본 논문은 선교적 교회론이 이론뿐만 아니라 사역 현장에서 가시적인 결과를 도출할 수 있도록 하기 위한 현장 연구 방법론에 관한 연구이다. 본 연구는 그동안 사용해 오던 현장 연구 방법들이 갖는 한계들을 알아보는 데서 출발한다. 그리고 그에 대한 대안으로 두 가지 이상의 현장 연구 방법들을 다양한 방식으로 혼합 및 활용할 수 있는 통합 방법론(mixed methodology)을 소개한다. 선교적 교회론이 존재론, 실존론은 물론 상황화적 적용에도 활용이 가능해지기 위해서는 현장에 대한 이해와 또 그에 바탕 한 사역 전략의 수립이 필수적이다. 또한 가시적이고 정확한 현장의 자료를 수집하기 위하여서 설계 과정에서부터 정확한 목표, 표본과 모집단의 선정, 자료수집 방법, 현장에 대한 현실적인 이해, 자료의 정리 방식 등을 정확히 설정해야 한다. 기존의 양적 연구와 질적 연구의 특성과 그것들이 갖고 있는 철학적 배경을 이해할 경우 각 방법들이 갖고 있는 장점과 한계를 이해할 수 있다. 통합방법론은 이런 방법들의 한계를 최소화한 것으로 선교적 교회론의 실현에 좀 더 현실적인 기여를 할 수 있을 것으로 기대된다. 선교적 교회론을 가시화하기 위하여서는 사역의 단계마다 수행해야 할 현장연구들이 조금씩 달라야 한다. 그리고 각 단계들의 현장 조사의 성격이 다른 만큼 사용하는 자료 수집 방법들, 그들의 배합, 그리고 방법들의 순차는 다양하게 선택할 수가 있어야 한다. 통합하는 방식에도 두 가지 방법들을 단순하게 합하는 삼각화 설계법을 필두로 리서치의 목적에 따라 순차성과 동시성, 리서치의 성격에 따라 탐색적, 설명적, 그리고 내재적 접근들을 고루 사용할 수 있다. 본 논문은 이 중에서도 선교적 교회론에 적용이 비교적 용이해 보이는 6가지 통합방법의 유형들을 소개할 것이다. 각 유형별로 적절한 현장 연구의 예들로 어떤 것이 있는지도 소개할 것이다.

World evangelization needs to be conducted by both older churches (sending churches) and younger churches (receiving churches) because the distinction between the former and the latter has disappeared. God uses great resources from the younger churches for world evangelization.The church, defined as all Christian churches without regard to denominational distinction, needs to understand the urgency of the evangelistic task. More than two-thirds of mankind have yet to be evangelized and there is a great receptivity to the gospel in many parts of the world. The church should be ashamed that so many souls have been neglected and unreached for Christ.The church needs to understand the significance of evangelism as it relates to different world cultures. Missionaries need to be sensitive to different cultures through which the gospel can be effectively communicated to different people groups. The gospel message needs to be presented in such a way that it can be meaningful to the people.The church needs to develop indigenous leadership to enable native leaders in every country to evangelize their people, plant the indigenous churches according to their needs, and extend God's kingdom. Christian leaders are not born but made through appropriate training and education. The church needs to follow Jesus Christ in terms of making disciples of all nations.The church needs to understand the spiritual conflict involved when the church is active in world evangelization. Churches are engaged in constant spiritual warfare with the principalities and powers of evil seeking to overthrow the Lord's church and frustrate its mission of world evangelization. The church needs to equip itself with the word of God and prayer.The church needs to understand the importance of religious freedom and the seriousness of religious persecution throughout the world. The church needs to pray for world leaders and call upon them to guarantee freedom of thought, conscience, and freedom to practice and propagate religion according to God's will. The church needs to understand the power of the Holy Spirit and to believe the Holy Spirit will help the church to effectively carry out world evangelization. World evangelization calls for conviction of sin, faith in Christ, a new birth, and Christian growth. The church needs to be filled with the Holy Spirit to become the true missionary church.The church needs to believe in the imminent return of the Lord Jesus Christ to consummate His salvation and His judgement. The church needs to remember that God will perfect His kingdom which anticipates the new heaven and new earth where righteousness will dwell and God will rule forever.The Lausanne Movement for World Evangelization is based on the Great Commission and the Great Commandment. The Lausanne theology of missions is based upon the Lausanne Covenant, the Manila Manifesto, and the Capetown Commitment which were officially adopted as the promise, the declaration, and the devotion of the church to carry out the world evangelization until the return of Jesus Christ.

