본 연구는 코칭 전공 대학원생들이 코칭을 전공으로 선택한 이유를 대학원생 들의 관점에서 살펴보고 유형화하여 이들이 실질적으로 코칭 전공 대학원에서 갈망하는 요구를 이해하기 위한 목적으로 진행되었다. 이를 위하여 인간의 주관 적 인식을 분석하기에 적합한 Q방법론을 통해 연구 문제를 분석하였다. 본 연구 에서는 국내 코칭 관련 학과 대학원 석·박사과정 재학 또는 졸업한 사람들 중 목적표집 방법으로 선발된 총 21명의 P표본을 대상으로 40개의 진술문을 구성 하여 연구가 진행되었다. 연구 결과 총 4개의 유형으로 분석되었고 유형Ⅰ은 ‘경 제적 수입보다 사람을 중요시하는 기여형’, 유형Ⅱ는 ‘네트워킹보다 스스로를 중 요시하는 자아 계발형’, 유형Ⅲ은 ‘스펙을 통해 코칭의 학문 발전을 중요시하는 준비형’, 유형Ⅳ은 ‘코칭 철학을 믿는 긍정적 영향력 발휘형’으로 나타났다. 본 연구 결과는 유형화된 대학원생의 코칭전공 선택에 관한 주관성 특성을 바탕으 로 이후 국내 코칭의 학문적 발전을 위해 코칭 관련 학과 대학원의 체계적인 교 육과정 방향성의 틀로 활용될 수 있으며, 나아가 국내 코칭 정착과 발전에 필요 한 기반이 될 수 있을 것이라 기대한다.

본 연구는 대학원생의 혁신행동에 영향을 미칠 수 있는 인지적 유연성, 디지털 리터러시 및 협력 적 조절 간의 구조적 관계를 구명하고자 하였다. 특히, 대학원생의 인지적 유연성이 혁신행동에 영 향을 미치는 과정에서 디지털 리터러시와 협력적 조절이 매개변인으로 작용하는지 살펴보는 데 중 점을 두었다. 이를 위해 서울 소재 S 국립대학 소속 대학원생(N= 1,062)을 대상으로 한 설문조사 응답을 분석 자료로 사용하였으며, 변인 간 관계를 검증하기 위해 구조방정식 모형을 활용하였다. 주요 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 인지적 유연성은 혁신행동에 직접적인 정적 영향을 미치는 것 으로 나타났다. 둘째, 두 매개변인 디지털 리터러시와 협력적 조절 모두 대학원생의 혁신행동에 각 각 정적인 직접 효과를 가지는 것으로 확인하였다. 셋째, 대학원생의 인지적 유연성과 혁신행동 간 의 관계에서 디지털 리터러시와 협력적 조절의 개별 매개효과는 통계적으로 유의했으며, 두 변인의 이중매개효과 역시 유의한 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 기업 환경에서 주로 연구되어 왔던 인지적 유연성과 혁신행동 간의 관계를 대학원 교육의 맥락으로 확장하여 탐구하였다는 데에 그 의의가 크 다. 또한, 대학원생의 혁신행동에 영향을 미칠 수 있는 행동적, 사회적 변인을 고려하였다는 점에서 중요한 시사점을 가진다. 본 연구를 통해 대학원생의 혁신행동 제고를 통한 새로운 지식 창출과 국 가경쟁력 강화를 위해 대학원 차원에서의 실천적 노력이 필요함을 제언하였다.

목적 : 본 연구는 보건대학원생을 대상으로 연구윤리에 대한 인지도, 자기효능감을 통해 지식수준을 파악하고 자 하였다. 방법 : 서술적 설문조사 설계를 사용하였다. 국내 보건대학원에서 총204명의 참여자를 모집하였다. 데이터 수 집 도구는 미국 National Science Foundation과 Association of Graduate School에서 제안된 Responsible Conduct of Research(RCR) 교육 핵심 영역을 기반으로 개발되었다. 참여자들은 연구윤리에 관한 질문으로 구성 된 자가보고식 설문지를 작성하였다. 데이터는 PASW Statistics 18 Window 프로그램을 활용하여 기술 통계로 분석하였다. 결과 : 대상자(평균 연령=30세)는 석사(77.5%)과 박사(22.5%) 과정 학생으로 구성되었다. 대상자의 25.5%만 연구윤리 관련 과목을 수강한 경험이 있었고, 26.5%는 연구책임자로서 연구를 수행한 경험이 있었다. 연구윤리에 대한 인지 수준(5점 만점에 평균 2.90점)과 윤리적 연구수행을 위한 자기효능감 수준(5점 만점에 평균 3.14점)은 보통 수준이었다. 가장 인지도가 낮은 분야는 ‘지적재산권 및 특허 보호’였으며, 그 다음은 ‘부당한 논문저자 표시’ 였고, 가장 지식이 부족한 분야는 ‘연구논문 작성’이었다. 연구윤리에 대한 인지도, 자기효능감, 지식 간에는 통계 적으로 유의미한 상관관계가 있는 것으로 나타났다(all p<0.050). 결론 : 본 연구에서는 학생들이 윤리적으로 건전한 연구를 수행할 수 있도록 보건대학원생을 위한 연구윤리 지 식 교육 프로그램이 필요하다고 사료된다.

