2020년 6월 25일 조영남 그림 대작(代作)사건에 대한 대법원 판결이 있었다. 이 사건은 사기죄로 기소되어 대법원에서 무죄를 선고받았지만, 그 사안을 들여다보면 저작권 귀속과 저작권 침해의 문제임을 알 수 있 다. 이에 본 연구에서는 이 사건의 사실관계를 기초로 하여 저작권법상의 쟁점이 되는 저작권 귀속과 저작권 침해의 문제에 대해서 논의를 하였다. 피고인은 자신이 저작자이고 공소외인은 조수라는 주장에 대해서 저작 권법상 저작권 귀속에 관한 법리를 중심으로 하여 피고인의 주장에 대해 검토하여 보았다. 저작권법은 아이디어를 제공한 자가 아니라 이를 표현 한 자에게 저작권이 귀속되도록 하고 있는데 이 사건의 사실관계를 살펴 보면 피고인은 아이디어를 제공하였을 뿐이고 실질적으로 표현을 한 자 는 공소외인 이므로 저작자는 공소외인이 된다는 결론을 도출하였다. 피고인은 자신의 그림은 개념미술 그리고 팝아트에 해당하기 때문에 개념을 제시한 자신에게 저작권이 있고 공소외인에게는 저작권이 없다는 취지의 주장에 대해서 개념미술의 개념과 팝아트의 개념을 살피고 2인 이상의 사람이 팝아트나 개념미술의 창작에 관여하는 경우 저작권은 누 구에게 귀속하게 되는지에 대해서 살펴보았다. 개념미술이나 팝아트라고 하더라도 저작권법이 표현을 보호하고자 하는 취지를 벗어날 수는 없기 때문에 피고인이 아무리 팝아트적인 요소인 화투를 가지고 꽃으로 표현 하라는 것을 지시하였다고 하더라도 결국 캔버스에 어떻게 그릴 것인지 구상하고 이러한 구상을 토대로 실질적으로 그림을 그려낸 사람은 공소 외인에 해당하므로 공소외인이 저작권자가 된다는 결론을 도출하였다. 피고인과 공소외인의 거래 관계를 일반적으로 대작계약이라고 칭하고 있는 점에 대해서 대작계약의 정의와 대작계약의 경우 누구에게 저작권 이 귀속되는지에 대해서 살펴보았다. 대작계약은 양도불가능한 저작권의 양도를 목적으로 하고 있기 때문에 대작계약은 무효이고, 저작권은 미술 품을 창작한 자에게 원시적으로 귀속되므로 이 사안에서 저작권은 공소 외인에게 귀속된다고 할 수 있다. 저작권이 공소외인에게 귀속되는 경우 피고인이 미술품에 직접적으로 덧칠을 한 행위는 저작권법상 동일성 유지권을 침해한 행위가 되므로 이 를 근거로 공소외인은 피고인에게 저작권법에 따라 민ᆞ형사상의 구제를 청구할 수 있을 것이다.

본 논문은 시각장애인의 문화향유권 확대를 위하여 현재 비중 있게 다루어지지 않고 있는 감각인 후각을 사용한 새로운 미술작품 감상법 개발의 가능성에 대하여 다루고 있다. 인간의 후각은 현대사회에서는 크게 중요시되지 않는 감각이지만 이는 문화적인 요인에 의한 것이며, 생물학적인 관점에서 후각은 실용적 활용 가능성을 충분히 지닌 감각이 다. 본 연구에서는 여러 종류의 향이 후각을 통하여 인지될 때 각각 고유의 색상 및 개념과 무의식적인 연관 관계를 지니고 있음을 가정하였고, 이를 향의 색 지향성과 개념 지향성이라는 용어로 나타내었다. 연구자들은 실험을 통하여 특정한 일부 향에 색 지향성과 개념 지향성이 존재함을 확인하였고 이러한 향을 활용하여 시각장애인들에게 미술작품 에 사용된 색상에 대한 정보를 전달하는데 성공하였다. 본 연구를 기반으로 색채가 지닌 명도와 채도 및 더 다양한 색상을 전달할 수 있는 색-개념 지향성 향의 활용에 관한 연구를 지속할 수 있기를 희망한다.