Der Ursprung des islamischen Mystizismus geht auf den Begriff ‘Sufi’ zurueck, der mit dem Schafwolle bekleidet und asketisches Leben fuehrt. Als ein Sufi gefragt wurde, was der Sufi sei, antwortete er, ein Sufi sei ein Mensch, der nichts hat, aber von nimandem in Besizt genommen wird. Im Hintergrund des islamischen Mystizismus liegt die Entwicklung des Islams nach dem Tode von Muhammad insbesondere durche den Eroberungskrieg von Umaiya Hally(661-750). Die Machthaber des Islams wurden reicher und politisch unterdrueckerisch. Dagegen gab es immer wieder eine Gegenbewegung, die die Umkehr und die Ehrfurcht vor Gott aufforderte und dem Leben von Muhammad als ein ideales Leben nachfolgen wollte. Die radikale Trennung von der Welt, der asketische und einfache Lebensstil und die Einsiedlung waren ihre Merkmale. Karen Amstrong und Annemarie Schimmen, die besten Wissenschaftlerinnen des Islams, teilen die Entwicklung des islamischen Mystizismus in zwei Kategorien auf, bzw. der Asketik und der Liebe. In dieser Arbeit habe ich versucht, in diese zwei mystischen Bewegungen einzufuehren, um den islamischen Mystizismus am Beispiel von einigen typischen Mistikern zu verstehen. Erstaunlich ist, dass der islamische Mystizismus im 13. Jahrhundert in einer engen Beziehung zu dem christlichen Mystizimus steht. Die beiden zu vergleichen, bleibt als naechstes Forschungsthema. Heute interessiert sich sehr viele Leute ueber die Spiritualitaet. Spiritualitaet hat die Bedeutung im Lateinischen Sinne, ‘atmen’. Und wir stellen gleich fest, dass die Spiritualitaet mit dem Leben zu tun hat. Im Greek hat der Mystizismus seinen Ursprung in ‘mysterion’ und ‘mystikos’, die mit ‘myein’, also ‘schliessen’ zu tun haben. Wenn man die Spiritualitaet vom Mystizismus unterscheiden will, bedeutet die Spiritualitaet einen Weg von unten zu Gott. Aber die Mystik den Weg von oben nach unten, bzw. von Gott zu Menschen. Die Menschen von heute suchen die Ganzheit(Einheit zwischen Koerper und Seele), Praxis(Einheit zwischen Wort und Tun), Altaeglichkeit(Einheit zwischen heiligen und sekularen) und Geschichtlichkeit(Einheit zwischen Geschichte und Transzendenz) der Spiritualitaet. Und ich gehe davon aus, dass der islamische Mystizismus uns dazu befaehigt, uns mit der geistigen Herausforderung der kapitalistischen Gesellschaft auseinanderzusetzen.

