해상교통안전진단제도가 해사안전법(구. 해상교통안전법)에 명시(2009. 5. 27)되어 제도적 기반을 구축한 이후 개선을 위한 지속적인 노력은 계속되어 왔으나 아직까지 제도의 고도화를 위한 종합적이고 체계적인 검토가 이루어지지 못하고 있는 실정이다. 이에, 본 연구는 메타평가에 관한 이론을 토대로 설계된 해상교통안전진단제도의 메타평가 분석틀, 즉 'PIP'OU 메타평가 모형'을 적용, 진단활동 전반에 대한 메타평가를 실시하여 현황 및 문제점을 분석하고 개선방안을 제시하였다. 그 결과, 진단 관련자들은 진단활동 자체가 제도의 목적에 부합하고 있으나 운영 측면은 미흡하여 '진단계획' 영역을 중심으로 개선이 필요하고 특히, 관련 이해당사자간 시각차를 최소화 할 수 있는 방안을 함께 고려하여야 하는 것으로 분석되었다. 본 연구는 제도 개선사항의 시급성을 정량화하여 우선순위를 제안함으로써 향후 관련 정책의 체계적인 개선에 활용될 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

In the year of 2012, 259 criminal cases decided by the Korean Supreme Court(KSC) are registered on the internet homepage of the Court. 4 cases of which are decided by the Grand Panel. In this paper, 20 cases of the 259 cases are reviewed which, I think, are comparatively imporant. 7 cases are conceruing the general provisions of Korean Criminal Law. The other 13 cases are concering the pariticular provisions of Korean Cirminal Law. All the reviews are constituted of 1. The Fact of the Case, 2. The Summary of Decision and 3. The Critical Note.

The scientific evidence has become more important in judicial conflict. Aside from its authenticity, scientific evidence combining with tendency in perception of people affect establishment of the fact greatly when it is adopted as evidence. Therefore, which channel is used to have the court recognize science evidence has emerged as an important issue, especially in the U.S. where jury trials have taken place in stead of judge trials. The U.S. Supreme Court has provided a variety of legal grounds on this issue and is developing the grounds. In this commentary, the progress of discussion in the U.S. regarding adoption of scientific evidence is reviewed in detail.Korea is about to introduce full-fledged criminal trial by jury, so how to adopt expert testimony including scientific evidence to confirm the fact of judicial conflicts will have more grave importance. In this regard, discussion over the role of a justice as a gate keeper, suggested in the Supreme Court’s decision on Daubert case, will take shape.The court has tried to evaluate scientific evidence through precedents on individual evidence including a polygraph. The subject decision is very significant because it went further to suggest common standard for validity of scientific evidence by referring to the reliability standard suggested in the U.S. Supreme Court’s rulings. However, suggesting the generality without legal basis like the U.S. Federal rules on evidence has a room for criticism such as ‘creating the law’ by court’s decisions. To resolve such concerns, admissibility of evidence and reliability should be divided and standards appropriate for Korea’s criminal procedure system where strict evidence reliability is needed. Then, based on those efforts, interpretation on court rulings should be developed. The discussion between the academia and the field is urgently necessary. Also, judgement on scientific evidence requires collaboration between the science and the judicial society. Therefore, various efforts for communication and institutional improvements shown in the commentary must be developed and there should be improvements regarding the system of seeking an expert opinion.

