생태복원은 생태계의 건강성과 지속성에 있어 생물다양성의 손실을 막을 수 있는 좋은 수단으로 인식되어 있으나 식물종 선정에 관한 환경, 생리·생태요인, 복원목표 설정 등 종합이고 객관적인 기준점이 없어 실행에 옮기는데 애로사 항이 있다. 이에 전문가 그룹의 의견을 종합하는 델파이 기법을 활용하여 생태복원용 식물종을 선정하는데 필요한 평가지표를 개발하였다. 생태복원 등의 전문가를 대상으로 2회에 걸쳐 38부의 설문조사를 시행하여, 복원 대상지를 내륙과 도서 지역으로 나눠 평가지표의 중요도와 우선순위를 분석했다. 중요도 분석 결과, ‘자생식물’이라는 평가지표 가 내륙과 도서 지역에서 모두 평균 4.9로 가장 높았다. 다음 ‘종자확보’, ‘증식’, 활착률’ 순으로 높았다. 내륙의 지표 우선순위는 ‘자생식물’, ‘출현빈도’, ‘활착율’, ‘분포범위’, ‘종자확보’로 도서 지역은 ‘자생식물’, ‘활착율’, ‘출현빈도’, ‘분포범위’, ‘내성’ 순으로 나타났다. 중요도와 우선순위 분석을 수행한 결과 ‘내륙의 중요도 평균값은 4.1, 우선순위 2.9로 도서지역은 중요도 평균값은 4.2, 우선순위 2.9로 기준을 설정하였다. 생태복원용 식물종 선정의 중요도와 우선순 위는 ‘자생식물’이 중요도와 우선순위가 가장 높은 것으로 나타났다. 다음은 ‘종자확보’, ‘활착율’, ‘지형’, ‘증식’, ‘내 성’, ‘토양조건’, ‘생육특성’, ‘천이초기’, ‘분포범위’, ‘출현빈도’, ‘발아율’이 중요도와 우선순위가 낮은 하위 그룹으로 분류되었다. 가장 낮은 지표는 ‘천이 최종단계’, ‘천이장기’, ‘천이중기’, ‘뿌리’, ‘번식’, ‘토양’, ‘성상’, ‘기술’, ‘경관’, ‘기후’, ‘발아율’로 구분되었다. 이에, 생태복원용 식물종 선정을 위해 객관적 검증을 통한 생태복원용 자생식물 종 선정을 위한 평가지표로 복원사업에 활용되기를 기대한다.

제주의 대중 수출은 2018년 기준 2,283만 달러로 연평균 38%씩 증가하고 있는 실정이나. 수출액은 타 지자체에 비해 미미한 수준이다. 본 연구에서는 대중 수출을 위한 제주 상품의 경쟁력 분석을 위해 제주산 주요 수출 품목군 선정과 함께 우선 순위를 도출하고자 하였다. 이는 향후 제주의 대중 수출에 대해 행정적인 측면에서 도 선택과 집중을 통해 수출을 활성화하기 위함이다. 본 연구에서는 무역특화지수와 시장비교우위지수를 활용하여 제주의 대중 수출 경쟁력을 분석하였으며, 제주의 수출 성장에 대한 주요 품목별 대중 수출 기여도를 산출하였다. 또한 상기 분석된 무역특화지수와 시장비교우위지수, 수출 기여도를 통해 Z-SCORE 가중치를 적용하여 제주지역의 대중 수출 우선순위 품목을 선정하였다. 연구결과 기초화장품(330499) 제1위, 소주 등 증류주(220890) 제2위, 기타혼합주스(200990) 제3위, 감귤류과실(200830) 제4위, 기타녹차(미발효)(090220) 제5위, 기타조제식품류(210690) 제6위, 기타어종-갈 치(030389) 제7위, 기타당류제품(170490) 제8위로 나타났다.

