해상교통안전진단제도는 선박통항에 영향을 미치는 수역이나 시설의 변경 시 선박통항 안전성 여부를 사전에 평가하고자 도 입되었다. 동 제도의 도입 이후 지난 2014년 대상사업의 범위를 한정하여 길이 100미터 이상 및 최고 속력 60노트 이상인 선박을 대상사 업의 기준으로 설정하였다. 본 연구에서는 이렇게 설정된 대상선박 기준을 해사안전법의 교통안전특정해역, 유조선통항금지해역 등의 대 상선박 기준과 비교 검토하고, 안전진단 대상선박 현황 및 안전진단 제외사례를 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 교통안전특정해역에서 1,000G/T 이상, 유조선통항금지해역에서 794G/T 이상의 위험화물운반선에 대하여 안전진단이 필요한 것으로 나타났고, 여객선 및 위험화물운반선 에 대하여 보다 강화된 기준 적용 필요성이 제기되었다. 따라서 결론으로 대상선박 기준 재검토 필요성을 제시하였다.

For the purpose of economic growth in the nineteenth century, social infrastructures have been rapidly aging since the 21st century, Currently, many of the existing infrastructure has been aged, and many national costs have been spent on safety Inspection and maintenance. It is expected that more maintenance will be costly in the future, and maintenance cost can be expected to be reduced due to safety inspection and repair and reinforcement measures in a timely manner. The measures provided in the national and international safety inspection and maintenance manual reduce the efficiency of the work by repeating document work. In addition, due to lack of information sharing among practitioners performing inspection and maintenance, it is considered that incomplete work or incurring additional costs will lead to a large national loss. Building Information Modeling (BIM) can manage all the information generated during the whole life cycle of social infrastructures. Domestic institutions are increasing the use of BIM, and the Public Procurement Service is obliged to design BIM. We expect to increase the work efficiency of practitioners by reducing repetitive document work using BIM, It will make the integrated management information enable bi-directional communication among practitioners. First of all, building a library of social infrastructures and standardizing the information classification system and procedures for BIM application should be essential. As a result, standardization studies on standard information classification system and procedures based on representative bridges among social infrastructures were conducted.

Since 1995 the special act for safety management of public facilities have been enacted in Korea. Since then undergoing safety accidents great and small, legal system was revised several times for safety promotion. As part of its efforts Korea Infrastructure Safety & Technology Corporation have periodically evaluated the building safety inspection or diagnosis reports based on Special Act for Safety Control of Public Structures and published annual casebook. This study investigates and examines the cases of bad or poor reports until now. This paper aims at reasoning out the technical and institutional improvement plan for error-prone problems when safety inspection of buildings.

In recent years, there have been many serious disasters caused by the lack of basic safety and health measures at workplaces, such as chemical poisoning accidents and fire and explosion accidents at large shipyards. At the same time, interest and awareness of the safety of our people is rising. There are several schemes to preemptively remove industrial accidents. Among them, the safety and health diagnosis system that provides the safety and health of the workplace is proposed as an alternative and the system is expanding quantitatively every year by suggesting problems and remedial measures. Therefore, it is very important to secure the safety and health of the workplace through the safety and health diagnosis. However, due to the lack of laws and regulations on safety and health diagnosis system, dumping of diagnosis amount due to the existence of too many diagnosis agencies, lack of expertise of diagnostic workforce, etc. there has been serious disasters in the diagnostic workspaces. In this regard, the reliability of the safety and health diagnosis is questionable. Therefore, in this study, I intend to improve the reliability of safety and health diagnosis by reviving the intention of safety and health diagnosis legislation

해상교통안전진단제도는 연안에서 선박의 항행에 영향을 미치는 각종 해상사업으로 인해 발생할 수 있는 위험요인을 전문적으로 조사·측정·평가하기 위해 2009년에 법제화된 이후에 제도 발전에 관한 여러 연구가 수행되어 왔다. 이러한 연구결과를 분석하여 현 제도의 미비점을 색인한 결과, 안전진단 결과에 따라 해상사업이 수행되었는지 검증하기 위한 절차와 안전진단의 주요 과정 중 하나인 선박조종 시뮬레이션의 정확성을 검증하기 위한 사후관리 관련 규정이 미흡했다. 사후관리제도 도입 필요성이 드러남에 따라 법령화된 유사 제도인 환경영향평가제도와 도로교통안전진단제도의 법체계를 분석하였다. 그리고 해상교통분야의 미비점을 개선하기 위한 법령안을 구체적으로 제시하였다. 본 고의 법령안은 진단의 정확도를 검증하고 진단결과의 이행을 담보함으로써 해상사업과 관련된 잠재적 위험요인을 제거하고 해상교통안전에 기여할 것으로 기대된다.