In the domain of hearsay evidence, “special guarantees of trustworthiness” now occupy a position as a weight requirement by the revision of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 2007, and the Supreme Court through the judgment of the recent in order to recognize the admissibility of evidence was required to determine the more stringent requirements of special guarantees of trustworthiness. Despite a major certification requirements for admissibility of hearsay evidence, special guarantees of trustworthiness have not been discussed much in the field of the law of evidence so far, but it was going to appear as important themes because of the Supreme Court and the Code of Criminal Procedure of these amendments, and you should have a lively discussion of this special guarantees of trustworthiness. The court has taken the position that should be judged individually according to case specific about the presence or absence of special guarantees of trustworthiness, but it has applied inconsistent criteria or misunderstand the meaning of special guarantees of trustworthiness case-by-case so far.I think that the presence or absence of special guarantees of trustworthiness is necessary to be distinguished clearly with a matter of probative value, and that it is necessary to be judged by the course of statement or the external situation of statement than the credibility of the statement or circle the contents of the original statement as much as possible for avoiding confusion with the problem of determining probative value. And special guarantees of trustworthiness should be distinguished also voluntariness of the statements, and it must be considerated whether the statement was originally carried out in the presence of law enforcement agencies or not, in addition to whether the statement was done to attend the court or not.

The defendant consulted an attorney-at-law regarding legal issues which might constitute crimes before commencement of an investigation. The defendant received legal opinion from the counsel by e-mail, which was later seized and presented as evidence of guilt by investigative authority.The court of original instance rejected to accept written legal opinion from the counsel as evidence on the ground of Attorney-Client Privilege. The Supreme Court, however, deemed Attorney-Client Privilege is not rooted in our legal system.I concur with the opinion of the Supreme Court in that we have yet to find traditional or provisional basis for Attorney-Client Privilege. It is premature to acknowledge the concept of Attorney-Client Privilege without in-depth probe. Instead, the majority opinion of the Supreme Court looked to Articles 314 and 149 of the Criminal Procedure Act. Article 314 provides one of the exceptions to hearsay rule, which allows the written statement to be admitted as evidence of guilt without cross-examination against the person who wrote the statement, in case that the person is not available due to illness, unknown whereabouts, etc. as well as that the statement is proved to have been written under especially reliable circumstances. Article 149 confers the right to refuse to testify on the legal counsel regarding professional secrets he obtained in the course of business. The majority opinion of the Supreme Court ruled that Article 314 shall not apply in case that the legal counsel exercises his right to refuse to testify under Article 149. The majority opinion based its rationale on the fact that Article 314 had been revised with a tendency to reinforce oral hearing and direct examination by narrowing the scope of the exceptions to hearsay rule, as well as on the purpose Article 149 seeks to achieve. On the contrary, the dissenting opinion of the Supreme Court deemed that Article 314 shall apply in case of exercise of right for refusal of witness under Article 149. The dissenting opinion pointed out that Article 314 serves to discover the truth by allowing hearsay evidence under exceptional circumstances. According to the dissenting opinion, there is no difference between situation where the witness is unable to appear because of illness, etc. and situation where the witness exercises his right to refuse to testify when it comes to applying Article 314.I concur with the majority opinion of the Supreme Court. The witness who refuses to testify may or may not have lawful grounds to refuse. If he has sufficient lawful grounds, we should pay attention to the purpose of the Article which confers the right to refuse to testify. In this context, it stands to reason to declare that Article 314 shall not apply in case that the legal counsel exercises his right to refuse to testify under Article 149. By denying the admissibility of legal opinion as evidence of guilt, written by the legal counsel who lawfully exercises the right to refuse to testify, we can further the right to refuse to testify as well as the principle of oral hearing and direct examination.

In the Prosecution Service Act, it is prescribed that the attending officer of the public attorney has the role of the document officer and the helping agency for the public attorney. As the helping officer, he participate in the interrogation of the public attorney and put questions to the suspect or witness and other persons.As for the questioning of the attending officer, it was judged by the Court in this case that it is allowed, but has limitations. First, the public attorney should in person put questions about the important matters and after it, the attending officer can put questions about details or ambiguous answers. Second, during the question of the attending officer, the public attorney should be present the interrogating place with the attending officer and preside the process. There are some people who insist that the attending officer’s questioning should be prohibited and the public attorney should put all questions in person. But this opinion does not accord with the current law. On enacting the Prosecution service Act, the legislature made the choice with the provision §46 ① 1. that allows the attending officer to do the works relating to the investigation which the public attorney orders. It is thought that this choice would be made because of the insufficient numbers of the public attorney and the necessity of the sharing the burden of works.Considering the overweighting burden of works for the public attorney, the Court’s interpretation could be said to be right to the present. But in practice, if we can say the public attorney’s interrogation, the role of the attending officer should be limited within the supplement of the factual work.

