The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (RCEP) is the world's largest free trade agreement. The RCEP has significant implications for China’s agricultural trade especially in the ASEAN region which is China’s top export market, the second-biggest source of imports for Chinese agricultural products, and largest trading partner in the agricultural sector. To boost trade development, this paper presents a detailed SWOT analysis of China’s agricultural trade with the ASEAN using the RCEP as the research background. Through the RCEP, China’s agricultural products are expected to achieve not only growth in trade scale and trade facilitation, but also stronger economic ties in East Asia. However, the RECP also poses new challenges to China’s agricultural trade structure, core competitiveness, and quality and safety system. Therefore, China should reinforce its brand building, optimize its trade layout, deepen its agricultural transformation, and improve its cooperation to better enjoy the trade dividends brought by RCEP.

The current scale of the import trade of the US with China is significant and has the potential to be more in near future. However, patent-based disputes, especially in terms of Section 337 investigation, have also been increased in recent years. In the context of parallel development of national innovation strategies of China’s “Made in China 2025 Plan” and the American “Advanced Manufacturing Partnership,” along with the latest expanded “Information Technology Agreement” in the WTO trading system, the implications for optimally resolving patent-based disputes in the US import trade with China is highly significant for two countries. These disputes may even impact the world trade, since bilateral trade between China and the US accounts for a considerable proportion. Thus, both China and the US should take precautions and appropriate measures to guard against such potential frictions in order to attain mutually beneficial outcomes in resolving such disputes.

China’s economic success and trade expansion since the 1980s is one of the most important economic achievements, which lifted more populations out of extreme poverty than any other time and place in history. This achievement has been made possible by trade-led development policies successfully adopted by China. China also joined the WTO in 2001, after fifteen years of negotiations with its trade partners, and is subject to WTO legal disciplines requiring the transparency of its trade-related decisions and procedures. This article examines China’s economic reform, which led to its accession into the WTO, and reviews China’s trade and development policies under the WTO. In addition, this article discusses China’s participation in the WTO Dispute Settlement Procedure. There has been a concern as to whether China will be compliant with the requirements under the Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU). The article shows that China has become an active participant and has maintained well under the terms of the DSU.

본 연구는 양방향 방송프로그램 포맷 개발과 제작을 통해 산업 종사자 및 관련자 인터뷰와 문헌 검토를 통해서 고찰하였다. 양방향 방송프로그램 포맷은 전통적인 방송프로그램이 지니고 있는 제작기획 또는 프로그램 기획에서 글로벌 표준화(Global Standard)된 구성방식을 포함한 제작매뉴얼 또는 제작바이블과 이에 따른 제작가이드를 뜻하는 용어로서, 양방향 방송프로그램 포맷의 제작과정을 담고 있는 내용 및 형식상의 독창적인 요소들을 기록한 것을 뜻한다. 양방향 방송프로그램 포맷거래에서는 방송부문과 방송 외 부문 거래로 마케팅과 홍보, 기술 지원 등을 포함하고 있는 제작매뉴얼 및 바이블, 현지 담당 프로듀서(Producer) 또는 컨설턴트의 파견 포맷 상품화 옵션에 따라 거래되는 내용에 차이가 있다. 글로벌 포맷거래를 살펴보면, 대부분 글로벌 제작사들의 방송프로그램 포맷이 거래의 대부분을 차지하고 있다. 따라서 단순히 전통적인 방송프로그램 포맷거래가 되기보다는 국내 IT인프라를 활용한 새로운 기술과 매체들의 융합을 통해 확장된 양방향 방송프로그램 포맷거래에 있어서 우위를 차지하고, 글로벌 경쟁력을 확보할 수 있어야 한다. 양방향 방송프로그램 포맷 거래가 활성화되기 위해서는 방송과 통신의 융합 포맷으로 확장과 다양한 포맷거래가 가능한 포맷 상품화가 필요하다. 또한 이와 관련된 양방향 방송프로그램 포맷의 창작과 아이디어 개발을 위한 법적, 제도적인 개선이 필요한 상황이다. 국내 방송과 통신사업자들의 글로벌 경쟁과 새로운 비즈니스 기회요소 및 정부의 실질적인 지원정책에 유용한 도움이 되고자 하였다. 본 연구에서 제안들은 향후 양방향 방송프로그램 포맷거래 산업에 있어서 방송과 통신사업자들 뿐만 아니라 양방향 정책을 지원하는 정부의 정책적 대안에 실질적인 방안들을 제안하고자 하였다.

