說文解字卷七下 ｢疒｣부에 나타난 질병과 관련 있는 글자는 모두 103개 글자로 다수가 질병과 유관한 글자로 “고대 중국인의 질병 발생의 근본 원인과 질병관, 질병의 종류와 증상, 질병의 쾌유”에 대하여 기술하고 있다. 본 연구는 說文解字｢疒｣부에서 22개의 글자를 통해 ‘고대 중국인의 질병 발생의 원인’을 6가지로 나누어서 기술하였다. 첫째, 氣의 과다로 인한 질병. 둘째, 외상으로 인한 질병. 셋째, 악물 오용으로 인한 질병. 넷째, 역병으로 인한 질병. 다섯째, 과로로 인한 질병. 여섯째로 선천적인 장애로 인한 질병으로 說文解字의 ｢疒｣부의 글자들을 통해 고대 중국인의 질병 발생의 원인을 살펴보았다. 그 외 說文解字에서 기술된 뜻을 좀 더 명확하게 서술하고자 출토문자들과 대조해 보고, 방증으로 중국 고대 자서와 의 학에 관한 문헌을 참고하여 “고대 중국인의 질병 발생의 원인”을 탐구하며 전개하였다.

This paper probes the elements of theoretical necessity, starting with the word ruo (若) in Duan Yucai’s Shuo Wen Jie Zi Zhu (段玉裁《說文解字註》). From the prospective of theoretical methods of “Ruo (若) ,” the theoretical necessity of “Ruo (若) ,” the exegesis functions of “Ruo (若) ” and different intonations with different modal particles, the author conducted multi-level and multi-dimensional analysis on “Ruo (若) ” in Duan Yucai’s Shuo Wen Jie Zi Zhu (段玉裁《說文解 字註》) so as to explore the concepts of theoretical necessity from Duan Yucai.

Punishment is an important method for the ruling class to discipline criminals and alert people. According to historical records, a systematic punishment system was already existent during the Xia Dynasty. The “Ancient Five Punishments” recorded in Book of Documents occupies an important position in ancient Chinese punishments. Because they were all corporal punishment and the execution methods were extremely cruel so they were abolished in the Han Dynasty. The execution process of corporal punishment depends on the use of various knives. Therefore, punishment in ancient China is closely related to the “knife”. Shuo Wen Jie Zi contains a large number of Chinese characters related to punishment, and they are closely related to the “Ancient Five Punishments”. “刵（Er）”, as an ear-cutting penalty, can be traced back to the Zhou Dynasty or even earlier, and has similar meaning with the words “聝(Guo)” and “取（Q u）”. “㓷（Yi）” and “劓(Yi)” are variants of each other, and they were widely used as a penalty for cutting the nose only before the Han Dynasty. “刖(Yue)” means the punishment of cutting the legs, which has same meaning with the words “剕(Fei)” and “跀(Yue)”, but it was different from the word of “膑(Bin)” though they have similar meaning. The three characters “ (Xing)”, “刭(Jing)” and “刎(Wen)” can be explained by each other, and they all refer to the punishment of beheading. “罚(Fa)” means punishment for minor crimes. This word and the word of “刑(Xing)” meaning the punishment for serious crimes constitute the phrase of “刑罚(Xingfa)” in Chinese.

『說文解字』 ‘足’部에는 85개의 한자와 4개의 重文이 수록되어 있다. 본고에서는 ‘足’部 한자 중 重文을 제외한 85자를 살펴보고자 하며, 문자학적 관점과 의미학적 관점, 그리고 현재까지 상용되는 ‘足부 한자 등 세 부분으로 나누어 연구를 진행하고자 한다. 문자학적 접근에서는 造字 방법에 따라 관련 한자를 육서의 개념으로 분류해보고, 한자 訓釋에서의 특징, 字義 해 석과정에서의 특징으로 나누어보며, 의미학적 접근에서는 ‘足’부 한자를 크게 명사와 동사로 쓰이는 경우로 나누어 분류해 본다. 현대한자에 대한 접근에 있어서는 현대한자에서의 통용 여부, 이체자로 분류된 자형과 간체자로 사용되고 있는 한자 및 의미의 변화에 대해 알아보고자 한다. 이러한 연구를 통해 ‘足’부 한자들의 자형과 의미의 특징들을 살펴보는 것을 주요 내용으로 한다.

Despite numerous errors already revealed in Shuo Wen Jie Zi by Xu Shen in Eastern Han dynasty, it is still considered to be an important literature in Chinese character studies. This study utilizes tools, such as mathematical functions, set and logic, to look into Shuo Wen Jie Zi from a new perspective. Through this approach, one can get a macro-scale tendency or trend. At the same time, one can pin-point numerous micro-scale errors. This study firstly defines functions that constitute the framework, and then processes the entire data set within Shuo Wen Jie Zi, addressing the topics associated with it.

The purpose of the study was to the Cognitive Interpretation of “the “White” System Words in Shuo Wen Jie Zi” Terms. The results revealed Based on Conceptual Blending Theory, the paper concluded: “the “White” System Words in Shuo Wen Jie Zi” Terms, is looking for more this word, and then by metaphor, metonymy activate the synthesis of new cognitive meaning empty, meaning the formation of a new color. Such a series of “hidden word refers specifically to look for” a lot of the later “refers to identifying the dominant word” generation preparations were made on semantics (a) Colors and nominal objects usually have a fusion form in ancient times and a batch of phraseologies take place in mediaeval times consisting of color terms plus original word with color acceptation having spillage over the original word due to the latter’s wearing away and expansion for accurate expression or because of word shapes, rhetoric and perceptions. The study findings may serve as a guide for further research on Chinese color terms system and culture of Chinese.