This article aims to analyze and apply to the Great Revival Movement of Pyugyang 1907 by using the revitalization movement model of Anthony Wallace with the complement of the innovation model of Homer Barnet. Socio-cultural change is the result of any transformation of customs, values, and ways of thinks or behaviors in a society. The religious meaning of this change is the worldview change in a society as a form of religious conversion. Wallace defines revitalization movement as “a deliberate, organized, conscious effort by members of a society to construct a more satisfying culture.” In the process of revitalization there are three factors presented: (1) the perception of the culture as a system; (2) dissatisfaction with that system; and (3) an organized effort to change that system. The process of revitalization movement shares a common structure, consisting of the following five stages: (1) steady state; (2) period of increased individual stress; (3) period of cultural distortion; (4) period of revitalization(in this period there are six functions: formulation of a code, communication, organization, adaptation, cultural transformation, and routinization); and (5) new steady state. Anthony Wallace’s anthropological model of revitalization movement, in combination with Homer G. Barnet’s model of innovation can provide a useful framework for examining and understanding of the Great Revival Movement of Pyengyang 1907. He defines an innovation as “any thought, behavior, or thing that is new because it is qualitatively different from existing forms.” The emphasis in this model is on the reorganization of ideas rather than on quantitative variation. Culture change takes place not when there is just more or less of the same thing, but when idea, a behavior pattern or a material object is qualitatively different from existing forms. He has contributed to the understanding of culture change as he suggested the theory focusing on the innovator’s behavior pattern. As an outsider the role of the missionary is important, but the change agent is the indigenous leadership, the one who mainly influences on the decision on the reception of the socio-cultural change. The change by the outsider(or missionaries) may be destructive so that the cross-cultural witness should attempt to contextualize the gospel through a careful examination of the local culture, because they are the persons who use to bring sociocultural changes as well as individual change. In the end of the Chosen Dynasty, people had experienced a religious vacuum. The reasons were because Korean traditional religions, Buddhism and Confucianism, has lost their ability to provide people mental framework. This religious vacuum caused people to desire for fervently seeking a new religion. Also the Tonghak revolution and Chinese-Russian war and following the assassination of the queen Min drove people into fear and frustration. The year 1884 was one of the darkest eras in the Chosen history because there was no sign to resolve the current situation. Endemic disease spread all around the country accelerated the crisis and fear felt by the people. So people were trying to seek some solution to resolve the crisis. The stress level of people became increased, in fact, facing the crisis the colonial Japan began to occupy the country with power. In this circumstances there was a candle ignited for a revival by American Methodist missionary Hardie from Wonsan in 1903 August. In his confession we can find a transforming code for overcoming the national crisis and desperate situation, which was radical and super cultural. The revival movement started from Wonsan became spread to Kangwon province, Seoul, Gaesung, Pyugyang, and all around the country. Finally this movement exploded at Changdaehyun church in 1907 January. At that time, there were around 1,000 men for bible studying meeting and missionaries gathered for noon prayer meeting. Then how can the code as a spiritual awakening be interpreted and communicated by the Korean believers? The revival movement as a renovative code was interpreted and communicated as means of salvation, and it was diffused to beyond Pyungyang. The leaders of the movement included Korean church leaders such as Kil Sunju, Chun Kyeeun, and Chung Chuhsoo as well as foreign missionaries. They had lead revival meetings with a clear motivation to breakthrough the desperate situation in faith, which were combined with the prayer meetings of the missionaries. In fact, the Korean church leaders were involved in the revival movement with a strong desire to find a clue of overcoming the crisis, while the missionaries started the revivals with repentance and reflect of their mission works. But these two different motives were directly connected to the Great Revival, and they were finding a new code and goal culture. The Great Revival movement had played an important role to rapidly grow churches and to encourage evangelism among Korean churches through making young people to commit their lives for ministry, and to develop church structure. A turning point made by the Great Revival movement was the organization of the church structure, the unity of denominations, and missionary endeavor such as working together for medical and educational mission works. The Great Revival was really successful, and it had influenced on the development of the church structure, theology, and church growth. It can be evaluated that not only did it include repentance and awakening in a spiritual dimension, but it was closely related to socio-cultural transformation. So it is a crucial factor to examine the socio-cultural and political dimensions of the Great Revival movement. From a missiological perspective, socio-cultural change must include a transforming factor of the gospel. Any socio-cultural change in Christianity is not merely the change of individual's mind and behavior, but should be extended to social and cultural movements. During socio-cultural changes, the role of the church is to provide a valid biblical framework in order for people to change their worldview to biblical one and to suggest an alternative theological agenda for a relevant contextual theology to overcome the gospel reductionism and syncretism. To some extent, critical evaluation to the Great Revival movement might be something that it had done in an American form of Christian faith. In this reason, from the beginning the Korean Christianity had difficulties to indigenize and contextualize the gospel, difficulty that it was to transplant the gospel message into the Korean soil. In this respect it is suggested a problem that the movement has hardly contributed to the contextualize the gospel for the Korean church. Though there are both positive and negative aspects to the Great Revival movement, it must be the crucial event that the Korean church today reexamines and rediscovers as the event that has a huge contribution for the formation of Korean believers’ faith pattern in the critical time when the country lost her national right and identity. The challenge the Korean church are facing is that the church has to attempt to discover a new code and ideal culture that can inspire in believers’ mind and diagnose the today’s crisis through the Bible and the church history.

