본 논문은 비디오 아트에서의 투영된 이미지의 발전과 스크린-매개 설치 미술에서 최근의 프로젝션-기반 뉴 미디어 아트로의 프로젝션 개념의 전이와 관객성의 변모된 양상을 분석했다. 스크린-매개 설치미술에서의 관객성의 공간은 디지털 테크놀로지에 의해 다원화되었고 컴퓨터 네트워크에 의해 가능해진 새로운 공간적 관계성과 함께 복잡하고 잠재적으로 불안정한 관람 유형이 초래되었다. 디지털 프로젝션의 개념은 이미지 투영을 넘어서 데이터 투영을 통한 다중적 감각을 공유하는 것으로 전이, 확장되며 상호작용성을 재고하게 한다. 또한 프로젝션 기반 뉴 미디어 아트는 스크린-접속 영역에서의 공동체 형성에 관한 논의를 유도하며 사회적 문맥을 취하는 예술적 실천으로 집단적인 의미를 정립해내는 관계적 논리에서의 관객성을 촉진한다.

2014년에 제작 개봉된 안드레이 즈바긴체프의 영화 <리바이어던>은 현대 자 연주의 환경에 처한 개인이 사회와 국가의 막강한 권력에 맞설 수 있는 가를 질 문한 작품이다. 웅장하고 거대한 자연의 장면으로 시작하는 이 영화는 술에 의 존하며 하루하루를 희망 없이 살아가는 어촌마을 사람들의 일상부터 정치, 법, 종교 간의 결탁에 이르기까지 모순에 찬 러시아, 나아가 현대사회의 억압적 현 실을 낱낱이 드러내고 있다. 제목 “리바이어던”은 욥기 41장에 나오는 엄청난 괴력의 바다괴물을 의미함과 동시에 1651년 영국 런던에서 출간된 홉스의 책 제목과 동일하다. 이 작품은 욥과 홉스의 “리바이어던”이 동시적으로 의미의 이 중주를 울리면서 진행된다. 욥기의 “리바이어던”은 신의 피조물 가운데 가장 강 력한 힘을 발휘하는 바다괴물로서 어떤 인간도 그의 힘을 넘을 수 없다. 홉스는 이런 지상 최고의 힘을 비유하는 괴물을 국가라는 거대한 창조물에 비유하였다. 이 작품에서 제목 <리바이어던>은 부패하고 사악한 러시아의 권력집단, 나아가 모순으로 가득 찬 국가의 권력을 의미하면서, 욥기와의 관련성은 신과 인간간의 형이상학적 질문뿐 아니라 시간을 초월하는 인간고통의 이야기로 향하게 한다. 본 논문은 작품 <리바이어던>을 영상과 함께 시나리오로 읽고, 리바이어던의 상징성에 대해 욥과 홉스에 관한 현대적 해석을 시도한 것이다.

본 연구는 르네상스 초부터 관심을 가지기 시작했던 해부학에 대한 문화적 관점과 1490년대부터 18세기 중반까지 이탈리아에서 출간된 해부학 서적의 삽화들을 토대로 미술과 의학의 상호 연관성을 분석한다. 의학 분야는 해부학을 통해 경험을 보편적인 지식으로 구성해갔지만 당시 해부학에 대한 심리적 거리를 줄이는 과정에서 예술가의 도움을 받아 기존 예술품을 차용해서 인간의 신체를 표현하고 도상학적 지식을 함께 전달했다. 이 과정에서 의사와 예술가는 모두 개체를 설명할 수 있는 보편적 사유 구조를 공유할 수 있었고, 예술가는 이를 바탕으로 다양한 표현을 확장해갈 수 있었다. 이런 점은 매너리즘 이후 아카데미의 설립 과정에서 진행된 해부학의 논쟁이나 바르톨로메오 파세로티의 <해부학 수업>의 사례에서처럼 유파의 분류 기준으로 변하는 과정을 통해서 확인할 수 있다. 따라서 해부학 전문 서적의 삽화들은 대상이 아니라 대상을 보는 문화적 사유 구조를 바탕으로 각 분야의 독립적 담론을 구성하고 학문적 자율성을 부여하는 과정에서 중요한 역할을 담당했다고 볼 수 있다.

