Ryoo, Hye-Kyung. 2017. “Discourse Analysis of Microteaching: Dynamic Identities and Situational Frames”. The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea 25(2), 165~196. The present paper is based on a discourse analysis of Microteaching speech events of Korean pre-service training students taking a teacher training course in college. The purpose of this study is to look closely into what really is going on in the discourse of microteaching events in terms of the participants' identity enactment and framing of situations. Fifteen pre-service training students' microteaching lessons were video-taped and transcribed to examine detailed discourse features. The results of the qualitative analysis of the discourse revealed frequent dynamic shifting and enactments of identities in momentary situational frames. The participants in the present study were able to act on diverse situational frames by orienting to locally-managed situated identities.

Kim, KaHyun & Shin, Dongil. 2016. “A Critical Discourse Analysis on Global Talents and Their English Competence”. The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea 24(3). 249~280. The purpose of this study is to examine the media discourse on global talents and their English competence through critical discourse analysis. The special feature articles of the JoongAng daily newspaper on ‘global talent’ were traced and analyzed. The articles of JoongAng Sunday magazine on the global talent, which were published between January 2008 and March 2016, were also examined. The analysis drew upon the van Dijk’s (2009b) sociocognitive approach. By understanding how social cognition played its role in formative process of the discourse with linguistic features, the dialectical relationship of the dicourse and the society was inferred. Findings revealed the schema of the global companies, which counted human resources as the goal of management and essential part of their success, empathized individuals’ role and led them to make efforts. Microscopic linguistic features formed global talent discourses with being influenced and affecting the macroscopic structure. The media discourse often valued self-improvement, which involved neoliberalistic orientation of global companies.

Purpose: Health professionals need to bemore sensitive to the languages used in clinical settings to better understand their patients and to generate better health outcomes. The purpose of this article was to introduce discourse analysis as a way of understanding languages related with health and illness. Methods: This was a review of studies done bymultiple scholars dealt with discourse analysis. Results: This study provides theoretical backgrounds and basic assumptions of discourse analysis. Several key concepts were demonstrated compared with phenomenology and grounded theory methods. Those were data collection, analysis, and purpose of the study. In addition, evaluation criteria of discourse analysis was provided with strategies to improve quality of the study. Lastly, exemplary texts on discourse analysis in healthcare area were presented to promote understanding. Conclusion: Discourse analysis can help healthcare professionals develop effective communication strategies by gaining insight and sensitivity on languages related with health and illness that are habitually used in healthcare settings.

Kim Byeong-keon. 2016. “A Critical Discourse Analysis of Newspaper Editorials and Columns on Progressivism”. The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea 24(1). 65~90. The aim of this study is to discuss how progressivism is depicted based on Appraisal Theory in Chosun Ilbo and Hankyoreh Shinmun. We also explore difference between two newspapers. The term of Appraisal refers to a linguistic resource by which a speaker/ writer expresses his own effect, judgement, and appreciation. As a result, Hankyoreh Shinmun relatively depicts positive image on progressivism through it positive and negative evaluations, while Chosun Ilbo depicts negative image using a negative evaluation. By looking at them from the Ideological Square of van Dijk, we are able to know that progressivism is a ‘They’ to Chosun Ilbo.

A meta-analysis was conducted to analyze the history of discourse analytic studies that appeared in the English Teachingjournal ofKorea over the past 50 years. Atotal of 161 studies were categorized according to discourse modes, primary themes employed and levels of application. The results indicated that in the most recent years, DA articles occupy about 22% ofthe total studies published in thejournal, with an overall increase in DA studies analyzing written texts. Qualitative studies such as ethnographies and case studies employing discourse data as a primary component of data analysis have also steadily increased over the years. The findings suggest that in the future, more DA research on primary or secondary level students, classroom interactions, and critical discourse studies examining the Korean context may benefit a wider range of readership who may be interested in the practical application of DA results to the Korean English education context.

