본 연구는 한국에 유학 중인 몽골 대학원생들의 적응 과정을 질적으로 살펴보며, 이들의 동기, 경험, 그리고 기존 연구와 관련된 어려움에 초점 을 맞추어 분석하는 데 목적을 둔다. 설문 조사와 인터뷰를 통해 수집된 질적 데이터는 이들이 주로 한국 문화와 언어에 대한 관심과 높은 수준 의 교육을 추구하는 동기로 학업에 임하고 있음을 보여준다. 대부분의 학생들이 차별을 거의 경험하지 않았고 한국인들에게 환영받고 있다고 느끼는 한편, 다른 학생들과의 상호작용 확대를 바라고 있는 것으로 나 타났다. 본 연구는 국제 학생과 현지 학생 간의 교류 프로그램을 활성화 하고, 정서적 안정을 지원하기 위한 상담 서비스를 제공할 것을 제언하 며, 이러한 연구 결과를 확장하기 위한 향후 연구 방향을 제안한다.

본 연구는 한국 정신분석학의 학문적 정립을 위하여 그 태동과 발달과정의 현황을 알아보고 문헌 자료를 토대로 연구하였다. 연구 결과, 정신분석학은 1920년대 일본에서 유입되어 일반적인 교양으로 활성화되다가 1990년대 이후 단행본, 학술지 및 학위논문이 꾸준히 증가하면서 학문적 관심이 높아졌으며 2010년대에 대학에서 석박사학위과정이 개설되었고 여러 개의 연구소와 학회에 서 분석가 훈련과정이 개설되었다. 현재 국내 정신분석학은 대중적인 르네상 스 시기를 거쳐 학문적 기초를 다지기 위한 단계로 볼 수 있다. 둘째, 한 국 정신분석학은 연구소에서 분석가 양성을 위한 임상훈련을 실시하며 대학원마 다 철학 및 예술, 상담교육, 정신분석개념 등 각각 교과 내용의 초점이 상이하 다. 따라서 앞으로의 정신분석은 임상의 실제적 접근을 위하여 프로이트가 추구한 정신병리적 관점의 학문으로 나아가야 한다. 이에 인간의 성장 및 성숙과정과 정신병리 형성의 치료과정, 건강한 일상생활을 위한 학문적 접근을 기대한다.

This collaborative action research aimed to develop and evaluate an academic Korean curriculum for immigrant students in grades 5~6, analyzing its effects on students’ academic Korean achievement and examining teachers’ perceptions of teaching academic Korean during the process. For this purpose, the collaboratively developed academic Korean curriculum was reviewed, and the academic Korean achievement of immigrant students was quantitatively analyzed through three assessments. Additionally, qualitative analysis was conducted on student interviews and teacher discussions regarding their experiences with the curriculum. The results indicated that the developed curriculum had a positive impact on the students’ academic Korean proficiency and their learning in other subjects. However, learning difficulties and elevated levels of anxiety during the course were common among students, regardless of their achievement levels. The teachers involved in the collaborative process proposed several strategies for more effective academic Korean teaching, such as expanding individualized support and strengthening connections with students’ families and homeroom classes. The significance of this collaborative action research lies in its empirical demonstration of the characteristics of academic Korean teaching, an area that has not been extensively covered in existing research on Korean language education.

본 연구는 네트워크 분석(network analysis)을 활용해 국내 경력성공 연구동향을 살피고자 하는데 그 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 학술연구정보(Riss)사이트에서 2000년부터 2023년까지 게제된 논문 중 총 132편 을 분석하였다. 연구자가 설정한 연구목적 위배, 노드 통일, 링크의 과대추정 방지, 연구목적 보완과 같이 4가지 기준을 통해 핵심어를 코딩하였으며, 분석결과 전체 노드수 152개, 전체 링크 수 368개, 네트워크 밀도 .032로 나타났다. 경력성공과 가장 높은 연결중심성(degree centrality)을 보이는 노드(node)는 '경력 만족'이었으며, 이후 ‘고용가능성’, ‘임금’, ‘승진’, ‘일과 삶 균형’ 등이 높은 노드로 분석되었다. 기존 경력성 공에 대한 연구동향이 주관적 경력성공에 한정적이었다면 본 연구를 통해 객관적 경력성공의 연구동향을 함께 확인하고 더 나아가 2023년 연구 현황을 파악하여, 폭 넓은 연구동향의 근거를 제시할 수 있었다.