The structural aesthetics of architecture are becoming an inspirational source for many fashion designers and have been reborn in structural fashion. This study planned to analyze the method of expression of structural aesthetics expressed in modern structural fashion design and the construction method to maximize such an effect on the basis of the construction characteristic of Santiago Calatrava as the representative architect of the structural aesthetic. According to the study, the structural aesthetics expressed in modern structural fashion design are as follows: 1) The symbolical formative aesthetic expressed by symbolical inference and analyzation; 2) the dynamic beauty of physic expressed by visual emphasis and dynamics; and 3) the asymmetric beauty of symmetry expressed by metastasis toward the boundary between balance and imbalance. In addition, to maximize structural aesthetics, we used repetition and a progressive technique based on rhythm, asymmetry, and incision-based variances, such as balance, polygon flux, and inference, and analyzation-based distortion as the structuring principle. The following expression methods for maximizing structural aesthetics were found: 1) symbolical and structural exaggeration of appearance; 2) detail technique expansion and material property diversification; and 3) the three-dimensional transformation of structure and shell expression. Structural fashion design was found to have maximized structural aesthetics by using such expression methods to secure artistic esthetics, destroy existing shapes and patterns, and create unique shapes.

타우베스의 바울 독해는 정통 신학적 바울 이해와 차별화된다. 바울의 새관점 학파 등장 이후에 바울을 유대인의 배경에서 이해하고자 하는 시도가 있어 왔다. 타우베스는 이런 전통에서 철학적 바울 이해를 추구한다. 슈미트의 영향 아래 바울을 정치신학으로 해석한 타우베스는 바울을 유대인으로서 메시아적 소명에 따라 이방인의 사도가 된 인물로 해석한다. 이런 정체성을 가진 바울이 유대인과 로마제국의 노모스 신학에 대항해 새로운 정치신학을 제시하고 있다고 강조한다. 로마서 독해를 통해서 타우베스는 바울이 프네우마의 원리에 따른 종말론적 정적주의를 지향한다고 강조한다. 이런 타우베스의 바울 독해는 세 가지 근대적 해석 프레임을 기반으로 하고 있다. 첫째, 로마서에 나타난 저자의 의도와 텍스트의 심층구조를 분석하는 해석학적 방법론이 근대적이다. 둘째, 유대인 대 반유대인의 대립 구도를 드러내는 인종주의적 인식 프레임이 근대적이다. 셋째, 정치신학적 테제가 근대군주론적 담론을 기반으로 하고 있어 근대적이다. 이런 해석학적 프레임에도 불구하고 타우베스의 바울 독해는 탈근대적 바울 담론의 주요 텍스트 중의 하나로 다뤄지고 있다는 점에서 연구 가치가 있다

지도는 인간의 시야를 초월한 범위의 지표 상태를 과학적 근거에 의해 제작한 것으로, 지도제작에 관한 기술은 측지학, 지리학, 측량공학, 인쇄공학 등을 배경으로 하는 지도학을 근거로 광범위한 과학기술의 분야와 밀접한 관계가 있다. 지도학이란 지도제작에 관한 과학ㆍ기술ㆍ예술ㆍ지도이용 등에 대한 학술분야를 총칭하는 것으로, 광의적으로는 측량ㆍ지도편집ㆍ지도제도ㆍ지도인쇄 등의 모든 공정을 대상으로 하고, 협의적으로는 지도편집 이하의 공정을 대상으로 한다. 본고는 근현대 한국을 중심으로한 지도제작 기술 가운데 제도기법의 변천에 대해 지도제작 현장에서의 경험을 바탕으로 한 연구 결과이다.

This research aims at a critical discourse on the relation between the concepts of the uncanny and posthistoire , on the basis of descriptions in The Architectural Uncanny (1992) by Anthony Vidler. For the purpose, Histories of the Immediate Present (2008), another book by Vidler that discusses posthistoire philosophy to which he is not positive, is also investigated along with the former thesis; and various publications related to the themes by the influential writers such as Freud, Lyotard, Vattimo, and Habermas are referred to, too. Firstly, this paper will illustrate an essential understanding of the uncanny, an outgrowth of the sublime, and the history of posthistoire respectively; and then analyse contexts where the posthistoire was mentioned in The Architectural Uncanny. In the 'Introduction' and 'Losing Face' chapters of the book, this paper argues, the two concepts are connected by the notions of 'repetition' and 'losing the classical facade' as well as the uncanny as 'a metaphor for a fundamentally unlivable modern condition'. Though Vidler's recognition of posthistoire in the two chapters are differently interpreted, each as 'the emptiness of capitalism' and 'the decomposition of representation', both can be understood in terms of 'modernity' that is 'still open'. If modernity is 'an unfinished project' as maintained by Habermas, who Vidler relies on, we need to continue innovative experiments and internal investigations in architectural creation beyond the categories of modernism and postmodernism.