These acts of unfair trades are increasing in our capital market and especially the occurrences of new type of unfair trades cast attentions on same fields for example manipulations disguising hedge in Knock-out option trade etc. Elements of some crimes in which unfair trades result are composed of requirements objective and subjective, in that case the latter is more important than the former.We could prove it the satisfaction of objective elements by comparing the share price produced by manipulations with original price. But it is very difficulty that we prove the satisfaction of subjective elements because it is inward intentions.When intending on manipulations, the intention is represented by inducing transactions. Inducing transactions is usually so unrevealed that unless a criminal confesses his intentions, we should prove it by assembling indirect evidences and total circumstances.Crimes in manipulations fields are developing without halts. In order to cope with its revolutions, we should make flexible applications of inducing meaning and establish concrete legal basis focused on specific features according to trading shares in each stage. Further more it is necessary to abolish one of several subjective requirement that is inducing through a future revision of law.

독도 문제는 동아시아의 미래 등과도 밀접한 연관이 있다. 그럼으로 앞으로는 독도 문제 를 평화적으로 해결하기 위한 현실주의적인 해법을 찾아야만 할 것이다. 독도 문제에서 1905년 1월 일본의 독도 점유는 조선 침략을 시작하면서 5년 뒤의 강압적인 한국 병합을 위한 전조로 행해졌다는 점에 시초가 있다. 일본으로서는 이 주장을 논박하는 것은 불가능 하다. 이렇듯 독도 문제는 일본군 강제위안부 등 여전히 미해결 상태인 다른 과거사 문제 청산작업과 동시에 진행돼야 할 것이다. 그리고 이젠 이런 문제를 인정한 뒤 대화와 협상에 나서지 않으면 쌍방 모두 심대한 손실을 입게 될 상황에 처하고 있다. 이 연구에서는 이런 중대한 의미를 갖는 독도 문제에 대해 한국 국민들의 현재 상황을 파악해 보는 시도이다. 이를 위하여 이 연구에서는 특히 우리 국민의 독도 영유권 인식을 중심으로 살펴보고자 하였다. 이를 위하여 이 연구에서는 먼저 한국 국민의 독도 영유권 인식 현황을 살펴보았다. 더불어 사회경제학적 입장에 따른 한국 국민의 독도 영유권 인식 현황을 살펴보았다. 다음 으로는 독도 영유권과 관련 있다고 판단하는 다른 항목들에 대한 인식 현황을 살펴보고, 이들 관련 항목과 독도 영유권 인식과의 관련성을 분석해 보았다.