본 연구는 국립미술관이 지향하는 공공성의 실체를 파악하는 과정에서 그 운영방침의 전제가 되는 미술정책과 공공성의 역학 관계를 과연 어떤 관점에서 조명해야 하는가를 질문한다. 만약 정책을 ‘공익의 실현’이라는 목표에 이상적으로 부합할 수 있는 실질적이면서 합리적인 수단이라고 전제한다면, 박정희 정권의 조국 근대화 프로젝트 중 하나였던 국현 경복궁관 개관, 공공 미술관으로서의 대중성과 전문성을 확보하고자 했던 과천관의 설립과 전개, 그리고 민간 경영의 개념 도입 이후 정부와 미술계의 논쟁으로부터 비롯된 특수법인화 추진까지의 정책사는 공공성 에 대한 복합적인 정치적 이해관계가 얽혀있음을 전제해야 한다.

한스 하케는 여러 개념미술 작업을 통해 나치 시대라는 억압된 역사의 기억을 일깨우며 현재 속에 은밀히 작동하고 있는 파시즘의 잔재를 자각하게 하였다. 그라츠에서 이루어진 작업 <너희들은 결국 승리 하였다>는 50년 전의 나치와의 합병행사를 재현하며 무비판적으로 그들의 이데올로기에 잠식되어갔던 과거의 불편한 기억들을 소환하였고, 베니스 비엔날레에서의 작업 <게르마니아>는 통일이라는 독일 역사의 영광의 순간을 파시즘의 기억과 대비시키며 후기 자본주의 체제 안에 여전히 작동하고 있는 파시즘 의 연속성을 숙고하게 하였다. 독일 국회의사당의 설치작업 <거주민들에게>는 외국인에 대한 적대 감정 이라는 통일 이후 점증하는 사회 문제가 나치시대의 배타적 민족주의와 동일한 뿌리를 가지고 있음을 일깨우며 독일 영토에 사는 모든 이들의 권익을 대변하는 국회가 되기를 촉구하였다. 이러한 하케의 작업들 은 감상자들에게 자기비판과 논의의 계기를 제공하며 사회적 변화의 한 동인이 되어 주었는데 그러한 의미에서 그의 미술은 계몽을 위한 도구이며 정치적인 행위였다.

This thesis is a study on Sook-Jae Lim(1899~1937) and Korean modern design. In modern Korea, design like most cultural advances came from western culture, that was introduced via Japan. So Korean design can be betterunderstood from observing Japanese modern design history. The research on Japanese modern design, however, is not being done actively. Sook-Jae Lim was the first Korean to graduate from the Department of Design at Tokyo Fine Arts School (currently the Tokyo National University of Fine Arts and Music). He died at a premature 38 years old, so very little of his works exist. That makes the study about him very difficult. From this perspective, the study aims to examine modern design concepts and styles accepted into Korea from Japan and position Lim as an early design pioneer in Korean design history, by using research of Korean and Japanese design fields in the modern era with focus on Lim and his works. Chapter II researches the process of how the concept of design was formed in modern Japan and how the “Art-Nouveau” style not only represents early modern design but also features Lim's works dominantly. Chapter Ⅲ looks into the process of how the concept of design was formed and which design styles were introduced and applied in modern Korea. Chapter Ⅳ analyzes how Lim's viewpoint on design and his works were developed with observations about the tendency of the Japanese design field and curriculums of the Tokyo Fine Arts School during the period of his college days.

本文以中国改革开放之后的乡土美术为研究对象，主要讨论了乡土美术发展的三个阶段及其代表性的艺术家和艺术作品；对支持和影响不同阶段的乡土美术的观念进行了阐释。改革开放之后乡土美术的出现和发展，就其本身而言经历了三个大的发展阶段。即七十年代末到八十年代的乡土写实主义美术；八十年代中期兴起的以西北为题材的乡土美术；九十年代市场经济兴起之后，以进城打工的农民工为表达对象的乡土美术。乡土写实主义的美术就是改革开放之初，卽伤痕美术。改革开放之后，人们普遍认为文革美术是假大空的虚伪现实主义艺术，原因之一就是它用理想化的农村和农民形象，遮蔽了生活在艰难困苦之中的乡村和农民。从观念上说就是用毛时代一直受到批判的人道主义和人性论，来反对毛时代，特别是文革中流行的阶级斗争观念。在上世纪八十年中期，中国的知识分子感受到西方强势文化的压力，不约而同地把眼光投向了西北。借西北的乡村和农民形象，神圣化汉唐的历史和文化来神圣化中国文化。这作为回应西方文化冲击的一种特殊方式，标志着乡土美术的转向，那就是从关注对文革的否定和反思上转向对整个中国文化的反思。进入九十年代之后，一个重要的艺术现象是新生代的出现。从中国视觉艺术史的角度看，新生代的艺术标志着从表达乡村到描绘都市的转向，同时也预示了另一种新型农民形象-----农民 工形象---的出现。过去以地理空间为界限的城乡对立，在改革开放之后也进入城市空间之中，形成一种新的社会结构。上世纪九十年代开始的市场经济改革，加大了中国社会贫富之间的差距，由此导致知识界的新左派和自由主义者对中国社会问题的争论，其中社会公正、公平和经济效率成为两派争论的焦点。事实上，农民被置入社会底层，成为市场经济改革中受益最少的人群，正是改革者为了追求经济效率最大化的制度设计产生的结果。此时表达农民工形象的乡土美术，在一定程度上反映了新左派的思想影响，也体现了历史上早有的民粹主义关注弱势人群的传统。本文认为改革开放之后的乡土美术，虽然是以中国乡村和农民为表达对象的，但这个对象在作品并不是主体，而是沉默、无语和匿名的。原因在于中国乡村和农民的边缘化进程，与中国社会的变迁几乎是同步的，由此证明了从一开始，乡土美术并没有真正成为农民的代言人，而是另有政治和艺术的诉求。

