이 글에서는 행정기관 간 분절되어 보유·관리되고 있는 공공데이터가 환류되지 않아 발생하는 소위 ‘데이터 칸막이 문제’에 대해 심도깊게 논 의하였다. 칸막이 현상은 우리 법 현실에서 관행적으로 뿌리내린 부처소관 주의가 행정의 영역에도 영향을 미치고 있음을 단적으로 보여준다. 각 부처 별로 구획되어 관련 행정사무를 분장하다 보니 소관 사무를 다른 기관에 이전하였을 때 책임의 문제로부터 자유롭기 어려우며, 이로 인해 소관사무 의 일환인 데이터 처리 업무를 재량껏 수행하기 어려워 나타나는 현상의 단면인 것이다. 따라서 객관적인 명분과 당위성이 존재하거나 법률상 명시 적 근거가 없는 경우 공행정주체에게 적극적인 집행을 기대하기는 어렵다 고 할 것이다. 이처럼 행정기관의 재량의 영역에서 발생하는 비효율성 문제 는 사안의 본질을 꿰뚫지 않는 한 해갈(解渴)이 쉽지 않다. 자칫 소극행정 에 대한 일관된 지적과 같이 행정작용이 전개되는 양상에만 몰두한 나머지, 시장에서의 현실적인 변화를 만들어내지 못할 가능성이 있기 때문이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 데이터 칸막이 현상이 발생하는 본질적인 원인을 파 악하기 위해 기존에 제시된 대안들이 갖는 한계를 도출하는 것으로부터 논 의를 출발하였다. 또 데이터를 규율하는 개별 법령을 분석함으로써 모범적 인 입법례와 정비가 필요한 대상 입법례를 발굴하였다. 이를 통해 얻은 다 양한 시사점은 그 동안 기관 간 칸막이 문제로 인해 소관 기관에 머물러야 했던 수요 데이터가 재조명받을 수 있도록 하는 문제 해결의 단초가 될 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

In his Liberation Day speech, President Yoon Suk-yeol of South Korea pointed out that he would like to improve Korea-Japan relations towards a common future. However, a thorn in the relation between Japan and South Korea has been the unresolved issue of the so-called comfort women who had been forced to serve as sex slaves for the Japanese army between 1932 to 1945. The case of the comfort women raises many legal questions. On December 28, 2015, the Japanese and Korean government reached an agreement that aims to resolve the decades-old problem. The so-called 2015 Agreement gave new impetus to the debate over the legal responsibility of the Japanese government under international law. The most relevant issues and subsequent legal developments will be discussed in the following article.

Bronze Zhi has few names. The bronze vessels we now call Zhi were classified and named by the Song Dynasty according to the vessel types and rites. However, compared with the literature records, zhi, which often appears in the literature as a drinking ritual vessel, is not the zhi that song people call it. At present, there are only a few bronze zhi with their own names, which can be divided into four kinds. Mr. Xie Mingwen argues that the bronze “Zhi” is “guan”. This paper verifies this view from the perspective of the archaeological unearthed combination and the shape and form of the artifacts. We believe that to discuss the original name of Bronze Zhi, we need to treat it separately according to the shape and structure of the utensils. Daigaizhi and Wugaizhi in the early Western Zhou dynasty were different in shape, size, capacity and system of use. The former is a drinking cup, while the latter is a small wine holder. Daigaizhi and Wugaizhi may be different in the early Western Zhou Dynasty. If the renaming is based on a personal name, we recommend that daigaizhi be renamed as “Guan” only.

Criticism has erupted around the world over the paper “Contracting for sex in the Pacific War” written by Mark Ramseyer, a Mitsubishi professor at Harvard University Law School. Ramseyer insists tha “comfort women” by Japanese imperial military made “credible contracts” with recruiters regardless of the Japanese government or the Japanese military. Ramseyer further insists that the “comfort women” were certified prostitutes. However, the Japanese government selected recruiters secretly and provided them with convenience in mobilizing women. Recruiters have deceived women, mainly by job fraud, into kidnapping them to military brothels. The recruiters signed with Japanese women as barmaids (shakuhu), meaning women who served drinks. However, the Japanese military brothels were prohibited from drinking. Almost Korean women were illiterate in 1940’s, so recruiters did not make contract papers with them. It was very easy to deceive Korean women to make sexual slaves of Japanese military. The surviving Japanese military’s surgeon or soldiers testified that Korean “comfort women” had been sexual slaves.