한국의 현행 대외무역법은 1986년 제정된 이래 29차례의 개정을 거치면서 무역의 확대와 국제수지의 균형에 기여하였다. 반면 1994년 제정된 이래 중국의 대외무역법은 WTO가입 이후 2004년 한 차례의 개정만을 거쳤으며 현재 변화하는 국제무역환경에 대응하기 위해 개정논의가 진행중에 있다. 한중 양국의 역사적, 사회적 배경이 다르기 때문에 양국의 대외무역법 체계는 구성요소와 특징 면에서 차이가 있다. 이러한 양국 대외무역법의 역사적 발전과정에 대한 이해는 중국의 현행 대외무역법에 대한 이해를 제고시킬 뿐만 아니라 향후 개정방향에도 시사점을 제공할 수 있을 것이다. 본 연구에서는 한국과 중국의 대외무역법의 역사적 발전과정을 살펴본 후, 양국 대외무역법의 발전배경, 행정관리체계, 무역촉진 및 무역제한, 수출입질서, 무역업 자유화 등을 비교분석하고 있다.

최근 정부와 기업에서는 종이서류 없는 무역환경 자동화를 통해 글로벌 경쟁력 강화에 중요하게 인식하고 있으며, 이에 전자무역 시스템 개발 프로젝트는 증가하고 있다. 정보시스템 프로젝트의 위험관리 연구는 지난 20년 넘게 수행되어 왔으며, 이에 전형적인 위험 요인 목록을 도출한 연구 결과가 문헌을 통해 많이 제시되었다. 본 연구에서는 이러한 정보시스 템 프로젝트의 위험요인 문헌 연구를 통해 전자무역 시스템 개발 프로젝트 환경에 맞는 위험요인 목록을 도출한다. 정보시스템 개발의 범위를 전자무역 시스템으로 한정하여 프로젝트 위험요인을 연구한 것에 의미를 갖는 본 연구는, 향후 발생할 전자무역 시스템 개발 프로젝트 실패를 줄이고 성공 가능성을 높임으로써 프로젝트 수행을 성공으로 이끄는 데 도움이 되고자 한다.

본고는 송대 무역 발달을 가져온 요인을 규명하는 과정에서 항해술, 조선술의 발전과 해양환경, 시박사, 실크로드, 향료무역에 관한 연구를 한 것이다. 해양환경을 이해하기 위해 해상활동에 대한 경험과 기술의 필수적 요소에 선행하는 것을 사례를 통해 제시하였으며, 남송의 풍부한 경제력과 대외개방정책은 무역관리기구를 통해 체계적으로 관리되었음을 입증하였고, 그 기저에는 남송의 해상무역이 커다란 영향을 미치고 있다. 향료무역의은 동서교류의 연질고리인 동시에 서세동점(西勢東漸)의 원인을 제공했으며 향료수입이 세입의 1/20에서 1/10까지 차지하는 형국에 이르렀다. 이를 통해서 송대 국가 재정상에서 얼마나 영향이 컸는지 알 수 있다.

Analyzing and comparing the digital trade rules of free trade zones such as the European Union (EU) and North America is significant for the localization of China’s digital trade rule system. In this paper, the significance of digital trade rules is demonstrated by analyzing and comparing the characteristics of digital trade rules in each regional agreement. Through analysis of the digital trade rules of each region, it is proposed that the construction of digital trade rules in China needs to be based on promoting the development of digital economy, strengthening the protection of digital security and improving data crossborder circulation rules.

With the evolution of industrial structure and industrialization in developing countries, some trade has become intra-industry between developing and developed countries. The level of intra-industry trade between China and South Korea has also become an essential indicator of the country’s economic development and industrialization. Since the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and South Korea in 1992, bilateral trade between China and South Korea has steadily developed, and the “Belt and Road” initiative proposed by China in 2013 and the official signing of the China-South Korea Free Trade Agreement (FTA) in 2015 have provided a good platform for the development of trade between China and South Korea. In 2017 South Korea proposed in 2017, South Korea proposed the “New North Policy”, and China and South Korea agreed to dovetail the “Belt and Road” and the “New North Policy” to achieve a superior development of China-Korea trade. However, there are still problems, such as trade imbalance and a need for a two-way flow of investment between the two sides. This paper examines the existing problems in developing China-Korea import and export trade through developing China-Korea intra-industry trade in the new era. It suggests accelerating the sustainable development of China-Korea trade from the perspectives of strengthening trade communication between the two sides and accelerating Chinese enterprises’ investment in Korea.

With the change of industrial structure and the advancement of industrialization process in developing countries, product trade has become an important industrial trade between developing countries and developed countries. The level of trade has also become an important indicator to measure a country’s economic development and industrialization level. The development of international trade in the new era has also entered a new stage. Trade is an important part of a country’s economic development, especially the trade of cultural products under the background of modern society. With the official signing of the China-South Korea Free Trade Agreement on June 1, 2015, China and South Korea officially completed the system design of the construction of the China-South Korea free trade area and will soon enter the implementation stage. In order to better realize the great goal of “China and South Korea linkage the world, opening up and creating prosperity”, it was very necessary to explore the development trend of cultural product trade. The following part of this paper mainly focuses on the development of cultural product trade between China and South Korea in the new era.