독도는 역사적, 지리적, 국제법적 및 그 실효적 관할 상 대한민국의 영토임은 재론을 요치 아니한다. 이는 우리 역사기록 뿐만 아니라 일본의 태정류전(太政類典)과 일본총리부 령 제24호(1951.6.6) 등에도 명문으로 규정되어 있다. 국제법적 견지에서는 II차 세계대전 후 포츠담선언(8)과 일본항복 후 초기 일본의 점령 및 통제를 위한 연합국최고사령관에 시달된 훈령(1945.11.1) I(d)에 근거하여, 연합국최고사령관(the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers, SCAP)이 훈령(지령) 677호(1946.1.29)에 의거 명문으로 ‘독도’ 등을 일본주권에서 제외 조치한 것이고, 당시 일본정부는 이를 전적으로 수용하여 일본총리 부령 제24호(1951.6.6) 및 대장성 고시 제654호(1946.8.15)에 ‘독도’ 등이 일본 땅이 아니라 외국 땅임을 명문으로 규정한 것이다. 샌프란시스코 강화조약 시 동 강화조약 제19조(d)에 동 SCAPIN 677호의 효력이 계승되어 있다. 또한, 일본은 한·일 기본관계조약 (1965.6.22)에 의거 ‘독도’가 한국영토임을 국제법상 묵인(acquiesence) 한 것이다. 그럼에도 불구하고, 일본 정부는 그간 터무니없이 ‘독도’가 일본영토 소위 ‘다케시마’라 고 주장하여 왔다. 근간에는 한국정부의 항의에도 불구하고, 일본정부가 일본의 초, 중, 고교 교과서(사회과)에 ‘독도’를 ‘다케시마’라고 일률적으로 왜곡하여 교육을 실시하고 있 다. 이런 여건에서 이명박 대통령이 2012년 8월 10일 독도를 방문하였다. 일본정부는 이명 박 대통령의 독도방문을 강하게 비난하고, ‘독도영유권’ 문제를 공동으로 국제사법재판소 (ICJ)에 제소하여 그 판결을 받아 결정하자는 제의를 우리정부에 하여 왔다(2012.9.21). 끈질긴 일본정부의 동 ICJ제소 공세 결과 인 듯 근간 우리사회 일각에 ‘부득이한 경우’에 대응하여 우리도 ICJ를 대비할 필요가 있다는 견해가 나타나기 시작하였고, 드디어 지난 (2013년) 3월 25일 국회헌정기념관에서 ‘독도문제에 대한 일본정부의 국제사법재판소 (ICJ)제소에 대한 대응방안’ 제하에 세미나가 열렸다. 본고는 동 세미나에서 배포된 자료 등을 중심으로 동 ICJ제소 문제를 심층 고찰하여 소위. 독도문제는 일본의 한반도 침략과정 에서 그 일환으로 우선 ‘독도’가 불법적으로 탈취 된 역사적 문제(a historical issue)이고, 새삼스럽게 독도영유권에 관한 법적다툼(a legal dispute)이 될 수가 없다고 본다. 따라서 우리가 독도문제를 계속 심도 있게 앞으로도 연구하여야 하는 것은 어디 까지나 독도영토주 권보유국가로서 독도를 온전히 보존하고, 불법부당한 일본의 독도 재 침탈 야욕을 밝히고, 규탄하고, 국내외적으로 홍보하여 일본의 독도 재 침탈야욕을 저지하는 데서 그 의의를 찾아야 할 것이지, 결코 우리 독도영토주권을 ICJ에 회부하여 결정하자는 일본의 제의에 동의할 수 없음을 국제법적 견지에서 접근코자 하는 것이다.

Our Criminal Act Article 355 states that “A person who, having the custody of another’s property, embezzles of refuses to return it, shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than five years or by a fine not exceeding fifteen million won”. Furthermore Act Article 359 provides that “Attempts to commit the crimes specified in Articles 355 through 357 shall be punished”.However there is a debate over the legal character of “embezzlement”, that is a clash of opinions as to whether its legal character is “endangerment offenses” or “depriving offense”.In this context, during that time, the Supreme Court simply have showedthat the embezzlement is an endangerment offense. But, in this decision, the Supreme Court, to be more specific, states that its character is “offense provoking specific danger”.However, with reference to the consummated time of embezzlement, thegrounds presented by the Supreme Court is rather to support that the embezzlement is depriving offense. Because if the transfer of a real right by the delivery of movables or registration of real estate is enacted, it means that the benefit and protection of the law already is invaded.

