목적 : 본 연구는 보건대학원생을 대상으로 연구윤리에 대한 인지도, 자기효능감을 통해 지식수준을 파악하고 자 하였다. 방법 : 서술적 설문조사 설계를 사용하였다. 국내 보건대학원에서 총204명의 참여자를 모집하였다. 데이터 수 집 도구는 미국 National Science Foundation과 Association of Graduate School에서 제안된 Responsible Conduct of Research(RCR) 교육 핵심 영역을 기반으로 개발되었다. 참여자들은 연구윤리에 관한 질문으로 구성 된 자가보고식 설문지를 작성하였다. 데이터는 PASW Statistics 18 Window 프로그램을 활용하여 기술 통계로 분석하였다. 결과 : 대상자(평균 연령=30세)는 석사(77.5%)과 박사(22.5%) 과정 학생으로 구성되었다. 대상자의 25.5%만 연구윤리 관련 과목을 수강한 경험이 있었고, 26.5%는 연구책임자로서 연구를 수행한 경험이 있었다. 연구윤리에 대한 인지 수준(5점 만점에 평균 2.90점)과 윤리적 연구수행을 위한 자기효능감 수준(5점 만점에 평균 3.14점)은 보통 수준이었다. 가장 인지도가 낮은 분야는 ‘지적재산권 및 특허 보호’였으며, 그 다음은 ‘부당한 논문저자 표시’ 였고, 가장 지식이 부족한 분야는 ‘연구논문 작성’이었다. 연구윤리에 대한 인지도, 자기효능감, 지식 간에는 통계 적으로 유의미한 상관관계가 있는 것으로 나타났다(all p<0.050). 결론 : 본 연구에서는 학생들이 윤리적으로 건전한 연구를 수행할 수 있도록 보건대학원생을 위한 연구윤리 지 식 교육 프로그램이 필요하다고 사료된다.

This study aimed to explore research trends of nursing ethics in Korea applying text network analysis and topic modelling. 306 articles published in KCI journals from 1998 to 2021 were identified and 516 author-provided keywords were collected. A co-occurrence matrix with 123 keywords, which appeared at least in two articles, were developed based on the Jaccard coefficient. Degree centrality and betweenness centrality were calculated and LDA topic modelling were performed using NetMiner software. The largest number of the articles (70, 23%) were published in Korean Journal of Medical Ethics. The most critical core-keywords, defined as the top 30 keywords in degree centrality and betweenness centrality, were ‘nursing students’ and ‘moral sensitivity’. The other core-keywords included ‘attitude,’ ‘awareness,’ ‘professionalism,’ ‘knowledge,’ and ‘critical thinking.’ related to ethical competence, ‘death,’ ‘hospice,’ ‘euthanasia,’ and ‘research ethics’ related to bioethical issues, and ‘job satisfaction,’ ‘burn out,’ ‘stress,’ ‘organizational culture,’ ‘ethical leadership,’ and ‘ethical climate’ related to organization and leadership. Five topics were identified and named as a) bioethics education for nursing students, b) knowledge and attitudes for bioethical issues, c) awareness and values of bioethics, d) ethical conflicts of RNs, and e) nursing ethics education. This study found that bioethics was the main topics in Korean nursing ethics research and suggested nursing research should focus on ethical issues RNs frequently experience in patient care. Also, research gaps were inferred in multiple topics including nurse-to-nurse relationships, theoretical perspectives of virtue ethics and care ethics, or witnessing healthcare professionals’ unethical behavior.

Purpose: This study was aimed to examine the background of the emergence of qualitative research and the purpose pursued by qualitative research. Based on this, it was to derive ethical principles and considerations that the researcher should reflect and practice in the process of conducting qualitative research. Methods: A review article was constructed by collecting and analyzing extensive literature related to the research ethics topics. Results: In a human subject research, both positivistic and qualitative researchers should most sensitively consider the protection of the research subjects, especially those in vulnerable situations. Ethical principles for human subject research can be suggested as follows. The first is to respect and protect the subject's autonomy, which is linked to the principle of informed consent and subject protection. Second, the researcher should conduct research according to the best interests of the study participants. This is linked to the selection of research topics and the reciprocity of the research results. Third, it is necessary to maintain an open attitude to the study participants. To this end, it is also linked to the researcher's open and sympathetic attitude to respect the emotions and experiences of the study participants, and to treat them truthfully without hiding or deceived during the data collection process. Conclusion: The core purpose of qualitative research is to restore humanity. Qualitative research needs to go deeper into the lives of others. Researchers who are conducting qualitative research must reflect on ethics and consider ethical guidelines.