In the process of China’s modernization of social and economic development, China has gradually expanded the scope of foreign trade, especially the deepening of economic and trade cooperation with South Korea, and the steady growth of bilateral trade and investment. However, during this period, it will be affected by internal and external factors, leading to the increasing trade deficit between China and South Korea. The frequent occurrence of trade friction has caused a serious impact on the economic and trade development of China and South Korea. Therefore, in the actual work, it is necessary to respond flexibly to the challenges, meet the opportunities and adopt scientific countermeasures according to the development status of Sino-South Korea economic and trade cooperation, so as to promote the continuous progress of the two countries’ economic and trade.

RCEP, through its unique rules of origin accumulation, promotes mutual tariff concessions between Korea and China, reduces trade production costs, and will further promote the negotiation of the Korea-China FTA. Focusing on the post-epidemic era, South Korea and China should strengthen the consensus on economic and trade cooperation and use the higher standard and more comprehensive RCEP agreement to achieve a mutually beneficial and win-win situation. The industrial supply chain between South Korea and South Korea is the result of the spontaneous formation of the market, mutual benefit and win-win results. Third-party markets such as the Far East can better cooperate to provide impetus for the economic development of the two countries and the recovery of the world economy.

Integrated circuits are the cornerstone of the development of information and communication technology industries in various countries, and to a large extent affect the development of the future technological industry revolution, and are known as “industrial food”. With the transfer of the global integrated circuit industry chain, emerging economies in East Asia represented by China and South Korea occupy a core position in the global integrated circuit trade. In recent years, although the scale of China’s integrated circuit trade has expanded rapidly, it has been in an unbalanced state for a long time, and the trade deficit is extremely high. The domestic demand for high-end integrated circuits can only be met by imports. The development of my country’s integrated circuit trade is large but not strong. Thanks to the financial support and preferential policies of the Korean government, in the 1980s, Korean integrated circuit companies took the lead in breaking through the international technology of memory integrated circuits. After that, the Korean government developed other integrated circuit products on this basis. Export of foreign exchange earning products. In order to measure the gap between China’s IC trade international competitiveness and South Korea more accurately. Next, a literature study is conducted on the comparative analysis of the development status of integrated circuit trade between China and South Korea. It was found that the development of South Korea’s integrated circuit industry was later than that of China, but the latter came ahead.

Since the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and South Korea for decades, the trade relations between the two countries have been developing towards a positive trend. Especially in recent years, for South Korea, China has become its largest trading partner, largest source of imports, and largest export destination. In contrast, for China, South Korea has also become an extremely important trading partner of China on a global scale. It can be seen that the development of China-South Korea economic and trade cooperation is an indispensable key force in the foreign trade of China and South Korea. In view of this, this article focuses on China-Korea economic and trade cooperation, discusses the development practice of China-Korea economic and trade cooperation, analyzes the opportunities and challenges in detail based on the current situation, and puts forward some countermeasures for reference only.

본고는 RCEP(《역내포괄적경제동반협정이다》)의 개황과 주요 내용을 소개하였다. 이어서 중국, 아세안, 일본, 호주의 새로운 등 국가의 인구, 무역 데이터 등 정보에 근거하여 현재 국내 국제 풍운이 변화하는 형세와 쌍순환의 새로운 발전 구조에서 RCEP협정이 중국 국제 무역 경제 발전에 미친 영향을 분석했다. 본고는 다섯 가지 측면의 영향을 정리했다. 첫째, 중국의 개방 정도가 더욱 향상될 것이다. 둘째, 새로운 발전 구조에 대해 강력한 지지를 형성했다. 셋째, 중국 자유무역지대 네트워크의'금 함유량'을 향상시킨다. 넷째, 국민의 물질적 생활과 정신적 생활 수준을 향상시킨다. 다섯째, 기업에 더 많은 발전 기회를 가져온다.

In recent years, with the development of economic globalization and the promotion of modern media technology, cultural enterprises such as publishing, entertainment and new media have sprung up like mushrooms after a rain and made significant contributions to economic growth, which not only increased China's financial revenue, but also promoted product export and improved its international image. Although the digital cultural trade of Chinese enterprises started relatively late, it has already formed a certain scale and has a good development prospect in the international development and cooperative operation. Since the signing of the cooperation agreement between China and South Korea in June 2015, it has largely promoted the development of enterprises’ digital cultural trade. By comparing the digital development of cultural trade between Chinese and Korean enterprises, this paper points out the current problems faced by Chinese enterprises in the internationalization development, and gives practical suggestions.

The establishment of China-South Korea Free trade area has a positive role in promoting bilateral trade. By analyzing the current situation of China-South Korea trade, the features of China-South Korea Free trade agreement and using intra-industry trade index and other indicators, this article intuitively shows the impact of trade. According to the analysis of the trade effect on China and South Korea, it is concluded that the intra-industry trade keeps improving, the trade deficit of both sides keeps shrinking, and the regional creation effect is obvious, as well as relevant suggestions for enterprises to increase preferential efforts to ensure the activity of the Free trade area and improve the standardization of it.