근대 유럽 지도에 나타난 한국 관련 지리정보는 중국이 ｢황여전람도(皇輿全覽圖)｣를 발간하고 이 지도가 당빌에 의해유럽에 번역‧소개되면서 질적·양적으로 증가하게 된다. 이후 18세기말부터 프랑스, 영국 및 러시아 등에 의한 해안 및 수로조사결과가 반영되면서 한반도 모양을 비롯한 지리정보의 양과 질이 풍부해지는 계기가 된다. 특히 서양 탐사선에 의한 해안선 및도서지역 탐사는 선박의 국적에 따라 그 나라 언어로 지명을 부여하는 것으로 분석되었다. 초기에 중국어 발음으로 표기되던 우리나라와 관련된 지명은 김대건 신부에 의해 한국어 발음의 프랑스어로 제작된 ｢조선전도｣가 유럽으로 전파된 시점을 기해각국의 지도에 반영되기 시작한 것으로 보이며 이는 1872년의 스틸러의 지도에서 대부분 우리나라 발음으로 지명이 표기된 사실을 통해 확인할 수 있다. 영어식 표현의 확산은 일본주재 외교관이었던 어네스트 사토우와 ｢한반도 산맥도｣를 저술한 고토분지로의역할이 컸던 것으로 확인된다.

This paper focuses on analyzing the modern warfare and weapon systems supported by improved GPS informations. The GPS capability was investigated through the real experimental test for verifying the most recent GPS features under its modernization processing. And then it was verified that such capabilities, accuracy and availability, of a typical L1, C/A code GPS receiver are equivalent to the military receiver's ones. It was also sure that the influence of GPS improved informations on NCW(Network-Centric Warfare), PGM(Precision Guided Munition) and C4SIR(Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance) should be increased and the modern warfare may be strongly dependent on GNSS informations.

In this paper, through the relevant syntactic structure and semantic comparison of Chinese and Korean Studies on Modern Chinese function words “De(的)”, “De(的)” was investigated whether has the character of aspect. Through the investigation discovery, Korean language in common and difference on time. In the concrete analysis, this paper also uses Chomsky Government and Binding Theory theory and Barriers theory, analyzes the tree diagram “De(的)” sentence, and through the investigation of the verb “De(的)” analysis, comparison of Chinese and Korean “De(的)” aspect feature. The results are as follows:

Studies of the Chinese neologisms zōngjiào 宗教 and zhéxué 哲學 have been pursued along etymological and historical lines, focusing on works of particular intellectuals that employed these terms. I argue that these methods are limited in their explanatory power to indicate how these words become dominant terms representing new academic disciplines in 20th century China. There is a need to demonstrate how the these terms invoked new interests shaping East Asian intellectuals’ identities in differing 19th and 20th century cultural contexts. A dialectical cultural transformation is involved, as well as institutionalization processes reflecting the values associated with these neologisms. These Chinese words become dominant terms precisely because there was a new set of experiences which older terms could not articulate. Zōngjiào and zhéxué, therefore, not only emerged from external cultural sources, but also represented a new mentality among Chinese intellectuals involved in modern transformations of post-traditional Chinese cultures.

The tasks of writing history is to reconstruct the past in order to understand the present condition and to envision the future. Modern architectural histories in the west have assumed this role, from Winckelmann to Giedion. Likewise, history of Korean modern architecture has to serve this purpose. However, existing histories of Korean modern architecture simply list up stylistic changes from western eclectic architecture to modernism without any historical narratives explaining the transition from Korean traditional architecture to modern architecture. History of Korean modern architecture has simply been understood as a unilateral process of transplantation of western architecture into Korea. This paper points out two major problems underlying this kind of historiography of Korean modern architecture. The one is formalistic approach which sees history of modern architecture mainly as a process of formal and stylistic changes. The other is humanistic approach which sees modern architects as agents of history. This paper argues that this kind of history writings has limitations since modernity of Korean architecture is fundamentally different from that of the west. and that specific tasks that Korean modern architectural history has to address are then two folds;(re)connecting the past architectural tradition to the present and forming self-identity of Korean architecture.

‘的’ is the most frequently used word. This paper is a study of the Tense-Aspect [时体] mark ‘的’. And it can be defined as follows. First, The Tense-Aspect [时体] mark ‘的’ is tenses and Aspect is present both in the transition period like English. Tense-Aspect [时体] mark ‘的’ has both the past tense and the certain aspect. Second, The ‘的’ is positioned between the center verb of the predicate and the object, and role to emphasize, and shows the certain aspect more clearly. Third, I contend that The ‘的’ in the structure ‘是 + VP + 的 + NP’ is also Tense-Aspect [时体] mark ‘的’. In that structure, ‘是’ is the adverb and it is not the center verb of the predicate. ‘的’ is Tense-Aspect [时体] mark.