Purpose: This study aims to explore the students’ experiences of taking class in nursing philosophy at the graduate school of nursing. Methods: Data were collected through individual in-depth interviews with 18 participants who took nursing philosophy class. Core question was 'What is your experience of taking nursing philosophy class?' Verbatim transcripts were analyzed using content analysis. Results: Qualitative data analysis revealed nine theme clusters in four categories; 'The distance from philosophy that is too far to be friendly’, ‘Finding the academic roots of nursing',’The way to find answers through creative insights' and ‘Presenting a vision of nursing through reflection and maturity'. Conclusion: Nursing graduate students initially encountered challenging thoughts and a sense of detachment from reality when they embarked on their nursing philosophy class. However, nursing philosophy classes are essential for uncovering the academic foundations of nursing science, fostering creative insights, and navigating the actual clinical fields. This is particularly crucial because nurses frequently encounter numerous ethical dilemmas and critical decision-making situations. Nursing philosophy classes should be mandated as a required course for nursing graduate students, as they are responsible for shaping the future of nursing scholars.

The study aims to understand personal changes experienced through Korean language learning and the significance of these changes to members of the new Korean Language and Culture Community by examining the life histories of foreign graduate students majoring in Korean language education and Korean literature. To this end, six Vietnamese students who are studying at a graduate school specializing in Korean language participated in this study and their life histories were examined, focusing on the development of their identities. The analysis focused on the (re)construction of identity in the learning processes of participants and showed that participants achieved complex identity development by learning and using Korean in various formal and informal contexts. In this study, changes were described in terms of improving Korean language skills, changing the self-image during early adulthood, and personal growth.

이 연구의 목적은 교직과정을 이수하는 교육대학원생의 심리적, 재정적 어려움으로부터 파생된 불안과 이들이 가진 교직에 대한 희망 사이의 갈등상황을 파악하는 것이다. 이를 위해 지구과학교육 전공 교육대학원생 3명을 연구 대상자로 선정해 내러티브 탐구기법을 적용하여 분석하였다. 첫째, 연구 참여자들의 심리적 불안에 영향을 주는 요소는 전공 지식의 부족, 멘토의 부족, 늦은 출발, 재정적 문제와 차별, 정보의 부족 등이다. 둘째, 연구 참여자는 자신의 삶은 가치가 있다는 인식, 학생들을 선하게 변화시킬 수 있다는 인식, 자신은 점점 발전하고 있다는 인식에서 희망을 얻는다. 셋째, 연구 참여자들은 자신이 가진 희망 요소에 의해 현 상황을 감내하고 있지만 어려움으로부터 파생된 불안과 교직 으로 진출하고자 하는 희망 사이에서 심리적 갈등상황에 놓여 있다. 이러한 결과를 바탕으로 다음과 같은 결론을 도출 하였다. 첫째, 교직과정을 이수하는 교육대학원생의 수요를 바탕으로 정보의 수집 및 분석하여 그들의 요구를 충족시킬수 있는 제도 개선이 필요하다. 둘째, 불안을 극복하지 못하는 교육대학원생들을 대상으로 심리상담 프로그램이 필요하 다. 이 연구는 향후 현시점의 교육대학원이 현직 교사의 재양성에만 초점을 두지 않고 구성원 모두의 만족감을 높일 수 있는 방향을 제시함으로써 더 나은 교육대학원의 환경이 마련될 수 있길 기대한다.