The Villa Mairea (1937-39) designed by Alvar Aalto (1898-1976) has been studied by many researchers from various viewpoints. However, few studies have devoted their attention to the major issue raised by Aalto at the Yale University lecture and "Mairea" article in arkitekten in 1939. The issue is to fuse art with life in the living room with mobile partition walls that can function both as art exhibition walls and as art storage cabinets at the same time. Through this device, he maintained, the client can change displayed pictures easily according to the situation and so "painting and everyday life can evolve in a more direct manner." This paper argues that Aalto's concept originated from Japanese 'tokonoma' in Tetsuro Yoshida's Das japanische Wohnhaus (1935), which he referred to during the project. Differently from other Japanese features in the house, this tokonoma idea is more than formal, but more decisive than passing in driving the plan. And, whether coincidently or not, his idea exactly corresponds to Japanese aesthetes' and critics' own interpretation of the tononoma as the symbolic centre of Japanese people's everyday life. More importantly, however, this art display concept discloses secret strata of modern architecture during the time when the petrified rationalism was still at its power Even through the tokonoma motif alone, we see diverse trails in modern architecture: fusion of the East and the West, fusion of the traditional and the modern, to say nothing of fusion of art with life.

The purpose of this article is to delve into the problems of originality of the artwork by examining issues of reproduction within the contemporary art market. In contemporary arts, especially in terms of art production and consumption, we can’t overlook society and its economic structure and its connection with of capitalism. As the purity of art creation has turned into an exchange value, art, especially an object as artwork, has fallen into the status of production in an economic marketing system. Walter Benjamin mainly referred to that point in his thesis Das Kunstwerk im Zeitalter seiner technischen Reproduzierbarkeit, which originated the sociology of plastic arts. This thesis, published in 1936, traced how the artistic functions of photograph and movie had been changed through the social development. His main concerns were movie and photograph but what I am concentrating from his point of view, is that even in the field of plastic arts, the manufacture of reproduction has been practiced as a primary method within the social and political contexts and development. Though I am referring to this in the main body of this article, reproduction in contemporary art strongly needs a new definition since it has been spread all over like a newest virus, not only by collector’s personal taste or but also by commercial circulations of these reproductions to the public. This relates to Benjamin’s argument about the value of an exhibition at a museum(Ausstellungswert). Since the function of an artwork has been one of cultural industry, the manufacturing of reproduction raises unexpected problems, such as, the originality of the artwork, the value of an exhibition at a museum, its achievement as documentary and as a territory of art criticism. In this point of view, I want to inquire into the value and criteria of an exhibition in contemporary art through the review of the definitions and the intrinsic attributes of reproduction. Somehow in a broad sense, the reproduction is a product coming out of representation or copy (replica) of an original art work or an model. Therefore, the problems it presents differ from the Simulacre, which is an image without an original one. In terms of the Meanings of reproduction, we can distinguish it as reproductions, copies, and productions. These types of reproductions are not the original artworks reflected by the creative intention of the artists. For example, a publishing company reproduced some of lithographs of Salvador Dali in the 1960s. They are commercial copies in the form of representation or reproduction with no artistic and creative intention of the artist. However, In despite of this theoretical basis, reproductions of the famous artists are still displayed without any verification for of the public’s quest for the artworks. Moreover, many commercial companies that are planning to exhibit art works of the world-famous artists only for their profits keep trying to speak ill of and judging by the law the honest art critics’ articles which discuss the true values of exhibition. If freedom of expression is one of the ideals of democracy, even the judgment of the originality of the artworks should be freely expressed.

