We conclude if Jeju Peace Island for Koreas 2018 gets international awareness from participants in the spheres of Peace Island Education & Tourism Welfare Model at the Grass Roots Level, it will contribute to institutionalization of both peace island and welfare tourism. In addition, if Jeju government supports the financial budget for the establishment of a Jeju Peace University or a Jeju Environmental University, our efforts might include an impetus to create and operate a Jeju Peace University or a Jeju Environmental University based on collaborative Jeju Peace Studies in Korea and internationally in the nearer future. Of course, we believe that, through this kind of collaborative leadership, a vision of a Nonviolence Korea “Jeju Peace Island for two Koreas” might serve as a buffer zone potentially approved by the Six Nations in the Asia Pacific region in 2019.
This study was analyzed from the perspective of the 2nd generation of Jeju 4·3 experienced residents, unrelated to the ideology of right or left. This study was approached from the perspective of a historical trauma. In order to confirm the cause of this traumatic event, collective stigma politically imposed on Jeju at macro system were analyzed and four Korean national daily newspapers titled Donga Ilbo(1962-1999), Kyung Hyang Newspaper (1947-1999), Maeil Business Newspaper (1966-1999), Hankyoreh Newspaper (1989-1999) were analyzed by the key word Jeju 4·3 in the Naver news library at exo system[1]. And interview results were analyzed at micro system. Incurring the “unidentified unsafe feeling”, anxiety and fear that even innocent ordinary people from Jeju Island could be stigmatized in “red” without their knowledge whether they were left or right, different attitudes changing at various systems have had influence on trauma transmission from generation to generation since 1948 until now. This research showed that the sense of safety or security at all the level of systems was never secured over 70 years. Therefore, publicly guaranteed safety feeling at macro system should become the starting line of recovering the Jeju 4·3 historical trauma. The Jeju 4·3 related historical trauma, which has been handed down through generations in the silence of 70 years, should be solved by the central government policy.
There have been a lot of reporting regarding continued problems of English education instructions in Korea because of too much emphasis on grammar-translation method. This study focuses on the effectiveness of three different English instruction approaches, Whole Language Approach (Whole), English for Specific Purposes (ESP), and E-mail for English Teaching (E-mail). The data were collected in May, 2017 by distributing survey questionnaire to the first and second year students in four classes in the Department of Tourism English at a selected university in Jeju. 12 questions in the questionnaire were used to measure how the participants perceived the importance of various goals regarding three different communication-based English instruction approaches, Whole Language Approach (Whole), English for Specific Purposes (ESP), and E-mail for English Teaching (E-mail). Participants in this study are most interested in Whole Language Approach (Whole) followed by English for Specific Purposes (ESP) and E-mail for English Teaching (E-mail).