Countries in the Chinese character cultural sphere share the Chinese Zodiac that assigns twelve animals to each year a person is born based on the order of arrival, so-called Tti. The twelve animals reflect the psychological characteristics of human life and are regarded as more special than other animals. Thus, the animals are used in idiomatic expressions as a vehicle to more properly describe human feelings and thought. This study therefore analyzed the semantic features of the twelve animals to explore the Chinese perception about the animals. The study result can be summarized as below: The representative semantic features of the twelve animals are as follows: [Villain], [Thief], [Misdeed], [Harmful], and [Heinous] for Rat; [Big] for Ox; [Villain], [Ferocious], [Cruel], [Heinous], [Foe], [Causing Fear], [Causing Risk], [Harmful], [Aggressor], and [Predator] for Tiger; [Agile] and [Quick] for Rabbit; [Emperor], [King], [High Status], [Authority], and [General] for Dragon; [Villain], [Aggressor], [Greedy], [Cunning], [Heinous], and [Vicious] for Snake; [War] and [Military] for Horse; [Weak], [Sacrifice], and [Dangerous Situation] for Sheep; [Nominal] for Monkey; [Small], [Slight], [Trifling], and [Useless] for Rooster; [Shabby], [Vulgar], [Bad], and [Foolish] for Dog; and [Shabby], [Vulgar], and [Wicked] for Pig. The negative semantic features were dominant in all animals except the dragon, which is consistent with a tendency that the animals are generally used to emphasize the negative aspects of a person. The semantic features of the animals are also presented in various domains of action, psychology, personality, morality, size, episode, speed, status, position, geographical features, attitude, shape, living, means, situation, etc.

There are many changes appeared with the Chinese degree adverbs as languages evolve over time, such as the emerging degree adverb ‘ju(巨)’ and the phrase structures like ‘巨多’, ‘巨好’, ‘巨痛’ are used in our daily communication commonly. This article discussed about the evolution mechanism of the Chinese emerging degree adverb ‘ju(巨)’s meaning in perspective of cognitive linguistics. First, we focused on the prototype meaning of ‘ju(巨)’ which is a adjective and the existing meaning of ‘ju(巨)’ which is used as a degree adverb. Second, we compared the image schema of the adjective ‘ju(巨)’ with the image schema of the degree adverb ‘ju(巨)’ and managed to find the differences between them. Then we studied the evolution mechanism of the degree adverb ‘ju(巨)’s meaning that is metaphor and made ‘ju(巨)’s metaphor mapping model. Third, we chose ‘巨多’, ‘巨好’ and ‘巨痛’ as examples by corpus-based study and used the conceptual blending theory to compared the conceptual blending spaces of them. Lastly, we found a general rule that can have reference significance to the study about the evolution of the other emerging degree adverbs, such as ‘狂’, ‘神’and so on. 저 자

Modern Chinese Dictionary, one of the most popular language reference books in Mainland China, has been published in seven editions by the end of 2016. As the most important and comprehensive revision was published in 2012, the 6th edition laid the foundation of the next version. The article makes a comparison between the fourth (supplement edition in 2002), fifth and sixth edition of Modern Chinese Dictionary in the changes of entries, phonetic notations, meanings and styles of standard revision in order to reveal the difficulties of the dictionary compilation. On the other hand, based on the evolution of the theory and practice, Modern Chinese Dictionary still needs to be modified constantly.

Chinese often use some pronouns as Exclamatives tone markers, such as "zhe" "Na" "zheme" "name" "Shenme", and they can be noun phrases, adjective and verb phrases constitute a minority of some commonly used exclamation structure, these exclamation structure have different features. The author intends to syntactic structure, semantic features and pragmatic aspects of a preliminary study on them. The adverb marked exclamatory sentence features: first, if the adverb in the exclamatory sentences, then the sentence is generally exclamation exclamatory center adjectives, state adjectives cannot be used in exclamatory sentence; second, adverb as a marker of exclamatory sentence semantics is expressed according to the speaker's subjective standard, objectivity weak. This kind of Exclamatives objective level is relatively low, the subjective color is very obvious, this type of exclamatory sentence is judged from the speaker's subjective standard, objective understanding and others are not consistent. The characteristics of exclamatory sentences marked by pronouns are as follows: first, when the "Ni" "zhe" and the noun predicate constitute an exclamatory sentence, the way of expressing feelings is negative. General ellipsis. "Ni" "zhe" after the addition of nominal predicate exclamatory sentences can only use the second person pronouns. But behind the plus noun predicate, second person or third person can use; second, "Shenme" "hedeng" "zenme" "Zenyang" "duoshao" interrogative pronouns in exclamatory sentences are used to represent the exclamatory mood, then you no longer have the pronoun itself with the interrogative mood.

Stroke is the most basic element in modern Chinese character structure unit, normalization and standardization of stroke cannot only be essential to literacy teaching, and writing, retrieval and computer processing of Chinese characters, but can further improve normalization and standardization levels of Chinese characters. However, there are lots of disputes about many issues of stroke in academia, and contents about stroke in modern Chinese teaching materials in colleges and universities are inconsistent. Ten representative teaching materials of Modern Chinese are selected in this article to take strokes in these teaching materials as study object for comparison and analysis of classification, names and sequence of strokes, so as to give suggestion to normalization and standardization of strokes. The teaching materials involved in this article include: Modern Chinese (the 4th revised edition) written by Huang Borong and Liao Xudong in 2007, referred to as “Huang and Liao‟s Version”; Modern Chinese written by Hu Yushu in 1992, referred to as “Hu‟s Version”; New Modern Chinese written by Zhang Bin in 2002, referred to as “Zhang‟s Version 1”; Modern Chinese written by Zhang Zhigong in 1982, referred to as “Zhang‟s Version 2”; Introduction to Modern Chinese written by Shao Jingmin in 2001, referred to as “Shao‟s Version”; Modern Chinese written by modern Chinese teaching and research office of Department of Chinese Language and Literature of Peking University in 2000, referred to as “Bei‟s Version”; Modern Chinese Character Outline written by Su Peicheng in 2001, referred to as “Su‟s Version”; Modern Chinese Tutorial written by Xing Fuyi① in 1986, referred to as “Xing's Version"; Modern Chinese written by Zhou Yimin in 2006, referred to as “Zhou's Version”; Modern Chinese written by Ma Guorong in 1990, referred to as “Ma's Version”.