In the 20th century, Christian churches and mission agencies had a great revival and missionary movement. The revival movement made an huge impact on Christian believers to repent of their sins and to commit themselves into the missionary works. The mission mind that was coming out of revivalism must be a power to transform the churches and societies in order to evangelize their family members, friends, relatives, and even those who were in the physical and spiritual needs through all over the world. From the viewpoint of sociological stands, the 20th century revivalism tends to deny the theory of secularization. Even though the society of the 20th century became more secular than the previous century, the churches and mission minds could not be weaken by the secularization process. However, from the economic and political standpoints, it was negatively evaluated, because it should be closely connected with Western capitalism and American right wing sides. Lastly, from the socio-cultural aspects, it had a crisis of destruction threatened by the popular cultures and multi-cultures. In conclusion, revivalism and Christian missions have to go together. The missionary works should firstly recover the power and enthusiasm from the Holy Spirit. The missions, however, should not be royal only to a specific culture and nation but to the archy type of Christianity in the biblical first church. The major task of Christian missions should be the recovery of enthusiasm experienced in the biblical first church and the application to the all nations and people.

The purpose of this study is to explore the German Pietism movement, the church renewal of England and the spiritual awakening movement of America’s churches from the view point of mission history. This study found out that each movement has close relationship to each other. The above mentioned variables also had a direct influential power to the social problems. These were the facts that made churches more vital and boosted activities of churches in history. This paper analyzed the contemporary situations of the Korean churches after 100th anniversary of Pyungyang revival movement in 1907. All the Church Renewal movements for both the Korean churches and the foreign churches has one thing in common: How to get out of the past mannerism and how to get rid of those practical ways which are being performed until these days. It is very important to look back to the situations between the “Past” and the “Present” from the Pyungyang revival movement in Korea because the situations of present korean churches are similar to those of the past churches. The Afghanistan hostage incident which happened last summer 2007 left so many questions to the Korean Churches: why they could not stand for oversea missions, how crucial it is for them and what's the real cause of this problem. Because of that hostage taking, the people nowadays think that Korean churches lost their social responsibility and they think there’s no place for them outside the church. With the essential findings of this study we can predict the ways of reviving the Korean church and Church Renewal. We just need to open our mind and think about Pyungyang revival movement.

