This study aims to validate the feasibility of using LiDAR reflectivity data to quantitatively estimate the retroreflectivity of road lane markings. The goal is to establish the optimal scanning conditions considering the channel position, angle of incidence, and vehicle speed for an accurate and consistent retroreflectivity assessment in mobile environments. Fifteen standard lane marking samples with known retroreflectivity values were scanned using an OS1-128 LiDAR sensor under controlled field conditions. A two-phase experiment was conducted: (1) a speed-based test to assess the influence of vehicle velocity (20-80 km/h) on LiDAR reflectivity measurements, and (2) a channel–angle–distance test using a static testbed to analyze the relationship between retroreflectivity, LiDAR channel position (that is, the angle of incidence), and measurement distance. Ground truth retroreflectivity values were obtained using a high-precision handheld retroreflectometer. Reflectivity measurements showed a strong correlation with standard retroreflectivity values, particularly at scanning angle between 100-115° and distances of 4.9-5.6 m. The coefficient of determination (R2) exceeded 0.97 across optimal conditions. Speedrelated tests confirmed that the LiDAR-based reflectivity remained stable with a minimal RMSE (< 5), even under high-speed driving scenarios. LiDAR sensors provided reliable and contactless estimates of pavement marking retroreflectivity when the channel angle and scanning distance were appropriately selected. The findings demonstrated that channel-specific calibration and incidence angle correction significantly improved the measurement accuracy. This suggests a practical path forward for automated large-scale retroreflectivity monitoring in road asset management systems.

The results of the measurements using an optical surface roughness meter are shown according to the angle changes of 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, and 3°. Through the experiment, it can be seen that the measurement value is 3.140 at 0°, 3.148 at 0.5°, 3.140 at 1°, 3.151 at 1.5°, 5.078 at 2°, and 4.790 at 3° setting. In addition, the test statistic (P) value is 0.000, which is smaller than the significance level of 0.005, so it was confirmed through the experiment that a measurement error occurs according to the angle change when measuring the surface roughness.

In this study, using a 100mm gauge block in a contact-type three-dimensional measuring machine surface plate, an NPL-type angle measurement, and a steel ruler, the specimen was measured at 0°, 5°, 10°, 20°, 30°, and 40° along the X and Y axes. After setting the measurement conditions, the average value and standard deviation were confirmed by repeating measurements for each yield 10 times. After checking the statistical test value (P) through ANOVA, the correlation between the angle change and the error was checked.

This study proposes a low-cycle fatigue life derived from measurement points on pipe elbows, which are components that are vulnerable to seismic load in the interface piping systems of nuclear power plants that use seismic isolation systems. In order to quantitatively define limit states regarding leakage, i.e., actual failure caused by low-cycle fatigue, in-plane cyclic loading tests were performed using a sine wave of constant amplitude. The test specimens consisted of SCH40 6-inch carbon steel pipe elbows and straight pipes, and an image processing method was used to measure the nonlinear behavior of the test specimens. The leakage lines caused by low-cycle fatigue and the low-cycle fatigue curves were compared and analyzed using the relationship between the relative deformation angles, which were measured based on each of the measurement points on the straight pipe, and the moment, which was measured at the center of the pipe elbow. Damage indices based on the combination of ductility and dissipation energy at each measurement point were used to quantitatively express the time at which leakage occurs due to through-wall cracking in the pipe elbow.

This study aimed to compare chin deviation in angle measurement on posteroanterior(PA) cephalogram and computed tomography (CT). Chin deviation was assessed as menton(Me) deviation in angle measurement on PA cephalogram and CT images of 35 patients who had orthognathic surgery (19 male and 16 female with average age of 22.1±3.33yr). The difference between the Me deviation was calculated and statistical analysis was performed to compare the deviation direction and asymmetry severity on the two imaging modalities. There was statistically significant difference in the difference of Me deviation between PA cephalogram and CT by one-simple t-test (p<.05). The mean difference of Me deviation was 2.21°± 1.84°. The maximum difference of Me deviation was 8.64°. There were statistical agreements in the deviation direction (k =0.82, p<.05) and in the severity of facial asymmetry (k =0.37, p<.05). The difference of the deviation direction was detected in 2 patients (5.71 %). The difference of the severity of facial asymmetry was in 15 patients (42.86%). The chin deviation in angle measurement might be different between PA cephalogram and CT in some patients.

The purpose of this study was to assess the intra-rater test-retest reliability of tibial external rotation angle measurement using a smartphone-based photographic goniometer, DrGoniometer (DrG) compared to a three-dimensional motion analysis system (Vicon). The current study showed an interchangeable method using DrG to measure the tibial external rotation angle in standing knee flexion at . Twelve healthy subjects participated in this study. A rest session was conducted 30 minutes later for within-day reliability and five days later for between-day intra-rater test-retest reliability. To assess the validity of the measurement using DrG, we used a three dimensional motion analysis system as a gold standard to measure the angle of tibial external rotation. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and the standard error of measurement (SEM) values were used to determine the within- and between- day intra-rater test-retest reliability of using DrG and a three dimensional motion analysis system. To assess validity, Pearson correlation coefficients were used for two measurement techniques. The measurement for tibial external rotation had high intra-rater test-retest reliability of within-day (ICC=.88) and between-day (ICC=.83) reliability using DrG and of within-day (ICC=.93) and between-day (ICC=.77) reliability using a three-dimentional motion analysis system. Tibial external rotation angle measurement using DrG was highly correlated with those of the three-dimensional motion analysis system (r=.86). These results represented that the tibial external rotation angle measurement using DrG showed acceptable reliability and validity compared with the use of three-dimensional motion analysis system.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability and validity of goniometer measurements of the hallux valgus angle (HVA) compared to radiographic measurements, which are the current standard. Twenty subjects (10 female, 10 male) were recruited for this study (40 feet). The HVA of the subjects was measured using goniometer and radiographic measurement. In three trials, measurements were taken of each subject by two examiners using goniometer and radiographic measurements using radiography in a standing position. The reliability of the measurements was investigated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC(3,1)), and the validity was tested using the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient and an independent t-test. The intra-rater reliability of left and right HVAs were poor (ICC=.409 and .341, respectively). The inter-rater reliability of left and right HVAs were poor and moderate (ICC=.303 and .501, respectively). Left and right HVAs measured using goniometer and radiographic measurements were also poor and moderate (Pearson r=.246 and .544, respectively). These results suggest that goniometer measurements of the HVA are inaccurate and have unacceptable validity compared to radiographic measurements.

Testing device was newly designed and built to measure the dynamic contact angle. The measurement was made using microscope interfaced with computerized image analysis system while the dynamic condition being controled using Instron. As specimens for the experiment, two different types of fibers, i.e., hydrophilic and hydrophobic, were prepared. In case of hydrophilic fiber, the increase of twist level gave the increase of contact angle. However, in hydrophobic yarn the increase of twist level gave the decrease of contact angle. When saline was used as a telling liquid, the increase of the concentration gave the increase of contact angle. The results rationalized clearly on the basis of known concepts could be used in designing fabric structure for the improvement of comport performance.

To evaluate the prestressing loss of tendon caused by deflection angle, test is conducted with the variables of a deflection angle and a diameter of deviator head. Results show that the prestressing loss increases when the delfection angle increases but the diameter of deviator head gives no significant influence on the prestressing loss.