With the development of the national economy, the cultivation of technical talents is urg ent. As the largest economical province in China, the government of Guangdong Province needs to quickly enhance the rationality, effectiveness, and practicality of policies, fully leve rage the mediating, guiding, and promoting role of policy tools. This research from a new perspective to analyze current research focus, which can provide some reference for impro ving region vocational education policies. This research adopted a qualitative research method to analyze the text of college-enter prise cooperation policies in Guangdong Province under the background of the “Double Hi gh Program”, based on the perspective of McDonnell & Elmore policy tools, constructed a n analytical framework model, formed “X-axis” policy tools and “Y-axis” talent cultivation m odel elements, used WPS software to fully collect effective policy texts, and rigorously enc oded and analyzed policy texts with the NVivo12Plus software. Through the previous researches and the key words frequency analysis of policy texts, w hich can clarify the research focus of Guangdong Province's college-enterprise cooperation policy under the background of the “Double High Program”. By analyzing the proportion o f policy tools and the proportion of talent cultivation model elements, it can reveal the fra mework, characteristics, and challenges of current policies. From three dimensions analysis: policy content, policy tools and talent cultivation model elements, it can achieve conclusio n, suggestions and future approaches for current policies. The distribution of the five policy tools for college-enterprise cooperation policy in Guan gdong Province is not balanced, indicating that the current policies need to adjust the poli cy tool proportion in a timely manner, enhance rationality and effectiveness. From the freq uency of appearance of talent cultivation model elements, the proportion of mode element s is the highest, while the proportion of concept elements is the lowest. Therefore, in futu re policy formulation, it is necessary to increase the proportion of concept elements, instill correct values, optimize talent cultivation model, and enhance the practicality of policies.

There is a wrong splicing in the eighth volume of Kehong Yinyi preserved in the Korean Tripitaka, it involves some phonetic and meaning entries in Buddha’s Names Sutra, Three Thousand Buddhas’ Names Sutra and Five Thousand Five Hundred Buddhas’ Names Sutra. By backtracking the scriptures, the exact origin of these phonetic and meaning entries can be determined. At the same time, combined with the selected transcript of Kehong Yinyi recorded on the back of the Dunhuang Scroll P.2948, it can be inferred that this phenomenon already existed in Kehong Yinyi before it was introduced into Goryeo. As for the specific link in which this misalignment occurred, it is difficult to know for sure due to the lack of evidence chain.

“Tuan Feng” (摶風) is first seen in the Wei and Jin Dynasties, and which is formed by allusions “Tuan Fuyao” (摶扶搖) in Xiao Yao You of Zhuang Zi, and which is first called “Wuyi” (屋翼) in the Tang Dynasty. Since the Warring States period, the words “Zhuan” (專) and “Fu” (尃) have been sometimes confused because of their proximity. Therefore, there has always been a dispute between “Tuan” (摶) and “Bo” (搏) about “Tuan Fuyao” in the literature after Wei and Jin Dynasties. Affected by this, “Tuan Feng” which represents the “Wuyi” is often falsely referred to as “Bo Feng” (搏風) in the literature. This paper makes a textual research on the allusions referring to “Wuyi” as “Tuan Feng” rather than “Bo Feng” from the aspects of the differentiation and correction of “Tuan Fuyao” in the allusion, the naming rationale of “Wuyi” as “Tuan Feng” and the structure, component name, function and use of “Wuyi” in ancient wooden buildings.

본고는《全唐诗补编》와《全唐文补编》속의 “ ”, “ ”, “ ”, “ ”, “ ”, “ ”, “ ”, “ ”, “ ”, “ ”등 10개의 유니코드 미등재 의난자(疑难字)를 관련 문헌, 자형의 변천, 기타 증거 자료의 세 방면에서 고찰하여 개별 글자 간의 관계를 밝혀 시문 속에서의 의난자를 고증하 여 그 해석의 어려움을 해소하고자 하였다.《全唐诗补编》,《全唐文补编》, 未编码疑难字, 考辨

The famous Korean monster Shizishan cited many documents to annotate “Shichaoshi”, which included ten seven-character Octaves written by the famous Tang poet Wen Tingyun. This paper tries to compare it to “The chronicle of Tang Poetry”, “Youxuan Anthology”, “Tang Poetry Guchui”, “Appreciation of Tang Poetry”, “Tang Poetry” and finds some dissimilarities among them. This paper aims to make a textual study on it and argue the merits and demerits of the dissimilarities. The quotations in “Shichaoshi” involved many ancient classics, but were given too simple explanation. For example, it didn’t annotate the well-known “Huanzi Xinlun”. What’s more, it abbreviated the book names, “Yu” for “Lunyu”, “Xuan” for “Wenxuan”, but it didn’t give an appendix of short forms. This will bring difficulty for the offspring to collect and edit the lost ancient books. It is the modern people’s responsibility to correct the mistakes made to the ancient classics in passing from generation to generation.

Etymological approaches can be applied to textual research on the dates of ancient texts. An article titled “Textual Research on ‘Qing’” found the connotations of “Qing” in literature expanded from its original limited use of denoting “nature” to include the connotation of affection and presented a preliminary judgment on the age of some documents. Following and critiquing that article, this paper examines connotations of “Qing” in the Guodian Chu Jian and Kongzi Jiayu and discusses the prerequisites for using an etymological approach in order to ensure their validity. The etymological approach is helpful in determining the relative times of different ancient documents and may provide objective evidence, subject to certain conditions, for determining the likely date when the composition of ancient texts began. It reveals that the date for the Guodian Chu Jian is later than 296 BCE.

