In understranding the essence of the Korea traditional Architecture, it is important to consider the jointing methods of architectural members, architectural technologies, etc. Especially the purpose of this study is understanding on the Jointing Method of Wooden Members in the period of Unified Silla Architecture. It's conclusion is summarized as follows. 1. A section of column has very close to do with the foundation stone. The structures of foundation stone and column are generally concluded by butt joint, arrow-head joint, housed joint by Grang-e method. Judu is structured by arrow-head joint. And, in general, beam is structured by Sagaematchum Chumcha and sagaljudu of Dori direction. At the head of Pyungju and the body of Goju, Changbang is structed by Jangbumachum with arrow-head joint or by jumukchang- machum. Also, it is surmised that Gyisoseum and Anssolim methods had been applied to columns from former ages. The example can be found at Bagjae Mireuksaji stone pagoda. Bagjae Mireuksaji stone pagoda taking wooden-pagoda form adopts Gyisoseum and Anssolim methods. We can also find such a sort of methods from other stone constructions like Budo, etc. 2. Injahwaban is structured by short Changbumachum with arrowed-head joint at upper members, and by Anjangmachum at the lower part. This sort of Gongpo style can be seen in the mural painting of tomb of Koguryo and in Buplyungsa, Buplyunsa, Bupkisa-located in Japan, which are influenced by Bakjae or Unified Silla. It is considered that at the end of the late United Silla, Injawhaban had been replaced with Chumcha and Soro on the Pyungbang under influence of Dapo style from China.

This study is examine the scales applied to buildings in the age of Unified Silla through construction sites excavated and its results are as follows; First, scales used in the age of Unified Silla were varied like Jucheok, Dangcheok and Hancheok, but it was generally accepted that Dangcheok was used in Yeongjocheok Since it was found that the scales applied to Dabotap at the Bulguksa temple and main building of the Gameunsa temple belonged to Goguryeo, Yeongjocheok scale used early in the age of Unified Silla was transitional and it was thought that Goguryeocheok and Dangcheok were used togethar. Second, according to actual rulers in Korea, china and Japan, the length of Dangcheok(ruler used in Chinese Tang era) mostly belonged to the extent of $29.25cm\;{\sim}\;30.5cm$(central value: 29,71cm). Third, plane features of main building of temple are assumed that it had five rooms in front compartment until the 7th century and then it was diversified to three, five and seven compartment. The size of compartment was same in the scale of front Eokan and Hyeopkan until late 7th century, but since then the dimension of Eokan tended to be wider than Hyeopkan. It was judged that the front Eokan used triple scales like 9, 12, 15, 18 cheok. Fourth, the length of residential structures was 17.5cheok${\sim}$36cheok and Bcheok was commonly used for front side of structure, The length of official structures was 8.4cheok${\sim}$36.3cheok which is similar to residential structures. However it has been confirmed that each of 9cheok, 12cheok, and 15cheok has been used for Eokan and Hyeopkan which gave presumption that triple scales was used for the measure.

The North Korean mission is inseparable from the South-North unification policy. In addition, the opinions of neighboring counties are also important. Such are the perimeters of the North Korean mission. This study attempts to examine North Korean mission, particularly the reconstruction of North Korean Church within the process of South North unification process. The reconstruction of the North Korean Church, as North Korean mission and unification movement, is a policy issue amidst the unification process. It is a policy that can create a basis within the North Korea and effectively manage the personnel, financial and mission resources of the South Korean Church. At the same time, the reconstruction of the North Korean Church joins the reunification process of the Korean peninsular with the North Korean mission purposes. The current situation is created by the ideological conflict between the conservative versus liberal elements within the Korean Church in regard to the North Korean mission and unification movement. In addition, there is a great disparity in the approach towards the reconstruction of the North Korean Church. The problems are three-fold: 1) Who is the protagonist of the North Korean mission? Is it the South Korean Church? or is it the North Korean Church? In case it it’s the latter, the term North Korean mission does not apply. 2) The phrase “North Korean mission” implies an imbedded view of the South North division. 3) Should the North Korean “Chosun Christian Association” be accepted as a partner in the North Korean mission? Or should it be viewed as a mission object? The best means of North Korean mission is to have the “Chosun Christian Association” take the leading role in the reconstruction of the North Korean Church. Since, however, it is the South Korean Church that is taking action to prepare for such an event, mutual cooperation between the two is essential. The reconstruction of the North Korean Church cannot be achieve by the South Korean Church alone. In addition, the reconstruction of North Korean Church is linked to the Korean war, a factor behind the division of the Korean Church into the liberal and conservative camp. The anti-communist stance of the South Korean regime was another factor that unified the right wing Christians. Attempts by the “Korean Christian Association” to reconstruct the North Korean Church within this approach involved, not only efforts to reconstruct the North Korean Church, but various aid programs. However, such aid programs were commonly perceived to be the work of mission organizations and not the conservative South Korean Church. Furthermore, the “Korean Christian Association,” which advocated the reconstruction of the North Korean Church, were mistakenly criticized as an organization that were only interested in the reconstruction of the Northern Church. Therefore, the reconstruction effort of the Northern Church must be newly reinterpreted. The role of the Church, from a mission history perspective, is to be a bridgehead of mission, a center of training for workers, and center of mission field. As such, though the reconstruction of the Northern Church is premature, efforts to prepare for such an event, financial preparation, training center for mission workers and confidence building between the South and North through information and assistance projects can be viewed within the context of the unification process. The North Korean mission through the reconstruction of the Northern Church within the context of the unification process can promote the unification capability of South and North. It is futuristic unification policy of the Southern Church. Precedents for the reconstruction of the Northern Church must be found from similar cases following the liberation from Japan and post-Korean war and examined strategically. The North Korean mission must conclude with the reconstruction of the North Korean Church.