This study intends to review ≪The Subject's Linguistic Theory≫, the 1st volume of the Linguistics Collection, published in 2005 by the Institute of Linguistics at the Academy of Social Sciences. The Linguistics Collection was published with the aim of summing up the achievements of the linguistics research conducted by North Korea after its liberation from Japanese colonial rule, and the fact that ≪The Subject's Linguistic Theory≫ was selected as the 1st volume of this series means that this field is the best manifestation of the nature of North Korean linguistics. This study aims to see how North Korea's language perception differs from or same as ours, and eventually to explore the possibility of mutual communication of linguistic studies conducted in the South and the North. In section 1, it explains the overall purpose of the study, and in section 2, it examines the process in which the North's linguistic theory, called “The Subject's Linguistic Theory,” has been formed, and in section 3, it analyzes the contents of ≪The Subject's Linguistic Theory≫ (2005), published as part of the Linguistics Collection. In section 4, we attempt to present the necessity of meta-linguistics and the role of social linguistics through the theoretical questions that this 'The Subject's Linguistic Theory' poses to us.

민법 제812조 제1항은 “혼인은 「가족관계의 등록 등에 관한 법률」에 정한 바에 의하여 신고함으로써 그 효력이 생긴다.”고 규정하여 법률 혼주의를 채택하고 있다. 이에 따라 혼인에 관한 규정은 혼인신고를 한 법률상 부부에게 적용이 되며 혼인신고를 마치지 않은 사실혼은 원칙적으로 인정되지 않는다. 다만 사실혼을 보호할 필요성이 있는 경우 혼인 신고를 전제로 한 효과를 제외한 나머지 법률혼의 효과를 인정한다. 판례에 따르면 중혼적 사실혼도 사실관계에 따라 전혼인 법률혼이 사실상 이혼상태에 놓여있는 특별한 사정이 있다면 중혼적 사실혼도 보호할 수 있다. 그러나 판례에서 언급하고 있는 사실상 이혼은 민법 규정에 정한 바 없고, 이제까지 사실상 이혼의 성립요건 및 그 효과에 대하여 논의하고 있는 문헌도 많지 않다. 사실상 이혼을 인정하려면 어떠한 요건을 갖추어야 하고, 어떠한 법률효과가 발생 또는 제한이 되는지에 대하여 연구할 필요성이 있다. 사실상 이혼의 성립에서 살펴보아야 할 것은 부부가 장기간의 별거로 인하여 혼인관계의 실질이 존재하지 않는 경우에 이혼의사의 합치가 있었는가에 따라 다르게 볼 것인가이다. 이와 관련하여 우리 민법상 법률 혼주의와 유책주의 이혼법을 근거로 검토해 보았다.

This paper provides detailed analysis of the so-called ‘Rusk Letter’ which has been generally referred to as an evidence of Japan’s territorial claim to Dokdo island. The Rusk Letter is a diplomatic epistle which was drafted by Dean Rusk, the US Assistant Secretary of State and sent to the Korean Embassy in the US on August 10, 1951. This letter considers Dokdo as Japan’s territory. However, the Rusk Letter has been legally and historically criticized from mainly two aspects. First, the Rusk Letter referred to the ownership of Dokdo only considering the Japanese position which was not true. Second, this letter was a confidential and unofficial document which was sent only to Korea; Japan and even the US Embassy to Korea did not know the Rusk Letter. It did not influence on the decision of Peace Treaty. Therefore, the Rusk Letter cannot be a critical evidence of Japan’s territorial claim over Dokdo.