이 연구의 목적은 국내 유학생들을 대상으로 그들이 한국문화 적응과 정에서 경험한 스트레스 유형을 파악하고, 그것이 유학생들의 진학과 취 업동기에 어떤 영향을 미치는지 상관 조사하는데 있다. 연구를 수행하기 위해 국내 대학에 재학 중인 56명의 유학생을 중심으로 설문과 신청자 면담을 진행하였다. 설문지를 통해 수집된 자료를 기술통계 분석하였으 며, 이 요인들로 인하여 향후 그들의 진학과 취업동기에 어떤 영향을 끼 치는지 조사하기 위해 다중회귀분석을 실시하였다. 연구결과로서 유학생 들의 한국문화 적응 스트레스 중에 학업 스트레스의 ‘과제 및 시험’에 대 한 만족도 평균이 가장 낮았다. 개인성향 및 대인관계 스트레스에서는 ‘대인관계’의 평균이, 그리고 지역문화 및 학습환경 스트레스에서는 ‘지 각된 차별감’이 가장 낮은 점수로 나타났다. 이러한 스트레스 유형은 유 학생들의 진학 및 취업동기 면에서도 유의미한 상관관계를 보여주었다. 이에 관련 교육기관은 유학생들을 위한 한국문화 적응과정 프로그램과 다문화 공동체 학습 환경을 면밀하게 계획하고 조성할 필요가 있다.

본 연구는 간호대학생을 대상으로 학업스트레스와 그릿, 메타인지, 학 업성취도와의 관계를 확인하고, 학업스트레스와 학업성취도와의 관계에 서 그릿과 메타인지의 매개효과를 규명하여 학업성취도 향상을 위한 간 호중재 개발의 근거자료를 제공하고자 시도되었다. 본 연구의 자료수집 은 2024년 4월 1일부터 4월5일까지 경북지역의 일개 간호대학생 210명 을 대상으로 온라인 설문조사 방식으로 진행되었다. 수집된 자료는 Descriptive statistics, t-test, ANOVA, Pearson’s correlation coefficient 를 이용하여 분석하였으며, 병렬다중 매개효과의 검증을 위해서 PROCESS Macro의 4번 모형을 사용하였다. 연구결과 학업스트레스와 그릿(r =-. 313, p<.001), 메타인지(r =-.303, p<.001), 학업성취도(r =-.378, p<.001) 는 부적의 상관관계에 있었고, 학업성취도와 그릿(r =.289, p<.001), 메타 인지(r =.244, p<.001)는 정적인 상관관계에 있으면서 통계적으로 유의하 였다. 그리고 학업스트레스와 학업성취도와의 관계에서 그릿의 부분매 개 효과(B=-0.03 CI[-0.06~-0.01])가 확인되었으며, 모형의 설명력은 22.5%였다(F=13.99. p<.001). 그러므로 간호대학생의 학업스트레스를 줄이고 학업성취도 향상을 위해서는 그릿을 강화하는 다양한 프로그램의 개발과 함께 그 효과를 확인하는 연구가 이루어져야 할 것이다.

본 연구는 2018년부터 2023년까지 약 5년간 2018평창동계올림픽 이후 스노보드와 관련된 국 내 KCI 등재지에서 발행된 국내 선행문헌 21편을 연구대상으로 선정하여 특성, 참여형태, 연구분과, 연구 방법에 대해 분석한 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 성별에서는 남성 및 남성과 여성을 대상으로 한 논문이 대 부분을 차지하였으며 연령은 20∼50대까지 다양하게 분포되었다. 피험자 수의 경우 50명 미만의 논문이 대부분을 차지하였다. 둘째, 참여형태에서는 등록선수와 스키장 이용객이 대부분을 차지하였으며 유소년 선수, 지도자, 심사위원 순으로 논문이 형성되었다. 셋째, 연구방법에 대해서는 양적연구와 실험연구가 대 부분이었으며 질적연구와 통합연구 순으로 분석되었다. 넷째, 연구분과로는 스포츠 사회학, 운동역학이 주 를 이루었으며 스포츠 심리학, 운동생리학, 스포츠 측정평가, 스포츠 경영학, 체육사학 순으로 분석되었다.