The study into ancient artifacts originated from the age of King Zhen (真) in the Song Dynasty. The research by Liu Chang and Ouyang Xiu in the age of King Ren (仁) opened the fashion for epigraphy collection and appreciation to ancient artifacts. The academic notes in the Song Dynasty mainly discussed the context of three levels. Firstly, the collection of ancient artifacts. For example, Nenggai Zhaiwanlu of Wu Zeng and Yanxia Fangyan of Ye Mengde all described the collection of ancient artifacts in the Qin and Han dynasties. Secondly, historical research on epigraphy. For example, Mozhuang Manlu of Zhang Bangji and Rongzhai Suibi of Hong Mai all used the epigraphy and stone inscriptions to verify the history of ancient artifacts. Thirdly, the textual research on epigraphy such as Guangchuan Shuba of Dong You, Dongguan Yu lu of Huang Bosi. They all recorded the comments on the advantages and disadvantages of inscription or epigraphy while it also contained the comments on the characteristics of Chinese calligraphy art. The stone inscriptions stored in the academic notes of the Song Dynasty then become an important reference to studies on the Epigraphy of Song Dynasty, which not only provides an important proof for the construction of calligraphy or epigraphic history in the Song Dynasty but also expands the academic horizon for the research on epigraphy in the later generations that holds academic and historical significance.

This article makes a textual research on the characters of “机”, “据”, “據”, “𤧫”, “脺”, “熇”, “㸌”, “薳”, “𨗨”, analyzing the reasons for the Homograph. Through consulting various kinds of literature, this paper makes a supplementary explanation for the missed sounds and meanings of Grand Chinese Dictionary in order to put forward personal opinions on the editing and editing of contemporary large-scale dictionaries, and also contributes to the analysis, examination, and compilation of identical words in large-scale dictionaries.

With the help of literature analysis, the development and evolution of “ping (垪)”,“di (俤)”,“zhen (鋴)” and “ba (紦)” were sorted out ,which makes up and corrects errors in universal language dictionaries. Character research follows the principle of “practical and realistic”. Basing on literature, we can study changes and developments of Chinese characters and avoid circulating erroneous reports in deciding originality.

본고는 ‘조애구새(趙賹璽)’에 대해 관건이 되는 글자를 심층적으로 분 석한 다음 전국시기의 고새(古璽)와 진(秦)·한(漢)·위(魏)·진(晉)나라 황제와 황후가 사용하였던 옥새제도와 옥새실물들을 비교 분석하였다. 이 를 통해, ‘조애구새’는 삼진(三晉)의 조새(趙璽)이며, 여러 학자들이 주장하 는 ‘조태후새(趙太后璽)’가 아님을 증명해 내었다. 일반적으로 ‘태후(太后)’ 라고 읽었던 글자는 마땅히 ‘구( )’자로 읽어야 하며, 성씨가 ‘조(趙)’이고 이름이 ‘애구(賹)’인 개인의 인장이라고 할 수 있다. 본고는 ‘조애구새’에 보이는 글자들의 고석과 유형분류를 계기로 전국 시기 고새의 유형분류와 국가별 표준을 심층적으로 논의하였다. ‘도상새 (圖像璽)’의 종류, ‘성어새(成語璽)’의 기본적인 문자내용, 각국의 사새 (私璽)에 자주 보이는 성씨와 독특한 성씨, 관새(官璽)의 기본 구성형식 및 종류 등과 같이 서로 다른 고새의 특징을 명확하게 파악한다면 고새 의 속성에 대해 초보적인 판단을 할 수 있을 것이다. 다만 각국 문자의 구성특징과 서사풍격에 익숙하다면 각국 새인(璽印)의 형식특징을 이해 하고 각국 새인의 독특한 관직명, 기관명 및 각국의 독특한 지명, 호칭 등에 대한 정확한 판단을 토대로 하여야 전국시기 고새의 국가별 차이를 명확하게 판별하는데 도움이 될 수 있을 것이다.

This paper has carried out a study on “Children head theory” and “Thatched cottage biography”, the two hanmun compositions on Kim Jin Yang published in the late Goryeo period. By studying the texts, the relationship between Kim Jin Yang and the two authors, and the creation date, the author of this paper has analyzed the structures, forms, styles, and writing tactics of these two compositions, trying to investigate the differences in between. An conclusion is drawn that the difference of these two compositions lies in their genres, one is "theory" and the other is "biography ". Kwon Geun and Lee Sung In eulogized Kim Jin Yang not only ecause of their friendship, but his frugality which is advocated by the scholars. Kwon Geun’s “Children head theory” described the liberal, high-spirited and vigorous young Kim Jin Yang by using a pleasant tone and a lively atmosphere. This composition is different from the traditional ancient Chinese "theory", which is much more like a “miscellany”, this is the Goryeo type of "theory". The Lee Sung In’s “Thatched cottage biography” describe the later years of Kim Jin Yang, so the atmosphere of this article is quite plodding, aiming at sketching out Kim Jin Yang’s aloofness and he can take the rough with the smooth even after his dismissal. This composition is also different from the traditional ancient Chinese "biography". Both two compositions not only helped to research the Goryeo scholar Kim Jin Yang, but also has a great importance for study the hanmun "theory" and "Biography" during the transition period from the end of the Goryeo to the beginning of the Chosun.