The recent nuclear crisis triggered by North Korea on October 9, 2006 and the subsequent changes of political environment of the Korean Peninsula and surrounding superpower countries demand the Korean Christians to think seriously about the impending future of the South-North relationship and the possibility of the reunification of two Koreas no matter what kind of process may be taking place during the course of reunification. Even the possibility of sudden collapse of the North Korean regime has been cautiously proposed. At least many politicians and observers agree to the reality that the Koreas are in the first stage of reunification after the historical South-North Summit Talks in 1990. What does Korean Christianity do for the impending reunification of the Koreas? Do we have a master plan for the future other than the old paradigm of nationalistic approach by the radical proponents of “Unification Theology” during the 1970s and 1980s? Do we have a mission plan for North Korean Christianity after the reunification other than the imperialistic church planting based on South Korean Christians' denominational lines? What if there is a sudden collapse of North Korea? The present author aims to provide a comprehensive outlook for the leaders of South Korean Christianity to review the possible scenarios of reunification process by examining the expecting results of reunification and/or collapse. The author predicts that there will be (1) massive migration of North Koreans to South Korea (2) minor territorial conflict with China (3) the rapid dismantle of North Korean society (4) the rapid rise of unemployment rate (5) the rise of anti-North Koreans sentiment (6) the dissatisfaction of North Koreans increases. To verify these predictions, the author investigates the preceeding case of reunification in Germany, the role of East German Church in the process of reunification and the following results, and the lesson that could be gathered from the cases of North Korean refugees who have tried to settle in South Korean society. As conclusion, the present author suggests to South Korean Church to prepare the followings: (1) the theological enterprises for the soft-landing of North Koreans' Ju-che Philosophy (2) the theological articulation for preventing social anomie among North Koreans (3) Making South Korean churches as a strong mediating structure to make a political space (4) Interpreting the Christian Gospel with the theology of peaceful reconciliation and mutual endurance (5) Becoming a member of reunification governance (6) Paradigm shift from “nationalistic strategy” to “global-dimension reunification plan”.

The 1974 nation's christianizing reform had become an important long-pending question for Korea's unification. During 1980 and 1990 the KNCC and WCC established, using democracy and the people as a medium, roads for independent unification. It was then, when the liberative and conservative fractions of the Korean Christianity had disputes about the view toward the identification of North Korea. At the end there will be a nation's christianizing reform in a shell of liberative unification which is actually filled with conservative thoughts. This is the mission and the way of the Korean Church. Following below, there are results from analyzing treaties worked by ten South Korean Christian scholars themed on this issue. 1. The nation's christianization in the perspective of unification based on international and domestic situation studies. The direct experiences of the unification research workers, studies based on nation's christianizing reform about the North Korean Church and data from North Korea are the most reliable research materials. 2. Korea's unification plan and nation's christianizing reform established through evangelism'sliberalism. The liberalism's way of the nation's christianization reform has been to pursue for news about who actually holds the power for independency and democracy and thus create a road for unification. 3. The North Korean MissionPolicy Researcher's view of actualization of nation's christianization reform is not based on unification but missionary strategies. Their idea is to set up the whole nation's christianization reform concept and doing social work and spreading the good news to revive followers for strategic purposes and afterwards proceeding with a spiritual movement. The question here is having this vast discourse on the unification what news to put into the nation's christianization reform. If it had been only for strategic purposes, now is the time to set aside differences between fractions and concentrate on reconciliation, forgiveness and a unified settlement on how to proceed. How to achieve that is still left to solve. Although in the liberal's unification approach, may not be the direct statement about nation's Christianization reform so apparent, it is significant in creating a road for unification. What is left to solve in the future is how to get an agreement of the North Korean Mission Policy Organizations and graft every Christian societies together to cooperate and get an integreated statement.