Seo So-a. 2015. “A Critical Discourse Analysis of Recontextualization in the News Headline Translation”. The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea 23(2). 97~129. Most international news tends to be strategically translated to fit for the target context. A useful case for analysis includes the discursive patterns of English to Korean translation of international news headlines, particularly on the reportage of the Libyan and Syrian conflicts. Using data collected from the on-line articles in three Korean newspapers, this study draws on the concept of recontextualization and analyzes the textual practices and discursive strategies in terms of the critical discourse analysis based upon Hallidayean systemic-functional linguistics. The results demonstrate that the translated headline as the target text is discursively recontextualized into its interpretative and national context of Korea, while it is decontextualized from the reported event context of Libya and Syria as well as from the source context of the U.S. It is, thus, suggested that the international news headline translation is the target-oriented recontextualization at textual and contextual level. (145)

한문 문법 분석에 있어 현재 일반적으로 통용되는 가장 큰 單位는 문장이다. 그러나 문장에 대한 학자들의 정의가 다르고, 그에 따른 문장의 경계도 달라 좀 더 명확한 서술이 필요하다고 판단되어, “문장은 완정한 의미를 표현하는 독립할 수 있는 언어 단위로, 주어[문두의 NP]가 관할하는 구절까지를 경계로 한다.”라는 정의가 제시된 바 있다. 그러나 이 정의도 문두의 NP가 관할하는 범위가 段落으로까지 길어지는 언어 현상에 대해서는 분석의 한계가 있었다. 그 이유는 문법 분석의 단위를 문장으로 국한시켰기 때문이라고 생각되어 본고에서는 문장으로 조합된, 문장보다 더 큰 단위의 조직인, 단락을 상정하고 단락을 관할하는 ‘주제’를 제안할 필요가 있다고 판단하였다. 또한 문법 분석 단위를 단락으로 확장했을 때의 효용성을 단어의 문법 성질 파악, 문헌 독해, 한문 교과서 글감 제시 범위 등 세 가지 측면에서 제시하였다.

The aim of this study is to discuss the attributes of political discourse in political advertisements. The materials of the study are the advertisements used by candidates in the 16th and 17th Korean presidential elections. Presidential election advertising is the social practice of competing in political discourse on who is more proper for the presidency. The upper level of discourse in advertisement takes on the narrative of statements directed at the public, but argumentation about political assertions is included in it. The core of the argumentation asserts support for the candidate and backs such an assertion. A story that dramatizes the details related to the candidate or his/her policy has a big effect of gaining sympathy for the message, but on the other hand it can also lead to criticism that political issues are being dealt with only through images rather than language. Narrative, complexly constructed through spoken language, visual images, subtitles, sounds and other channels, accordingly contains various messages, but it has a strong impact ultimately by being condensed into one symbolic rhetoric, since the candidate's personality, political message, and the power to realize these-that is, all the factors the public considers in making a political choice-are included in it.

A major task for the teacher is to engage students in three kinds of learning: learning of language, learning through language, and learning about language (Halliday, 1979). Therefore, in order to help students learn and use language effectively, teachers themselves need explicit knowledge of language, and need to be aware of what students are trying to achieve and learn. There have been many classroom research investigations into this issue with respect to the role of the first language (L1) in facilitating learning (Osman and Hannafin 1994; Johnson 1997). Classroom-oriented research has led to an increased awareness of the great complexity of both the language used and the learning process. Classroom language can be investigated systematically and no longer needs to be regarded as “an impenetrable black box” (Long 1983 a, 1983 b). Transcripts, coded data and frequency counts can show how classroom interaction develops as it is a dynamic phenomenon (Allwright and Bailey 1991). Marton and Booth (1997, p.107) described learning as ‘a way of coming to experience the world in a certain way, and different ways of experiencing will lead to different learning outcomes’. Marton and Tsui (2004) linked classroom discourse to learning, coining the term “space of learning”: “The second premise is that language plays a central role in learning: that it does not merely convey meaning, it also creates meaning. An understanding of how the space of learning is linguistically constituted in the classroom is best achieved through investigating “classroom discourse”. This research observed and collected data from two different primary four classes taught by two teachers of the same school on the same topic on Chinese words. Multiple data from multiple sources were used for analysis. This paper will discuss how the difference usage of discourse in the classroom could bring about different learning outcomes.

