The purpose of this study was to investigate the preference of the general public about Japanese foods. Self-adminitered questionnaires were collected from 217 residents in seoul and its vicinities. Data was analysed by chi-square test, t-test and one-way ANOVA. The preference of Japanese food was generally high except for the items. These was a significant difference in the average score of preference for each kind of Japanese food according to gender and age. Saengsunchobab, Saewootuegim, Gowangawhae, Yhachai tuegim, Naembiwoodong and kimchobab are highly preferred Japanese foods, whereas Domijiri, Moduemnaembi, Haesamchowhae and Mooneachowhae are poorly considered among the general public.

Japan's prisons were run according to the Prison Law of 1908, the product of an age in which the Emperor was sovereign, and the administrative directives whose primary intent was disciplinary. in 1982, the japanese government embarked upon a process of revising the Prison Law according to a self-declared policy of "codification, modernization and internationalization," A Penal Facility Bill was submitted to the national Diet(parliament). But this bill was entirely unacceptable because not only does it perpetuate the present rules and policies presently in force in prisons but has been presented as a package with a Police Detention Facility Bill which perpetuates the infamous Daiyo-kangoku, that is police station cells used as substitute prisons. The Japan Federation of Bar Associations(JFBA) had strongly opposed the two detention facility bills on the ground that they institutionalize the already prevailing order in Japan's penal institutions, and they are not in keeping with principles of codification, modernization and internationalization. Thus far, the legislation package had been presented unsuccessfully three times to the Diet. After the Nagoya-Prison case in 2003 the Ministry of Justice has been working to revise the Prison Law and submitted a bill on criminal institutes and the treatment of convicted inmates, which was designed to replace a part of the Prison Law, to the Diet on March 14, 2005. And the Bill finally cleared the Upper House on May 18, 2005. This act excluded the provisions pertaining to unconvicted inmates as the JFBA had been strongly urged. In addition, recommendations by the Administrative Reform Council were well reflected in the bill, even though there were several points remained to be improved. And during the deliberation in the Lower House, 4 items were modified, including that the new law should be reviewed in 5 years. With respect to the provisions of the Prison Law relating to unconvicted inmates including use of Daiyo-Kangoku, they remain as a law on the detention of crime suspects in criminal institutes until they are revised at next legislation. In this regard, the JFBA, the Ministry of Justice, and the National Police Agency are going to hold joint meetings.

일본에서는 사법제도개혁의 일환으로 지적재산관계 소송에 대한 제1심 관할의 집중 및 그 항소심과 심결취소소송 관할의 일원화, 지적재산관계 소송에서의 대합의제 도입, 전문위원제도의 창설 등을 주된 내용으로 하는“민사소송법의 일부를 개정하는 법률안”이 2003. 7. 16. 공포되어 2004. 4.1.부터 시행되었다. 나아가 침해소송과 무효심판의 관계를 조정하고, 재판소조사관의 권한을 확대하고 명확히 하며, 침해행위의 입증을 용이하게 하기 위한 제도를 두고, 지적재산고등재판소를 설립하는 내용의“지적재산고등재판소설치법 및 재판소법 등의 일부를 개정하는 법률”이 2004. 6. 18. 공포되어 2005. 4. 1.부터 시행되었다. 한편 특허심판제도와 관련하여서는 특허이의 신청제도를 폐지하여 특허무효심판제도에 통합하고, 무효심판􀓋정정심판 및 심결취소소송과의 관계를 합리화하는 내용의“특허법 등의 일부를 개정하는 법률”이 2003. 5. 23. 공포되어 2004. 1. 1.부터 시행되고 있다. 지적재산 소송제도에 대한 개선의견이 강하게 제기되고 있는 우리로서도 현재 비판받고 있는 부분에 대한 진지하고 신속한 검토를 거쳐 지적재산 소송에 관한 합리적인 사법시스템을 구축하고 그 운영방안을 정비해 나갈 필요가 있을 것이므로, 일본의 지적재산관계법의 개정 내용을 소개한다.

In the last year, the number of registered vehicles in Korea surpassed the 15 million mark, and increase in number continuously. Nowdays, this tendency has raised some problems inevitably in the view of expansion of ELV(End of Life Vehicles) and earth environment pollution resulted from it. A foreign country is strengthening law about a car recycling for to solve this problem. Car recycling technology in Japan was introduced in this paper.

This study investigates the tendency of the word order of Japanese adjectives. Japanese adjectives are the representative adjectival modifiers and they define the nature, condition and characteristics of the words that are defined. There were not many studies on the word order among Japanese adjectives; however, their natural and general word order exists in case that the plural adjectives are used in the sentence. This study reveals the existence of a tendency in word order such as the adjectives representing the amount, the adjectives representing the old and new and the short- and long-term period and the adjectives representing the evaluation (judgment) by means of focusing on the word order among Japanese adjectives. Meanwhile, the adjectives representing the small and large, color and shape are not likely to have their word order. In short, this study suggests the following word order: amount〉time (old and new, long-term and short-term)〉small and large, color, shape〉evaluation> main noun.