Logistic enterprises want to be competitive enterprises in fierce logistic market and worry about the securement of discriminative competitiveness for it. The standards for the judgement of logistic industry’s maintenance of competitiveness are not only economic feasibility of logistic costs but also the satisfaction of users because well-established service system for variety and enhancement of logistic needs. Some of the quality attributes sufficiently satisfy expectation of customers, but not guarantee high-quality satisfaction. Therefore, it’s difficult to grasp quality attributes with the existing approach of perceived service quality. Quality attribute model suggested by Kano is widely used as the concept is accurate, there is high possibility to be used at the stage of product/service planning, and it can be easily applied. Kano model has a limitation that quality attributes are classified with mode and the differences between strong property of the quality attribute and week property in quality attributes were ignored. Therefore, Timko calculated customer satisfaction coefficient with the result of Kano’s survey and effects of customer satisfaction and unsatisfaction through relations between satisfaction coefficient and unsatisfaction coefficient. The purposes of this study are to use ASC, the average of satisfaction coefficient and unsatisfaction, as the satisfaction of quality characteristics, decide the importance of quality characteristics with TOPSIS, a representative multi-standard decision-making method, and calculate strategy improvement propriety of logistic service quality.

This research determined priority of quality improvement of public institution's education service by using ASC for importance and applying Topsis, a multi-standard decision-making method simplifying various attributes and scales of evaluation items and deciding the comparative priority for satisfaction and discussed the differences so as to measure the quality of public institution's educational service and examine the priority of education service' quality improvement. This research classified the characteristics of quality improvement. As a result, it's significant to suggest positive direction and method to improve satisfaction and education service's quality from an angle of demander by analyzing educational satisfaction of education service quality of public education institution and effects on the following improvement.

The purpose of this study is to provide the data for sewage policy by selection of demending section and priority for interceptor renovation in Daejeon Metropolitian City. The order of priority for interceptor renovation in this city is Daejean-cheon, Youdeng-cheon, Gab-cheon, Youseong-cheon and Jinjam-cheon. Length of demanding section for renovation is 5.6 km for Daejean-cheon, 11.9 km for Youdeng-cheon, 13.8 km for Gab-cheon, 10.4 km for Youseong-cheon, and 3.9 km for Jinjam-cheon, respectively. The total length for interceptor renovation is 45.6 km. Assuming 30% as partial repair and 70% total repair on trenchless replacement, total renovation cost is calculated 98.2 billion won, 3.5 billion won for Daejeon-cheon, 1.2 billion won for Jinjam-cheon, 49.7 billion won for Gab-cheon, 4.3 billion won for Youseong-cheon, and 39.5 billion won for Youdeng-cheon.

There have been growing concerns among people about food safety due to insufficient information on foodborne pathogens. In this study, we developed a risk priority of 15 foodborne pathogens. For the priority determination we collected risk profile criteria information from CODEX Alimentarius Commission and developed countries. The basis for criteria we selected from information of surveillance were frequency and severity of disease, frequency of consumption and probability of cross-contamination. We also considered foodborne pathogens which have been managed in developed countries though those pathogens are not currently managed appropriately in Korea. Priorities were divided into three groups following these consideration. The first priority group includes Norovirus, pathogenic E. coli, Salmonella spp, Clostridium botulinum and Listeria monocytogenes. The second priority group includes Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Stapylococcus aureus, Campylobacter jejuni and Bacillus cereus, and the third priority group includes Clostridium perfringens, Yersinia enterocolitica, Shigella spp, Cronobacter sakazakii and Hepatitis A virus. Our results could be applied to prevent foodborne illness from fresh produce.

In this study, non-point pollution sources in the Yeongsan river basin are analyzed; then, the priority regions (areas divided on a small scale) of management are selected for efficient water management of the Seungcheon and Jooksan reservoirs, which were constructed as one of the 4 major rivers restoration projects. The priority regions are decided by using the criteria of the excessive rate of target water quality, non-point pollution load per unit area, total TP load and down flow distance. The results of this study are as follows. The upper 10% of the priority regions for non-point pollution management includes YB15, YB05, YB10, YB24, YB14 and YB11 for the Seungcheon reservoir watershed, and YC24, YC25, YC30, YC34, YC22 and YC17 for the Jooksan reservoir watershed. However, a few regions in each of the Seungcheon and Jooksan reservoirs need to be selected in higher order, and the non-point pollution removal facilities in the regions need to be installed with respect to budget, urgent matter, and so on.