급격한 도시화는 토지이용 증가, 도시환경 파괴, 도시녹지부족 등 도시환경 파괴에 영향을 끼쳤고, 이에 따라 도시 내 환경개선 방안책의 하나로 도시농업이 각광을 받고 있다. 또한 도시민들의 도시농업에 대한 욕구 증대로 인하여 지자체에서는 도시농업과 관련된 조례 제정과 함께 도시농업 지원 및 활성화 방안을 마련하고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 향후 타 지자체의 도시농업 활성화를 위한 기초자료 제공을 목적으로 서울시와 경기도를 중심으로 도시농업에 대한 정책과 사례 등을 조사하였다. 서울시는 지속가능하고 환경친화적인 농업육성을 목적으로 2007년｢서울시 친환경농업 및 주말･체험영농 육성지원에 관한 조례｣를 제정하였고, 2009년에는 ｢서울특별시 보조금관리 조례｣를 제정하여 텃밭농원에 대한 지원을 추진하고 있다. 현재 25개의 자치구 중 13개의 자치구에서 관련 조례를 제정하여 시행중이며, 학교텃밭, 시민농장, 옥상텃밭, 주말농장, 주머니텃밭, 시민교육 등이 이루어지고 있다. 경기도는 2011년｢경기도 도시농업활성화 지원 조례｣시행하였고, 현재 31개 시․군 중 12개의 시․군이 도시농업관련 조례를 제정 및 시행하고 있으며, 학교텃밭, 시민농장, 옥상텃밭, 주말농장 등이 이루어지고 있다. 또한 도시텃밭 등의 이용자 편의를 도모하고 지역주민의 참여를 높이기 위하여 경기도 도시농업지원센터를 설치·운영 할 예정이다. 서울시와 경기도는 도시농업 활성화를 위하여 매년 도시농업과 관련된 사업을 유치하고 있으며, 도시농업과 관련된 교육을 실시하여 정보 제공 및 시민참여를 유도하고 있다. 서울시와 경기도의 적극적인 도시농업 활성화 방안에도 불구하고 시민들의 관심 부족으로 인하여 이를 적극적으로 활용하는 것이 어려운 실정이다. 향후 시민들의 관심 증대를 위하여 도시농업의 홍보방안, 자발적 시민참여 유도방안 등의 연구가 지속되어야 할 것이라 판단되며, 국가적인 차원에서의 도시농업 활성화를 위하여 지자체, 시민, 시민단체 등 민관 협력 네트워크 구축을 통한 정보교류 및 제공에 대한 지속적인 연구가 필요할 것이라 판단된다.

In relation with ‘affairs’ that become protecting objects of the affairs disturbance crime, there are pro and cons discussions about whether public affairs are included in the affairs in the crime centering on relations with ‘public affairs’ at the resisting arrest crime by chances of the harmonization judge in Supreme Court at 2009, but it is in situation of hardly finding out related discussions on ‘protecting values’ of the affairs actually. So, contrary features of judgment about existence of preventing values on the same affairs in practices become to be contacted frequently from lower and higher courts. Based on such awareness of issues, this study tries to look into attitudes of existing theories and judicial precedents on affairs’ protecting values in the affairs disturbance crime first, and then analyze them. And the study accentuates urgency of standard setting-up on affairs’ protecting values with bases of existing discussions, and investigates relations between public affairs and protecting values in the resisting arrest crime and legal nature of affairs disturbance crime for making a presupposition of discussions. After that, this study will review matters that have not to be corresponded to criminality which is prohibited by laws and objected to criminal penalties as affair requirements of becoming protecting objects from the affairs disturbance crime, have not antisocial nature to the extent of not being accepted at all from social norms, and shall take protecting values by the criminal law in relation with object judgments. Above discussions aim at minimizing illegitimacy that affects influences to judgments by contributing to systematic establishment of jurisprudence on affairs which become protecting values in the affairs disturbance crime.

The Purpose of this paper is to estimates consumers’ willingness to pay for Urban Agriculture Park attributes. we analysis the marginal WTP by choice experiment method. Choice experiment (CE) is designed to elicit the marginal WTP differences among urban agriculture park attributes (garden scales, learning and experience area, leisure and relaxation area and fund). The results of multinomial logit model are meaningful, the total marginal WTP on the urban agriculture park attributes is 18,852 won. gardens scales is 2,949 won, learning and experience area is 11,284 won, leisure and relaxation area is 4,619 won. In the current laws, the facilities related to urban agriculture park is not. Taking advantage of the new urban agriculture park, Amendments of the law is required.