목적 : 본 연구는 2013년 3월 현재 작업치료학 석사나 박사 과정 중이거나 수료한 자, 작업치료학과 교수를 대상으로 연구윤리에 대한 인식도를 알아보고자 하였다. 연구방법 : 본 연구는 연구윤리와 관련하여 선행된 Seong 등(2011)의 연구에서 사용한 설문지의 문항을 수정 보완하여 사용하였다. 설문의 내용은 크게 대상자들의 일반적 특성, 연구윤리에 대한 일반 항목과 연구자 의식으로 구성하였다. 설문은 직접 대면하거나 이메일을 통해 배부하여 수거하였고 최종 배부된 150부의 설문 중 총 85부가 회수되어 56.0%의 회수율을 보였다. 연구 대상자의 일반적 특성, 연구윤리 교육 수강여부, 연구자 의식은 빈도와 백분율, 카이제곱 점정을 이용 하였고 인식 수준(상, 중, 하)에 따른 연구자의 윤리의식 정도는 교차분석을 실시하였다. 결과 : 연구자들은 실험대상자의 정보공개에는 높은 일치도를 보였으나 자기논문 표절, 중복게재, 데이터 관리 등에서 문항간의 낮은 일치도를 보였다. 연구자들의 연구윤리에 대한 인식도는 98.2%로 높았으나 연구윤리에 대한 교육 경험은 44.7%에 불과하였다. 또한 연구윤리에 대해 자세히 알수록 연구윤리를 바라보는 시각이 엄격하다는 결과를 보였다.결론 : 연구자들은 연구윤리에 대한 인식도가 높을수록 엄격한 판단 기준을 갖고 있는 것으로 나타나 연구윤리교육의 필요성을 확인할 수 있었고 작업치료학 분야의 연구윤리 교육에 대한 기초적인 자료로 사용될 수 있을 것이다.

목 적: 본 연구는 한국의 안경광학 전공 대학원에서 연구윤리 교육의 현황과 필요도를 파악하고 적절한 교 육 형식을 도출하기 위하여 실시되었다. 방 법 : 국내의 안경광학 전공 대학원 재학생 31명을 대상으로 설문 조사를 실시하여 응답을 통계적으로 분석하였다. 결 과 : 한국의 안경광학 전공 대학원생들의 연구윤리에 대한 인식도는 높지 않으나, 연구윤리 교육에 대 한 필요성은 인정하고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 연구윤리 교육을 경험한 응답자들이 교육의 필요성과 유용성을 더 높이 평가하고 있는 것으로 파악되었다. 결 론 : 한국의 안경광학 전공 대학원에서 연구윤리에 대한 교육의 필요성은 매우 높으며, 정규 교과목이 나 비공식 특강의 형식을 통하여 필수적으로 실시되는 것이 바람직하다.

As an important carrier of cultural output, film and television can clearly show a country's ideology and regional characteristics. Over the years, south Korean films have been playing an increasingly important role in the world film and television due to their unique cultural background and ideological connotation.Inspired by culture and relying on film as a form of cultural communication, it has exerted a significant influence in the world. Based on the Confucian culture in the application of the south Korean film and television, the research systematically analyzes the theme and core values of Korean film works, and interprets the successful experience of Korean film works under the influence of Confucian culture. The author summarizes the problems in the expression of the core values of society in Chinese films and comes up with straegies to promote the development and dissemination of the film and television industry and the core values of society.

The public and the corporate itself are increasingly paying attention to the ethical problems because of the notorious conducts in corporate management, such as bribery, financial report fraud, dishonesty and trade secrets theft. The non ethical behavior doing harm to social conducts and hurting the relations between the corporate and the stakeholders has direct influences on the corporate image and long-term corporate profitability. Thus under the pressure of the public and self-sustaining development, the corporate ethic is brought into sharp focus. The corporate ethical capability refers to the overall ethical level shown by the corporate in the activities of management and marketing. The capability covers not only all the resources and mechanism but also the unique behavior both in the internal environment and external environment. In a sense, the corporate ethical capability is the highest level of the core competence. Therefore, to make rational criteria for the corporate ethical evaluation system and to build fair evaluation system are put forward as an important part. This article will probe into rational alternatives for the corporate ethical evaluation system under Chinese current situation in the perspective of the internal and external environment.

Purpose – The purpose of this research is to suggest researchers to know the standards of research ethics violation and eliminate the researchers’ anxiety for the possible cases in violation of research ethics through the notification on the web site with online paper submission system for over the last year. We have made an effort and achieved the most exemplary and leading position in the academic journals, however, not satisfied with this, we will endeavor to strengthen it. Research design, data and methodology – Plagiarism and overlapping publications are the most serious problems in research ethics. Therefore, it is necessary to verify the submitted articles making use of paper similarity test programs such as copy killer, KCI test, etc. Editorial board and reviewers should present clear evidences and notify contributors on research ethics violation after close review the contributors’ article content. Results – This research focused on the submitted articles which were verified as research ethics violation, and categorized them into 7 cases. Conclusions – With analyzing the verified 7 cases from KODISA journals, this research will examine closely the verification system and regulations in the current academic research ethics. Afterwards, this research will seek for solution to the problems and make an effort to get improvement for them.