This study evaluated the management priority of small catchments in the Nam River basin, comprehensively considering the impact of non-point pollution sources for water quality improvement. Water quality data from the Water Environment Measurement Network and additional field survey data were collected to understand the water quality status at the small catchment level. The management priority was calculated by integrating data on pollution sources, land cover, and runoff using a weighted method. As a result, the E08-2 small catchment, located downstream of the Nam River, showed the highest priority, followed by A18, B09, E04, and A19. The main factor influencing the water quality improvement priority was the pollution source characteristics within the small catchment, especially the influence factor and land use condition. This study contributes to the efficient water quality management of the Nam River basin by identifying the priority by small catchment through analysis that simultaneously considers point and non-point pollution sources.

목 적: 광주광역시 안경사를 대상으로 계층화 의사결정방법(AHP)를 활용하여 안경원 경영향상 요인 중 요도 및 우선순위에 대해 알아보고자 한다. 방 법: 안경원 경영향상 요인 중 중요요인을 이원비교하기 위해 광주광역시 안경사를 대상으로 계층화 의사결정방법(AHP)을 이용하여 상대적인 중요도 및 우선순위를 조사하였다. 안경원 경영향상 요인 중요도 및 우선순위 분석은 일관성 확보를 위해 일관성 비율 0.1 미만일 때 분석하였다. 결 과: 계층화 의사결정방법 분석 결과 안경원 경영향상 요인 중 Level 2항목 중요도는 상품/서비스가 가장 중요한 요인으로 분석되었다. Level 3항목별 중요도는 Level 3(01)은 전문안경사, Level 3(02)는 학교 에서 가까움, Level 3(03)은 홍보(전단지, 신문광고), Level 3(04)는 안경사의 신뢰성, Level 3(05)는 가격 의 적정성이 중요하다고 분석되었다. Level 3항목 우선순위는 안경사의 신뢰성(0.2552)으로 분석되었다. 결 론: 안경원 경영향상 요인 중요도 및 우선순위는 특정 관리자의 경험에 의존하던 안경원 경영을 좀 더 합리적이고 과학적 방법인 계층화 의사결정방법(AHP)을 적용함으로써 합리성을 높일 수 있으며, 그 결과 안경사의 신뢰성(0.2552)이 가장 중요한 요인으로 나타났다.

This study identifies influential factors for invigorating the public management office (PMO) system for system integration (SI) projects in public sectors and analyzes the priority of each factor from the point of different stakeholders, i.e., owners, SI company, and PMO. Based on the literature review, four first-level influential factors are identified: legal system maintenance, owner’s capability, SI company’s capability, and PMO’s capability. Among them, the PMO’s capability is determined as the most critical factor by all the stakeholders. Among the second-level influential factors, the capabilities of professional engineers and project managers are considered as important among the PMO’s capability, whereas the reasonable consulting fee is considered as the most critical factor among the legal system maintenance. With respect to each stakeholder, project management capability is considered as the most important factor for owners, while the reasonable consulting fee is considered as the most important factor for PMO.

In this study, non-point pollution sources in the Yeongsan river basin are analyzed; then, the priority regions (areas divided on a small scale) of management are selected for efficient water management of the Seungcheon and Jooksan reservoirs, which were constructed as one of the 4 major rivers restoration projects. The priority regions are decided by using the criteria of the excessive rate of target water quality, non-point pollution load per unit area, total TP load and down flow distance. The results of this study are as follows. The upper 10% of the priority regions for non-point pollution management includes YB15, YB05, YB10, YB24, YB14 and YB11 for the Seungcheon reservoir watershed, and YC24, YC25, YC30, YC34, YC22 and YC17 for the Jooksan reservoir watershed. However, a few regions in each of the Seungcheon and Jooksan reservoirs need to be selected in higher order, and the non-point pollution removal facilities in the regions need to be installed with respect to budget, urgent matter, and so on.

This study is to review strategic priority for Defense Quality Management Factors of the Defense Agency for Technology and Quality. It is necessary to decide which quality factors are more important and which quality factors are relatively less important.