본 연구의 목적은 중등과학수업에서 나타나는 담화양상과 의미형성 전략을 분석하는 것이다. 연구 참여 교사는 서울의 한 중학교에서 과학을 가르치고 있었으며, 연구에 자발적으로 참여하였다. 연구진은 참여교사의 수업을 관찰하고 비디오 녹화하였고 전사하였다. 자료는 두 단계로 분석되었다. 첫 단계에서는 담화 양상을 범주화하였다. 두 번째 단계에서는 미시적 수준에서 의미형성 전략을 확인하였다. 연구 결과로서, 초임교사의 '빛의 경로와 성질' 단원의 과학 수업담화에서 나타난 담화양상과 의미형성 전략에 관하여 5개의 에피소드가 제시되었다. 연구결과를 토대로, 결론 및 후속연구와 교사전문성 발달에 관한 시사점이 탐색되었다.

This article explores how the conflicting ideological positions of the news media in two different countries are reflected in their perceptions of the postwar situation in Iraq and become encoded in lexical choices and strategies in relation to the cognitive and socio-political dimension of the media. The target data were collected from the on-line news reports posted on the respective web sites of the two networks: the Fox News Channel in the U.S. (foxnews.com) and the English-language version of Al-Jazeera in Qatar (english.aljazeera.net). This study adopts an interdisciplinary theoretical framework of critical discourse analysis for ideological representations in news discourse by integrating labeling strategies in information structure from critical discourse scholars (Tomlin et al. 1997; Fairclough 1992, 1995). In particular, the lexical choices and their cognitive and discursive strategies are qualitatively and quantitatively examined by focusing on the labels on the War against Iraq and postwar Iraq. As a result, this study seeks to verify the idea that the ideological differences between the two news networks result in their own strategically and informationally structured labels on Iraqi situations in each news text, keeping and reproducing the separating concept of Self and Other according to each network's socio-cultural identity and ideology.

Over the last three decades, various disciplines of discourse analysis have shared a common interest in language use, especially in how people use real language. It is therefore of immediate interest to language teachers when selecting and devising teaching materials or when engaging learners in activities aimed at leading them to be more proficient users of their target language. This paper begins with outlining essential written discourse elements, such as grammatical and lexical cohesive devices, clause relations and larger text patterns which play important roles in syntactic and semantic cohesion and coherence in written texts. Then, the procedure of a written discourse analysis on a news text is described. The paper ends with a discussion on the insights from the written discourse analysis, which might be applicable, in specifiable ways, to language teaching, focusing on how to apply written discourse elements to teaching written English in real classrooms.

본 연구는 한국과 베트남의 장례식 조문 답례 담화에 대한 비교 분석을 목적으로 한다. 그 결과 한국은 고인과 저자의 관계 지향 적인 성격을 지닌 반면 베트남은 고인의 죽음에 대한 사실 정보 전달 의 성격을 지니고 있는 것으로 조사되었다. 또 한국 담화가 조문과 부 의라는 지원 요소에 감사를 하고 있는 것과 달리 베트남 담화에서는 감사한 대상을 나열하는 방식으로 감사를 표현하고 있었고, 양해 구하 기에 있어서도 한국은 찾아뵙지 못한 것에 대한 양해를 구한 반면, 베 트남은 혹시 모를 부주의에 대한 양해를 구하는 차이를 보이는 것으 로 나타났다.