This paper studies the mountain place name characters of the "Shuo wen jie zi", including eleven ancient Chinese characters: "Nao(峱), Yi(嶧), Yu(嵎), Yi(嶷), Min( ), Ji( ), Jie(巀), Xue(嶭), Hua(華), Guo(崞), Yang(崵)". Those characters are all from the same radical of the "San"—mean about mountain on "Shuo wen jie zi", and neighbor in the "San" radical. Mountain place name characters in "Shuo wen jie zi", the character structure all added a radical "San", making it become a synthetic character. However, ancient Chinese geographical literature, the mountain place name not necessarily have the radical "San". Therefore, this paper will focus on the mountain place name characters of the "Shuo wen jie zi", research on structural principle related and the use cases on ancient literatures.

The Assisted evidence of Shuo Wen Jie Zi（《說文解字翼徵》）was written by Piao Xuan Shou who is a famous scholar in Joseon Dynasty. This is South Korea's only remaining book that The author was first use of Chinese bronze inscriptions, Seal characters and drum-stone inscriptions to research Shuo Wen（《說文》）. By this way, The author want to correct the mistake of Shuo Wen. So it is stand for that the philology researching reached new heights. However, there are still quite a few defects and shortcomings in the book, like follow blindly view of Xu Shen and wrong to knew Chinese bronze inscriptions. For the Chinese scholars, this book have some effects like “Stones from other hills may serve to polish the jade of this one”. As an example with 12 characters from Bronze inscriptions of Yu Tripod （《大盂鼎銘文》） that it had quoted in this book, and the current Academic research Can be checked with the view of correction Shuo Wen. So that this book can be evaluated and inherited.

허신의 『설문해자』는 중국 언어학사에 있어서, 자형을 분석하고, 자의를 밝히고, 자음을 표 명한 최초의 자전이다. 지금까지 학자들에게 가장 영향력이 있는 고전 중의 하나이다. 그러한 이유 중에는 부수법의 창안이라는 업적이 자리하고 있다. 현재 우리가 사용하는 자형분류법 에 의한 ‘214부수법’은 허신의 자의분류법에 의한 부수법과 구분된다. 자형의 변화와 검자의 편리성 도모라는 현실적인 원인이 있다. 그와 함께 부수 본연의 의미에서 벗어난 모순도 함 께 지니고 있다. ‘214부수법’의 모순을 극복하고 보다 합리적이고 과학적인 대안을 마련하기 위해 부수 본연의 목적에 충실했던 허신의 ‘540부수법’에서 사라진 부수들의 귀속를 추적, 분 석하고자 한다. 허신의 540부수 가운데 『신화자전』을 기준으로 소실된 부수자의 수는 333개 이다. 궁극적인 목적을 달성하기 위한 연구의 첫걸음으로 본고에서는 귀속자를 가지지 못한 36개의 부수(‘문일부수’)를 연구대상으로 삼고 그 변화와 귀속을 분석하고, 그 속에서 대안을 위한 원칙을 세워나가고자 한다.

歷年以來，學者皆首推段玉裁《說文解字注》為闡釋許慎《說文解字》的文字工具書。然而，段《注》亦不免有不少漏錯之處。近年來，徐《箋》中的一些說法受到學界的認同和徵引，徐《箋》逐漸得到學術界的接受和肯定。徐《箋》雖為段《注》作箋，但徐氏不像一般的注釋家，把自己的工作局限在解釋原文方面，盲目跟從和維護段《注》對《說文》的解釋。徐《箋》的撰寫目的在於表識段說，在段《注》含混之處加以說明，簡略之處加以補充，有時更會另提己見，其識見甚或比段《注》更精確。本文試從「馬」、「䠶」、「臣」三字為討論中心，闡釋比段《注》精準之處。

一、《說文解字》的析字方法不是“六書” 1、“六書”是古代小學漢字教學的幾個實用知識點，本身不是學術系統或學術理論。 2、“六書”在《說文解字》的多個層面上有所體現，但跟形體結構分析沒有總體對應關係。  二、《說文解字》的析字方法是“構件分析法” 1、《說文解字》作為一部學術著作，以形體結構分析為中心，有自己貫徹始終的一套析字方法，就是“構件分析法”。 2、構件分析法包括“構件功能分析”“構件同形分析”“構件變異分析”三種情況。 3、《說文解字》沒有歸納漢字的結構類型。王寧教授建立漢字構形學，按照構件的功能組合歸納出漢字結構的基本類型，揭示了許慎“構件分析”的思想。  三、許慎析字方法在漢字教學中的應用 1、無論是古代漢字還是現代漢字，無論是繁體漢字還是簡化漢字，都可以運用“構件分析法”進行分析。 2、基礎教育階段，分析漢字重在功能理據的認知和形體異同的辨識，不必糾纏分類和歸類。類型系統屬於學術層面。 3、運用“構件分析法”需要注意的幾個問題：（1）扣緊字形，據形分析；（2）突出功能，據詞分析；（3）符合邏輯，客觀分析；（4）關照系統，聯類分析；（5）注意發展，歷時分析。