국내에서 연구된 금융교육 유관 학술논문을 보다 객관적으로 이해하고자 논문 초록에서 추출된 키워드를 중심으로 주요 토픽을 추론하여 포괄적인 담론들을 알아보고자 한다. 연구의 효율성을 높이고 반복될 수 있는 후속과제 연구를 위하여 빅 데이터 분석기법(텍스트 마이닝 - LDA)을 활용하였고 주요토픽에 대한 단어들을 추출하였다. 총 208건의 유관된 학술 논문을 전 처리 한 후에 추출된 명사 32,523건 중 상위빈도 1,201건에 대하여 LDA 토픽모델링을 실시한 결과 16개의 토픽 군이 형성되었다. 최다 빈도의 단어는 “금융이해력” 이었고 다음은 “학생”, “금융소비자” 순이었는데 추론 된 토픽들의 공통적인 주요 요소에는 학교와 학생들에게 교육을 제공하거나 공급하는 과정에 관심을 가지고 있다는 것이었다. 핵심 텍스트와 토픽을 정의하면서 피교육자의 사회적 요구와 성인을 위한 금융교육 관심도가 미흡하여 향후 지속적인 연구영역 확대 가 필요하다는 시사점을 발견하게 되었다.

The purpose of this study is to reveal through discourse analysis the processes and patterns in which discrimination and hate in Korean society is produced. The social aspect of discrimination and hatred is practiced and reproduced through discourse. Discourses related to dogs were selected for this inquiry, because discrimination and hatred against dogs, especially large dogs today, are confirmed through various discourse(language sources) of the media. For this critical discourse study, van Dijk's approach, emphasizing the cognitive component when exploring the relationship between discourse and society, was applied. As a result of the analysis, it was identified that the polarized distinction between ‘we’ group and ‘they’ groups according to categorization, discrimination based on prejudice and stereotypes, and hatred due to contemptuous attitudes were sequentially developed. And it was found that the division and discrimination were represented and reproduced through the discourse at the macro-level of society, and the hate was represented through the discourse at the micro-level.

한국은 2000년을 기점으로 국내 복지국가에 대한 논의와 연구가 활발히 진행 되고 있는 상황이다. 대부분의 연구 주제는 한국이 복지국가가 되기 위한 조건이 무엇이며 그 전략이 무엇인가에 대한 것이다. 그러나 많은 연구들이 한국은 이미 복지국가라는 것을 상정한 상태로 논의를 하고 있거나 한국의 목표가 유럽의 복지국가라는 전제하에서 논의되고 있는 상태다. 즉, 복지국가의 유형이나 성격 논쟁 등 대부분의 연구가 유럽 의 복지국가로 수렴 되어지는 결론을 보여주고 있다. 하지만 과연 한국의 여러 제한된 시스템 속에서 ‘유럽의 복지국가 모델이 합리적인 대안이 될 수 있는가’ 또, 한국의 복지 철학과 정치 시스템을 바탕으로 ‘유럽의 복 지국가 모델을 적용하는 것이 가능한가’ 라는 문제의식을 갖게 한다. 본 고는 거시적인 관점에서 복지국가론을 비판하고 한국이 나아가야 할 국가모델이 복지국가에만 있는 것이 아니라 다른 발전된 미래 모델에도 있다는 것을 제시함에 목적이 있다. 먼저 에스핑 앤더슨의 ‘복지국가 유형 분류’를 이용하여 유럽 복지국가의 모델을 설명하고 복지국가의 성공 요인을 다섯 가지로 논하였다. 그리고 한국과 유럽의 정치구조를 비교한 후 한국이 지향하는 복지국가 형태에 따른 저해 요소들에 대하여 설명하고, 새로운 국가모델로 공진 국가, 생태 국가, 혁신국가, 소강 국가, 지식 국가를 제시하였다. 결론적으로 본고는 한국의 프레임 속 복지가 과연 완벽한 복지 시스템인가를 생각해보고, 미래 한국의 발전을 위해 복지국가 이외의 새로운 국가모델을 제시해 본 시론적 성격의 논문이다.