The main purpose of this short essay is to mitigate harsh debate about ‘comfort women.’ Although it is not expected to be resolved in the foreseeable future, understanding the structure of the problem based on the fact-finding and legal analysis would enable the two peoples to seek a better solution. The author claims that: (1) although some of the historical facts remain unclear, and some people tend to focus too much attention on fact-finding, from the viewpoint of international law, sufficient evidence has been revealed to confirm Japan’s responsibility for its conduct in the Second World War, and Japan does not and should not deny the relevant historical facts; (2) Japan was absolved of its responsibility by the 1965 Agreement in a legal sense; and (3) having said that, this case reveals the limits of the positivistic legal approach, and the Asian Women’s Fund can be one legitimate way of dealing with this problem.

The seminal work such as Abney (1987) and Szabolcsi (1983, 1994) suggests that noun phrases have sentence-like structures. More specifically, noun phrases have functional categories analogous to I or C. The views raise the following question. How parallel are structures of clauses and noun phrases? In order to answer the question, we focus on interesting asymmetries which occur between nominal structures and clausal structures. More specifically, this paper explores restrictions on non-occurrence of so-called genitive markers previously discussed by An (2009, 2012, and 2014) and impossibility of movement inside the nominal domain. We also discuss further asymmetries related to quantifiers and adverbials which are not properly analyzed in the previous literature. We show that non-parallel behaviors are explained under the assumption that positions related to discourse are not available inside nominal domains.

There are futures, options as derivatives in our capital-market including KOSPI200 futures and options. Unfortunately linked-manipulations between stock tradings and derivatives tradings happen too often. It is able to distinguish linked-manipulations from faked-normal stock tradings using some criterias ; real purposes of tradings, rationals manners or not, the scales of profits. These acts of unfair trades are increasing in our capital market and especially the occurrences of new type of unfair trades cast attentions on same fields for example manipulations disguising hedge in option trades etc. Crimes in manipulations fields are developing without halts. In order to cope with its revolutions, we should make clear standards to distinguish linked-manipulations from faked-normal stock-tradings by searching same case studies.

There have been many linguists who studied Korean two-full-verb constructions. Some of them found an apparently meaningful similarity between these constructions in Korean and other serializing languages with respect to tense sharing and argument sharing and proposed serial verb constructions (SVC) in Korean. However, there are several phenomena which cannot be accounted for within the SVC framework, and one of the important properties of the SVC―the unaccusative second verb which takes the object of V1 as its subject―does not exist in Korean. In this paper we analyze the so-called SVCs into compound verb constructions (CVC) and covert coordination constructions (CCC) which already exist in Korean syntax. We also propose adequate structures for them without introducing a new structure to an already existing system. Based on this structural analysis, we not only explain the problems that the previous analysis could not solve but also provide further evidence for our non-serializing approach.

이 글은 일본에서 만들어진, 오늘날 일본인들의 가까운 선조들에 의해 만들어진, 일본의 권위있는 정부기관에서 생산된, 일본의 사료들만을 기초 자료로 하여, 당면하고 있는 소위 독도문제 의 본질을 이해하려 했으며, 그 문제의 중심에는 조작된 󰡔島根縣 告示 第40號󰡕가 존재하고 있음을 밝히려 하였다. 결론적으로, 일본은 독도가 주인없는 땅이 아니라는 역사적 사실을 1905년의 시마네현고시 제40호 이전에 이미 알고 있었으며, 고시에의 한 영토편입 이후에도 일본의 독도에 대한 영토인식, 즉 조선의 영토라 는 기존의 인식에는 변화가 없었음을 확인하였다. 더욱이, 일본이 국제 법적 근거로 내세우는「島根縣 告示 第40號󰡕의 실체는 일본 제국주의가 독도 불법강점을 위해 은밀히 진행시킨, 위장된 근거에 불과하다는 점이 드러났다. 당시의 국제 상황, 그리고 러시아와 전쟁의 와중에 그야말로 비밀에 붙일 수밖에 없는 저간의 사정을 모르는 바는 아니지만, 일본의 뿌리깊은 침략근성, 끈질긴 영토팽창야욕에 기인하는 술책으로 이해하고자 한다.