목적: 본 연구는 발달장애인을 위한 가상현실(Virtual Reality, VR) 기반 사회성 중재 프로그램에 대해 알아보기 위하여 체계적으로 문헌을 고찰하고 중재 효과를 비교하였다. 연구방법: 2012년 3월부터 2022년 3월까지 10년간 게재된 연구를 대상으로 하였다. 문헌검색을 위한 데이터베 이스로는 PubMed, CINAHL, SCIENCE ON, ERIC을 사용하였고 Google Scholar에서 논문을 추가로 수기 검색하였다. 주요 검색용어는 국내의 경우 “발달장애” OR “자폐스펙트럼장애” OR “지적장애” OR “아스퍼거” AND “가상현실” OR “증강현실” AND “사회성”을 사용하였고, 국외의 경우 “Developmental disability” OR “Autism spectrum disorder” OR “Intellectual disability” OR “Asperger’s” AND “Virtual reality” OR “Augmented reality” OR “Social”을 사용하였다. 검색된 문헌은 PICO (Patients, Intervention, Control, Outcome) 양식에 따라 체계적으로 분석하였다. 결과: VR 기반 사회성 훈련 프로그램은 주로 자폐스펙트럼 및 아스퍼거 장애 그룹에 적용되고 있었다. 적용 대상의 연령은 아동기에서 성인기까지 다양하였고, 아동과 청소년의 경우 또래 관계 및 학교생활 적응이 주된 훈련 목표였고 성인기는 면접 및 직장생활 기술이 주된 훈련 목적이었다. VR 기반 사회성 중재 프로그램은 발달장애인의 감정인식, 의사소통 기술, 직업기술 향상에 도움이 되는 것으로 나타났다. 결론: VR 기반의 사회성 중재 프로그램은 가상현실 내 다양한 치료 맥락을 설정할 수 있고 체계적으로 치료 조건을 조절할 수 있는 임상적 장점이 있다. 향후 다양한 진단 군의 특성을 반영한 VR 기반 사회성 훈련 프로그램이 연구되기를 기대한다.
The purpose of this study was to identify the moderating effects of internet shopping experience on appearance management in elder people, psychological adaptation and social connectedness. Data were collected from 257 elder people who living in Seoul or Gyeonggi-do. Collected data were analyzed by frequency, descriptive statistic analysis, moderated stepwise regression. The results of the study were as follows: First, appearance management of elder people was significantly related to psychological adaptation and social connectedness. Second, internet shopping experience moderated between appearance management and social connectedness. Third, internet shopping experience is not a moderator variable on between appearance management and psychological adaptation, it just was a influential factor on psychological adaptation. Based on these results, it suggests that there are strong needs of approaching of practical and political interventions to development internet shopping system for social connectedness and psychological adaptation of the elderly in future aging society.
The inauguration of the collective Reality and Utterance (Hyŏnsil kwa Parŏn) in 1979 and 1980 marked a watershed moment in Korean art. This is not only be-cause the collective gave birth to the politically-engaged art movement that would come to be labeled “Minjung Art” by the middle of the 80s, but also because it enthusiastically embraced a wide range of images from the urban culture. With a special focus on the members’ early work, my research explores an issue largely neglected in the dominant narrative of Minjung art as a form of activism against the authoritarian Korean government during the 80s. The issue is what was at stake in Reality and Utterance’s exploration of contemporary urban visual culture. The aim of this essay is to recognize the engagement with the urban visual culture as central to the group’s early project and to consider it at some distance from the anti-urban and anti-mass culture perspective which was endorsed by the Minjung narrative. Focusing on members’ turn to urban visual culture, this essay instead argues that this turn was by no means merely a means to making art as social cri-tique, but more importantly, it was an experiment with the shared image world, as opposed to the rarefid visual vocabularies of abstract modernism. Visual produc-tions such as advertisements, billboards, posters, and kitsch paintings, which come from outside the narrow confins of fin art, were definitly ominous signs of the colonization of everyday life in the capitalist city, but at the same time they were an-ticipated to be a catalyst for redefiningKorean art in a more communicative, acces-sible, and democratized way. In this regard, in the early 1980s—in particular 1980 and 1982—the members’ gesture oscillated between critique and embrace, which allowed the group to occupy a unique domain in the realm of Korean art production.
This research aims to demonstrate the sociocultural significance of architectural journals produced in the 1970s during which a fundamental reconsideration of architectural discipline has been made. To this end, we established a method of analysis adapted to the characteristics of architectural journals of that period. In this formulation, the relative autonomy of architectural journal with regard to various actors and institutions involved in its production emerged as a major criterion for the analysis of a journal. From this methodological reflection, we analyzed two French architectural journals, AMC published between 1973 and 1981 and l’Architecture d'Aujourd'hui between 1974 and 1977, which were produced both in close relation with parisian architectural schools (UPA) in the context of reestablishment of architectural education and beginning of architectural research in France after the events of May 1968. If these journals reflected and strengthened the architectural reality and especially the social network of their protagonists, it is equally important to note that they have transformed it into cultural network, and this by the mechanism proper to their preparation and their textual organization.
증강현실(AR) 게임 유행과 함께, 게임 유저들이 게임 중 지역 사회에 각종 피해를 발생키고, 이에 대해 게임 회사 책임을 묻는 새로운 유형의 민사 분쟁이 발생하고 있다. 이 같은 분쟁은게임을 하지 않는 제3자들에게도 피해를 끼친 점에서 기존 게임 상 분쟁과 다르다. 본 글은 해외 분쟁 사례들을 살펴보고, 무단침입, 생활방해, 부당이득과 같은 피해 유형, 관련 국내외법과판례들을 분석한다. 정리 결과, AR 게임 피해 사실만으로는 게임 회사에 법적 규제나 손해배상을 가하기 힘들다. 사전적 규제는 헌법상 과잉금지 원칙 위반 여부, 사후적 규제는 기존 법상의방해 유형, 게임과 피해 사이 인과 관계, 피해의 구체성과 지속성 등을 검토해 결정해야 한다.