The interest in text mining is recently increasing in the humanities and social sciences. Using a topic-modeling technique, this study analyzed a corpus of study abroad applications to explore a discursive field of study abroad. By doing so, this project finds the ways in which the new text analysis technique can contribute to the methodology of discourse analysis. For this purpose, 4,585 applications for a variety of undergraduate study-abroad programs were collected and sorted out into the corpora of successful and unsuccessful applications. The topic-modeling results show that generated topics generally match the discourses and themes that the existing research of study abroad have considered so far. The comparison of the results between successful and unsuccessful applications reveals that the former tends to exhibit a set of more clearly defined topics and use abstract and generalized words to describe actions engaging with study abroad. This study suggests that the topic-modeling technique can be a useful discourse-analytic tool as it helps understand a broad thematic and discursive terrain in a large size of textual data. This paper also discusses how traditional discourse analysis methods can contribute to addressing methodological limitations in text mining techniques.

본 연구는 《2020창원조각비엔날레》의 주제인 비조각 담론의 큐레이팅을 분석한다. 그레마스의 기호학에서 '비(not)'의 모순 논리를 빌려온 로잘린드 크라우스의 연구나, 비조각적 재료를 통해 비조각을 실험했던 이승택의 작품에서도 중성화는 주요한 개념이다. 본 연구는 비조각에 내 재한 자기모순과 자기반성의 중성화 담론에 대한 큐레이팅을 위해서 ‘빗금( / )’의 메타포를 제시 한다. ‘빗금의 경계’ 또는 ‘빗금 큐레이팅’은 A와 B의 영역을 계보학처럼 명확히 구별하지도 않지만, 그렇다고 리좀처럼 허물지도 않는다. 그것은 A와 B를 빗금의 경계 양쪽에 위치시키되 서로의 영역을 일정 부분 공유하는 화해와 소통을 지향하기 때문이다. 또한 이 연구는 야외/실내, 처음/ 마지막, 작품/작품, 작품/환경 그리고 조각/비조각의 영역에서 실제로 실험했던 빗금 큐레이팅을 분석하면서 비조각 담론의 큐레이팅 모델을 다각도로 탐구한다.

The purpose of this paper is to provide a critical overview of the discourse-analytic studies in Korean sociolinguistics, mainly analyzing articles published in The Sociolingustic Journal of Korea. To achieve this goal, this article discusses definitions of ‘discourse’ and ‘discourse analysis’, and approaches to discourse. The examination of the articles in the journal shows that major studies in Korean sociolinguistics can be summarized as in the following: (i) functional approaches to language and discourse markers, (ii) conversation analysis and interactional linguistics, (iv) media discourse and critical discourse analysis, (v) analysis of public speeches and advertisements, (vi) electronic discourse (internet and SNS discourse), among others. This overview shows that discourse-analytic studies in Korean linguistics have focused on certain specific topics such as discourse markers, conversation-analytic studies, critical discourse studies, and electronic discourse, differing in topics from sociolinguistic studies in American and other societies. This overview suggests that more sociolinguistic studies need to be carried out in the fields such as intercultural communication, electronic discourse, and gender-based discourse as further research topics in Korean sociolinguistics.

In this study, a researcher transcribed Korean negation sentences presented on four episodes of the [Love of 7.7 Billion] and analyzed the discourses of foreign panel members by focusing on Korean negation sentences. The aims of this study are to (1) analyze types and accuracy of Korean negation sentences in foreign panel members’ discourse and (2) present pedagogical implications for efficient Korean education on negation sentences. This study was launched as an attempt to analyze how correctly and variously foreign panel members in the program use Korean negation sentences in their discourse. Since discourse is closely related to the ordinary life of humans, discourses which appeared on the [Love of 7.7 Billion] would be suitable data to analyze since it is a discussion-based program. Therefore, discourse is useful from a pedagogical standpoint to look into the Korean language proficiency of them. Through discourse analysis, several implications were found. (1) foreign panels tended to use short negation sentences rather than long negation sentences; (2) panels’ use of Korean negation sentences was not various; (3) panels divided Korean negation sentences into often-used negation sentences and rarely-used negation sentences; (4) the use of negative polarity was not found that much.