This paper is intended to explore the otherness of ‘non-mainstream’ graduate students specializing in applied linguistics at various departments of English language and literature in Korea. Drawing on Honneth’s theory of recognition and its ideology, it attempted to understand the way their ‘professional identities’ are constructed both within and without the related academic communities. Through interviews and reflection journals, the lived stories of research participants illustrated that their trajectories of growth were not a transmission of knowledge and skills in applied linguistics, and that Honneth’s threefold conceptualization of intersubjective recognition (love, rights, solidarity) was usefully applied to the sociopolitical inquiry of ‘becoming professional.’ They did not feel a sense of affection, were not respected as rights-holders, and did not have mutual esteem and solidarity. The non-mainstream students strived for recognition in the graduate program by voicing their emotions in their qualitative research papers and improving their limited proficiency of English which, however, led to ‘uncritical’ conformity. They lost the emancipatory struggle for their independent and scholarly selves. The model of mutual recognition is expected to show good potential as an analytic tool for understanding the motivational and justificatory basis for social struggles. Further research is suggested to examine how Honneth’s theory can help in understanding people in different disciplines.

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the usage of address terms for professors by undergraduate and graduate students by the sociolinguistic methodology. To this end, this paper applied an integrated approach that combines quantitative analysis based on the response results of multiple-choice questions in the survey and qualitative interpretation based on the response results of subjective questions in both the survey and the in-depth interview. First, through quantitative analysis of the variation in the use of address terms, it was confirmed that “professor” occupies an overwhelming proportion and that the academic field of the speaker is the most important factor. The higher the intimacy with professors, the more “teacher” was used. Next, through the qualitative interpretation of the reason and meaning of using their choice of address terms, the most basic and superficial reason was to follow the experiences and customs in the affiliated community. The use of “professor” had some reasons or meanings such as meeting courtesy and expectations, highlighting privileged status, and equal respect for all the faculty members, whereas “teacher” was used as an expression of intimacy.

An Indirect Complaint(IC) is defined as the expression of dissatisfaction about oneself or someone/something that is not present in conversations. The present study considered ICs as positive strategies to build rapport and solidarity and investigated different responses of IC between Cambodian Korean learners as a second language(L2) and Korean native speakers by analyzing two categories – verbal and nonverbal responses. Data from the conversation of each group showed that non-substantive responses were highly employed in the non-native group, while commiserating responses were frequently used in the native group in verbal responses. On the other side, non-verbal commiserating strategies were observed relatively more in non-native speakers than in natives. As a result of the post-interview on IC perception, every participant of both groups perceived the positive effects of ICs. Based on the result, this study suggests applying ICs as positive social strategies when teaching Korean as L2, which leads the learners to have more opportunities to interact and practice the L2.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore and analyze the education experiences of nursing graduate students in training simulation educators. Methods: Data were collected using a focus group method with a total of 13 nursing graduate students who ever participated in simulation education for nursing college students. Results: Four theme clusters and 15 sub-themes were emerged through qualitative content analysis. The core theme was “Flapping wings as a novice simulation educator”. The four theme clusters include ‘Confronting myself where expectations and worries coexist’, ‘Experience a new world untrained in the hospital’, ‘Limitation of simulation hard to reach the reality’, ‘Way to become an expert in simulation education’. Conclusion: Nursing graduate students found that the experiences of novice learners as a simulation educator was rewarding and helpful in increasing their self-confidence prior to being placed in an educational setting. Creating a simulation experience for college students could be a daunting task for educators in nursing. Therefore, continued and sustainable efforts are mandated by developing the curriculum for training simulation educators.

Yang, Myung-hee & Kim, Bo-hyeon. 2017. “A Study on Korean Language Anxiety in the Classrooms of Advanced-level Korean Language Learners for Academic purposes: With Chinese Students in Graduate School in Korea”. The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea 25(1). 119~141. The aim of this study is to examine the level of and the factors for Korean language anxiety in the classrooms of advanced-level Korean language learners for academic purposes. To this end, 60 Chinese students attending graduate school participated in the survey with the questionnaires: i.e., PRCA and FLCAS. The results suggest as follows. First, the Korean language anxiety level in the classrooms of the Chinese students is likely to be high. Also, it is not because of the participants’ traits, but because of the classroom environment. Second, there are 5 factors for Korean language anxiety in the classrooms; communication anxiety with native speakers, communication anxiety, fears of negative evaluation and failing in class, Korean proficiency anxiety, and negative attitudes toward class. Especially, the forth factor suggests that Korean learners needs an educational intervention of Korean, even after they enter undergraduate or graduate institutions. Third, there is a negative correlation between Korean language anxiety in the classroom and a residence period in Korea. That is, it is necessary to give them as many opportunities as possible for being exposed to Korean by a Korean educational intervention.