Zum jetzigen Zeitpunkt mag es noch eine wissenschaftliche Fantasievorstellung sein, über die Reform des Strafvollzugs auf dem Gebiet Nordkoreas nach der koreanischen Wiedervereinigung zu sprechen, schliesslich ist die Herstellung der koreanischen Einheit ein politisch sehr komplizierter Prozess. Trotzdem muss man sich bereits jetzt auf die koreanische Einheit und die damit verbundenen rechtlichen Probleme vorbereiten. Diese Notwendigkeit wird besonders deutlich, wenn man die Nachwirkungen der deutschen Wiedervereinigung betrachtet. Ich denke, dass eine Untersuchung zur Reform des Strafvollzugs auf dem Gebiet Nordkoreas bereits heute dringend geboten ist und für die Zukunft des gesamten koreanischen Strafvollzugs von nicht zu unterschätzender Bedeutung. Natürlich unterscheidet sich die koreanische Situation von der deutschen im November des Jahres 1989 in wesentlichen Punkten. Dennoch denke ich, dass auch etliche politische und rechtliche Probleme nach der koreanischen Vereinigung den deutschen ähneln werden. So ist Korea in der glücklichen Lage, dass es bei der Lösung dieser Probleme von den deutschen Erfahrungen lernen kann. In diesem Aufsatz möchte ich zunächst analysieren, wie der Geltungsbereich des Strafvollzugsgesetzes auf das Gebiet der ehemaligen DDR ausgedehnt wurde und welche rechtlichen Probleme damit in der Praxis verbunden waren(II). Im Weiteren möchte ich die Festsetzung einer einheitlichen Bemessungsgrundlage für alle Gefangenen nach der koreanische Wiedervereinigung untersuchen sowie den Orientierungsrahmen zur Reform des Strafvollzugs auf dem Gebiet Nordkoreas diskutieren(III). Abschliessend soll aufgezeigt werden, welche Konsequenzen diese Änderungen für das koreanische Strafvollzugsgesetz haben wird(IV).

본고는 7차 교육과정에 따라 집필되어 검인정을 통과한 8종의 중학교 한문교과서를 중심으로 하여 중학교 교육용 기초한자 900자의 의미가 저자에 따라 ‘어떻게 풀이 되었는가’를 살펴보고, 그 ‘통일 방안’을 모색하는 장을 확대하는 것이 목적이다. 본고는 논의의 편의상 첫째, ‘字音으로 의미를 부여한 한자’, 둘째, ‘字意의 서술적 표현 한자’, 셋째, ‘관습에 의한 다양한 뜻풀이 한자’, 넷째, ‘난해한 의미의 한자’, 다섯째, ‘관습에 의한 과장․오류의 한자’로 나누어 살펴보았다.첫째, ‘字音으로 의미를 부여한 한자’를, ‘同音同義의 한자’와 ‘字音의 서술적 표현 한자’로 나누어 살펴보았다. ‘同音同義의 한자’는 중학교 한문 교육용 기초 한자 900자 가운데 15자가 있으나, 학습자가 이해하기 어려운 한자는 ‘功’, ‘德’, ‘半’, ‘姓’, ‘城’ 등 5자이고, ‘字音의 서술적 표현 한자’는 29자이다. 둘째, ‘字意의 서술적 표현된 한자’이다. 전통적으로 한자의 뜻풀이는 ‘서술어’의 형태를 취하여 한자의 의미를 먼저 풀이하고, 뒤에 한자음을 붙여서 한자를 제시한다. 서술적 표현으로 ‘의미’의 통일이 안된 한자는 15자로 출판사에 따라 서술형으로 의미를 풀이하였거나, 명사형으로 의미를 풀이하였다. 셋째, ‘관습에 의한 다양한 뜻풀이 한자’에 대하여 살펴보았다. 8종 교과서의 중학교 교육용 기초 한자 900자에 대한 뜻풀이는 저자의 관습에 의한 관용적 표현으로 준말로 풀이하거나, 저자의 주관에 의하여 다양하게 의미를 풀이한 한자는 118자 이상으로 교과서는 아직 인지발달이 미성숙한 학생을 상대로 하여 가장 정확한 의미를 전달하여야 하는 학습도구이므로, 그 통일성과 정확성이 반드시 전제되어야 한다. 넷째, ‘난해한 의미의 한자’에 대하여 살펴보았다. 중학교 한문교육용 기초한자 900자 가운데 그 의미가 난해한 한자는 21자이며, 학습자가 이해하기 쉽도록 현대의 의미로 바꾸어야 한다. 다섯째, ‘관습에 의한 과장․오류의 한자’에 대하여 살펴보았다. 7차 교육과정 한문교과서의 저자에 따라 차이가 있지만, 중학교 교육용 900자 가운데 한자의 뜻풀이가 과장되거나 잘못 풀이된 한자는 20자이다. 교과서는 저자의 잘못된 오류나 편견, 나아가 시대에 동떨어진 지식이 학습자에게 전달되기 때문에 반드시 바로 잡아야 한다. 지금까지 제 7차 교육과정 중학교 한문교과서에 나와 있는 중학교 한문교육용 기초 한자 900자의 뜻풀이를 살펴보고, 나아가 오류의 시정과 그 통일방안을 모색을 시도해 보았다. 이는 한 개인의 노력에 의해서 이루어질 과제가 아니며, 국어 관련 단체들이 국어 맞춤법 통일안을 제정하듯이 한문과 관련이 있는 제 단체가 공동으로 연구하여 최소한 한문 교육용 기초한자 1800자에 대한 의미를 통일하는 노력이 있어야 한다.