This study aims to analyze research trends in Korean listening education for academic purposes, and suggest for future research directions. For this purpose, this study consulted a total of 57 pre-existing studies, including 32 articles in academic journals, 21 masters’ theses, and four doctoral dissertations conducted from 2005 through December 2021. The results are as follows: First, to examine the trends by year and type, comparing the 2010s to the 2000s when the research began. It was found that the number of studies greatly increased in the 2010s, and the frequency of studies in the 2020s tend to increase further. Second, as a result of an analysis of the trends by topic, it was found that teaching and learning methods were most studied and that there were also many studies concerned with strategy. However, there were relatively fewer studies on evaluation and curriculum. Third, this study aimed to examine trends by research method. It was found that the studies mostly employed the survey method, followed by quantitative mixed method and experimental approaches. Consequently, it was noted that the quantitative research methods were most widely used in the field of listening to Korean for academic purposes, and at the same time, since all studies that used mixed research methods employed another research method along with the survey method, it was found that the use of the survey method was the dominant type of quantitative research method.

The purpose of this study is to present a diagnostic evaluation tool that can more accurately determine the academic performance level in Korean language proficiency of foreign undergraduate students studying at domestic universities. The diagnostic evaluation diagnoses the academic Korean language proficiency of foreign undergraduates, and provides the diagnosis results to foreign undergraduates, professors, and university institutions so that teaching activities can be conducted efficiently. In this study, it was considered that the ‘Basic Academic Ability Diagnostic Test for the Korean Language Subject' was suitable as a test tool for diagnosing to diagnose the academic achievment of foreign undergraduates. This diagnostic test is a diagnostic tool designed for Korean students in Korea, and it not only continuously verifies its reliability and validity, but also includes background knowledge that Korean university students in Korea are basically acquiring. To prove that the 'Basic Academic Ability Diagnostic Test' is suitable as a diagnostic evaluation tool for foreign undergraduates, the correlation with the Korean language achievement evaluation was analyzed. The correlation between diagnostic evaluation and other items showed a significantly positive correlation. When the diagnostic evaluation score was good, the pre-test and post-test scores of Korean language proficiency, and the TOPIC level was also high. This result proves that the basic academic ability diagnostic test tool is very suitable as a diagnostic evaluation tool for foreign undergraduate students. Also, the analysis result of the pre- and post-tests and the TOPIK test showed a very significant and strong positive correlation with the post-test, and the higher the TOPIK grade, the higher the score of the pre‐test.

This study is undertaken to design a Korean presentation class for academic purposes based on CALLA (Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach) and to find its effectiveness. In this study, 10 foreign graduate students participated in the class which teaches presentation strategies for 15 weeks. According to CALLA, some useful presentation strategies were introduced and practiced repeatedly, and the students’ presentations in Korean considering their major were completed gradually. As a result, positive effects from the presentation class on the perspective of language, non-language and data organization could be acquired through repetitive feedback and practice. Thus, the students could use the proper discourse for topics ranging from the introduction and development of the presentation to concluding presentation. The learners have shown a lot of improvements in presentation ability through the CALLA course regardless of language proficiency but the class design used in the study should be conducted in other presentation classes for academic purposes.

The purpose of this paper is to summarize research trends and analyze major discussions of previous studies on language policy and planning from a research historical perspective. In order to accomplish this purpose, this paper firstly established a database of related research lists through a complete enumeration survey of research articles by Korean researchers published in Korean academic journals. Then, based on the database, this paper summarized research trends of preceding studies by fields (status, corpus, education, etc.), by topics (language rank/function, orthographic norm, national language education, etc.), by relevant countries/regions (Korea, Asia, Europe, etc.). Finally, dividing the preceding studies into those related to Korea and those related to foreign countries, this paper analyzed major discussions by fields and topics based on representative and recent preceding studies. 'Not only does the aforementioned summary and analysis have research historical significance for preceding studies on language policy and planning, but 'they can also contribute to exploring the tasks and directions of future research.

The present study examines the usage patterns of stance that constructions in Korean EFL learners' written corpora by two different proficiency groups (KEFL 1, KEFL 2) to figure out some developmental features of marking stance in L2 academic prose. Focusing on three main categories (stance verbs, adjectives, and nouns) controlling stance that clauses, the study compares the frequency of each feature by the categories and their subcategories across the corpora. Employing both quantitative and qualitative analyses, the study found a marked developmental path across the corpora as a cross-sectional study. Indeed, less proficient L2 learners tended to use spoken involvement features as ‘a subjective transmitter’, emphasizing the writer's view only with a private authorial voice. However, more advanced learners showed remarkable features as ‘an objective interpreter’ with more implicitly detached stances. Despite a few chunk expressions considered as being memorized, more complex grammatical resources appropriate for academic discourse were observed. Finally, as the final stage, this study suggests ‘a refined stance-taker’ referring to an expert writer in the academic discourse community, which may be devoid in untrained native speakers' writing. In accordance with the need for university students to transition into more advanced academic discourse sooner, this study provides some practical insights into teaching and learning of stance patterns in using that complement clauses in English academic discourse.