본고는 “這些个英雄人物”、“那些个花儿”、“一些个消息” 등에 나타나는 “些个+NP”명사성 수량구의 용법을 검토하고 있다. 이와 같은 구조 속의 “个”에 대해 일부 사전 혹은 문법서에서는 “个”를 “些”의 접미사로 해석하고 있으나 이런 관점은 타당하지 않다고 생각한다. 따라서 본고에서는 현대중국어의 접미사에 대해 고찰한 후, 통사구조, 통사위치, 어법기능 등의 특징을 분석 검토하여, 위 구조 속의 “些”와 “个”가 수량관계임을 밝히고 있다. 즉, “个”는 “些”뒤에 덧붙어 양사의 어법기능을 하는 것이지 접미사 역할을 하는 것이 아니다.

본고는 “這些个英雄人物”、“那些个花儿”、“一些个消息” 등에 나타나는 “些个+NP”명사성 수량구의 용법을 검토하고 있다. 이와 같은 구조속의 “个”에 대해 일부 사전 혹은 문법서에서는 “个”를 “些”의 접미사로 해석하고 있으나 이런 관점은 타당하지 않다고 생각한다. 따라서 본고에서는 현대중국어의 접미사에 대해 고찰한 후, 통사구조, 통사위치, 어법기능 등의 특징을 분석 검토하여, 위 구조 속의 “些”와 “个”가 수량관계임을 밝히고 있다. 즉, “个”는 “些”뒤에 덧붙어 양사의 어법기능을 하는 것이지 접미사 역할을 하는 것이 아니다.

말소리는 분절음(segmental phonemes)과 초분절소(suprasegmental phonemes)로 구성되어 있으며, 분절음은 音色으로 분별하는 자음과 모음이며, 초분절소는 소리의 고저, 강약, 장단으로 의미를 분별하는 요소이다. 한어의 음절은 분절음인 성모와 운모 및 초분절소인 성조로 구성되기 때문에 분절음인 성모와 운모만의 구성을 분절음절이라고 할 수 있다. 한어의 음절을 구성하는 규칙은 매우 고정적이고 간단하기 때문에 음절의 수량과 분포 상태 역시 비교적 단순하다. 비록 그 동안 현대한어의 음절수와 분포 상태에 대해서는 줄곧 많은 관심을 가졌지만 방언 어휘, 감탄사, 의성사, 문어 어휘 및 경성음절의 수록 범위가 일치하지 않아 각 사전의 음절과 분절음절의 수량과 분포는 일치하지 않았다. 이 글에서는 중국에서 출판한 《现代汉语词典》《新华字典》《现代汉语规范字典》《现代汉语规范词典》과 일본에서 출판한 《中日大辭典》 및 한국에서 출판한 《中韓辭典》(고대 민족문화연구원)《中韓辭典》(두산동아) 등 7종의 자전 혹은 사전을 선택하여 각 사전에 수록된 기본음절, 비기본음절, 경성음절과 기본분절음절, 비기본분절음절, 경성음절을 모든 사전에 수록된 공통음절과 어느 일부의 사전에 수록된 개별음절로 나누어 수량, 분포 상태 및 특징을 비교 분석하였다. 7종 사전에 수록된 공통음절은 1277개(경성 24개 포함)이고，개별음절은 99개(경성음절 38개 포함)이어서 음절 총량은 1376개이며, 7종 사전 전부에 수록된 공통분절음절은 404개이고 개별음절은 18개(특수음절 7개 포함)이어서 분절음절 총수는 422개이다. 경성음절의 수록 조건과 범위에 대해서는 모든 사전이 명확한 근거를 가지고 있지 않아 각 사전의 수록 범위가 일치하지 않다. 《现代汉语规范词典》을 편찬한 주요 목적은 현대한어의 표준화에 있으며, 실제 공통분절음절 404개 외에 기본음절로 편입된 분절음절 “cei”와 “eng”를 표준으로 인정하고 기타 특수음절은 모두 취소하였으므로 결국 표준 분절음절은 406개이고 비경성기본음절은 1272개로 보는 것이 가장 합리적일 것이다.

ABB式形容詞是現代漢語形容詞中的一種特殊形式, 其特殊性體現在詞的構成, 意義, 以及在句子中的語法功能。 本文談詞的構成時, 從構形法和構詞法兩方面入手, 分析其內部組合規律, 進一步探討ABB式形容詞, 何時詞根是A, 何時詞根是AB, 倂根據詞根特點, 給ABB式形容詞分類, 談其在句子中表示的意義。因ABB式形容詞詞根的性質和特性, 使其在語法功能上與性質形容詞有所不同。 本文通過對大量語言材料的分析, 總結出了ABB式形容詞, 在一定條件下, 可在句子中作主語, 謂語, 賓語, 狀語, 定語, 補語六大句子成分。並硏究出了ABB式形容詞不能在比較句、是非疑問句、形容詞非主謂句中作謂語, 不能受“不”“沒有”的否定, 不能出現在祈使句補語的位置, 不能充當感歎句中被强調, 感歎的成分。