The modern Korean missions movement cannot be accurately understood apart from its relationship to the church growth movement and the revival movement. Therefore, the main purpose of this dissertation is to examine the factors contributing to the development of the modern Korean missions movement via historical analysis. Chapter 1 introduces the primary purpose of this dissertation, explains and defines the dissertations title, provides a brief survey of the current Korean missions movement, and outlines the background for the proposal. It also describes the plan and methodology to be used for this work. Because these are some ambiguities about the definitions of the missions movement, this chapter clarifies the definition of the modern Korean missions movement. Chapter 2 examines the history of missions in Korea. Though Korea has a brief history of overseas missions experience, this chapter attempts a through study, in order to understand today's Korean missions movement. This chapter details the earlychurch's foreign mission efforts in Korea and examines the significant role of foreign missions after the Korean War. A brief survey of the monumental efforts toward modern missions are included. Finally, a discussion regarding college campus missions which have contributed significantly to the birth of the missions movement in Korea isfound in this chapter. Chapter 3 seeks to determine the direction that the Korean church is going in foreign missions in today's world. Accordingly, there are four major missions forces in the Korean church. There are also many denominations in the Protestant churches. This author discusses the mission boards of major denominations because they represent the Korean church. This chapter attempts to show how para-church missions are successful in Korea. It also explains well college campus missions which have been pivotal in the modern Korean missions movement. Finally, this chapter examines how local churches participate in foreign missions. Chapter 4 concerns the main thrust of this dissertation. This chapter examines four significant factors regarding the development and the contributions of the modern Korean missions movement. The important atmosphere of its socio-political factors is examined in this chapter. Economic factors that made rapid Korean church growth possible is studied as part of the missions movement. Theological factors also made a great impact on the Korean missions movement and are discussed in this chapter. Chapter 5 provides an overview of tomorrow's missionary efforts in the Korean church. It explains the strategic sending of missionaries under the current mission circumstances. It also discusses a paradigm shift for Korean missions. Finally, it covers missionary training and networking missions on the mission field. Chapter 6 is the conclusion. It summarizes the ideas and thoughts in a final form, emphasizing important facts presented in the dissertation.

1920년대 한국 농촌을 위한 YMCA와 국제선교사협회의 협력은 계급 이데올로기 혁명을 기획하는 국제공산주의, 정치군사적 통제를 모색하는 제국주의, 또한 상업적 착취를 통한 경제적 부의 확장을 추구하는 강대국 민족주의와 구별되며, 본질적으로 민족의 상호협력과 인류애라는 보편가치를 추구한 기독교세계주의이다. 서구 선교사들은 교회와 국가의 역할을 구별 하는 파송 국가의 정부정책에 순응했지만 국제선교사협회는 거시적인 틀에서 한국의 민족주의자들과 협력하며, 식민정부의 주요 착취대상인 한국의 농부를 위해 종교적, 과학적, 물질적, 인적자원의 국제적 재배치를 총괄 함으로 여타 국제적 흐름과의 차별성을 시사한다. 국제선교사협회는 민족과 인종의 경계를 초월하는 기독교세계주의를 추구했는데, 한국의 농부를 위한 이러한 연대성은 세속국가의 외교경쟁이 가져온 한계에도 불구하고 초국가적 보편가치를 추구하는 중요한 국제주의의 흐름으로 포착된다. 국제선교사협회의 예루살렘대회는 한국의 다양한 교회기관이 교회 자체의 생존에 대한 관심을 넘어 사회병리적 문제의 해결을 위한 범교단적 협력과 기독교 농촌연구회의 조직을 고무했으며 태평양문제연구소로 하여금 한국 학자의 토지문제연구를 지원할 토대를 마련하였다. 또한 대한민국공화국의 토지개혁을 구상할 정부 요원에게 현장지식과 훈련기회를 제공했다. 제국 주의에 관한 거시적 이론을 넘어 구체적인 YMCA농촌운동에 참여하는 국제선교사협회의 활동에 대한 면밀한 자료의 검토는 기독교세계주의가 한국의 민족주의를 폄훼하기 보다 도리어 약소국의 민족역량을 강화하는 자양분으로 작동했음을 입증한다. 한국 YMCA농촌운동과 국제선교사협회의 협력을 연구함에 한국의 민족주의 틀을 넘어서, 일본 식민주의, 피압박민의 민족주의를 대체하며 활동한 국제공산주의, 강대국의 제국주의와 구별되는 기독교 세계주의의 취급이 요청된다.