본 연구는 국내에서 지속적으로 성장하고 있는 프리미엄 아이스크림 전문점 브랜드의 이미지 연구이다. 소비자가 브랜드 이미지에 대해서 받는 인상은 여러 가지 방식으로 측정이 되고 있지만 브랜드를 보고 판단하는 소비자들의 심리학적인 분석은 미흡한 현실이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 브랜드 페르소나라는 개념을 사용하였다. 브랜드 페르소나란 소비자들이 브랜드의 이미지를 마치 특정한 사람처럼 생각하고 은유한다는 것이다. 이는 실제로 사람들이 편하게 사물을 인식하는 방법이기 때문이다. 또한 일반적으로 사람들은 자신과 유사한 것을 더 좋아한다는 심리학의 유사성의 법칙이 브랜드 페르소나에 있어서도 역시 동일하게 적용되는지를 본 연구에서는 알고자 하였다. 연구 결과 소비자들은 브랜드를 사람과 같이 은유적으로 인식하고 있음이 브랜드 페르소나 조사를 통하여 나타났다. 그리고 소비자들은 자신들과 유사한 연령과 성별 그리고 성격을 지닌 브랜드 페르소나에 대한 호감이 상대적으로 상이한 인성유성을 가진 다른 브랜드 페르소나에 비교하여 더 높게 나타났다. 이를 통하여 특정 브랜드 페르소나와 고객의 세그먼트 간에 유사한 인간적 특성을 가졌을 때 더 호감을 가질 것이라는 유사성의 법칙은 상관관계가 있음을 알 수 있었다.

Causation in the Criminal Law is very important as it is a part of an element of a crime, especially result crime. Where an accused is charged with a result crime, it is necessary for the prosecution to prove that her act or omission caused the prohibited consequence.Traditionally speaking, there has been several theories to solve the problem of causation. One is a ‘sine qua non’ or ‘but for’ theory, which must be established that the consequence would not have occurred when it did ‘but for’ the accused’s conduct. But the sine qua non theory is said to be not sufficient for it’s ambit is too wide to establish the causation. So comes an ‘adequacy’ theory, which means that when a prohibited consequence occurs whether the relation between the cause in question and the consequence is adequate or reasonable. For a long time the adequacy theory has been the majority in theory and cases in Korea. But nowadays a new theory has appeared before 25 years ago from the German Criminal Law, which is called ‘objective attribution’ theory. It is getting and getting common here. Objective attribution theory means that a prohibited consequence comes from the cause in question.However, even though objective theory is popular among the scholars, adequacy theory is the majority in the criminal cases because of the Japanese criminal law theory. But it has been attacked by some scholars because the meaning of adequacy is somehow abstract or obscure. To overcome the problems of the adequacy theory, it must settle a new way of reasoning. As a one reasoning, there comes so-called ‘Fright and Flight’ theory in Anglo-American Criminal Law. It seems to solve the problems of adequacy theory.

본 연구는 백령도의 관속식물을 밝히고 주요 식물들의 분포를 조사하였다. 2011년 8월부터 2012년 11월까지 총 5회에 걸쳐 수행되었다. 그 결과 관속식물은 124과 411속 647종 8아종 68변종 7품종 2교잡종으로 총 732분류군이 확인되었으며, 처음으로 밝혀진 분류군은 193분류군이었다. 이 중 환경부 지정 멸종위기야생식물은 2분류군, 한국 고유종 8분류군, 식물구계학적 특정식물 78분류군, 희귀식물 20분류군이 조사되었다. 또한 남 북방계식물 30분류군, 염생식물 43분류군이 발견되었다. 귀화식물은 92분류군으로 확인되었으며, 귀화율은 12.5%로 나타났다.

This study is to update of vibration power generating model and to analyze electromotive force on subway. Analysis of electromotive force using power generation depending on classification of locations which are ballast bed and concrete bed. Induced electromotive force equation by Faraday's law was updated using Bayesian regression and correlation analysis with calculate value and experiment value. Using the updated model, it could get 40mV per one power generation in ballast bed, and it also could get 4mV per one power generation in concrete bed.

