The primary purpose of this study is to develop system modules of school buildings and the seismic loss function of the system modules for regional loss assessment of school buildings. System modules of school buildings were developed through statistical analysis of school facilities in Korea. The structural system of school buildings with non-seismic details is defined as reinforced concrete with partially masonry walls (RCPM), and 27 system modules of RCPM were developed considering the number of stories, spans, and the age of the building. System modules were designed to assess the structural behavior by applying the shear spring model and the shear failure of the columns of the school building. Probabilistic seismic demand models for each component of system modules were derived through nonlinear dynamic analysis to determine the relationship between seismic intensity, drift ratio, and peak floor acceleration of system modules. The seismic loss function was defined as the total damage ratio, which is the ratio of replacement cost to repair cost to evaluate the seismic loss quantitatively. The system module-based seismic loss well predicted the observed data. It will be possible to help many stakeholders make risk-informed decisions for a region through the regional loss assessment of school buildings in Korea.

In Korea, the function of Jeong(亭), Jeongja(亭子), and Nujeong(樓亭) architecture is essentially rest. However, in China, where the name Jeong was first coined and used, Jeong was not only used as a place of rest, but also for a variety of functions depending on the time and region, such as building units for guard posts, policing, and mail delivery. But why is it that in Korea, Jeong is primarily perceived and used as place of rest? Starting from this question, this article examines the historical process of the emergence of Jeong and its changing functions, focusing on the official history of China, and then examines the perception of Jeong in Korea through its connection to the dominant function of Jeong in China during the period of Jeong's emergence in Korean literature. This will help us to fundamentally understand the differences between Jeong architecture in Korea and Jeong architecture in China, and to further clarify the historical significance of the types of Jeongja and Nujeong architecture in Korea.

독일의 건축 역사학자 고트프리트 젬퍼는 1850년 전후 강연과 글에서 원시 형태(Urfo rmen) 건축을 이루는 네 가지 핵심 모티프로, 화덕, 지붕, 에워쌈, 터닦기를 제안했다. 이 가운데 에워쌈(Umfriedung)은 이후 젬퍼의 건축 이론에서 피복(Bekleidung) 개념 으로 발전하는데, 이런 에워쌈/피복은 19세기 이후 변화하는 현대건축의 기술적 조건 과 맞물려 당시 첨예하게 대두된 핵심 형태와 예술 형태의 문제를 다루는 데 있어 중 요한 개념으로 자리 잡는다. 특히 현대건축의 주요 의제 가운데 하나인 표면(surface) 을 다룰 때 젬퍼의 에워쌈/피복 관련 이론은 충분히 살필 만한 중요한 참조 대상이다. 다양한 경제 문화 요인에 따라 한국 현대건축에서도 표면이나 에워쌈/피복의 층위에 서 흥미로운 현상들이 발견되는데, 본 발표에서는 특히 에스오에이(강예린, 이치훈), 리슈(홍만식), 솔토지빈(조남호) 등의 작업을 이중(二重), 공중(空中), 중공(中空)의 에 워쌈으로 나눠 고찰함으로써 그 역사 이론적 의의를 논하고자 한다.