Lexical bundles have been widely investigated as an indicator of English for Academic Purposes (EAP) writing development in terms of structure and function by exploring the use by students compared to experts. However, little research has compared the use of lexical bundles by second language (L2) Korean EAP students across different academic levels versus first language (L1) English experts with longitudinal corpora. The current study addresses this gap by comparing lexical bundles used both two L2 student corpora and English L1 corpus consisting of introductions of research articles (RAs) and those of term papers. The findings showed the Korean graduate students are in the developmental process in the use of lexical bundles as their academic level advances. However, noticeable development was not found between the students at two levels in terms of function unlike in terms of structure. The pedagogical implications are discussed regarding structural and functional use of bundles for Korean EAP students.

The purposes of this study are to analyze high-frequency hedges in dissertations and provide basic data for Korean education for academic purposes. For these purposes, the investigator analyzed ‘-(으)ㄹ 수 있 다, -(으)ㄹ 것이다, and -(으)로 보이다’ in terms of frequency, distribution by the structure, and forms of combination in 50 dissertations for a master’s degree. The findings were as follows: first, ‘-(으)ㄹ 수 있다, -(으)ㄹ 것이다, and -(으)로 보이다’ were used total 3,880 times across all the dissertations. Of them, ‘-(으)ㄹ 수 있다’ were used 2,496 times, recording an overwhelmingly higher frequency than the others. Secondly, the study analyzed the frequency of hedges by the part in dissertations and found that hedges were most used in “Findings”(56.6%). Finally, there were standardized forms frequently combined with each hedge. ‘-(으)ㄹ 수 있다,’ for instance, was frequently used in the forms of ‘-(이)라고 할 수 있다/다고 할 수 있다,’ ‘-(으)ㅁ을 알 수 있다,’ and ‘-다는 것을 알 수 있다.’

Collocational competence is important part of L2 English amplifier acquisition. This competence entails learners' ability to use the right combination of words with natural-sounding semantic prosody. It is known to be an integral part of mastering pragmatic function of L2 English vocabulary, which also is a challenge for the learners at the same time (Zhang, 2008). Despite the importance, previous studies on ESL/EFL learners' amplifier use lacked empirical evidence and insight about semantic prosody. The purpose of present learner corpora-based study was to fill the existing research gap by finding patterns of amplifiers. Two existing corpora were selected, coded, and analyzed to fulfill this purpose; they are Korean EFL learners and native speakers of English (NE). Results from analysis found Korean learners' overall underuse in amplifiers. Also, frequently occurring amplifier ranks for each corpus differed. Semantic prosody analysis revealed that amplifier associated with dominantly positive connotation were very, really, and highly. Amplifiers associated with dominantly negative connotation were extremely, absolutely, severely, and greatly. Contrast analysis showed that the only amplifier that Koreans and NEs used amplifier to signal same semantic prosody dominantly was severely (negative). Other than that, Koreans and NE showed salient discrepancies in semantic prosody use. The pedagogical implication of the present study is that vocabulary teaching need to include semantic prosody, and the first step will be to conduct ESL/EFL teacher education about it (Zhang, 2009). It's important to remind them of the value of semantic prosody in language communication (S Lee, 2011).

Yang, Myung-hee & Kim, Bo-hyeon. 2017. “A Study on Korean Language Anxiety in the Classrooms of Advanced-level Korean Language Learners for Academic purposes: With Chinese Students in Graduate School in Korea”. The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea 25(1). 119~141. The aim of this study is to examine the level of and the factors for Korean language anxiety in the classrooms of advanced-level Korean language learners for academic purposes. To this end, 60 Chinese students attending graduate school participated in the survey with the questionnaires: i.e., PRCA and FLCAS. The results suggest as follows. First, the Korean language anxiety level in the classrooms of the Chinese students is likely to be high. Also, it is not because of the participants’ traits, but because of the classroom environment. Second, there are 5 factors for Korean language anxiety in the classrooms; communication anxiety with native speakers, communication anxiety, fears of negative evaluation and failing in class, Korean proficiency anxiety, and negative attitudes toward class. Especially, the forth factor suggests that Korean learners needs an educational intervention of Korean, even after they enter undergraduate or graduate institutions. Third, there is a negative correlation between Korean language anxiety in the classroom and a residence period in Korea. That is, it is necessary to give them as many opportunities as possible for being exposed to Korean by a Korean educational intervention.