This paper aims to use a critical discourse analysis (CDA) to analyze types of online news headlines about COVID-19 on cruise ship, the Diamond Princess, and to identify different traits between conservative newspapers and progressive ones. 480 articles were collected from five major news outlets in Korea: Chosun Ilbo, Joongang Ilbo, Donga Ilbo, Hankyoreh, and Kyunghyang Shinmun. The results show that the headlines tend to contain negative or extreme vocabulary and to employ quotes from experts or even from unknown sources in order to criticize Japan and blame the Japanese government for their way of dealing with the situation. In the case of differences between politically biased sources, it was found that the conservative media inclines toward framing negative images of the Japanese government by publishing more articles than the progressive media and by using numbers and statistics to clearly describe the surge of infected people on the ship. They also published more articles than the progressive media about Korea's actions to bring Koreans back home from the ship, framing positive images about the Korean government. As can be seen, the online news headlines are politically biased and manipulatively framed, so readers' discretion is necessary.

This article investigates from a critical discourse studies perspective the news media representations of inbound international students in Korean higher education. In light of the ideological workings of discourse and the media's social impact on the public consciousness, the current study examines the structures and detailed meanings of the media portrayals of international students as regards the three dimensions of the textual feature, discursive practice, and social practice. The findings suggest that the media representations of international students are racialized according to stratified power relations in the context of Korean higher education, and that the racialization and stratification is undergirded by neoliberal capitalist ideology of internationalization, ambivalent diversity discourse of Others, and benevolent care discourse of the minoritized. A range of discursive othering strategies are deployed in the news texts to render more newsworthy the reported issues and incidents concerning international students. The article concludes and argues that more fluid approaches to diversity should be developed to account for the complexity and multiplicity of transnational subjectivities.

News media discourses almost inevitably reflect their social and national context. A useful text case of this may be demonstrated with a critical analysis of the discursive patterns of metaphors in accounts of the social phenomenon known as the Arab Spring. In order to analyze those patterns, this paper uses data collected from online articles in the British national daily newspaper, The Guardian and the English version of the Chinese national daily newspaper, The People's Daily. The results demonstrate how the different ideological contexts of the two national newspapers are affirmed and reinforced in the discursive choices of metaphors on the Arab Spring. These results also reveal the newspapers' discursive strategy of positive self and negative other presentation to support their respective national context in the macro structure of political power and ideology.

이 연구는 한국전쟁 직후에 식민지 세대 화가ㆍ평론가들이 제기한 추상 담론이 한국근현대 미술사에서 어떤 의미와 위상을 차지하고 있는지를 재검토하는 작업의 일부이다. 추상 담론은 식민지 유산인 《대한민국미술전람회》를 중심으로 미술계가 재편된 가운데 제기되었다. 그들은 한국전쟁 후 폐허 같은 상황에서 이른바 세계화ㆍ현대화라는 시대적 과제를 설정하고, 서구의 전후 추상 물결을 현대성으로 인식하는 한편, 실존주의 사상과 문학에 공감하는 가운데 추상 담론을 전개했다. 그들은 주로 1930년대 초부터 1940년대 전반기의 동양주의 추상 담론을 재인식하는 가운데 추상을 통하여 동양적/한국적 정체성을 확보하고자 했다. 하지만 그들과 뒤이은 전후 세대가 냉전공간에 현대성을 지시하는 기호로서 추상을 신화화하는 동안, 식민지 근대성을 해체하는 또 다른 시대적 과제는 묻히게 되었다.