In this study, the discharge loads of non-point pollution sources were analyzed using a Hydrologic Simulation Program-Fortran (HSPF) model for 46 sub-watersheds in order to guide the management plan for water and streams passing through the city. The results using HSPF showed good applicability in comparison to point measurements, which were based on BOD, TP, and TN. The mean value of the BOD loads was 4.08 kg/km2 per day, and the highest level of BOD was 17.75 kg/km2 per day at Namri. Three potential areas of high priority for the installment of constructed wetlands were selected in order to reduce non-point pollution sources based on BOD loads and on environmental and economic conditions. The results for these scenarios indicated a maximum rate of reduction in BOD of 39.12% within the proposed constructed wetlands.

This study aims to analyze the situation and behavioral characteristic of nonpoint pollution sources by examining and analyzing the basic data such as the hydraulic and hydrologic characteristics and land use situation of the basin, and provide basic design data for basin management by calculating the soil loss rate due to rainfall effluents, for the Golji Stream basin located at Jeongseon, Gangwon province. For this, this study applied the SWAT model to the object basin, established input data for the model through parameter estimation and sensitivity analysis, and conducted a simulation. This study confirmed the suitability of the model by conducting a verification with the actually measured spillage being the basic of simulation results, analyzed that the maintenance of the sub-basin #15 with 34644.37 ton/yr of soil loss rate calculated by sub-basins in the object basin should be conducted first, and showed that there happened about 14,800 times of difference from the sub-basin #1 with 2.33 ton/yr of soil loss rate, the lowest. It is judged that this result should be considered as very important to set the priority order of basin management in a large basin and should be considered reasonably when applied to the work.

본 연구는 퍼지 TOPSIS법과 AHP법을 이용하여 IMO 정보관리시스템의 예비과제 우선순위를 평가하기 위한 것이다. 이러한 평가를 위해 먼저 24개의 예비과제를 추출하여 FSM법을 이용하여 대체안을 구조화하였고, 최종 4개의 주요 예비과제를 도출한다. 또한 평가항목간의 가중치는 의사결정자의 일관성을 유지하면서 평가가 가능한 AHP법을 이용한다. 그러나 AHP법은 비교대상의 수가 증가하면 쌍대비교의 횟수가 증가하고, 평가에는 수많은 애매성이 존재하기 때문에 최종 우선순위 선정에는 TOPSIS에 퍼지이론을 도입한 퍼지 TOPSIS법을 이용한다. 그 결과 IMO 기준정보관리, IMO 정보기준전달, IMO 통합데이터베이스, IMO 지식허브 순으로 구축되어야 하는 것으로 나타났다.

오늘날 해운산업분야에서 선박관리업의 역할과 중요성은 날로 확대되고 있다. 과거 해운경기의 불황을 거치면서 다수의 해운선사들은 비용의 상승 및 선원의 공급 불안정 등의 이유로 선원관리 분야의 아웃소싱을 시도하게 되었다. 이에 따라 해운산업에서도 분업화와 전문화가 활발해지면서 국내외 선박관리기업의 경쟁이 심화되고 있다. 경쟁시대에 생존을 위해서는 국내외 해운산업의 환경변화 및 선박관리업의 현황에 대한 정확한 이해와 경쟁력 제고를 위한 요인의 파악이 시급하다. 본 연구에서는 의사결정문제를 다루는 방법으로 다양한 대안 중에서 최적의 선택대안을 도출할 때 사용하는 계층분석적 의사결정방법(AHP)를 사용하여 우리나라 선박관리기업의 경쟁력 요인 우선순위를 도출하고자 한다. 분석 결과 선박관리업의 기업경쟁력 평가 요인에서 가장 중요하게 고려해야 할 사항은 인적자원 요인으로, 이것은 우수한 선원의 학보와 우수한 해기품질을 가진 육상의 관리요원을 확보하는 것이 중요하다는 것을 알 수 있다. 본 연구는 기업경쟁력에 관한 이론을 정립하는데 기여하며, 특히 선박관리기업의 경쟁력 요인을 도출함으로써 선박관리기업의 경쟁력 제고를 위한 경영전략 수립에 기여할 것으로 판단된다.