Orientalness is a concept that express the collective identity of the Orient in relation to the West. THe concept itself is mutable and defined by the relationship between the two regions art different points in time. Changes in the concept depend on a number of factors, such as cultural influence, the political balance of power between the two regions, and on the interpretative sheme that defines the relationship. In addition, the geographical notion of the concept evolves culturally, socially and politically. During this process, Oriental-ness becomes Oriental-ism art times. I will attempt to survey and measure the progression of Orientalness from its emergence in early 17th century to its subsequent tranformation in modern Korea as reflected in art theory and art works. The recognition of the comparative characteristics of Oriental art began when the Orient was exposed to the art of the West in the late Ming dynasty during the early 17th century. The changes in the artistic climate in China affected the late Chosun. I will start with a brief introduction of this time and the birth of Orientalness. The concept gradually changed during the period of Enlightenment(開化期) towards the end of the 19th century, and during the colonial period(1910-1945) it took on a new form. Establishment of the concept of "Orient" as a single, unifying concept spanning across cultures and national boundaries has been attributed to late Meiji period Japan, whose intention at that time is believed to have been to build a pan-Asia(亞細亞) empire with Japan at its commandinf center. IT has been stressed that the real motive behind the formation of one single cultural unit, where the shared common written language was Chinese and Confucianism and Taoism were the common metaphysical traditions, was to build one political unit. WHen the notion of a geographical unit of Asia was replaced by the cencept of Asia as a cultural and political unit, a massive growth of interest and discourse were provoked around the concept of Orientalism. When Orientalism was being formulated, Korea automatically became member of "one Asia" when the country became colonized. For Koreans, the identity of the Orient had ti be defined in ciltural terms, as the political notion of a nation was non-existent at that time. THe definition if udentity was pursued at two levels, pan-Asia and local. If Orientalism was an elite discourse centered in pan-Asian philosophical and religious trditions, localized Orientalism was a popular dis-course emphasizing locality as the byproduct of natural geographic condition. After the liveration in 1945 from colonial rule, a thrust of movement across towards political nationalism. Two types of discourses on Orientalism, elite and popular, continued as central themes in art. Despite the effort to redefine the national identity by eradicating the cultural language of the colonial past, the past was enduring well into the present time. As discussed above, even when the paintinf themes were selected from Korean history, the tradition of usinf history paintinf as a manifestation of political policy to glorify the local identity had its founding during the Meiji period. THe elevation of folk art to the level of high art also goes back to the colonial promotion of local color and local sentiment. Again, the succession of the past (colonial) ideal was defended as the tradition assumed a distict modern shape that was abstract in style. The concept of the "Orient" is of relative and changing nature. It was formulated in relation to Western culture or civilization. Whatever the real motive of the adoption of them had been, the superiority of the Orient was emphasized at all times. The essence of the Orient was always perceived as the metaphysical tradition as a way to downgrade Western culture as materialistic. This view still prevails and the principle of Orient was always sought in Confucianism, Taoism, and Buddhism. Even when Orientalism was employed by imperialist Japan in an effort to establish her position as the center of the Orient, the spiritual source was still in Chinese philosophy and religion. In art also, the Chinese literati tradition became the major platform for elite discourse. Orientalism was also degined locally, and the so-called local color was pursued in terms of theme and style. Thus trend continued despite the effort to eradicate the remnants of colonial culture long after the aesthetic ideal of the modern Korean art.

초등학교 미술 교육과정은 미적체험을 통해 자신의 시각 세계에 좀 더 논리적이고 분석적으로 사고하고 반응할 수 있는 능력과 태도를 기를 것을 강조하고 있다. 그러나 현재의 미적체험활동은 표현을 위한 도입단계에서 벗어나지 못하고 있으며, 내용 자체도 자연미와 조형미 감상에 국한되어 있다. 이에 본 연구는 미적체험의 미학적 접근을 통해 초등 미술 교육에 이바지 하고자하는 필요성에서 시작되었다. 이를 위해 우선 미학과 미적체험의 의미를 문헌 연구를 통해 살펴보고, 초등 미술 교육에서 미학적 접근의 필요성을 제시하였다. 그리고 초등 미술 교육에서 미학적 접근의 방향을 정한 후, 이를 바탕으로 한 접근 방안의 예로 미술의 개념 이해를 위한 학습 지도 계획을 제시하였다. 이런 시도를 통하여 초등 미술 교육이 학생들의 비판적 사고력과 창의성 향상에 기여할 것으로 기대한다.