호남학회 성립 이전에 호남지역에서 상경한 뜻있는 인사들은 주권이 심각한 위협을 받고 있는 상황에서 국권 회복을 갈망했다. 그러한 열망을 품은 당대 호남의 지식인들은 계몽 단체에 참여 하여 활약하는 동시에 국운 회복을 위해 다양한 활동을 전개하였다. 이러한 상황에서 재경호남 지식인들은 호남지역의 계몽과 신교육의 진흥을 목적으로 호남학회를 조직하였다. 호남학회를 근거지로 회원들이 모여들기 시작하면서 호남을 기반으로 특정 지향점을 공유하는 지식인 공동 체가 면모를 갖추게 되었다. 본고는 호남학회 활동시기 참여자들의 공론장 형성 활동을 기술하 고자 하였다. 특히 공론장의 주요 의사소통 행위자로 활약한 이들의 공론 표출 양상을 중심으로 논의를 전개하고자 하였다. 이와 함께 호남학회와 『호남학보』를 중심으로 형성된 지식인 공동 체의 성격과 유학적 관계망을 통한 호남 공론장의 특성을 규명하고자 하였다. 이러한 작업은 근 대전환기 호남의 공론장 연구를 한 단계 더 진전시킬 수 있는 계기가 될 것이다.

Given the view of tests as mechanisms within a language policy framework (Shohamy, 2006), Korean proficiency tests are not only used as a way to measure language knowledge, but rather as tools to impose national ideologies about langage use and diversity. The field of Korean language testing needs to embrace sociopolitical dimensions, and engage what is going on value and consequence in test development and validation. By drawing upon a combined approach of Messick’s (1989) validity framework, Fairclough’s (2001) Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), Bachman and Palmer’s Assessment Use Arugment (AUA), this study aims to illustrate how the practice of testing can be discursively interpreted as a multilayered phenomenon, constituted through discourse. It discussed the applicability of AUA’s two claims (decisions, consequences) to the validation of Korean language proficiency or related certification testing for immigrants with foci of value implications and consequences. The interconnectedness of test validation and CDA is modelled through the procedure of Faircough’s (2001) analytic methodology. In an effort to illustrate that language testing is discursively value-laded, this study not only offer a theoretical and methodological addition to the current inquiry of test validation, but also re-emphasize that language testing is sociopolitically driven from a discursive angle.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of social factors on the use of honorific language by discourse completion test. Participants complete a short discourse by filling in their responses in conversations that may occur in families, schools, and workplaces where the social status and solidarity of the listener is predetermined. Honorific styles of sentence endings of their responses are analyzed by the generalized linear mixed model. The results show that social status and solidarity are statistically significant factors in the use of honorific styles, but their effects are dependent on the discourse situation. The ratio of using honorific styles gradually increases as the formality of situation increases (i.e., family < school < workplace). Interestingly, when the solidarity is low at the workplace, the ratio of using honorific styles is consistently high regardless of the social status of the listener. These results show that the use of Korean honorific styles is pragmatically changing according to the discourse situation.

This study analyzes the discourse marker (henceforth DM)1) actually in college English textbooks (henceforth CETs) which have been most commonly used in college general English curricula in Korea. Based upon seven discourse functions of the DM actually used by native speakers in everyday language use, I analyze whether they are well represented in the CETs. The findings showed that although six functions of this marker were adequately presented in the CETs, their frequencies were somewhat dissimilar to each other: their uses as an informative marker and a contradiction marker were observed the most frequently, whereas their use as a disagreement-prefacing marker was observed the least frequently. In addition, their use as a topic-shift marker did not appear in the CETs. In addition, the DM actually appeared differently, depending on the CETs’ level. For instance, the frequency of actually was quite low at the beginner level as compared to actually at the advanced level, which resulted in interpretations that advanced-level students may use the DM actually more than low-level students. It is expected that this study can deepen our understanding regarding discourse markers and broaden relevant research field for the future.