Timothy Richard(1845-1919), a Welsh missionary, acted as the spearhead of the missionaries in China who were interested in the reform of the late Qing society. Being sent by the Baptist Missionary Society, he worked in the areas including North China and Shanghai from 1870 to 1916 and his works included relief, literature, education, and social reform as well as evangelism. Sublating the hagiographical writings on him published in the first decades following his death and the socialist historiography utterly criticizing him as the agent of imperialism from the other side, this study tries to take a look both at his missionary motivation for the reform of Chinese society and politics and at his problematic toleration of the imperialistic Western Powers that was implied in his suggestions. Richard was convinced that Western civilization was benefited from the discovery of “the workings of God in Nature.” Communicating with the highest Chinese officials like Zhang Zidong and Li Hongzhang of the Self-Strengthening Movement, which was started in the 1860s, he made an effort to provide the society with scientific education and reform ideas in many areas including agriculture, industry, commerce, transportation, education, and religious education. Serving as the general secretary of the Society for the Diffusion of Christian and General Knowledge among the Chinese (SDK/SDCGK) since 1891, he had a great opportunity to help the Chinese society with writing essays, translating books, publishing books and periodicals. Especially, his translation of History of Nineteenth Century and the periodical titled The Review of the Times edited by Young J. Allen were very popular among the Chinese intellectuals seeking the ways to reform Chinese society. It is important to note that, in terms of the ideology of reform, he did not agree on the overriding Chinese motto of reform, ‘zhong-ti-si-yong,’ which meant ‘the Chinese in mindset and the Western in technology.’ Rather, his idea started from the Western Civilization, not Chinese traditional value system. His suggestion was based on his conviction that Western civilization, comprising of the materialistic development based on natural sciences and ‘the true Christian civilization,’ was superior to Chinese civilization. Thus, his suggestion tends to be a universal reform including modernization, opening of the nation to foreign nations, improvement in commerce and international trades, Western education in sciences, and toleration of Christian education. Even though he did not deny the classical education coming from Chinese tradition and only did ask adding Western subjects to the current education, his respect for Chinese tradition rather came from missiological considerations and his reform ideas came from Western and Christian influences. Furthermore, at the base of Richard’s political activism was his evangelical conviction that made him a missionary to China. In addition to his evangelical faith, through his experiences in China, he developed a type of social gospel emphasizing the Kingdom of God seeking for the salvation of both ‘body’ and ‘soul’ and both ‘individuals’ and ‘nation.’ His effort of reform was at its peak at the 1898 Reform Movement, in which the young rising reformers like Kang Youwei and Liang Qichao co-operated with the Emperor Guangxu to drive forward more progressive reforms following after the Chinese’s defeat at the Sino-Japanese War (1894-1895). He was very influential to the top leaders of the movement in many directions. However, a series of foudroyant ideas that he suggested were not accepted or administered by the leaders and the Court. For example, he suggested 1) a protectorate by the Powers, 2) an annexation or union of China with Japan, the United States, and the British Empire at least in some areas including defence and diplomacy, and 3) a united cabinet with the same number of Chinese and foreign representatives. His ideas were shared by Chinese officials and, in fact, even some similar ideas were coined by Chinese themselves in the great crisis of the fall of the Empire in the encroachments by imperialist Western Powers. His ideas listed above, in spite of the consideration of the context, had implications of Western colonialism trespassing Chinese sovereignty. They especially show the lack of his understanding in the commercial expansion of the Western colonialists. However, despite this point, it does not seem that he was directly connected to the officials or colonialists of the Britain or other Western countries. His idea of protectorate, annexation, or united cabinet was foreign to the current British position in diplomacy. In conclusion, Richard’s reform idea, first, came from his revised evangelical faith including the idea of the Kingdom of God and missiological consideration seeking for cultural adaptation. second, he contributed to the late Qing reform movement in promoting the discourse of reform and educating the younger reformers. Third, his reform had limitations due to his own political and cultural identities as a British subject. He, in his imperialists-friendly suggestions, came to be in the line of supporting the Western colonialists and he never approached republican ideas, which some progressive Chinese already had in their mind by the end of the century.