Academic identity of graduate students is of considerable importance in their lives in graduate school and the process in which they became academics. In this study, we aimed to examine how education graduate students in South Korea construct their academic identities. In pursuing this purpose, we included maste.r students as well as doctoral students. In addition to this, we focused on the academic identity of part-time students, in this case mostly teachers. Semi-structured interviews with nine graduate students in a university were used to understand their experiences. Analysis procedure included open coding, axial coding and selective coding of transcriptions. The results indicated that the criterion to distinguish undergraduate, master's, and doctoral experiences was the degree of autonomy in academic work. There were also significant differences between doing a master's and a doctoral degree, including the relationship with the advisor and students ' perception of academic work. In addition, this study found that part-timers experienced floating identities, and explored factors that influenced their identity formation. The result of this study is expected to contribute to improving formal and informal educational practices in graduate schools of education in South Korea and facilitate intercultural conversation on graduate education.

대학(원)생에 의한 발명은 다른 직무발명의 상황과 달리 대학교, 외부 산업체, 국가 등 각종 법인체와 지도 교수가 함께 관여한다는 점에 큰 특징이 있다. 그런데 여기서 국가나 산업체는 대학(원)생의 발명에 대한 권리취득에 직접적인 영향을 미치지 않고, 대학교나 교수와의 각 관계에서 직무발명 규정의 적용여부가 위 권리취득에 결정적이다. 대학(원)생에 의한 발명에서 나타나기 쉬운 도덕적 해이문제를 해결하려면, 미국의 실례를 일부 참고하여 종업원의 발명이기만 하면 설령 직무발명이 아니라도 사용자가 계약으로 일정한 지위를 취득하는 것을 지금보다는 넓게 인정하고 반면 종업원을 위한 보상금은 아주 두텁게 상향하는 것이 바람직한 방안일 수 있다.

With restrictions in the target language, taking turns in a timely fashion to participate in class discussions can be a challenging task for L2 learners. In order to understand L2 learners" particular choices and behaviors in taking turns in class discussions, an in-depth investigation of their experiences and views contributed by the learners themselves is called for. This paper pursues a qualitative case study on Korean graduate students" experiences and perceptions of taking turns to participate in class discussions in a content course. Analysis of data from interviews, observations, and documents revealed that Korean students perceived language ability, cultural difference, educational background, context/condition, and personality as responsible for the challenges they faced in taking turns in class discussions in English. The Korean students were also aware of the differences between the native speakers and themselves with respect to the strategies applied to gain turns in discussions noting that the native speakers used certain expressions that eased the turn-takes. Contrary to expectations, the Korean students saw L2 proficiency as just one factor involved in obtaining turns in class discussions and highlighted confidence as a crucial factor for success.

This study investigated how adult second language learners negotiate their social, relational identities in real-life communicative interactions within professional, institutional social settings. Based on the sociocultural approach to identity formation (e.g., Lantolf & Pavlenko, 2001; Penuel & Wertsch, 1995), this study examined five Korean graduate students’ experiences with and perspectives regarding their real-life communicative interactions within U.S. academe. The study findings suggested the importance of English learners’ enactment of positive, relational identities in enhancing their agency in order to actively participate in English communicative practices and continue to improve their English proficiency. Pedagogical implications for enhancing Korean students’ agency in learning English were also discussed.

This qualitative study was designed to understand a role of culture on the experiences of Korean study abroad graduate students who tried to adjust to the U.S. academic and social life. Data was collected by semi-structured interviews and analyzed by the inductive process to identify analytical categories that emerged from the data. Three participants decided to go to a U.S. college in order to have an efficient learning environment, financial support, and career after schooling. They were satisfied with the factors that motivated them to study abroad as well as the American’s attitudes and observance of the rules. However, they experienced frustrations and difficulties in classrooms and in social settings due to limited English proficiency, the lack of familiarity with the American learning environment, and certain American’s unfair treatment. They developed strategies to cope with the difficulties and succeed at the university. The present study also revealed that the participants’experiential backgrounds played a crucial role in their perceptions of their own experiences in the U.S. The students acknowledged that there are cultural differences between two countries that were grounded in all findings of the research and those differences affected their attitudes and behaviors throughout the study and their stay in the U.S.