This study is on historiography of Modern Architecture since its beginning to present. As a critical review of the history of the writing history of Modern Architecture, this study tends to be a meta-history and criticism of historical text. This study try to analyse historiographical project of Modern architecture at specific phase since the beginning of modern architecture. The historiography of Modern architecture shows that writing a history is making a discourse of Modern architecture as a imaginative representation to define and justify Modernism in architecture. The analysis of canonic text since early 20th century proves that the history of writing history of Modern architecture played a critical role not only to shape of our ideal but the practice of architecture with a ideology construction in retrospect. With a name of truth or morality they made myths about the modernity in architecture. So we can find deep 'Hagelean Unconscious' in writing history of Modern architecture not even the first generation of historians but the second generation who were influenced by earlier writer in spite of their intention of revision and overcoming, which is in itself the key concept of Hegel's philosophy of History. Under this kind of 'operative' discourse our view point of Modern architecture were confined and the historiography of Modern architecture itself was narrowly defined as a kind of melodrama that a few architect and work of art matters. The rise of critical history fundamentally has changed the way of seeing and writing the history of Modern architecture. but it has also a new kind of dilemma as regard to writing history and involving practice. This review of historiography traces the texts of historians as like Pevsner, Giedion, Banham, Rowe, Tafuri, Frampton, and Curtis relating to different discours making. When we consider Benjamin's famous concept of constellation, writing history necessarily is a kind of montage making in time and we always need to recognize the historicity of historiography.

The purpose of this study is to identify ways of remodeling from the traditional hanok to the modern local governmental facility in 1910s. Analysing architectural drawings in the National Archives of Korea, 58 hanok remodeling cases of 52 facilities were verified like the provincial office, county office, county court from 1907 to 1910s. Using hanok as the local governmental building, exterior walls were all changed to the scaled-wooden wall like one of western-wooden building in 1910s and the western-style entrance was set. Change of the plan caused by remodeling interior walls had an intention of the centralized closed plan. Remodeled semi-outer corridor using the space of the eave became changed to the inner corridor with expansion of space. Expansion of hanok for spatial demand was in three ways. First was the expansion towards the eave space, second was direct extension from hanok, and last was the use of external corridor to the new building. Using the eave space was simple but had limitation of space, it was planed with other expansion ways. The way of direct extension was usually used than the one with the corridor, because it was more economical way.

In the domain of Korean arts history, the studies on the beginning of the Korean modern arts have been insufficient so far. But there have been attempted to deal with this issue in the various fields of Korean arts. But the field of crafts, compared to the fields of painting or architecture hasn't given us good results about this. This study aims at analyzing the beginning of modernization and the modernity of the ceramic crafts that appeared since the period of transition into modern era. In the late period of the Chosun dynasty, various ceramics used by royal class were intensively produced especially in Bunwon(分院) that was operated by government and the ceramics for the general public's daily life were produced actively in local kilns. But various foreign ceramics that were imported due to the opening of ports after the Treaty of Ganghwa-Island(江華島) in 1876 and the privatization of Bunwon in 1884 caused the traditional way of making ceramics to change a lot. And modern techniques of producing ceramics were imported from the West and experts from various countries were invited. Especially, in the period of Japanese colonial morden system of ceramic production was imported from Japan. From the end of 19th century to the early 20th century, the ceramic process and the distribution changed much, these aspects indicate the modernity of the Korean ceramics. This paper examined the progression of the aspects of the Korean ceramics that had undergone change since the late period of the Chosun in order to determine the period, the modernity of Korean ceramics began and established. The period of emerging modern ceramics were divided into two periods on the basis of the analysis of the system of manufacturing ceramics and the government policy in the late 19th century. The first period began when the Chosun opened her ports to foreign powers. After the reformation of systemin the late period of the Chosun, the opening of ports conclusively led to the different framework of the manufacture system that was new to the Chosun. And, in the period of the Great Korean Empire that succeeded the Chosun dynasty around the time of the privatization of Bunwon, modern factories research and education institute for ceramics were established foreign experts with technical skills came into Korea. However, Japan occupied Korea forcedly 5 years after they set up resident-general office in Korea, this caused the modernization. Japan adopted various policies in favor of them and made the manufacturing of the Chosun white porcelain declined fast. Partially the modern technique was adopted making vessels which changed the supply and demand of ceramics. Therefore, the period of Japanese occupation, of Korea when Korea faced the new modernization without voluntary agreement, can be classified as the second period of modernization. Especially in the period of about 40 years since 1910, the year when Japan began to occupy Korea, there were a lot of changes in the ceramic industry. So this period can be considered as a very important period of modernization. In the period of the opening of ports, the aspects of manufacture and the supply and demand of Korean modern ceramics began to change and the privatization of Bunwon caused the manufacture system to change rapidly. And through the period of Japanese occupation of Korea after the period of the Great Korean Empire, the modernization was pushed ahead forcedly without voluntary agreement. Therefore, it is required that the characteristics of the modernity of this period be analyzed by paying attention to the change of situation and system of Korea.