on organic animal husbandry and organic feed by the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry & Fisheries in 2005, organic foods have been under integrated and systematic supervision. Certification of organic foods can be undertaken by registered accredited bodies (private certification bodies) or legal entities conforming to the regulations of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry & Fisheries. However, with the amendment of the JAS laws in March 2006, only legal entities conforming to the regulations of the ISO/IEC GUIDE 65 are eligible as certification bodies. Foreign organic products imported to Japan must be certified organic under JAS regulations and must be manufactured or produced by foreign manufacturers certified by local or foreign registered accredited organizations and distributed with the Organic JAS Mark affixed or through importers certified by local registered accredited organizations and distributed with the Organic JAS Mark affixed on the products. It can be implied from the Japanese case study that it necessary to reform the diverse agricultural products certification systems to set up an integrated certification system, and the restructuring of government organizations, reforms of environmentally-friendly agricultural products certification system and the integration of the organic food certification systems are needed in order to integrate the control of the standards and certification systems.