Recently, the recycling of end-of-life vehicles is becoming increasingly interesting for less waste discharge and recovering useful materials such as valuable metals. Hence, in Korea, the target of the recycling rate is made to 85% until 2014 (energy recovery within 5%) and the recycling rate to 95% after 2015 (energy recovery within 10%) according to the law of "regulation about resource recycling of electrical and electronic products and automobiles". However, the recycling rate is around 84% in 2010, and registered numbers of shredder residue recyclers among dismantling recyclers, crushing recyclers, shredder residue recyclers, and waste gases recyclers are very few. In order to meet the goal of 85% until 2014, Korean recycling industry of ASR should grow bigger and innovative recycling technologies have to be developed as well. In the meantime, a recycling technology of automobile shredder residue is developed in the present study, in which ASR is introduced to a copper smelting process. This process is very promising because of co-beneficial effects such as recovering copper and process heat simultaneously from ASR. In this study, lab-scale melting furnace was developed and melting tests for various ASR were carried out. From the results, the physicochemical characteristics of Korean ASR were analyzed and its melting behavior was investigated for the application to the copper smelting process. In particular, melted slag products were fabricated at different melting temperatures. Then, the basicity and pouring index in the lab-scale melting furnace were examined to find out appropriate operating conditions for the melting process. As a result, Because the amount of lump coal that included in existing process samples is a little, melting state and value of pouring index are very similar to existing process samples. In result of this experiment, in case of changing lump coal to ASR, The existing copper smelting facilities, if basicity and melting temperature are well controlled, flow of melting material is considered that is almost not affected.

본 논문에서는 건축물의 실시간 피드백 진동제어를 위한 기초연구로써, 자체 기술력을 바탕으로 개발된 무선 가속도센서 시스템 및 프로토타입 (Prototype) AMD 시스템을 결합하여 피드백 진동제어 시스템을 구성하고, 모형 건축물을 대상으로 구성된 제어시스템의 기초성능을 평가하고자 하였다. 이를 위하여 본 논문에서는 우선 MEMS 센서 소자 및 블루투스 통신 모듈 기반의 무선 가속도 센서 유닛, 실시간 가속도 응답획득 및 제어법칙에 근거한 제어출력을 구현하도록 구성한 운영프로그램 등을 개발하였다. 또한 AC 서보모터를 이용해 기동되도록 설계한 프로토타입 AMD 및 모터 드라이버 시스템을 구성하였다. 마지막으로 이를 이용해 실시간 피드백 진동제어 시스템을 구성하였고, 2층 모형 건축물을 대상으로 실험실 규모의 진동제어 실험을 수행하여 목적된 구조물의 진동저감 효과를 정량적으로 분석하였다. 실험의 결과, 모형 구조물의 1차 및 2차 공진주파수 그리고 랜덤주파수 등의 실험조건에서 명확한 진동저감의 효과를 확인할 수 있었으며, 종국적으로 본 논문에서 개발한 무선 가속도센서 시스템 및 AMD 시스템이 향후 여타 구조물의 진동제어를 위한 효과적인 수단으로 응용될 수 있는 가능성을 확인하였다.

In order to clarify the impact of wildfire and its thermal forcing on atmospheric wind and temperature patterns, several numerical experiments were carried out using three dimensional atmospheric dynamic model WRF with wildfire parametrization module SFIRE. Since wind can accelerate fire spread speed, the moving speed of fireline is faster than its initial values, and the fireline tends to move the northeast, because of the wind direction and absolute vorticity conservation law associated with driving force induced by terrain. In comparison with non-fire case, the hydraulic jump that often occurs over downwind side of mountain became weak due to huge heat flux originated by surface wildfire and wind pattern over downwind side of mountain tends to vary asymmetrically with time passing. Therefore temporal variation of wind pattern should be catched to prevent the risk of widfire.