본 연구는 2012년에 결성된 한국 현대음악 단체 project21AND의 제4회-제6회 정기연주회(2016-2018년) 리허설 담론을 분석함으로써 한국 현대음악의 의미생성 과정의 현장을 질적으로 탐구하고자 하였다. 연구의 목적은 한국 현대 음악 전반의 흐름을 분석하는 것이 아니라, 일부일지라도 현재 활발하게 작품 활동을 하고 있는 음악인들의 역동적인 음악 만들기 과정을 심층적으로 해석하는 것이다. 연구에서 취했던 방법론은 현장중심의 인류학적 연구이며, 본 논문에서는 project21AND의 상임 작곡가 김정훈의 <Chorus (2016)>와 공모 작곡가 전현석의 <De Tuin der Lusten (2018)> 리허설 담론을 집중적으로 분석하였다. <Chorus>는 제4회 정기연주회(2016년)를 위한 작품으로서 project21AND의 설립자이자 상임 음악감독인 김승림과 김정훈이 지휘자와 작곡가의 역할로 음악 만들기에 공조했는가 하면, <De Tuin der Lusten>의 경우는 제6회 정기연주회(2018년)를 위한 공모에서 선정된 작품이었기에 project21AND의 내재적인 특성을 드러내기에 적합하였다. 분석의 틀은 긴스보르와 킹의 리허설 담론 연구와 고든의 현대음악 리허설 논의를 기본으로 했으며, 질적연구 소프트웨어 <NVivo12>를 활용하여 코딩하였다. 이 때, 제4회-제6회 정기 연주회에 참가한 총 13인의 작곡가와의 개별면담을 통해 ‘음악적 실험’을 추구하고자 하는 공통적인 인지적 맥락을 도출하였으며 이를 리허설 담론 분석의 근거로 삼았다. 실제로 리허설은 연습 리허설과 공연 리허설로 구분되었으며, 연구자는 리허설 내내 작곡가, 연주자, 지휘자 간의 대화를 녹취 및 녹화를 실시했다. 두 경우의 리허설에서 기록된 대화를 전사하여 코딩한 결과로 도출된 코드는 ‘작곡가의 작품에 대한 성찰’, ‘악보 보완 및 수정’, ‘악기 주법’, ‘연주자의 물리적 배치’, ‘공연에 대한 설명’ 등이었다. 이는 작곡가 면담에서 도출되었던 ‘음악적 실험’에 관한 가치관과 일맥상통한 것을 확인했으며, 작곡가, 지휘자, 그리고 연주자 간의 민주적인 상호관계가 형성되어 있음을 알 수 있었다.

이 연구는 미디어의 다문화 담론분석을 통해 현재 한국 사회의 다문화 담론의 방향성에 대해 조명해 보았다. 세계화시대 다문화 담론은 전 세계적인 핵심 논제가 되고 있다. 이는 한국도 예외가 아니어서 다문화 정책이나 다문화주의에 대한 논의들이 활발하게 진행 중이다. 이 연구는 이러한 논의들이 어떤 방향으로 초점화되고 있으며, 진행되고 있는지를『조선일보』기획기사 분석을 통해 시도했다. 이 분석을 위해 비판적 담론분석 방법과 텍스트언어학이론 등을 활용하여, 신문기사의 구조에 따라 담론을 분석하였다. 미디어에서 생산된 담론은 하나의 개념으로 정립되고, 다른 유사 담론으로 재생산되며 사회적 담론으로 규정되는 성격이 있다. 따라서 미디어가 규정하고 있는 다문화 가정에 대한 담론은 오늘날 한국 사회의 다문화 담론의 방향성을 확인하는 중요한 렌즈가 된다. 이러한 맥락에서 이 연구는 미디어에 조명된 다문화에 대한 인식과 관점을 분석하였다. 연구의 결과 현재 한국의 다문화 담론은 크게 보수적 다문화 담론, 공공의 다문화 담론, 비판적 다문화 담론 세 가지로 논의되고 있음을 확인하였다. 이 세 가지 담론은 지금 현시점에서 확인되고 있는 현실의 다문화 사회, 그리고 앞으로 나아가야 할 이상적 다문화 사회, 그리고 현실과 이상 사이의 간극에서 발생하는 문제점에 대해 비판하는 관점으로 유형화할 수 있다.