저작권 제도를 정당화하는 이론적인 근거로 자연권 이론과 인센티브 이론이 있어 왔다. 자연권 이론은 저작권 제도에 대하여 저작자 권리 중심의 해석을 시도했고, 인센티브 이론은 저작권 제도를 창작 인센티브 보호를 통해 저작물 창작을 촉진하는 공리주의적 수단으로 파악했다. 인센티브 이론은 미국 등에서 저작권 제도의 정당화 근거에 대한 주류적인 시각이 되었지만 외적 모티 베이션을 강조하는 특유의 관점 때문에 현실과는 부합하지 않는 측면이 있다는 비판이 다양하게 제기되어 왔다. 종래 인센티브 이론에 의한 현실 분석이 한계를 보인다는 지적이 제기되면서 그 대안적 이론으로 행동법경제학 내지는 저작권 온정주의가 대 두되었다. 인센티브 이론 내지 합리적 경제인 모델에 대해 회의적인 시각을 보였던 행동법경제학 이 저작권 온정주의로 발전된 것이었다. 온정주의는 개인, 특히 저작자들의 결정에 따른 결과로부터 그들을 보호하기 위한 목적으로 개인 선택을 제한 하는 것을 의미한다. 실제로 미국과 우리의 저작권 법상에도 종래의 인센티브 이론 내지 합리적 경제인 모델로는 해석하기 어려우나, 온정주의 이론으로는 무리 없이 해석 가능한 조항들이 존재한다. 저작권 온정주의는 종래 인센티브 이론과는 다른 새로운 시각을 제시하여 저작권법을 통한 현실보완을 도모할 계기를 제공하였다는 점에서 높이 평가할 수 있다. 즉, 온정주의 이론은 일부 취약한 저작권자들을 저작권법을 통해 보호할 근거를 제시하였다. 그러나, 한편으로는 간접적 보완이라는 연성 온정주의를 넘어 직접적 보상(규제) 이라는 경성 온정주의까지 진행하는 것은 창작에 대한 개입과 시장의 왜곡이라는 부작용을 초래할 우려도 있으므로 신중한 접근이 필요하다.

The body is an important object of costume expression, and the reflection of the aesthetics of the body according to age, culture, individual or group determines the form of the costume. In particular, British artist Leigh Bowery provided many designers and celebrities with original design ideas. Leigh Bowery’s costumes are related to the carnival concept. Thus, this study analyzed Leigh Bowery’s life and works, and examined Michael Bakhtin’s grotesque carnivalesque theory. Based on Bakhtin’s carnival theory around 100 works by Leigh Bowery, in the form of YouTube videos and DVD clips were analyzed in this study. The results of the analysis Leigh Bowery’s body and costume research are as follows. First, this study can define fetishism as a characteristic of costumes such as body suits, harnesses, high-heeled boots, and stockings, that stress the body. Second, the character of the body is not expressed as that of an idealized body, but the fat and ugly aspect are revealed. Third, Leigh Bowery’s costumes are characterized by ambiguity. The costumes blur the boundaries between women and men. Fourth, common sense, combined with normal and bizarre, brings out a strong sense of carnival humor with ridiculousness arising from the gap between reality and reality. His performance has had a significant impact on victims of discrimination or unequal treatment in sexual, racial, and age-related situations. This study should inspire many designers through the study of Leigh Bowery’s body expression and dress, but it also introduces fashion icons that are not well known in Korea.

The 19th century’s international law distinguished civilized from non-civilized States resulting in any country desiring equal treatment was required to obtain recognition from those already deemed civilized. Japan was able to join the civilized world by presenting a civilized image of itself in the First Sino-Japanese War, which was depicted by Western legal scholars as a clash between barbarism and civilization. Neither Japanese nor Western scholars of international law, however, have touched on the issue of the Triple Intervention. This incident serves as a case study for re-evaluating the operation of Western countries’ international legal standards. The argument is, that these countries cloak their motives in legal language for self-aggrandizement, thereby demonstrating the ahistorical nature of the West’s rhetoric of civilization. Further, this incident taught Japan the lesson that international law is concerned not with morality but with power.